Skip to main content
Log in

Competency evaluation on electrolytic conductivity measurement in Indonesia by an unofficial bilateral comparison between RCChem-LIPI and NIMT

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Research Centre for Chemistry—Indonesian Institute of Sciences (RCChem-LIPI) organized an unofficial bilateral comparison on electrolytic conductivity with the Electrochemistry Laboratory—National Institute of Metrology Thailand (NIMT). The electrochemical laboratory RCChem-LIPI, as a Designated Institute for Chemical Metrology in Indonesia, started to develop the secondary method on electrolytic conductivity measurement in 2016. Therefore, the purpose of this unofficial bilateral comparison was to test the ability of RCChem-LIPI laboratory and see the capacity building progress in doing the conductivity measurement. There were two samples containing potassium chloride prepared by RCChem-LIPI, and both samples had the electrolytic conductivity value in the range of 1000 µS cm−1 to 20000 µS cm−1. The samples were sent to NIMT and then measured at the same time duration. The results were compared, analyzed and evaluated based on their assigned values. The assigned values were 15309 µS cm−1 and 6650 µS cm−1 for samples A and B, respectively. The deviation for each measurement result was determined, and the uncertainties were also calculated from the data reported by both laboratories. The data evaluation and analysis confirm that the measurement results for both participant laboratories were in agreement with the assigned value of this unofficial bilateral comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ali NS, Mo K, Kim M (2012) A case study on the relationship between conductivity and dissolved solids to evaluate the potential for reuse of reclaimed industrial wastewater. KSCE J Civ Eng 16:708–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brinkmann F, Dam NE, Deák E, Durbiano F, Ferrara E, Fükö J, Jensen HD, Máriássy M, Shreiner RH, Spitzer P, Sudmeirer U, Surdu M, Vyskočil L (2003) Primary methods for the measurement of electrolytic conductivity. Accred Qual Assur 8:346–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Máriássy M, Pratt KW, Spitzer P (2009) Major applications of electrochemical techniques at national metrology institutes. Metrologia 46:199–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Orrù E (2014) Traceability of electrolytic conductivity measurements for ultra pure water. Politecnico Di Torino, Giugno

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shreiner RH, Pratt KW (2004) Primary standards and standard reference materials for electrolytic conductivity. Natl Inst Stand Technol Spec Publ 260–142:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  6. Asakai T, Maksimov I, Onuma S, Suzuki T, Miura T, Hioki A (2017) New Japanese certified reference materials for electrolytic conductivity measurements. Accred Qual Assur 22:73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Breuel U, Werner B, Jehnert D (2009) Metrology in chemistry for pH and electrolytic conductivity traceability dissemination. Chimia 63:643–646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Breuel U, Werner B, Spitzer P, Jensen HD (2016) Experiences with novel secondary conductivity sensors within the German calibration servoce (DKD). NCSLI Meas 3:32–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu YC, Koch WF, Hamer WJ, Kay RL (1987) Review of electrolytic conductance standards. J Solut Chem 16:985–997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Emerson Process Management (2010) Rosemount Analytical, Theory and Application of Conductivity, Application Data Sheet ADS 43-018/rev.D. https://www.emerson.com/documents/automation/application-data-theory-application-of-conductivity-en-68442.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2017

  11. Jameel RH, Wu YC, Pratt KW (2000) Primary standards and standard reference materials for electrolytic conductivity, chapter. US Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  12. Light TS, Kingman EA, Bevilacqua AC (1995) The conductivity of low concentrations of CO2 dissolved in ultrapure water from 0 to 100 °C. In: 209th American chemical society national meeting; April 2–6, 1995; Anaheim, CA

  13. Guanti RJ, Moran PJ (1986) Measurement of electrolytic conductivity in highly conducting solutions. J Appl Electrochem 16:678–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. BIPM CCQM KCRV WG-19 (2008) Data Evaluation Principles for CCQM Key Comparison. https://www.bipm.org/cc/CCQM/Allowed/15/CCQM09_03.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2017

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank to the Research Centre for Chemistry—Indonesian Institute of Sciences (RCChem-LIPI) for financial supporting this study under project “Competency Development Program.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fransiska Sri Herwahyu Krismastuti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krismastuti, F.S.H., Sujarwo, S., Hindayani, A. et al. Competency evaluation on electrolytic conductivity measurement in Indonesia by an unofficial bilateral comparison between RCChem-LIPI and NIMT. Accred Qual Assur 24, 119–125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-018-1360-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-018-1360-6

Keywords

Navigation