Abstract
Safety of ships and/or offshore structures at sea is increasingly crucial as seaborne activities intensify. However, maintenance and repair of them suffering marine accidents away from shipyards are an often overlooked area, with existing maintenance and/or repair ships either being of limited workshops and facilities or incapable lifting them out of water for underwater engineering. A conceptual design of a self-propelled semi-submersible repair ship is proposed for the first time to facilitate the spot maintenance and repair of damaged ships and/or offshore structures at sea, which is obviously able to reduce the time, costs and risks of transporting them from accident scenes to shipyards onshore. Furthermore, this paper focuses on parametric design and multi-objective optimization problem of this novel equipment. The ratio of deadweight to principal dimensions, working deck area and average daily cost considering marine emissions trading scheme are simultaneously chosen as objectives of this problem. Both the weighted ideal point method and the NSGA-II algorithm are used to obtain the optimization results of a 50 thousand dwt self-propelled semi-submersible repair ship and the relations and differences between the optimization results of two methods are analyzed. The research results indicate that the parametric design and multi-objective optimization method can provide theoretical support for the preliminary design.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clarkson Shipping Intelligence Network (2019) Post-panamax containership 15.000+ TEU contracting numbers. https://www.clarksons.net/n/#/sin/timeseries/browse. Accessed 15 Feb 2020
Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (2019) Safety and Shipping Review 2019. https://www.agcs.allianz.com/news-and-insights/reports/shipping-safety.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2020
Kimber A (2006) Future ship concepts for repair and maintenance at sea. In: The 2nd World maritime technology conference (WMTC2006). The Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology, London UK, pp 1–11
Dev AK, Saha M (2018) Dry-docking time and labour. Int J Marit Eng 160:A337–A379
Celebi UBT, Turan EK (2011) A supply chain management model for shipyards in Turkey. In: 14th International Congress of the International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean (IMAM2011). Int Maritime Assoc Mediterranean, Genova Italy, pp 551–557
Caprace JD, Petcu C, Velarde MG, Rigo P (2013) Optimization of shipyard space allocation and scheduling using a heuristic algorithm. J Mar Sci Technol 18(3):404–417
Christer AH, Lee SK (1997) Modelling ship operational reliability over a mission under regular inspections. J Oper Res Soc 48(7):688–699
Moan T (2005) Reliability-based management of inspection, maintenance and repair of offshore structures. Struct Infrastruct E 1(1):33–62
Wasalaski R, Anderson R, Gant G (2001) The float-on/float-off heavy lift and return home of USS Cole. Nav Eng J 113(3):101–130
Xie XL, Xu DL, Yang JB, Wang J, Ren J, Yu SJ (2008) Ship selection using a multiple-criteria synthesis approach. J Mar Sci Technol 13(01):50–62
Caprace JD, Rigo P (2011) Ship complexity assessment at concept design stage. J Mar Sci Technol 16(1):68–75
Gaspar HM, Rhodes DH, Ross AM, Erikstad SO (2012) Addressing complexity aspects in conceptual ship design: a systems engineering approach. J Ship Prod Des 28(4):145–159
Parsons MG, Scott RL (2004) Formulation of multicriterion design optimization problems for solution with scalar numerical optimization methods. J Ship Res 48(1):61–76
Hart CG, Vlahopoulos N (2009) An integrated multidisciplinary particle swarm optimization approach to conceptual ship design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(3):481–494
Diez M, Peri D (2010) Robust optimization for ship conceptual design. Ocean Eng 37(11):966–977
Yao J, Han D (2013) Improved barebones particle swarm optimization with neighborhood search and its application on ship design. Math Probl Eng 2013:1–12
Veluscek M, Kalganova T, Broomhead P, Grichnik A (2015) Composite goal methods for transportation network optimization. Expert Syst Appl 42(8):3852–3867
Li XB (2009) Multiobjective optimization and multiattribute decision making study of ship's principal parameters in conceptual design. J Ship Res 53(2):83–92
Papanikolaou A, Zaraphonitis G, Boulougouris E, Langbecker U, Matho S, Sames P (2010) Multi-objective optimization of oil tanker design. J Mar Sci Technol 15(4):359–373
Sekulski Z (2011) Multi-objective optimization of high speed vehicle-passenger catamaran by genetic algorithm: part II computational simulations. Pol Marit Res 18(3):3–30
Priftis A, Boulougouris E, Turan O, Papanikolaou A (2018) Parametric design and multi-objective optimisation of containerships. Ocean Eng 156(5):347–357
Cheng X, Feng B, Chang H, Liu Z, Zhan C (2019) Multi-objective optimisation of ship resistance performance based on CFD. J Mar Sci Technol 24(1):152–165
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE T Evol Comput 6(2):182–197
Li AD, He Z, Zhang Y (2016) Bi-objective variable selection for key quality characteristics selection based on a modified NSGA-II and the ideal point method. Comput Ind 82:95–103
Wang N, Zhao WJ, Wu N, Wu D (2017) Multi-objective optimization: a method for selecting the optimal solution from Pareto non-inferior solutions. Expert Syst Appl 74:96–104
