Introduction

Milk is produced by the mammary gland, and contains nutritional components for the growth and development of infants. Milk can reduce inflammation of the intestine, for example, necrotizing enterocolitis [1, 2]. Both human milk and cow’s milk lower tissue injury and even mortality in chemically induced endotoxemia models [3]. Further support for the anti-inflammatory activity of milk is based on in vitro studies. For example, pre-term human milk suppresses TNFα-induced inflammation in intestinal epithelial cells [4], while casein hydrolysate and its peptide-enriched fractions reduce the inflammatory response in Caco-2 cells and porcine colonic explants [5]. Whey protein hydrolysates decrease IL8 secretion in LPS-stimulated respiratory epithelial cells [6]. However, it is unknown if the anti-inflammatory effect of milk is independent of the target cells. If this is so, it is reasonable to suggest that milk exerts its anti-inflammatory effect in models representing inflammation of the oral cavity.

Fermentation causes the denaturation of casein, and changes the rheological properties of yoghurt, sour milk, and buttermilk [7]. Pasteurization usually occurs at approximately 72 °C for 15 s [8] and for the preparation of yoghurt, milk is heated to 80 °C to 95 °C for 10 to 30 min [9, 10]. Powdered milk is heated to 160 °C or higher [11]. On the other hand, for the production of cheese, casein is cleaved by rennet extract, or by enzymes derived from plants, fungi, and microbial sources [12]. What remains from milk after coagulation are the whey serum proteins. Whey attenuates inflammation-induced intestinal injury by improving mucosal barrier function [13]. Yoghurt has an anti-inflammatory activity in humans with inflammatory bowel disease, and in experimentally induced inflammatory bowel disease in mice. [14, 15] Yoghurt can also prevent Candida albicans-induced mucosal inflammation and proliferation in the forestomach of diabetic rats [16]. The question arises as to whether powdered milk and fermented milk products induce an anti-inflammatory response in oral cells?

Gingival fibroblast and oral epithelial cells are suitable to use for in vitro models to study the possible anti-inflammatory role of milk and its fermented products [17, 18]. With this bioassay, these cells were exposed to aqueous fractions of cow’s milk and human milk, as well as fermented milk products with and without IL1 and TNFα. Usually, the cells responded with an increased production of cytokines including IL1, IL6, and IL8. The question arises as to whether this inflammatory response can be attenuated by aqueous fractions of milk, fermented milk products, and powdered milk. The aim of the present study was to determine the anti-inflammatory role of milk and milk products, with bioassays relevant for oral health, particularly oral mucositis in patients suffering from radiation [19], chemotherapy [20], and chronic inflammatory disorders such as Crohn’s disease [21], periodontitis, and peri-implantitis.

Material and methods

Human milk, cow’s milk, fermented milk products, and cells

Human milk samples were collected at the Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Neonatology, of the Medical University of Vienna. Mother’s milk was prepared in daily totals for premature babies and delivered to the feeding stations. Three leftover residual amounts, which had been thawed and could not be refrozen, were used for the present study. No mother donated the milk for the study purpose by primary intension (Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Vienna Nr. 1021/2017). Human milk was centrifuged at 20,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. One aliquot was heated up to 85 °C for 1 h before freezing. For cow’s milk, three different batches of pasteurized cow’s milk (Billa Bergbauern Heumilch; Spar Halbfett Milch; Hofer Milfina Halbfett Milch), yoghurt (Ja Natürlich Naturjoghurt; Clever Joghurt; Nöm Naturjoghurt), sour milk (Hofer Milfina Sauermilch; Nöm Sauermilch; Schärdinger Sauermilch), buttermilk (Ja Natürlich Buttermilch Natur; Clever Buttermilch; Spar free from Buttermilch), and whey (Lattella Naturmolke; Clever Fruchtmolke; Spar free from Molke) were pooled and centrifuged, and then the aqueous fractions were stored at − 20 °C until testing. For powdered milk, three different batches (Aptamil, Milupa; Babylove, dm; Combiotik, Hipp) were reconstituted and pooled prior to centrifugation. Samples were subjected to not more than two freeze-thaw cycles.

