Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this prospective birth cohort study was to evaluate the effect of the programme for prevention (PP) of early childhood caries and the resulting need for orthodontic treatment in 8-year-old German children.
Material and methods
Children who had been enrolled in a caries-risk-related recall system with continuous dental care starting at the time of birth (prevention group, PG) were compared with children of the same birth cohort whose parents decided not to participate in the programme (control group, CG). All children (n = 289) participating in the last PP evaluation at the age of 5 years were invited again and examined by blinded clinicians. Dental caries was scored using the WHO diagnostic criteria expanded to d1-level without radiography. Impressions were taken of children with premature tooth loss to analyse space conditions.
Results
Two hundred twenty-seven children (mean age 8.4 ± 0.6 years; 46.7% female) were examined. Children in the PG (n = 127) showed significantly lower caries prevalence and experience (3.1%, 0.4 ± 1.0 d3–4mft) than children in the CG (37.3%, 3.9 ± 3.5 d3–4mft). Orthodontic analysis found a higher prevalence of premature tooth extraction, followed by a greater extent of space loss in the CG (41.0%; 3.3 ± 4.4 mm) vs. PG (7.9%; 0.4 ± 1.9 mm) and an increase in early orthodontic treatment need (KIG P3, IOTN 5).
Conclusions
The PP was an effective approach for preventing caries-related premature tooth loss in children and conserving relevant arch length.
Clinical relevance
Children who received continuous dental care starting at the time of birth showed better oral health with less premature loss of deciduous teeth and lower need for orthodontic treatment at the age of 8 years.
Trial registration
German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00003438, https://drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00003438
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
According to the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry Bangkok Declaration 2019, early childhood caries (ECC) is a common, mostly untreated tooth decay in preschool children with profound impact on child’s lives [1]. The complex multifactorial disease is defined by the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) as the occurrence of one or more decayed (non-cavitated and cavitated lesions), missing or filled tooth surfaces in any primary tooth in a child under the age of six [2]. Age-specific dietary patterns like frequent sugar exposure through sweetened drinks and foods and bottle or breastfeeding beyond 12 months are the main risk factors for development of ECC [1,2,3,4]. Children with ECC may suffer from dental pain, tooth destruction and odontogenic infections [1,2,3,4]. Premature loss of deciduous teeth, lack of space and a higher risk of caries development in the permanent dentition are considered to be possible long-term consequences of ECC, even though the available data is limited [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Primary maxillary incisors and the first and second molars are the teeth often affected by ECC-caused tooth loss [2,3,4, 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Premature loss of primary teeth may affect alignment of permanent teeth [8,9,10]. While the premature loss of anterior teeth causes no space loss, the early loss of primary molars may result in reduced arch length and is worst when tooth loss occurs before eruption of the permanent first molar [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Tooth migration, crowding, rotations, reduction in space and eruption problems of succeeding teeth are possible effects on the dentition and thus may lead to an increase in orthodontic treatment need [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Malocclusion is a prevalent condition in Europe and other countries [18, 19]. The orthodontic effect of premature loss of deciduous teeth on malocclusion in the permanent dentition is not yet in the focus of studies [10, 17], even though it is an important aspect for ECC-related management and treatment decisions [10, 17].
The high prevalence and devastating consequences of ECC for the child, the family, its society and health care system indicate the need for early interventions in childhood [1,2,3,4]. ECC is an entirely preventable disease [1,2,3,4]. Although extensive research was performed on its management, the progress in the prevention has been slow [1,2,3,4,5, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Dental caries is a non-communicable disease that shares common risk factors such as excessive sugar consumption [28]. For preventing ECC, a common vision of health and implementation of oral health strategies in child health programmes using new multi-sectoral and collaborative approaches is required [1, 3, 4, 28,29,30].
In this context, a regional programme for prevention (PP) of ECC in the German federal state of Thuringia was carried out. The programme starting at the time of birth focussed on a holistic approach for general and oral health promotion in young children and included primary, secondary and tertiary prevention measures. Basis was the cooperation between the Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, Jena University Hospital, and the communal newborn visiting service of the Youth Welfare Office of the city of Jena to gain access to all families. Caregivers were counselled about daily tooth brushing with fluoride toothpaste and reducing consumption of sugar and the early establishment of a medical and dental home using anticipatory guidance and motivational interviewing approaches [1,2,3,4, 20, 21, 31,32,33,34,35]. Additionally, the children were included in a caries-risk-related recall system with comprehensive continuous dental care [1,2,3,4, 36, 37]. Previous programme evaluation was carried out at the age of 1, 3 and 5 years [38,39,40].
