Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Er:YAG laser etching on topography, microstructure, compressive strength, and bond strength of a universal adhesive to calcium silicate cements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 16 October 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effect of Er:YAG etching on topography, microstructure, compressive strength, and shear bond strength (SBS) of All-Bond Universal adhesive to mineral trioxide aggregate-Angelus (AMTA) and Biodentine (BD).

Methods and materials

Sixty cylindrical specimens of each cement (AMTA and BD) in five groups were prepared and stored for 72 h. The control groups were non-etched, and four other groups were acid-etched and laser-etched with a pulse energy of 60, 80, or 100 mJ, followed by compressive strength testing. Surface micromorphology and topography were evaluated. Similar groups were bonded using All-Bond Universal with self-etch and etch-and-rinse (acid-etch) approaches, and laser-etch 60, 80, and 100 mJ, and SBS was tested. Data were analyzed using two-way and one-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni post hoc tests (α = 0.05).

Results

BD had a significantly higher compressive strength and SBS (except for laser-etch 100) compared to AMTA, regardless of the etching method (p < 0.001). Acid etching and laser etching 100 of both cements and laser etching 80 of BD alone produced a significantly lower compressive strength than that for the other groups. Contrary to BD, for AMTA, all the treatments significantly increased SBS compared to that of the self-etch group.

Conclusions

Etching of AMTA was needed for stronger bonding; laser etching with 60 or 80 mJ without compromising compressive strength was recommended. Etching not only did not improve bonding ability of BD, but it also negatively affected the strength of BD.

Clinical relevance

To achieve successful combined calcium silicate cement-resin material restoration, an adequate bond between the materials is mandatory. This might be provided with the ultramild adhesive through laser etching without compromising compressive strength, depending on cement composition and laser energy level used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 16 October 2019

    Figure 2 was incorrect in the original published version of this article. Correct figure in presented here. The original article has been corrected.

  • 16 October 2019

    Figure 2 was incorrect in the original published version of this article. Correct figure in presented here. The original article has been corrected.

