Skip to main content
Log in

“State of the art” for competency assessment in Australian medical laboratories

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper looks at the results of an audit conducted by the Royal College of Pathology Australasia, Key Incident Monitoring and Management Systems (RCPAQAP KIMMS). The audit was provided in Survey Monkey to 100 RCPAQAP participants in Australia and was open for the duration of August 2018. The aim was to look at the process used to assess competency, how often it is assessed, who undergoes assessment, who conducts the assessment and how formal the assessments are. Responders were also asked to comment on any audits they had performed to check compliance with the organisations competency assessment policy. The audit looked at 6 levels of staff: executive, pathologists, laboratory staff, collection staff, couriers and administrators. While the response rate was poor (estimated to cover 22 % of routine medical laboratories), the demographics indicate that they represent a reasonable cross section of the Australian medical laboratory landscape. The results show that 71 % of respondents do an audit for compliance with their competency assessment policy, only 41 % stated that they were “somewhat” compliant and 58 % are not compliant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data is the property of RCPAQAP.

References

  1. National Competency Standards Policy and Guidelines, National Training Board 1991

  2. Gonczi A, Hager P, Oliver L (1990) Establishing competency-based standards in the professions. National Office of Overseas Skills Recognition Research Paper No. 1. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra

  3. Willson C, Bertram K, Badrick T (2018) Pathology laboratory scientific scope of practice and competence-based standards for a certified workforce. Aust J Med Sci 39(2):32–37

    Google Scholar 

  4. AS ISO15189:2013. Medical laboratories—requirements for quality and competence

  5. Competency-based Standards for Medical Scientists 2009. https://www.aims.org.au/documents/item/259. Accessed 7 Nov 2019

  6. National Certification Scheme for the Medical Workforce—Final Draft Position Paper Human Capital Alliance 2018. http://humancapitalalliance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Position-Paper-Medical-Laboratory-Scientific-Workforce-Certification-Consultation-Draft-December-2018.pdf. Accessed Nov 2019

  7. National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council (NPAAC) (2018), Requirements for Supervision in the Clinical Governance of Medical pathology Laboratories, 4th edn

  8. Chittiprol S, Bornhorst J, Frederick L, Kiechle FL (2018) Top laboratory deficiencies across accreditation agencies. Clinical Laboratory News, July 2018

  9. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) (2012). What do I need to do to Assess Personnel Competency? https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/Downloads/CLIA_CompBrochure_508.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2019

  10. Kathy N (2015) Meaningful competency assessment. http://www.cola.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Competency-Assessment-Webinar-PowerPoint-and-Q-A-Dec-7-2015.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2019

  11. Sharp SE, Elder BL (2004) Competency assessment in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev 17(3):681–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gay S, Badrick T (2020) Changes in error rates in the Australian key incident monitoring and management system program. Biochem Med (AZagreb) 30(2):020704

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gay S, Sikaris K, Badrick T (2019) Reporting critical pathology results—what is the current state of play in Australian Laboratories? An opinion based on finding of a KIMMS audit. Aust J Med Sci (accepted)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The 2018 KIMMS Advisory Committee provided guidance in the development of the audit from which this paper is written; Ken Sikaris, Lynn Nelson, Rosemary Cooper, David Porter, Jason Graefling, Susan Benson, Leanne Olsen and Allison Terrell.

Funding

No funding was required for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SG put the original draft together, which was edited by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Gay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gay, S., Badrick, T. & Ross, J. “State of the art” for competency assessment in Australian medical laboratories. Accred Qual Assur 25, 323–327 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01442-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01442-8

Keywords

Navigation