Skip to main content
Log in

On the existence of primary methods of measurement

  • DISCUSSION FORUM
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 There is much discussion in chemical metrology about the definition of primary methods of measurement, just as a couple of years ago there was debate about its predecessors, absolute methods and definitive methods. It is argued in this paper that the designation of certain methods as being primary only makes sense if there is an outstanding property identified that is common to all primary methods, and not present for all non-primary methods. The aim to identify primary methods should not blur our notion that it is the good practice of analytical chemistry that produces good results, not a particular method of analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wegscheider, W. On the existence of primary methods of measurement. Accred Qual Assur 4, 478–479 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050416

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050416

Navigation