Primary gingival fibroblasts and HSC2 cells

Human gingival fibroblasts were prepared from explant cultures of three independent donors after approval of the Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK Nr. 631/2007). The epithelial cell line HSC2 was kindly provided by Prof. Rausch-Fan, Department of Periodontology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C in a growth medium consisting of DMEM, 10% fetal calf serum, and 1% antibiotics (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were plated in growth medium at 30,000 cells/cm2 into culture dishes. The following day, cells were exposed to 5% aqueous fractions of the respective preparations for 1 h before adding human IL-1β and TNFα (ProSpec-Tany TechnoGene Ltd., Rehovot, Israel), both at 5 ng/ml in growth medium. After 24 h, gene expression analysis was performed and supernatant was collected for immunoassays.

qRT-PCR analysis and immunoassay

Total RNA was isolated with the ExtractMe total RNA kit (Blirt S.A., Gdańsk, Poland). Reverse transcription was performed with SensiFAST™ cDNA (Bioline, London, UK). Polymerase chain reaction was done with the SensiFAST™ SYBR ROX Kit (Bioline) on a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (both Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA). Primer sequences are hIL1_F CTGATGGCCCTAAACAGATGAAGT, hIL1_R AGCCCTTGCTGTAGTGGTGGT; hIL6_F AATTCGGTACATCCTCGACGG, hIL6_R GGGCATGGATTTCAGACCC; hIL8_F AACTTCTCCACAACCCTCTG, hIL8_R TTGGCAGCCTTCCTGATTTC; hGAPDH_F AAGCCACATCGCTCAGACAC, hGAPDH_R GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC. The mRNA levels were calculated by normalizing to the housekeeping gene GAPDH using the ΔΔCt method after exponential expression transformation. For the immunoassay, the human IL6 and IL8 Quantikine ELISA kit was used (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

Statistical analysis

ANOVA testing comparing the mean rank of each treatment group with the mean rank of the untreated control group, followed by an uncorrected Fischer’s LSD post hoc test, was performed. The P values are indicated in the respective figures.

Results

Human milk and cow’s milk suppress induced inflammation in gingival fibroblasts

The aqueous fractions of fresh-frozen human milk, pasteurized human milk, and pasteurized cow’s milk all lowered the inflammatory response of gingival fibroblasts exposed to IL1 and TNFα. The reduction in gene expression was at least 40% in fibroblasts treated with IL1 and TNFα (Fig. 1). Dose-response experiments indicated that even 0.1% pasteurized human milk has an anti-inflammatory effect on an in vitro model (data not shown). Further support for the reduced inflammatory response comes from immunoassays showing that IL6 and IL8 in the supernatant reduced inflammation when gingival fibroblasts were exposed to 5% fresh-frozen human milk, pasteurized human milk, and pasteurized cow’s milk (Table 1). Together, these findings indicate that milk induces an anti-inflammatory activity in an in vitro setting when gingival fibroblasts are stimulated with IL1 and TNFα.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Human milk and cow’s milk suppress induced inflammation in gingival fibroblasts. Gingival fibroblasts were exposed to a fresh-frozen human milk, b pasteurized human milk, and c pasteurized cow’s milk with and without IL-1 and TNFα. Data are indicated as a percent of gene expression changes compared to control fibroblasts treated with inflammatory factors. P values are indicated in the graphs

Table 1 Human milk and cow’s milk suppress induced IL6 production in gingival fibroblasts. Gingival fibroblasts were exposed to fresh-frozen human milk, pasteurized human milk, and pasteurized cow’s milk with and without IL1 and TNFα. P values represent a paired t test compared to the IL1/TNFα group. MM human milk, HMM pasteurized human milk, CM pasteurized cow’s milk

Fermented milk products and powdered milk reduce IL1-TNFα-induced inflammation in gingival fibroblasts

