Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of repair between cartilage and osteocartilage defects in rabbits using similarly manipulated scaffold-free cartilage-like constructs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

Articular cartilage has a limited capacity for spontaneous repair, and its repair remains a clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to prepare scaffold-free cartilage-like constructs and evaluate the feasibility of their use for the treatment of cartilage and osteocartilage defects in vivo.

Methods

The scaffold-free constructs were prepared by chondrocytes isolated from the articular cartilage of rabbits using a high-density three-dimensional culture system. Two different defects, i.e., a chondral defect without oozing blood and an osteochondral defect with oozing blood, of 4-mm diameter, were created on the patellar groove of rabbits and forwarded to in vivo trials. In each defect, the constructs cut into 4-mm-diameter cylinders were grafted at the bottom of the defects. As a control, defects were only made on the contralateral knee joint in each rabbit. At 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after surgery, six rabbits in each group were evaluated macroscopically and histologically.

Results

In vitro, histological examination revealed that the constructs have the character of hyaline cartilage with a potential adhesiveness to surrounding tissue. In vivo, in two control groups, incomplete spontaneous cartilage repair was observed in the osteochondral defects, whereas no repair was observed in the chondral defects. In the two treated groups, the surviving constructs in chondral defects showed significantly better repair compared to those in osteochondral defects.

Conclusions

It is possible for a chondral defect to be repaired by scaffold-free constructs in certain conditions. Establishing the optimal environment suitable for cartilage repair is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benya PD, Shaffer JD. Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels. Cell. 1982;30:215–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buschmann MD, Gluzband YA, Grodzinsky AJ, Kimura JH, Hunziker EB. Chondrocytes in agarose culture synthesize a mechanically functional extracellular matrix. J Orthop Res. 1992;10:745–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Takahashi T, Ogasawara T, Asawa Y, Mori Y, Uchinuma E, Takato T, Hoshi K. Three-dimensional microenvironments retain chondrocyte phenotypes during proliferation culture. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:1583–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20:86–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Badylak SF, Gilbert TW. Immune response to biologic scaffold materials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20:109–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mainil-Varlet P, Rieser F, Grogan S, Mueller W, Saager C, Jakob RP. Articular cartilage repair using a tissue-engineered cartilage-like implant: an animal study. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2001;9 Suppl A:S6–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uenaka K, Imai S, Ando K, Matsusue Y. Relation of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound to the cell density of scaffold-free cartilage in a high-density static semi-open culture system. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15:816–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Freed LE, Martin I, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Frontiers in tissue engineering. In vitro modulation of chondrogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367 Suppl:S46–58.

  9. Kumagai K, Saito T, Koshino T. Articular cartilage repair of rabbit chondral defect: promoted by creation of periarticular bony defect. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8:700–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schaefer D, Martin I, Jundt G, Seidel J, Heberer M, Grodzinsky A, Bergin I, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Freed LE. Tissue-engineered composites for the repair of large osteochondral defects. Arthr Rheum. 2002;46:2524–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wei X, Gao J, Messner K. Maturation-dependent repair of untreated osteochondral defects in the rabbit knee joint. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;34:63–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wakitani S, Goto T, Pineda SJ, Young RG, Mansour JM, Caplan AI, Goldberg VM. Mesenchymal cell-based repair of large, full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:579–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsuda H, Kitamura N, Kurokawa T, Arakaki K, Gong JP, Kanaya F, Yasuda K. Influence of the gel thickness on in vivo hyaline cartilage regeneration induced by double-network gel implanted at the bottom of a large osteochondral defect: short-term results. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mankin HJ. Localization of tritiated thymidine in articular cartilage of rabbits II. Repair in immature cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg. 1962;44:688–98.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shapiro F, Koide S, Glimcher MJ. Cell origin and differentiation in the repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:532–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Woo SL, Buckwalter JA. AAOS/NIH/ORS workshop. Injury and repair of the musculoskeletal soft tissues. Savannah, Georgia, June 18–20, 1987. J Orthop Res. 1988;6:907–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin L, Zhou C, Wei X, Hou Y, Zhao L, Fu X, Zhang J, Yu C. Articular cartilage repair using dedifferentiated articular chondrocytes and bone morphogenetic protein 4 in a rabbit model of articular cartilage defects. Arthr Rheum. 2008;58:1067–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boopalan PR, Arumugam S, Livingston A, Mohanty M, Chittaranjan S. Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy results in healing of full thickness articular cartilage defect. Int Orthop. 2011;35:143–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang W, Li B, Li Y, Jiang Y, Ouyang H, Gao C. In vivo restoration of full-thickness cartilage defects by poly(lactide-co-glycolide) sponges filled with fibrin gel, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and DNA complexes. Biomaterials. 2010;31:5953–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Okano T, Yamada N, Sakai H, Sakurai Y. A novel recovery system for cultured cells using plasma-treated polystyrene dishes grafted with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:1243–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Buckwalter JA. Articular cartilage: injuries and potential for healing. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28:192–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen J, Maniwa S, Ochi M. Influence of trypsin on the biological bonding of cartilaginous surface to bone in rabbits. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:587–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brehm W, Aklin B, Yamashita T, Rieser F, Trüb T, Jakob RP, Mainil-Varlet P. Repair of superficial osteochondral defects with an autologous scaffold-free cartilage construct in a caprine model: implantation method and short-term results. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2006;14:1214–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marlovits S, Striessnig G, Kutscha-Lissberg F, Resinger C, Aldrian SM, Vécsei V, Trattnig S. Early postoperative adherence of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:451–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ho ST, Hutmacher DW, Ekaputra AK, Hitendra D, Hui JH. The evaluation of a biphasic osteochondral implant coupled with an electrospun membrane in a large animal model. Tissue Eng Part. 2010;16:1123–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schreiber RE, Ilten-Kirby BM, Dunkelman NS, Symons KT, Rekettye LM, Willoughby J, Ratcliffe A. Repair of osteochondral defects with allogeneic tissue engineered cartilage implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367 Suppl:S382–95.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Yoko Uratani for her technical assistance and thank Takefumi Yamamoto (Central Research Laboratory, Shiga University of Medical Science) for technical support regarding histological examinations. We also thank Drs. Mitsuhiko Kubo and Fumiyoshi Kojima for their advice.

Conflict of interest

We did not have any financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) our work. Neither we nor a member of our immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization related to the authors or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuhiro Oda.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oda, K., Mori, K., Imai, S. et al. Comparison of repair between cartilage and osteocartilage defects in rabbits using similarly manipulated scaffold-free cartilage-like constructs. J Orthop Sci 19, 637–645 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0574-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0574-7

Keywords

Navigation