References

  1. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M (2010) Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod 36:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bogen G, Kuttler S (2009) Mineral trioxide aggregate obturation: a review and case series. J Endod 35:777–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashem AAR, Hassanien EE (2008) ProRoot MTA, MTA-Angelus and IRM used to repair large furcation perforations: sealability study. J Endod 34:59–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee B-N, Hwang Y-C, Jang J-H, Chang H-S, Hwang I-N, Yang S-Y, Park Y-J, Son H-H, Oh W-M (2011) Improvement of the properties of mineral trioxide aggregate by mixing with hydration accelerators. J Endod 37:1433–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Komabayashi T, Spångberg LS (2008) Comparative analysis of the particle size and shape of commercially available mineral trioxide aggregates and Portland cement: a study with a flow particle image analyzer. J Endod 34:94–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rajasekharan S, Martens LC, Cauwels RG, Verbeeck RM (2014) Biodentine material characteristics and clinical applications: a review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 15:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Camilleri J, Sorrentino F, Damidot D (2013) Investigation of the hydration and bioactivity of radiopacified tricalcium silicate cement, Biodentine and MTA Angelus. Dent Mater 29:580–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Altunsoy M, Tanriver M, Ok E, Kucukyilmaz E (2015) Shear bond strength of a self-adhering Flowable composite and a Flowable Base composite to mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture cement, and Biodentine. J Endod 41:1691–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shin JH, Jang JH, Park SH, Kim E (2014) Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate surface treatments on morphology and bond strength to composite resin. J Endod 40:1210–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kayahan MB, Nekoofar MH, Kazandag M, Canpolat C, Malkondu O, Kaptan F, Dummer PM (2009) Effect of acid-etching procedure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 42:1004–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carrieri TC, de Freitas PM, Navarro RS, Eduardo CP, Mori M (2007) Adhesion of composite luting cement to Er:YAG-laser-treated dentin. Laser Med Sci 22:165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akyil MS, Yilmaz A, Karaalioglu OF, Duymus ZY (2010) Shear bond strength of repair composite resin to an acid-etched and a laser-irradiated feldspathic ceramic surface. Photomed Laser Surg 28:539–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Navimipour EJ, Oskoee SS, Oskoee PA, Bahari M, Rikhtegaran S, Ghojazadeh M (2012) Effect of acid and laser etching on shear bond strength of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements to composite resin. Laser Med Sci 27:305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nekoofar M, Adusei G, Sheykhrezae M, Hayes S, Bryant S, Dummer P (2007) The effect of condensation pressure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 40:453–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Danesh G, Dammaschke T, Gerth H, Zandbiglari T, Schäfer E (2006) A comparative study of selected properties of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and two Portland cements. Int Endod J 39:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gancedo-Caravia L, Garcia-Barbero E (2006) Influence of humidity and setting time on the push-out strength of mineral trioxide aggregate obturations. J Endod 32:894–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bodanezi A, Carvalho N, Silva D, Bernardineli N, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, IGd M (2008) Immediate and delayed solubility of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. J Appl Oral Sci 16:127–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guven Y, Aktoren O (2015) Shear bond strength and ultrastructural interface analysis of different adhesive systems to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. Laser Med Sci 30:769–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bahrami B, Askari N, Tielemans M, Heysselaer D, Lamard L, Peremans A, Nyssen-Behets C, Nammour S (2011) Effect of low fluency dentin conditioning on tensile bond strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin: a preliminary study. Laser Med Sci 26:187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Odabaş ME, Bani M, Tirali RE (2013) Shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to Biodentine. ScientificWorldJournal 2013:626103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bayrak S, Tunc ES, Saroglu I, Egilmez T (2009) Shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to white mineral trioxide aggregate. Dent Mater J 28:62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Atabek D, Sillelioğlu H, Ölmez A (2012) Bond strength of adhesive systems to mineral trioxide aggregate with different time intervals. J Endod 38:1288–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kayahan MB, Nekoofar MH, McCann A, Sunay H, Kaptan RF, Meraji N, Dummer PM (2013) Effect of acid etching procedures on the compressive strength of 4 calcium silicate–based endodontic cements. J Endod 39:1646–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shafiei F, Doozandeh M, Gharibpour F, Adl A (2018) Effect of reducing of acid-etching duration time on compressive strength and bonding of a universal adhesive to calcium silicate cements. Int Endod J 52:530–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Soares LE, Brugnera Junior A, Zanin F, Pacheco MT, Martin AA (2006) Molecular analysis of Er:YAG laser irradiation on dentin. Braz Dent J 17:15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Camerlingo C, Lepore M, Gaeta GM, Riccio R, Riccio C, De Rosa A, De Rosa M (2004) Er: YAG laser treatments on dentine surface: micro-Raman spectroscopy and SEM analysis. J Dent 32:399–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hadley J, Young DA, Eversole LR, Gornbein JA (2000) A laser-powered hydrokinetic system: for caries removal and cavity preparation. J Am Dent Assoc 131:777–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Brady K, Sweeney R, Curtis RV, Ford TRP (2005) The constitution of mineral trioxide aggregate. Dent Mater 21:297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hashem DF, Foxton R, Manoharan A, Watson TF, Banerjee A (2014) The physical characteristics of resin composite–calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration. Dent Mater 30:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Camilleri J (2013) Investigation of Biodentine as dentine replacement material. J Dent 41:600–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Namazikhah M, Nekoofar MH, Sheykhrezae M, Salariyeh S, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, Mohammadi M, Dummer PMH (2008) The effect of pH on surface hardness and microstructure of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 41:108–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee Y-L, Lee B-S, Lin F-H, Lin AY, Lan W-H, Lin C-P (2004) Effects of physiological environments on the hydration behavior of mineral trioxide aggregate. Biomaterials 25:787–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shie M-Y, Huang T-H, Kao C-T, Huang C-H, Ding S-J (2009) The effect of a physiologic solution pH on properties of white mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 35:98–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alzraikat H, Taha NA, Qasrawi D, Burrow MF (2016) Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems. Dent Mater J 35:881–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cantekin K, Avci S (2014) Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®). J Appl Oral Sci 22:302–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the vice-chancellery for research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, for supporting research (Grant #16026).The manuscript relevant thesis of Paria Dehghanian.

Funding

This work was supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran (grant no. 16026).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahtab Memarpour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Inform consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shafiei, F., Dehghanian, P., Memarpour, M. et al. Effect of Er:YAG laser etching on topography, microstructure, compressive strength, and bond strength of a universal adhesive to calcium silicate cements. Clin Oral Invest 24, 711–718 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02903-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02903-2

Keywords

Navigation