Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement uncertainty and its implications for collaborative study method validation and method performance parameters

  • GENERAL PAPER
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 ISO principles of measurement uncertainty estimation are compared with protocols for method development and validation by collaborative trial and concomitant "top-down" estimation of uncertainty. It is shown that there is substantial commonality between the two procedures. In particular, both require a careful consideration and study of the main effects on the result. Most of the information required to evaluate measurement uncertainty is therefore gathered during the method development and validation process. However, the information is not generally published in sufficient detail at present; recommendations are accordingly made for future reporting of the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 22 September 1997 · Accepted: 6 October 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ellison, S., Williams, A. Measurement uncertainty and its implications for collaborative study method validation and method performance parameters. Accred Qual Assur 3, 6–10 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050174

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050174

Keywords

Navigation