Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term safety and effectiveness of denosumab in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: 3-year post-marketing surveillance study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Denosumab is a humanized IgG2 monoclonal antibody that was approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan in 2013. This study aimed to investigate the long-term safety and effectiveness of denosumab in Japanese patients with osteoporosis in daily clinical practice.

Materials and methods

This 3-year, prospective, observational, post-marketing study included patients who initiated treatment with denosumab (60 mg/6 months) for osteoporosis. Data were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Key endpoints were adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), occurrence of osteoporotic fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone turnover markers. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify predictors of hypocalcaemia and percent change in BMD.

Results

Overall, 3534 patients were assessed (mean 75.7 years; 89.8% women). In total, 298 patients (8.4%) developed ADRs; the most common was hypocalcaemia (3.9%). Hypocalcaemia risk was significantly increased in patients with creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, no prior use of bisphosphonates, prior use of calcium and vitamin D preparations, baseline serum calcium < 8.5 mg/dL, and no concomitant use of calcium or vitamin D preparations. Six patients had adjudicated osteonecrosis of the jaw. Lumbar spine BMD increased significantly from baseline (mean percent change: 11.4% at 36 months). All bone turnover markers decreased significantly from baseline. Over 3 years, 3.3% of patients developed a new osteoporotic fracture.

Conclusions

This study confirmed the long-term safety and effectiveness of denosumab in Japanese patients with osteoporosis in daily clinical practice. No new safety signals were identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Black DM, Rosen CJ (2016) Clinical practice. Postmenopausal Osteoporos N Engl J Med 374:254–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Orimo H, Nakamura T, Hosoi T, Iki M, Uenishi K, Endo N, Ohta H, Shiraki M, Sugimoto T, Suzuki T, Soen S, Nishizawa Y, Hagino H, Fukunaga M, Fujiwara S (2012) Japanese 2011 guidelines for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis—executive summary. Arch Osteoporos 7:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rachner TD, Khosla S, Hofbauer LC (2011) Osteoporosis: now and the future. Lancet 377:1276–1287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kitamura S, Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S, Sasaki R, Iwata H, Wingstrand H, Thorngren KG (1998) Functional outcome after hip fracture in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 348:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iki M (2012) Epidemiology of osteoporosis in Japan (in Japanese). Clin Calcium 22:797–803

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. International Osteoporosis Foundation (2009) The Asian Audit: epidemiology, costs and burden of osteoporosis in Asia 2009. https://www.iofbonehealth.org/sites/default/files/PDFs/Audit%20Asia/Asian_regional_audit_2009.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2020

  8. Lacey DL, Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Kostenuik PJ, Dougall WC, Sullivan JK, San Martin J, Dansey R (2012) Bench to bedside: elucidation of the OPG-RANK-RANKL pathway and the development of denosumab. Nat Rev Drug Discov 11:401–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bekker PJ, Holloway DL, Rasmussen AS, Murphy R, Martin SW, Leese PT, Holmes GB, Dunstan CR, DePaoli AM (2004) A single-dose placebo-controlled study of AMG 162, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 19:1059–1066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McClung MR (2006) Inhibition of RANKL as a treatment for osteoporosis: preclinical and early clinical studies. Curr Osteoporos Rep 4:28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C (2009) Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 361:756–765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamura T, Matsumoto T, Sugimoto T, Hosoi T, Miki T, Gorai I, Yoshikawa H, Tanaka Y, Tanaka S, Sone T, Nakano T, Ito M, Matsui S, Yoneda T, Takami H, Watanabe K, Osakabe T, Shiraki M, Fukunaga M (2014) Clinical trials express: fracture risk reduction with denosumab in Japanese postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis: denosumab fracture intervention randomized placebo controlled trial (DIRECT). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:2599–2607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bone HG, Wagman RB, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Chapurlat R et al (2017) 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 5:513–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sugimoto T, Matsumoto T, Hosoi T, Miki T, Gorai I et al (2015) Three-year denosumab treatment in postmenopausal Japanese women and men with osteoporosis: results from a 1-year open-label extension of the Denosumab Fracture Intervention Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial (DIRECT). Osteoporos Int 26:765–774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanaka S, Mizutani H, Tsuruya E, Mochikuzi Y, Kuge K, Okubo N (2018) Safety and efficacy of long-term denosumab treatment in Japanese patients with osteoporosis in daily clinical practice: an interim analysis of a post-marketing surveillance study. Ther Res 39:453–465

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, Goodday R, Aghaloo T, Mehrotra B, O’Ryan F (2014) American association of oral and maxillofacial surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw—2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72:1938–1956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Clopper CJ, Pearson ES (1934) The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 26:404–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Price D, Bateman ED, Chisholm A, Papadopoulos NG, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Pizzichini E, Hillyer EV, Buist AS (2014) Complementing the randomized controlled trial evidence base. Evolution not revolution. Ann Am Thorac Soc 11:S92–S98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McClung MR, Boonen S, Torring O, Roux C, Rizzoli R, Bone HG, Benhamou CL, Lems WF, Minisola S, Halse J, Hoeck HC, Eastell R, Wang A, Siddhanti S, Cummings SR (2012) Effect of denosumab treatment on the risk of fractures in subgroups of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 27:211–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Iidaka T, Muraki S, Akune T, Oka H, Kodama R, Tanaka S, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Yoshimura N (2016) Prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis and its association with hip pain in Japanese men and women: the ROAD study. Osteoarthr Cartil 24:117–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamatari M, Koto S, Ozawa N, Urao C, Suzuki Y, Akasaka E, Yanagimoto K, Sakota K (2007) Factors affecting long-term compliance of osteoporotic patients with bisphosphonate treatment and QOL assessment in actual practice: alendronate and risedronate. J Bone Miner Metab 25:302–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Assael LA, Landesberg R, Marx RE, Mehrotra B (2009) American association of oral and maxillofacial surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws—2009 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are deeply grateful to the investigators and participants of the survey. This study was sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). In addition, the authors would like to thank Go Kuratomi, PhD, and Catherine Rees, of Springer Healthcare Communications, who wrote the outline and the subsequent drafts of this manuscript, respectively, and Sarah Greig, PhD, of Springer Healthcare Communications who assisted with manuscript revisions post-submission. This medical writing assistance was funded by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. This study was sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideki Mizutani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

S. Tanaka received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. H. Mizutani, E. Tsuruya, R. Fukuda, K. Kuge and N. Okubo are employees of Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the Japanese GPSP guidelines. Under these guidelines, the requirement for written informed consent is waived because treatment is in accordance with clinical practice.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 920 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanaka, S., Mizutani, H., Tsuruya, E. et al. Long-term safety and effectiveness of denosumab in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: 3-year post-marketing surveillance study. J Bone Miner Metab 39, 463–473 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-020-01180-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-020-01180-4

Keywords

Navigation