Abstract
This paper looks at the results of an audit conducted by the Royal College of Pathology Australasia, Key Incident Monitoring and Management Systems (RCPAQAP KIMMS). The audit was provided in Survey Monkey to 100 RCPAQAP participants in Australia and was open for the duration of August 2018. The aim was to look at the process used to assess competency, how often it is assessed, who undergoes assessment, who conducts the assessment and how formal the assessments are. Responders were also asked to comment on any audits they had performed to check compliance with the organisations competency assessment policy. The audit looked at 6 levels of staff: executive, pathologists, laboratory staff, collection staff, couriers and administrators. While the response rate was poor (estimated to cover 22 % of routine medical laboratories), the demographics indicate that they represent a reasonable cross section of the Australian medical laboratory landscape. The results show that 71 % of respondents do an audit for compliance with their competency assessment policy, only 41 % stated that they were “somewhat” compliant and 58 % are not compliant.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Data is the property of RCPAQAP.
References
National Competency Standards Policy and Guidelines, National Training Board 1991
Gonczi A, Hager P, Oliver L (1990) Establishing competency-based standards in the professions. National Office of Overseas Skills Recognition Research Paper No. 1. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra
Willson C, Bertram K, Badrick T (2018) Pathology laboratory scientific scope of practice and competence-based standards for a certified workforce. Aust J Med Sci 39(2):32–37
AS ISO15189:2013. Medical laboratories—requirements for quality and competence
Competency-based Standards for Medical Scientists 2009. https://www.aims.org.au/documents/item/259. Accessed 7 Nov 2019
National Certification Scheme for the Medical Workforce—Final Draft Position Paper Human Capital Alliance 2018. http://humancapitalalliance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Position-Paper-Medical-Laboratory-Scientific-Workforce-Certification-Consultation-Draft-December-2018.pdf. Accessed Nov 2019
National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council (NPAAC) (2018), Requirements for Supervision in the Clinical Governance of Medical pathology Laboratories, 4th edn
Chittiprol S, Bornhorst J, Frederick L, Kiechle FL (2018) Top laboratory deficiencies across accreditation agencies. Clinical Laboratory News, July 2018
Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) (2012). What do I need to do to Assess Personnel Competency? https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/Downloads/CLIA_CompBrochure_508.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2019
Kathy N (2015) Meaningful competency assessment. http://www.cola.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Competency-Assessment-Webinar-PowerPoint-and-Q-A-Dec-7-2015.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2019
Sharp SE, Elder BL (2004) Competency assessment in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev 17(3):681–694
Gay S, Badrick T (2020) Changes in error rates in the Australian key incident monitoring and management system program. Biochem Med (AZagreb) 30(2):020704
Gay S, Sikaris K, Badrick T (2019) Reporting critical pathology results—what is the current state of play in Australian Laboratories? An opinion based on finding of a KIMMS audit. Aust J Med Sci (accepted)
Acknowledgements
The 2018 KIMMS Advisory Committee provided guidance in the development of the audit from which this paper is written; Ken Sikaris, Lynn Nelson, Rosemary Cooper, David Porter, Jason Graefling, Susan Benson, Leanne Olsen and Allison Terrell.
Funding
No funding was required for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SG put the original draft together, which was edited by all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gay, S., Badrick, T. & Ross, J. “State of the art” for competency assessment in Australian medical laboratories. Accred Qual Assur 25, 323–327 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01442-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01442-8