The aim of this prospective birth cohort study was to evaluate the effect of the PP of ECC and the resulting need for orthodontic treatment in 8-year-old German children. The null hypothesis was that the PP was not effective for preventing caries and premature primary tooth loss in children. The study hypothesis was that children, who had been enrolled in a caries-risk-related recall system with continuous dental care starting at the time of birth, have a better oral health with less premature loss of deciduous teeth and lower need for orthodontic treatment at the age of 8 years than children who did not participate (the control group).
Materials and methods
Study design
This prospective birth cohort study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jena University Hospital (2759-02/10; German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00003438). Conduction of the study was in full accordance with the ethical requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2008) and all caregivers had to give written informed consent to participate in the study. The study was complied with the recommendations of the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement guidelines.
Preventive programme
The regional preventive programme (PP) was carried out in the German federal state of Thuringia and had been described previously [38,39,40]. The basis was the cooperation between the Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry (DPD), Jena University Hospital, and the communal newborn visiting service (CNVS) of the Youth Welfare Office of the city of Jena to ensure access to all families for general and oral health promotion in young children. Since 2009, all parents of newborn children (about 1000 children per year) have been visited and counselled by CNVS-qualified staff (midwives, social workers, nurses) between the 1st and 4th weeks after birth. Mothers were counselled on general and oral health using brief motivational interviewing and anticipatory guidance approaches (covering the importance of breastfeeding, use of baby bottles and pacifiers, healthy diet, importance of screening examinations by a paediatrician and caries development and its prevention). Families were advised about the importance of daily tooth brushing with fluoride toothpaste, reducing consumption of sugar and the early establishment of a dental home. A dental home should be established in the first year of a child’s life followed by regular dental care. Every family received a folder with brief information material in their native language, and a toothbrush, fluoride toothpaste and a pacifier for the child were provided as incentives.
The children of the Jena birth cohort July 2009 to October 2010 (n = 1162) had the possibility to participate in the PP with caries-risk-related continuous dental care provided by a paediatric dentist in the dental practice of the DPD at least to the age of 5 years. Recruitment was done by the CNVS by sending invitations to all families for a dental examination in the first year of the child’s life. Five hundred and twelve families accepted the invitation and were included as participants of the PP (prevention group). Those families who did not appear for the dental examination were included in the control group (CG). It has to be mentioned that all families received the same maternal counselling at time after birth with the difference that families in the CG were personally responsible to establish a dental home with regular dental care.
The Caries-Risk Assessment Tool for infants, children and adolescents of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) was used to categorise the children and re-evaluated at each dental appointment [36]. Children with a low or moderate caries risk were reappointed every 6 months and children with an increased caries risk every 3 months [36, 37]. In children with a low or moderate caries risk, fluoride varnish (Fluoridin N5, VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany; 0.25 ml) was applied biannually by a dentist in the dental practice from the age of 3 years [25, 27, 31,32,33, 41]. In the first 3 years of life, fluoride varnish application was limited to children with an increased caries risk. Those who are at low risk received a minimal amount of fluoride varnish application biannually, limited to surfaces at risk (< 0.25 ml), whereas in older high-risk children (> 3 years), fluoride varnish was applied quarterly [25, 27, 31,32,33, 41].
In 2013 and 2015, a programme evaluation was conducted and described [39, 40].
Study population
In 2018, all families (n = 289) participating in the last programme evaluation at the age of 5 years [40] were invited to an examination in the DPD. Figure 1 presents the participant flow diagram of the total birth cohort for the 8-year PP. The study population included all children who followed the invitation. The eligibility criteria were the provision of written consent by the caregiver and the availability of data relating to the dental examination of the child. Children with special health care needs (congenital, developmental or acquired disability or impairment) and those with incomplete data and missing parent’s written consent were excluded from the analysis of the study.
Sample size calculation was done at the beginning of the prospective study. The sample size was calculated by dental caries experience based on the last nationwide survey of 6-year-olds in Germany in 2009, which was 2.56 dmft in Thuringia. To detect a 30% difference between the PG and CG with a two-tailed significance test, a 5% critical level and power of 80%, a sample of 66 children per group was required.
Dental examination
Children were examined in the DPD by two blinded clinicians after professional tooth cleaning. All the examinations were conducted using a dental light, plane mouth mirror and a CPI ball-end probe. Caries experience was assessed by the dmfs index at the d1-level and scored according to the WHO standard criteria [42]. No radiographs were taken. In children with premature loss of one or more deciduous molars, conventional alginate impressions were taken for orthodontic study models of the dental arches and poured immediately in plaster. The bite was recorded using a wax wafer.