Aqueous fractions of pooled yoghurt, sour milk, buttermilk, and whey each reduced the inflammatory response of gingival fibroblasts exposed to IL1 and TNFα. The decrease in gene expression was at least 50% of the positive control in gingival fibroblasts (Fig. 2). Moreover, 5% powdered milk from three independent manufacturers caused a substantial reduction of at least 70% in the inflammatory response of gingival fibroblasts exposed to IL1 and TNFα (Fig. 3). Collectively, these data suggest that not only fermented milk products but also powdered milk maintain the anti-inflammatory activity of milk in a model using gingival fibroblasts.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Fermented milk products reduce IL1-TNFα-induced inflammation in gingival fibroblasts. Gingival fibroblasts were exposed to aqueous fractions of a pooled yoghurt, b sour milk, c buttermilk, and d whey with and without IL1 and TNFα. Data indicate a percentage of gene expression changes compared to control fibroblasts treated with inflammatory factors. P values are indicated in the graphs

Fig. 3
figure 3

Sprayed dried milk reduces IL1-TNFα-induced inflammation in gingival fibroblasts. Gingival fibroblasts were exposed to aqueous fractions of sprayed dried milk with and without IL1 and TNFα. Data indicate a percentage of gene expression changes compared to control fibroblasts treated with inflammatory factors. P values are indicated in the graphs

Human milk and cow’s milk suppress IL1-TNFα-induced inflammation in human epithelial cells

When the human oral epithelial cell line HSC2 was exposed to IL1 and TNFα, fresh-frozen human milk, pasteurized human milk, and pasteurized cow’s milk once again lowered the inflammatory response. The reduction in gene expression was at least 40% in the respective positive control fibroblasts treated with IL1 and TNFα (Fig. 4). Thus, the aqueous fractions of fresh-frozen human milk, pasteurized human milk, and pasteurized cow’s milk also hold an anti-inflammatory potential in oral epithelial cells.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Human and cow’s milk suppress IL1-TNFα-induced inflammation in human epithelial cells. HSC2 human epithelial cells were exposed to a fresh-frozen human milk, b pasteurized human milk, and c pasteurized cow’s milk with and without IL1 and TNFα. Data indicate a percentage of gene expression changes compared to control fibroblasts treated with inflammatory factors. P values are indicated in the graphs

Fermented milk products and powdered milk reduce IL1-TNFα-induced inflammation in human epithelial cells

As observed with gingival fibroblasts, a 5% aqueous fraction of pooled yoghurt, sour milk, buttermilk, and whey reduced the inflammatory response of the human epithelial cell line HSC2 exposed to IL1 and TNFα. The reduction in expression of inflammatory genes was at least 30% in the HSC2 cells treated with IL1 and TNFα (Fig. 5). Likewise, powdered milk from three companies caused a significant decrease of at least 30% in the inflammatory response of HSC2 cells exposed to IL1 and TNFα (Fig. 6). These observations suggest that fermented milk products as well as powdered milk have an anti-inflammatory activity in vitro when using human epithelial cells (Table 2).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Fermented milk products reduce IL1-TNFα-induced inflammation in human epithelial cells. HSC2 human epithelial cells were exposed to aqueous fractions of a pooled yoghurt, b sour milk, c buttermilk, and d whey with and without IL1 and TNFα. Data indicate a percent of gene expression changes compared to control fibroblasts treated with inflammatory factors. P values are indicated in the graphs

Fig. 6
figure 6

Powdered milk products reduce IL1-TNFα-induced inflammation in human epithelial cells. HSC2 human epithelial cells were exposed to aqueous fractions of powdered milk with and without IL1 and TNFα. Data indicate a percent of gene expression changes compared to control fibroblasts treated with inflammatory factors. P values are indicated in the graphs

Table 2 Human milk and cow’s milk suppress IL1-TNFα-induced IL8 production in gingival fibroblasts. Gingival fibroblasts were exposed to fresh-frozen human milk, pasteurized human milk, and pasteurized cow’s milk with and without IL1 and TNFα. No statistical analysis was performed. MM human milk, HMM pasteurized human milk, CM pasteurized cow’s milk

Discussion

Oral mucositis is a critical issue in patients exposed to radiation [19] and/or chemotherapy [20], and in those with chronic inflammatory disorders such as Crohn’s disease [21], periodontitis, and peri-implantitis. Today’s anti-inflammatory strategies include antibiotics, as well as oral mouth rinses supplemented with chlorhexidine [22] and other pharmacological compounds [23]. These potent therapies, however, have side effects and should be restricted to a limited time period [24]. Consequently, there is a growing demand for anti-inflammatory strategies to complement the range of traditional pharmacological therapies. These are based on natural components such as propolis [25], green tea [26], and aloe vera [27]. The possible anti-inflammatory effect of milk and related products for the oral cavity has not been considered so far, even though there is strong evidence that milk can reduce inflammation of the intestine [1, 2]. The main finding of the present study was that pasteurized human milk and pasteurized cow’s milk, as well as also yoghurt, buttermilk, sour milk, whey, and dry milk reduce the inflammatory response of gingival fibroblasts and oral epithelial cells exposed to IL1 and TNFα.