Turan O, Olcer AI, Lazakis I, Rigo P, Caprace JD (2009) Maintenance/repair and production-oriented life cycle cost/earning model for ship structural optimisation during conceptual design stage. Ships Offshore Struct 4(2):107–125
Zhao JL, Yang LQ (2018) A bi-objective model for vessel emergency maintenance under a condition-based maintenance strategy. Simul Trans Soc Model Sim 94(7):609–624
Gaythwaite JW (2004) Design of marine facilities for the berthing, mooring, and repair of vessels, 2nd edn. American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia
Biobaku T, Lim G, Cho J, Parsaei H, Kim S (2015) Liquefied natural gas ship route planning: a risk analysis approach. Procedia Manuf 3:1319–1326
Wei ZK, Xie XL, Wei M, Bao TT (2019) Meteorological information extraction algorithm for ship routing. J Mar Sci Technol Taiwan 27(6):523–531
Wang K, Fu X, Luo M (2015) Modeling the impacts of alternative emission trading schemes on international shipping. Transport Res A Pol 77:35–49
Lindstad E, Bø TI (2018) Potential power setups, fuels and hull designs capable of satisfying future EEDI requirements. Transport Res D Transp Environ 63:276–290
Lin CK, Shaw HJ (2017) Feature-based estimation of preliminary costs in shipbuilding. Ocean Eng 144:305–319
Kretschmann L, Burmeister HC, Jahn C (2017) Analyzing the economic benefit of unmanned autonomous ships: an exploratory cost-comparison between an autonomous and a conventional bulk carrier. Res Transp Bus Manag 25:76–86
China state shipbuilding corporation limited (2013) Practical handbook for ship design, 3rd edn. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Boveri A, Silvestro F, Gualeni P (2017) Ship electrical load analysis and power generation optimisation to reduce operational costs. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on electrical systems for aircraft, railway, ship propulsion and road vehicles & international transportation electrification conference (ESARS 2016), IEEE, Toulouse France, pp 1–6
Kanellopoulou A, Kytariolou A, Papanikolaou A, Shigunov V, Zaraphonitis G (2019) Parametric ship design and optimisation of cargo vessels for efficiency and safe operation in adverse weather conditions. J Mar Sci Technol 24(4):1223–1240
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China [Grant Number 2017YFC0805309] and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant number 3132019303].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1: Notations and descriptions
Appendix 1: Notations and descriptions
Notations (unit) | Notation descriptions |
---|---|
R (ton/m3) | Ratio of deadweight to principal dimensions |
S (m2) | working deck area |
E (dollars/day) | Average daily cost considering METS in a voyage of carrying out MR works |
DWT and \({\text{DWT}}_{0}\) (ton) | Deadweight and predetermined deadweight, respectively |
L, B, D and T (m) | Length, breadth, depth and draft, respectively |
\(C_{{\text{B}}}\) | Block coefficient |
v (kn) | Sailing speed |
\(P_{{\text{E}}}\) (kW) | Total power |
(L/B)min and (L/B)max | Lower and upper bounds of the ratio of length to breadth, respectively |
(B/T)min and (B/T)max | Lower and upper bounds of the ratio of breadth to draft, respectively |
(D/T)min and (D/T)max | Lower and upper bounds of the ratio of depth to draft, respectively |
\(C_{{\text{B}}}^{\min }\) and \(C_{{\text{B}}}^{\max }\) | Lower and upper bounds of block coefficient, respectively |
vmin and vmax | Lower and upper bounds of sailing speed, respectively |
Fn and Fnmax | Froude number [37] and its upper bound, respectively |
N | Total number of conditions and \(n \in \{ 1,2, \ldots ,N\}\) means the nth condition |
\(P_{n}\) (kW) | A required power under the nth condition |
\(r_{nm}\) | A coefficient, 1 if the nth condition in the mth situation is required, otherwise 0 |
\(P_{{{\text{re}}}}^{m}\) (kW) | A power that is counted twice in the mth situation |
\(P_{{\text{M}}}\) | Shaft power |
\(\omega\) and \(\varphi\) | Parameters to calculate \(P_{{\text{M}}}\) |
\(t_{n}\) (day) | Working time under the nth condition |
\(\mu\) | Area coefficient |
\(U_{{{\text{carbon}}}}\) (dollars) | Payment of carbon trading cost in a voyage based on METS |
\(U_{{{\text{cost}}}}\) (dollars) | Total cost except for \(U_{{{\text{carbon}}}}\) in a voyage |
F (dollars) | Fuel cost in a voyage |
\(\psi\) (dollars/ton) | Fuel price |
\(u\) (g/kW h) | Fuel consumption rate |
H (day) | Voyage time |
\(\sigma\) (dollars/ton) | Price of purchasing or selling carbon emissions per unit |
Q (ton) | total carbon emissions in a voyage |
\(\xi\) (ton/day) | average of daily carbon emission limits |
\(\tau\) | CO2 emission coefficient of fuel |
\(E_{{\text{C}}}\) and \(E_{{\text{I}}}\) | sets of equipment in continuous and intermittent load, respectively |
\(P_{{\text{C}}}^{i}\) and \(P_{{\text{I}}}^{j}\) (kW) | rated powers of the ith (\(i \in E_{{\text{C}}}\)) equipment in continuous loads and the jth (\(j \in E_{{\text{I}}}\)) equipment in intermittent loads, respectively |
\(k_{i}\) and \(k_{j}\) | Demand factors of the ith (\(i \in E_{{\text{C}}}\)) and jth (\(j \in E_{{\text{I}}}\)) equipment |
\(\lambda\) | Simultaneous utilization factor |
\(\varepsilon\) | A small amount |
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, X., Zhao, R. & Zhu, Y. Conceptual design and parametric optimization of self-propelled semi-submersible repair ships: a novel equipment providing maintenance and repair support at sea. J Mar Sci Technol 26, 243–256 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00733-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00733-6