All records were performed by two trained and calibrated examiners. The calibration procedures were performed following the WHO guidelines with 10 children prior to the beginning of the survey [42]. Afterwards, the dentists examined a group of 20 pre-selected children twice on successive days to assess the consistency. The intrarater- and interrater-reliability was very good (κintra1 = 0.89; κintra2 = 0.92; κinter = 0.90).
Orthodontic analysis
Orthodontic study models of children with premature loss of primary teeth were measured independently by two blinded, trained and calibrated orthodontists. Intra-arch measurements were made with a vernier calliper (Münchner Model 042-751-00, Dentaurum, Germany) with an accuracy of 0.1 mm. Study models were investigated to record the following parameters:
-
1.
Arch lengths in millimetres in the incisal segment and lateral segments measured between the distal surfaces of the lateral incisors and from the distal surfaces of the lateral incisors to the mesial surfaces of the first molars. Extent of total space loss or space excess in accordance with Moyer’s mixed dentition space analysis [43] and Tonn’s tooth width analysis [44].
-
2.
Orthodontic treatment need due to space loss based on the German KIG system (Kieferorthopädische Indikationsgruppen = Orthodontic Indication Groups) and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) [45]. The transfer of KIG classification to the IOTN was carried out using a specially designed scheme described by Streckbein [46]. A total space loss of over 3 and under 4 mm in the lateral segments was defined as P3 (KIG) or 5ipx (IOTN); a total space loss of at least 4 mm was defined as P4 (KIG) or 5ip (IOTN).
Both orthodontists measured each study model twice and means were calculated for each parameter. Prior to the beginning of the study, a calibration and training were conducted with the measurement of ten study models. Afterwards, both orthodontists independently measured 30 pre-selected study models to assess the consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficients for intraobserver agreement regarding measurement of space loss or space excess were 0.990–0.998 (IK) and 0.991–0.998 (TK). The intraclass correlation coefficients for interobserver reliability with regard to the space analysis were 0.954–0.996. The average measuring difference between the dentists was 0.05 mm.
Additional information
Information regarding socioeconomic status (SES) of the families, group allocation (prevention or control group) and time of premature tooth loss were compared with the findings of the interim evaluation in 2013 and 2015 [39, 40, 47].
Statistical analysis
Data were recorded in Microsoft Excel files (Office Version 2016, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and transferred to the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 23, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism (version 7, GraphPad software, San Diego, CA, USA) for analysis. The primary endpoint was the caries experience measured by the dmft/DMFT (decayed, missing and filled teeth) index. Secondary endpoints were the dmfs/DMFS index (including non-cavitated carious lesions), the caries prevalence, the prevalence of premature tooth loss and the extent of lack of space. Frequencies, percentages, mean values and standard deviations were calculated. The primary and secondary endpoints were compared between the two groups of children using chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact test or unpaired t test. The central limit theorem of statistics has been complied with. Group sizes below 30 children were graphically checked for normal distribution per group. The significance level for all statistical tests was set at α = 0.05. Additional the caries prevalence and caries experience related to a low socioeconomic status (SES) were calculated and compared between groups. The SES of the families was assessed by using the Brandenburg social index [47]. The index was computed for each child based on the education and employment status of their parents. The children were allocated to lower, middle or higher SES groups [47]. For cases with missing values for one parent, the value of the other parent part was double-weighted, analogous for single parents [47]. For data analysis and comparison of the prevention and control groups, a matching of all examined subjects relating to the variables (‘matching criteria’) of sex, age, SES and ethnicity was performed. In the case of several suitable statistical twins, the subjects were assigned at random to the control group. This matching reduced potential sources that might have influenced oral health outcomes.
Results
The response rate was 78.5%. A total of 227 children (aged 8.4 ± 0.6 years; 45.8% female) were included in the study (PG n = 127, CG n = 100) with an average of 12.7 primary and 11.2 permanent teeth. Sixty-two children had to be excluded due to non-appearance on dental examination day (n = 19) and relocation to another area (n = 43). Figure 1 presents the participant flow diagram of the total birth cohort for the 8-year PP. Caries was present in 18.5% (n = 42) of the children. Prevalence of premature tooth loss was 22.5% (n = 51). There were no differences between genders (results not shown).
