Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward location-aware Web: extraction method, applications and evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Location-based services (LBS) belong to one of the most popular types of services today. However, a recurring issue is that most of the content in LBS has to be created from scratch and needs to be explicitly tagged to locations, which makes existing Web content not directly usable for LBS. In this paper, we aim at making Web sites location-aware and feed this information to LBS. Our approach toward location-aware Web is threefold: First, we present a location extraction method: SALT. It receives Web sites as input and equips them with location tags. Compared to other approaches, SALT is capable of extracting locations with a precision up to the street level. Performance evaluations further show high applicability for practice. Second, we present three applications for SALT: Webnear.me, Local Browsing and Local Facebook. Webnear.me offers location-aware Web surfing through a mobile Web site and a smartphone app. Local Browsing adds the feature to browse by nearby tags, extracted from Web sites delivered by SALT. Local Facebook extends location tagging to social networks, allowing to run SALT on one’s own and one’s friends’ timeline. Finally, we evaluate SALT for technology acceptance of Webnear.me through a formative user study. Through real user data, collected during a 3 months pilot field deployment of Webnear.me, we assess whether SALT is a proper instance of “location of a Web site”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://googleblog.blogspot.ch/2008/07/we-knew-web-was-big.html.

References

  1. Opera standards for geocoding (2009) Location-based publishing and services. http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/location-based-publishing-and-services/

  2. Gartner identifies 10 consumer mobile applications to watch in 2012 (2010). http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1544815

  3. Agichtein E, Brill E, Dumais S (2006) Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In: proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR ’06, pp 19–26 ACM, New York, NY, USA. doi:10.1145/1148170.1148177

  4. Aho AV, Corasick MJ (1975) Efficient string matching: an aid to bibliographic search. Commun ACM 18(6):333–340

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Odon de Alencar R, Davis Jr C, Gonçalves M (2010) Geographical classification of documents using evidence from wikipedia. In: proceedings of the 6th Workshop on geographic information retrieval, p 12. ACM

  6. Amitay E, Har’El N, Sivan R, Soffer A (2004) Web-a-where: geotagging web content. In: proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference onresearch and development in information retrieval, pp 273–280. ACM

  7. Anastácio I, Martins B, Calado P (2010) Using the geographic scopes of web documents for contextual advertising. In: proceedings of the 6th workshop on geographic information retrieval, p 18. ACM

  8. Dao D, Rizos C, Wang J (2002) Location-based services: technical and business issues. Gps Solut 6(3):169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis F (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q, pp 319–340

  10. Hess B, Gasimov A, Sutanto J (2011) A universal approach that makes legacy online content location-based. In: proceedings of the 10th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia, pp 127–133. ACM

  11. Hess B, Magagna F, Sutanto J (2012) Discovering the web by location with webnear.me. In: proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on ubiquitous computing, UbiComp ’12, pp 538–538. ACM, New York, NY, USA. doi:10.1145/2370216.2370298

  12. Hill L (2000) Core elements of digital gazetteers: placenames, categories, and footprints. Res Adv Technol Digit Libr pp 280–290

  13. Lakhina A, Byers J, Crovella M, Matta I (2003) On the geographic location of internet resources. Sel Areas Commun IEEE J 21(6):934–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leveling J, Hartrumpf S, Veiel D (2006) Using semantic networks for geographic information retrieval. In: Peters C et al. (eds) Accessing multilingual information repositories, pp 977–986. Springer, Berlin. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F11878773_109

  15. Lieberman M, Samet H, Sankaranayananan J (2010) Geotagging: using proximity, sibling, and prominence clues to understand comma groups. In: proceedings of the 6th workshop on geographic information retrieval, p 6. ACM

  16. Magagna F, Hess B, Sutanto J (2012) Building location-aware web with salt and webnear.me. Procedia Comput Sci 10:601–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Markowetz A, Chen Y, Suel T, Long X, Seeger B (2005) Design and implementation of a geographic search engine. In: 8th international workshop on the web and databases (WebDB)

  18. McCurley KS (2001) Geospatial mapping and navigation of the web. In: proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, pp 221–229. ACM, Hong Kong. doi:10.1145/371920.372056

  19. Morimoto Y, Aono M, Houle M, McCurley K (2003) Extracting spatial knowledge from the web. In: applications and the internet, 2003. Proceedings. 2003 Symposium on, pp 326–333. IEEE

  20. Qin T, Xiao R, Fang L, Xie X, Zhang L (2010) An efficient location extraction algorithm by leveraging web contextual information. In: proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, pp 53–60. ACM

  21. Quercini G, Samet H, Sankaranarayanan J, Lieberman M (2010) Determining the spatial reader scopes of news sources using local lexicons. In: proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, pp 43–52. ACM

  22. Teevan J, Dumais ST, Horvitz E (2005) Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities. In: proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR ’05, pp 449–456. ACM, New York, NY, USA. doi:10.1145/1076034.1076111

  23. Teevan J, Karlson A, Amini S, Brush AJB, Krumm J (2011) Understanding the importance of location, time, and people in mobile local search behavior. In: proceedings of the 13th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, MobileHCI ’11, pp 77–80. ACM, New York, NY, USA. doi:10.1145/2037373.2037386

  24. Tobin R, Grover C, Byrne K, Reid J, Walsh J (2010) Evaluation of georeferencing. In: proceedings of the 6th workshop on geographic information retrieval, p 7. ACM

  25. Tseng V, Lin K (2006) Efficient mining and prediction of user behavior patterns in mobile web systems. Inf Softw technol 48(6):357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Virrantaus K, Markkula J, Garmash A, Terziyan V, Veijalainen J, Katanosov A, Tirri H (2001) Developing gis-supported location-based services. In: web information systems engineering. Proceedings of the second international conference on, vol 2, pp 66–75. IEEE

  27. Zubizarreta Á, de la Fuente P, Cantera J, Arias M, Cabrero J, García G, Llamas C, Vegas J (2009) Extracting geographic context from the web: georeferencing in mymose. In: Boughanem M et al (eds) Advances in information retrieval, Lecture notes in Computer Science, vol 5478. Springer, Berlin, pp 554–561

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Sebastian Wendland, Samuel Zihlmann and Dominik Bucher for the design and implementation of the Local Browsing application, as well as Thomas Bürli and Benjamin de Capitani for implementing a prototype of SALT. Further the authors thank Mihai Grigore for his help in proofreading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ETH Zürich, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland

    Basil Hess, Fabio Magagna & Juliana Sutanto

Authors
  1. Basil Hess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabio Magagna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juliana Sutanto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basil Hess.

Additional information

This paper is an extended and revised version of [16].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hess, B., Magagna, F. & Sutanto, J. Toward location-aware Web: extraction method, applications and evaluation. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18, 1047–1060 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0718-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0718-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation