Abstract
The methodology of evaluating the performance of sampling, sample preparation, and subsampling is reviewed. The requirements to be set for a successful experiment are revisited. The central role of the reference method is explained, and so is the choice of the parameters and the measurement methods. Based on the principles of the "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" (GUM), a statistical model is developed that demonstrates the influence of the experimental design on the outcome of the assessment experiment. This relationship is often overlooked in practice, as it is hardly mentioned in written standards dealing with this kind of quality assessments. The statistical framework thus developed covers the statistical procedures commonly appearing in written standards. Finally, the issue of testing the significance of the bias obtained from the experiment is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 14 June 1997 · Accepted: 2 September 1997
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van der Veen, A., Alink, A. A practitioner's approach to the assessment of the quality of sampling, sample preparation, and subsampling. Accred Qual Assur 3, 20–26 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050177
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050177