Description of all children according to group at baseline (time at birth) and at 8 years of age is presented in Table 1. Children in the PP had significantly lower caries prevalence and experience at the d1–4/D1–4- and d3–4/D3–4-level than children in the CG (p < 0.05; Table 2). The proportion of children with low SES was similar in both groups and the impact of SES on caries experience was significant (Table 2). Children with a low SES had the highest caries experience in the PG and the CG (PG 1.7 ± 1.5 d3–4mft; CG 8.8 ± 2.8 d3–4mft; Table 2). The data of caries prevalence, caries experience, prevalence of premature tooth loss, extent of space loss and orthodontic treatment need in the PG and the CG before and after matching are shown in Table 3. To avoid contamination biases, the total sample was parallelised. The final representative sample included 150 children after the matching process with 13.6% more than the estimated sample size.
Orthodontic analysis
Early loss of deciduous teeth
Orthodontic analysis found a higher prevalence of premature tooth loss in the CG (41%) than in the PG (7.9%) group. The prevalence of tooth loss in both groups increased exponentially compared with previous examinations at the age of 3 and 5 years showing a significant higher amount of missing teeth in the CG group (Fig. 2).
The most common missing teeth were the right upper primary first molars (Fig. 3). Twenty children (39.2%) lost one primary tooth, 20 children (39.2%) lost two primary teeth, 4 children (7.8%) lost three primary teeth, 6 children (11.8%) lost four primary teeth and 1 child lost five primary teeth (2%). The prevalence for early loss of premature teeth was higher in the first primary molars compared with that in the second primary molars. Premature tooth loss was more frequently present in the upper (43.1%) compared with the lower jaw (29.4%). In most patients, only one jaw was affected. Premature tooth loss of both jaws was only present in the CG (27.5%) group, but not in the PG (0%) group.
Extent of tooth/arch length discrepancy
Space analysis revealed a significant higher extent of overall space loss in the CG (CG 3.3 ± 4.4 mm vs. PG 0.4 ± 1.9 mm) group (Fig. 4). Regarding the upper or lower jaw, space loss in the CG was significant higher in the upper (4.2 ± 4.5 mm) than in the lower jaw (2.3 ± 4.2 mm), whereas space loss in the PG was higher in the lower (0.5 ± 1.5 mm) than in the upper jaw (0.2 ± 3.3 mm), but the difference was not significant.
Children with a low SES showed a significant higher overall space loss (5.4 ± 4.2 mm) compared with children with a middle or high SES (1.0 ± 3.2 mm). Analysing the correlation of children’s SES and the effect of the dental care programme, the prevalence of observed tooth/arch length discrepancies demonstrated a significant increase if children who belonged to low SES and to the CG (Fig. 5).
Orthodontic treatment need
Orthodontic treatment need due to the mesial drift of posterior teeth and space loss was present in 31.4% (n = 16) of the children with premature extraction of primary teeth (Table 2). Treatment need according to IOTN 5ipx/ip or KIG P3/4 index could be observed only in the CG group (Table 2; Fig. 6). Regarding the amount of space loss and arch length discrepancy, three children were categorised to P3 (KIG) or 5ipx (IOTN) and four children were categorised to P4 (KIG) or 5ip (IOTN). These findings are most likely associated with a severe extent of tooth/arch length discrepancy in the permanent dentition resulting in a high need for complex orthodontic treatment including interventions to create space in the lateral segment such as extractions of permanent premolars.
Discussion
The evaluation of the long-term effect of the programme for prevention (PP) of early childhood caries (ECC) and the resulting need for orthodontic treatment in 8-year-old Thuringian children in Germany demonstrates that children who participate in the PP have a lower caries prevalence and caries experience than children who did not participate (the control group). The main results are that children who had been enrolled in a caries-risk-related recall system with continuous dental care starting at the time of birth have a better oral health with less premature extractions of deciduous teeth and lower need for early orthodontic treatment at the age of 8 years than children who did not participate (the control group).
Study hypothesis
The present study is based on data from a regional birth cohort study in Germany. The results show that the programme is effective for the prevention of caries and premature tooth loss in children and the null hypothesis could be rejected. A programme starting at the time of birth and consisting of early maternal counselling, establishment of a dental home and inclusion of the children in a caries-risk-related recall system with continuous dental care and fluoride varnish application can prevent caries in the primary and in the permanent dentition.
Oral health
The analysis reveals significant differences between the PP and CG if caries prevalence, caries experience, prevalence of premature tooth loss, extent of space loss and resulting orthodontic treatment need are considered.
