Skip to main content
Log in

Locking plate fixation for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a critical analysis of 135 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Purpose

The overall incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) is between 0.1 and 6 % of all total hip arthroplasties. Locking compression plates (LCP) have been used for the treatment of Vancouver B1 PPFs with variable results. The aim of this study is to examine the literature on locking plate failure rates, mode and reasons for failure.

Methodology

A literature search was conducted for studies reporting the management of PPF of the femur with LCP fixation. The primary medical search engines used for the study were Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to August 2012.

Results

Twelve studies were identified, reporting overall union rates of 91 % in 135 fractures. Only 7 (5 %) fractures required revision surgery due to plate fracture (5) or pull out (2). Important trends in plate complications included: stress riser at the end of the plate, stress concentration in the fracture area due to rigid fixation, early loading and absence of cortical strut grafting for biological support when needed.

Conclusion

LCP has been used successfully in the management of Vancouver B1 PPF. However, potential areas of improvement include, leaving the fracture site free of locking screws, therefore, not disturbing the soft tissue envelope around the fracture and also reducing plate stiffness. Adding cortical strut allografts to improve stability and bone quality, if needed, may also improve outcome. Limitations in the use of strut grafts or transverse fractures below the tip of the stem that cannot be controlled with single or double plating may require long stem revision to achieve axial stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tsiridis E, Pavlou G, Venkatesh R, Bobak P, Gie G. Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty: current concepts in their management. Hip Int. 2009;19(2):75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kingdom, N.J.R.U., 2009/2010.

  3. Berry DJ. Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(2):183–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan CP, Masri BA. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:293–304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury. 2003;34(Suppl 2):B63–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bottlang M, Doornink J, Fitzpatrick DC, Madey SM. Far cortical locking can reduce stiffness of locked plating constructs while retaining construct strength. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1985–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moazen M, Jones AC, Jin Z, Wilcox RK, Tsiridis E. Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: a review of biomechanical testing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26(1):13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khalid M, Theivendran K, Cheema M, Rajaratnam V, Deshmukh SC. Biomechanical comparison of pull-out force of unicortical versus bicortical screws in proximal phalanges of the hand: a human cadaveric study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23(9):1136–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chakravarthy J, Bansal R, Cooper J. Locking plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver Type B1 and Type C periprosthetic fractures of femur: a report on 12 patients. Injury. 2007;38(6):725–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anakwe RE, Aitken SA, Khan LA. Osteoporotic periprosthetic fractures of the femur in elderly patients: outcome after fixation with the LISS plate. Injury. 2008;39(10):1191–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bryant GK, Morshed S, Agel J, Henley MB, Barei DP, Taitsman LA. Isolated locked compression plating for Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury. 2009;40(11):1180–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Buttaro MA, Farfalli G, Paredes Núñez M, Comba F, Piccaluga F. Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1964–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ebraheim NA, Gomez C, Ramineni SK, Liu J. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures adjacent to a well-fixed femoral stem with reversed distal femoral locking plate. J Trauma. 2009;66(4):1152–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaab MJ, Stöckle U, Schütz M, Stefansky J, Perka C, Haas NP. Stabilisation of periprosthetic fractures with angular stable internal fixation: a report of 13 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126(2):105–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobbe P, Klemm R, Reilmann H, Hockertz TJ. Less invasive stabilisation system (LISS) for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: a 3-year follow-up. Injury. 2008;39(4):472–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar V, Kanabar P, Owen PJ, Rushton N. Less invasive stabilization system for the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2008;23(3):446–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Toole RV, Kanabar P, Owen PJ, Rushton N. Low complication rate of LISS for femur fractures adjacent to stable hip or knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450:203–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ricci WM, Bolhofner BR, Loftus T, Cox C, Mitchell S, Borrelli J Jr. Indirect reduction and plate fixation, without grafting, for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures about a stable intramedullary implant. Surg Technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88 Suppl 1 Pt 2:275–82.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schutz M, Krettek C, Höntzsch D, Regazzoni P, Ganz R, Haas N. Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury. 2001;32 Suppl 3:SC48–54.

  20. Wood GC, Naudie DR, McAuley J, McCalden RW. Locking compression plates for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed total hip and knee implants. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(6):886–92. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.002.

  21. Xue H, Tu Y, Cai M, Yang A. Locking compression plate and cerclage band for type b1 periprosthetic femoral fractures preliminary results at average 30-month follow-up. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(3):467–71.e1. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.031.

  22. Pavlou G, Panteliadis P, Macdonald D, Timperley JA, Gie G, Bancroft G, Tsiridis E. A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures—stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures. Hip Int. 2011;21(1):21–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lujan TJ, Henderson CE, Madey SM, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL, Bottlang M. Locked plating of distal femur fractures leads to inconsistent and asymmetric callus formation. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(3):156–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(8):1093–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gächter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP—how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Injury. 2003;34(Suppl 2):B11–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS, Candal-Couto J, Green S, Hui AC. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability? Injury. 2007;38(3):358–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bellapianta J, Dow K, Pallotta NA, Hospodar PP, Uhl RL, Ledet EH. Threaded screw head inserts improve locking plate biomechanical properties. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(2):65–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Uhthoff HK, Poitras P, Backman DS. Internal plate fixation of fractures: short history and recent developments. J Orthop Sci. 2006;11(2):118–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Masri BA. Duncan CP. Structural proximal femoral allografts for failed total hip replacements: a minimum review of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(6):830–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Noordeen MH, Lavy CB, Shergill NS, Tuite JD, Jackson AM. Cyclical micromovement and fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77(4):645–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon M. Graham.

About this article

Cite this article

Graham, S.M., Moazen, M., Leonidou, A. et al. Locking plate fixation for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a critical analysis of 135 cases. J Orthop Sci 18, 426–436 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0359-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0359-4

Keywords

Navigation