Questions arising are related to the ranking of the tested compounds. In this way, a clinician would have a better idea which dairy products were most effective at lowering inflammation The present study, however, was exploratory, meaning that it was not our intension to compare the anti-inflammatory activity of the various preparations; hence, the study is underpowered for this purpose and the variation between the experiments was rather high, likely because of the variation caused by the primary cells and variations between the different batches within one group. Nevertheless, we did a nonparametric comparison of all seven groups and failed to reach the level of significance. Hence, it requires a more controlled setting to determine possible differences in the anti-inflammatory activity of the groups investigated.

If we relate these findings to those of other researchers, the results are consistent with observations in different in vitro systems. For example, pre-term human milk suppresses TNF-induced inflammation in intestinal epithelial cells [4]. All other in vitro studies focus on fractions of milk such as hydrolysate to reduce the inflammatory response of TNFα-challenged colon cancer cells and LPS-challenged porcine colonic explants [5]. Moreover, whey protein hydrolysates decrease IL8 secretion in LPS-stimulated respiratory epithelial cells [6]. Thus, there is moderate knowledge of the in vitro anti-inflammatory activity of milk and related products, even though there is strong evidence from pre-clinical research and clinical studies that milk prevents enterocolitis [1]. The present in vitro research therefore advances current knowledge based on intestinal epithelial cells, adding further support for the anti-inflammatory activity of milk and related products in oral gingival fibroblasts and a human oral epithelial cell line.

The underlying molecular mechanism responsible for the anti-inflammatory effect of milk and its respective products remains open. Considering that casein and whey hydrolysates display an anti-inflammatory effect on colon and respiratory epithelial cells [5, 6], together with our findings based on fermented milk products and even powdered milk (the latter being heated up to 160 °C) [11], it is likely that a milk component which resists heating and fermentation is responsible for the anti-inflammatory activity in the various cell types. Soluble TNFα receptors IL1Ra neutralizing the bioactivity of the respective cytokines [28, 29] are present in milk but are presumably not that heat stable to exert the anti-inflammatory activity of powdered milk.

Human milk oligosaccharides have an anti-inflammatory effect and are resistant to pasteurization and freeze-drying [30]. They are highly abundant in milk besides lactose, fat, and proteins. There is an existing hypothesis that milk oligosaccharides reduce the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants [31, 32]. Moreover, milk oligosaccharides can suppress inflammation in colonic epithelial cells [33] and trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid-induced colitis in rats [34]. Milk oligosaccharides also reduce E. coli-induced interleukin IL8 release by intestinal epithelial cells [35]. It is likely that milk and its respective products exert their anti-inflammatory effect possibly independent of the target cell for IL1 and TNFα. What also remains to be clarified in future research is whether milk neutralizes IL1 and TNFα, and consequently prevents the binding to the respective receptors, or if it activates the anti-inflammatory mechanism that suppresses activation of the inflammosome [36].

The clinical relevance of the present data remains at the level of speculation. Even though in vitro, milk, fermented milk products, and powdered milk possess a potent anti-inflammatory effect, as to whether this observation can be applied to patients suffering from oral mucositis is questionable. Epidemiological research into the association between the intake of yoghurt and the incidence of periodontitis, in a nationally representative sample of Korean adults, conflicts with this proposition [37]. Recent systematic reviews on the protective effect of breastfeeding with respect to malocclusion and caries raise a possible role of milk in oral health, but not with a focus on inflammation [38]. Again, the pre-clinical and the clinical data supporting milk in preventing enterocolitis only serve as a basis for a hypothesis on the possible anti-inflammatory activity of milk in the oral cavity.