The findings of the previous analyses demonstrated that families who participated in the PP had a better oral health and feeding behaviour [39, 40]. Families in the PP started earlier with tooth brushing, and their children received a regular second brush more often [39, 40]. Regular removal and control of the biofilm by daily brushing with fluoride toothpaste is essential for caries prevention and the best home-based measure [2,3,4, 22,23,24, 26, 27, 31,32,33]. In addition, children in the PP had an improved dietary behaviour with less in-between sugar-containing snacks and beverages per day and a shorter duration of the use of the bottle than others [39, 40]. The provision of preventive guidance within the first year of life by the communal newborn visiting service and following comprehensive continuous dental care were the key elements of the PP for ECC. The first published results showed that families in the PP visited the dentist in their first year of life, whereas children in the CG visited the dentist at a later age [39, 40]. The regular conducted caries-risk assessment allowed individual preventive measures including dietary and oral hygiene counselling and follow-up intervals. The findings clearly demonstrate that comprehensive continuous dental care with repeated maternal counselling about oral health promotion by use of anticipatory guidance and motivational interviewing approaches support patient self-management strategies and raise awareness of ECC [1,2,3,4, 20, 21, 34,35,36,37]. Primary preventive measures were complemented by professional plaque removal and fluoride varnish application to prevent caries development and its progression and to stimulate remineralisation of initial, non-cavitated carious lesions [25, 27, 31,32,33, 41, 48]. Fluoride varnish application is an appropriate measure to prevent and control caries and children in the PP received more fluoride varnish applications than children in the CG [25, 27, 31,32,33, 41, 48]. Cavitated carious lesions were treated conservatively and restored to prevent further progression and to avoid premature tooth loss. Previous analysis revealed that the care index in 5-year-old children in the CG was lower (45.1%) than that in the PP (100.0%) [39, 40]. Dental caries, if left untreated, can lead to further tooth breakdown, pulp exposure and premature tooth loss [1,2,3,4, 8].
Premature tooth loss
The findings of the present and previous analyses show an increased prevalence of premature tooth loss with increased age in both CG and PP, but the amount was several times higher in the CG than in the PP [40]. The prevalence of 41.0% in the CG is comparable to previous literature with prevalence that varied between 22.3 and 65.4% depending on cohort and country [15, 49,50,51]. Participating in the PP led to a much lower prevalence of 7.9% and also to a delay of tooth loss of 2–3 years compared with the CG.
The PP had the additional benefit that in cases of premature tooth loss the space and dental development could be monitored and a space maintainer could be applied on demand. Studies show the importance of space maintainers because tooth migration begins within 3 weeks after tooth extraction and lasts for several months [52,53,54]. The present investigation shows that space loss was present if space management was left up to patients and parents and was not watched by professionals. Moreover, 31.4% space loss led to a subsequent need for orthodontic treatment defined by the KIG/IOTN classification.
Preventive programme and oral health disparities
The PP approach and its regularity are responsible for the better oral health with a lower prevalence of premature tooth loss and less space loss in children in the PP compared with the CG. In addition, it led to a compensation of oral health disparities. Caries is particularly prevalent in socio-economically disadvantaged groups [55,56,57]. In this study, the socioeconomic status (SES) is also an influencing variable on caries development and resulting premature tooth loss. Even though the subgroups with a low SES are very small and the generalisability should be made carefully, it could be demonstrated that the PP has a positive effect on the dental health of 8-year-olds with a low SES. The SES-dependent disparities regarding caries experience, premature tooth loss and tooth/arch length discrepancies could be compensated. The same positive effect could be shown regarding caries prevalence and caries experience in the last programme evaluations [38,39,40].
Strengths of the study
The PP of ECC already includes almost all recommendations of the current preventive and management strategies suggested by the IAPD Bangkok Declaration [1, 3]. The PP uses a new multi-sectoral approach providing preventive guidance within the first year of life by community health workers to raise awareness of ECC. The preventive measures included maternal counselling about reducing consumption of sugar, daily brushing with fluoridated toothpaste, the early establishment of a dental home, regular assessment of caries risk, inclusion of the children in a caries-risk-related recall system with comprehensive continuous dental care and fluoride varnish application. All children were drawn from the same population at time of birth, when no primary tooth has been erupted yet and followed over a period of 8 years. There were no baseline differences between groups regarding age, gender, SES and migration background [38,39,40]. For programme evaluation, children were surveyed at 3 and 5 years of age to capture oral health status [39, 40].
Limitations
There are a few limitations of this study to note. First, this study was conducted in a medium-sized and well-situated city in Germany with a relatively low proportion of families with a low SES or migration background. Second, due to ethical considerations, all families should have the possibility to participate in the PP, so that the assignments to groups were made by the preference of the family and not at random. Consequently, the findings are restricted to this population group. Lower income groups usually have a lower response rate to health promotion and preventive programmes, which could represent a substantial risk of bias [55]. To reduce potential sources that might have influenced oral health outcomes, an analysis of the non-participants (n = 650) regarding their SES and ethnicity was carried out at the beginning of the study and showed no differences between the two groups (data not shown). Additionally, lack of randomisation was tried to compensate by an adequate statistical analysis including a representative sample size and a matching of all subjects. Another limitation is the participation rate in the examination. After 8 years, just 20% of the total birth cohort could be examined. Although the required number of children per group is representative and twice as high as in the sample size calculation, a generalisability of the study results has to be made with caution. The latter aspect is partly due to the fact that at the beginning 512 families decided to participate in the PP and 650 wanted to be personally responsible for establishing a dental home with regular dental care. The high drop-out rate can be explained by the long duration of the programme, relocation, schedule difficulties, effort and lack of interest. Nevertheless, 78.5% of the children of the last programme evaluation in 2015 could be examined. The last limitation is the precise determination of the time of premature tooth loss in children in the control group. While all data of the children in the prevention group were recorded longitudinally, starting at the time of birth to the age of 8, the data of the children in the control group could just be compared with the findings of the interim evaluation in 2013 and 2015 [39, 40]. To reduce the source of potential bias, the analysis relates to a defined period of time of premature tooth loss (before age 3, between age 3 and 5, between age 5 and 8).
Summary
Children in the PP had a lower caries prevalence and caries experience, less premature loss of deciduous teeth and lower need for orthodontic treatment at the age of 8 years than children in the control group.
In summary, it can be stated that a programme consisting of the early establishment of a dental home, assessment of caries risk and inclusion of the children in a caries-risk-related recall system with continuous dental care and fluoride varnish application can prevent caries and premature tooth loss. In addition, children will show a reduced need for complex orthodontic interventions due to loss of space and the establishment of severe tooth/arch length discrepancies.
References
Pitts N, Baez R, Diaz-Guallory C et al (2019) Early childhood caries: IAPD Bangkok Declaration. Int J Paediatr Dent 29:384–386
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2016) Policy on early childhood caries: classifications, consequences and preventive strategies https://wwwaapdorg/media/policies_guidelines/p_eccclassificationspdf Accessed 20 June 2019
Tinanoff N, Baez RJ, Diaz Guillory C, Donly KJ, Feldens CA, McGrath C, Phantumvanit P, Pitts NB, Seow WK, Sharkov N, Songpaisan Y, Twetman S (2019) Early childhood caries epidemiology, aetiology, risk assessment, societal burden, management, education, and policy: global perspective. Int J Paediatr Dent 29:238–248
Phantumvanit P, Makino Y, Ogawa H, Rugg-Gunn A, Moynihan P, Petersen PE, Evans W, Feldens CA, Lo E, Khoshnevisan MH, Baez R, Varenne B, Vichayanrat T, Songpaisan Y, Woodward M, Nakornchai S, Ungchusak C (2018) WHO Global Consultation on Public Health Intervention against early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 46:280–287
Mejàre I, Axelsson S, Dahlén G, Espelid I, Norlund A, Tranaeus S, Twetman S (2014) Caries risk assessment: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 72:81–91
Skeie MS, Raadal M, Strand GV, Espelid I (2006) The relationship between caries in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and permanent dentition at 10 years of age—a longitudinal study. Int J Paediatr Dent 16:152–160
Jordan AR, Becker N, Jöhren HP, Zimmer S (2016) Early childhood caries and caries experience in permanent dentition. Swiss Dent J SSO 126:114–119
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2014) Management of the developing dentition and occlusion in pediatric dentistry. https://wwwaapdorg/globalassets/media/policies_guidelines/bp_developdentitionpdf Accessed 25 June 2019
Raja SM, Mohan M, Jeevanandan G (2018) Premature loss of primary teeth and developing malocclusion: a review. J Pharm Res 12:190–193
Bhujel N, Duggal MS, Saini P, Day PF (2016) The effect of premature extraction of primary teeth on the subsequent need for orthodontic treatment. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 17:423–434
Tunison W, Flores-Mir C, Elbadrawy H et al (2008) Dental arch space changes following premature loss of primary first molars: a systematic review. Pediatr Dent 30:297–302
Northway WM, Wainright RL, Demirjian A (1984) Effects of premature loss of deciduous molars. Angle Orthod 54:295–329
Pokorna H, Marek I, Kucera J, Hanzelka T (2016) Space reduction after premature loss of a deciduous second molar—retrospective study. J Dent Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1511020108
Lucas-Rincon SE, Robles-Bermeo NL, Lara-Carrillo E et al (2019) Interproximal caries and premature tooth loss in primary dentition as risk factor for loss of space in the posterior sector. Medicine 98(11):e14875
Monte-Santo AS, Viana SVC, Moreira MKS, Imparato JCP, Mendes FM, Bonini GAVC (2018) Prevalence of early loss of primary molar and its impact in schoolchildren’s quality of life. Int J Paediatr Dent 28:595–601
Ahmad AJ, Parekh S, Ashley PF (2018) Methods of space maintenance for premature loss of a primary molar: a review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 19:311–320
Brown LR, Barber S, Benson PE et al (2019) PLATOON: Premature Loss of bAby Teeth and its impact On Orthodontic Need—protocol. J Orthod 46:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465312519843305
World Health Organization (WHO) What is the burden of oral disease? http://www.who.int/oral_health/disease_burden/global/en/. Accessed 25 June 2019
Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C (2018) Global distribution of malocclusion traits: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod 23:40.e1–40.e10
Albino J, Tiwari T (2015) Preventing childhood caries: a review of recent behavioral research. J Dent Res 95:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515609034
Borrelli B, Tooley EM, Lori AJ, Scott-Sheldon LAJ (2015) Motivational interviewing for parent-child health interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Dent 37:254–265
Mejàre I, Klingberg G, Mowafi FK, Stecksen-Blicks C, Twetman SHA, Tranaeus SH (2015) A systematic map of systematic reviews in pediatric dentistry—what do we really know? PLoS One 10:e0117537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117537
Twetman S, Dhar V (2015) Evidence of effectiveness of current therapies to prevent and treat ECC. Pediatr Dent 37:246–253
Wright JT, Hanson N, Ristic H, Whall CW, Estrich CG, Zentz RR (2014) Fluoride toothpastes efficacy and safety in children younger than 6 years: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 145:182–189
Marinho VC, Worthington HV, Walsh T, Clarkson JE (2013) Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 11(7):CD002279. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002279.pub2
European Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (EAPD (2008) Guidelines on prevention of early childhood caries—an EAPD policy document. https://www.eapd.eu/uploads/1722F50D_file.pdf
Chou R, Cantor A, Zakher B, Mitchell JP, Pappas M (2014) Prevention of dental caries in children younger than 5 years old. Systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force Recommendation. Evidence Synthesis, No. 104. Rockville, Md., USA: Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
United Nations General Assembly (2011) Political declaration of the high-level meeting of the general assembly on the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases. https://digitallibraryunorg/record/720106/files/A_RES_66_2-ENpdf Accessed 25 June 2019
Fisher J, Johnston S, Hewson N, Dijk W, Reich E, Eiselé JL, Bourgeois D (2012) FDI global caries initiative; implementing a paradigm shift in dental practice and the global policy context. Int Dent J 62:169–174
Douglass JM, Clark MB (2015) Integrating oral health into overall health care to prevent early childhood caries: need, evidence, and solutions. Pediatr Dent 37:266–274
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2018) Fluoride therapy. https://wwwaapdorg/media/Policies_Guidelines/BP_FluorideTherapypdf Accessed 25 June 2019
European Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (EAPD) (2009) Guidelines on the use of fluoride in children: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch of Paediatr Dent 10:129–135
Working Group of the Scientific Medical Societies. Guideline fluoridation measures for caries prophylaxis. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) (2013) S2-k Leitlinie Fluoridierungsmaßnahmen zur Kariesprophylaxe. https://wwwawmforg/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/083-001l_S2k_Fluoridierungsma%C3%9Fnahmen_zur_Kariesprophylaxe_2013-01-abgelaufenpdf Accessed 25 June 2019
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2016) Perinatal and infant oral health care. https://wwwaapdorg/globalassets/media/policies_guidelines/bp_perinataloralhealthcarepdf Accessed 25 June 2019
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2017) Policy on dietary recommendations for infants, children, and adolescents https://wwwaapdorg/globalassets/media/policies_guidelines/p_recdietarypdf Accessed 25 June 2019
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2014) Caries-risk assessment and management for infants, children, and adolescents https://wwwaapdorg/globalassets/media/policies_guidelines/bp_cariesriskassessmentpdf Accessed 25 June 2019
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2018) Periodicity of examination, preventive dental services, anticipatory guidance/counseling, and oral treatment for infants, children, and adolescents https://wwwaapdorg/globalassets/media/policies_guidelines/bp_periodicitypdf Accessed 25 June 2019
Wagner Y, Heinrich-Weltzien R (2017) Caries prevalence and risk assessment in Thuringian infants, Germany. Oral Health Prev Dent 15:489–494
Wagner Y, Heinrich-Weltzien R (2016) Evaluation of an interdisciplinary preventive programme for early childhood caries: findings of a regional German birth cohort study. Clin Oral Invest 20:1943–1952
Wagner Y, Heinrich-Weltzien R (2017) Evaluation of regional German interdisciplinary oral health programme for children from birth to 5 years of age. Clin Oral Invest 21:225–235
American Dental Association (2013) Topical fluoride for caries prevention. https://ebdadaorg/en/evidence/guidelines/topical-fluoride Accessed 25 June 2019
World Health Organization (2013) Oral health surveys, basic methods. 5th edition, Geneva
Moyers RE (1973) Handbook of orthodontics for the student and general practitioner. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago
Tonn P (1937) Über die mesio-distalen Zahnbreiten-Relationen der Zähne des Oberkiefers zu den entsprechenden des Unterkiefers bei normaler und anormaler Okklusion. Dissertation, Friedrich-Wilhelms-University of Berlin
Peters HB, William CS (1989) The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 11:309–320
Streckbein EM (2017) Veränderung der klinischen Versorgungsaufgabe und deren Auswirkung auf die Behandlungsqualität an einer universitären kieferorthopädischen Poliklinik über einen Zeitraum von 21 Jahren. VVB Laufersweiler Verlag
Böhm A, Ellsäßer G, Lüdecke K (2007) The Brandenburg Social Index: a tool for health and social reporting at state and local level in the analysis of pupil enrolment data. Der Brandenburger Sozialindex: Ein Werkzeug für die Gesundheits- und Sozialberichterstattung auf Landes- und kommunaler Ebene bei der Analyse von Einschülerdaten Gesundheitswesen; 69: 555–559
Memarpour M, Dadaein S, Fakhraei E (2016) Comparison of oral health education and fluoride varnish to prevent early childhood caries: a randomized clinical trial. Caries Res 50:433–442
López-Gómez SA, Villalobos-Rodelo JJ, Ávila-Burgos L, Casanova-Rosado JF, Vallejos-Sánchez AA, Lucas-Rincón SE, Patiño-Marín N, Medina-Solís CE (2016) Relationship between premature loss of primary teeth with oral hygiene, consumption of soft drinks, dental care, and previous caries experience. Sci Rep 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21147
Murshid S, Al-Labani M, Aldhorae K, Rodis O (2016) Prevalence of prematurely lost primary teeth in 5-10-year-old children in Thamar City, Yemen: a cross-sectional study. J Int Soc Prev Communit Dent 6:S126–S130. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.189739
Melsen B, Terp S (1982) The influence of extractions caries cause on the development of malocclusion and need for orthodontic treatment. Swed Dent J Suppl 15:163–169
Bindayel NA (2019) Clinical evaluation of short term space variation following premature loss of primary second molar, at early permanent dentition stage. Saudi Dent J 31:311–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.03.002
Alnahwi HH, Donly KJ, Contreras CI (2015) Space loss following premature loss of primary second molars. Gen Dent 63:e1–e4
MacEna MCB, Tornisiello Katz CR, Heimer MV et al (2011) Space changes after premature loss of deciduous molars among Brazilian children. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:771–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.023
Schwendicke F, Dörfer CE, Schlattmann P, Page LF, Thomson WM, Paris S (2015) Socioeconomic inequality and caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 94:10–18
Un Lam C, Khin LW, Yee R et al (2017) Identification of caries risk determinants in toddlers: results of the GUSTO birth cohort study. Caries Res 51:271–282
Plutzer K, Spencer AJ, Keirse MJNC (2012) Reassessment at 6-7 years of age of a randomized controlled trial initiated before birth to prevent early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 40:116–124
Acknowledgements
We thank the families and their children for the participation in this examination.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL. The present study received financial support from the German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO). The underlying preventive programme was supported by Bamed AG, Wollerau, Switzerland; VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany; MAM Babyartikel GmbH, Vienna, Austria; Procter & Gamble International Operations S.A., Petit-Lancy, Switzerland; Wrigley GmbH, Munich, Germany; and the German Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (DGZMK), Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was conducted in full accordance with the ethical requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2008). This investigation complied with the recommendations of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement guidelines.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jena University Hospital (2759-02/10; German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00003438).
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all parents whose children participated in the study.
Disclaimer
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, Y., Knaup, I., Knaup, T.J. et al. Influence of a programme for prevention of early childhood caries on early orthodontic treatment needs. Clin Oral Invest 24, 4313–4324 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03295-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03295-4