Skip to main content
Log in

Proficiency testing as an instrument to assess the analytical performance and the methods routinely implemented: the Italian experience for the screening of antibiotic residues in milk in the official control

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work describes the outcome of the second proficiency test (PT) for the routine screening of antibiotic residues in milk, organized in 2016, for the Official Control Laboratories by the National Reference Laboratory (NRL) for veterinary antimicrobial residues in food of animal origin (ISS, Italy). Besides assessing the overall laboratories’ performance, this PT aimed to update the information concerning the screening methods used at the national level and focused, in particular, on the Official Control Laboratories performance for the detection of tetracyclines. This last feature intended to tackle the strong criticalities observed in the first PT, organized by the NRL in 2012, and to monitor the consequent implementation of relevant corrective actions. Thirty-one Official Control Laboratories joined the 2016 PT. They received five lyophilized milk samples, one negative and four positive for benzylpenicillin (PEN), sulphadiazine (SDZ) and oxytetracycline (OXY) to be reconstituted to the final concentrations of 1×MRL for PEN and SDZ and 2.5× and 4×MRL, respectively, for OXY. In addition, only for OXY, the protocol required the preparation by dilution of two additional samples at the final concentrations of 2× and 1×MRL. Overall the laboratories’ performance was satisfactory. However, for OXY, although a reduction in the percentage of false negative results was observed, as compared to the first PT, the majority of laboratories had not yet implemented complementary methods to respond to the criticality previously signalled. One more time the organization of a dedicated PT proved to be an effective means to provide objective indicators of the state of the art in a specific area of testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Landers TF, Cohen B, Wittum TE, Larson EL (2012) A review of antibiotic use in food animals: perspective, policy, and potential. Public Health Rep 127:4–22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwarz S, Kehrenberg C, Walsh TR (2001) Use of antimicrobial agents in veterinary medicine and food animal production. Int J Antimicrob Agents 17:431–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. European Parliament and Council (2004) Directive 2004/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 march 2004 amending directive 2001/82/EC on the community code relating to veterinary medicinal products. OJ L 136/58 (30.4.2004)

  4. Vitomir C, Silva D, Biljana A, Sanja C (2011) The significance of rational use of drugs in veterinary medicine for food safety. Tehnologija Mesa 52(1):74–79

    Google Scholar 

  5. Canadian Food Inspection Agency (2014) Chemical residues. In: Meat hygiene manual of procedures: Chapter 5—sampling and testing

  6. Fischer WJ, Tritscher AM, Schilter B, Stadler RH (2003) Contaminants of milk and dairy products/contaminants resulting from agricultural and dairy practices. In: Roginski H (ed.) Encyclopedia of dairy sciences, vol 1. Elsevier, London, pp 516–532

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zwald AG, Ruegg PL, Kaneene JB, Warnick LD, Wells SJ, Fossler C, Halbert LW (2004) Management practices and reported antimicrobial usage on conventional and organic dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 87:191–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. European Parliament and Council (2009) Regulation (EC) 470/2009 laying down Community procedures for the establishment of residue limits of pharmacologically active substances in foodstuffs of animal origin, repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 and amending Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council. OJ L 152/11 (16.6.2009)

  9. European Commission (2010) Commission Regulation (EU) n. 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding Maximum Residue Limits in foodstuffs of animal origin, OJ L 15/1 (20.1.2010)

  10. European Commission (2002) Decision 2002/657/EC implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results, OJ L221/8 (17.8.2002)

  11. European Council (1996) Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decision 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC. OJ L125/10 (23.5.96)

  12. Diserens JM, Beck Henzelin A, Le Breton MH, Savoy Perroud MC (2010) Current situation and compilation of commercially available screening methods for the detection of inhibitors/antibiotic residues in milk. Bull Int Dairy Fed 442:1–164

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrini AM, Agrimi U, Appicciafuoco B, Borroni R, Ciccaglioni G, Galati F, Massaro MR, Patriarca M (2015) PT as a tool to point out criticalities in the strategy for control of antibiotic residues in milk: the Italian experience. Accred Qual Assur 20:267–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pikkemaat MG (2009) Microbial screening methods for detection of antibiotic residues in slaughter animals. Anal Bioanal Chem 395:893–905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Report for 2014 on the results from the monitoring of veterinary medicinal product residues and other substances in live animals and animal products; EFSA Supporting publication 2016:EN-923

  16. European Parliament and Council (2004) Regulation (EC) N. 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules. OJ L 165/1 (30.4.2004)

  17. Serraino A, Giacometti F, Marchetti G, Zambrini AV, Zanirato G, Fustini M, Rosmini R (2013) Survey on antimicrobial residues in raw milk and antimicrobial use in dairy farms in the Emilia Romagna region, Italy. Italian J Anim Sci 12(e68):422–425

    Google Scholar 

  18. Busani L, Graziani C, Franco A, Di Egidio A, Binkin N, Battisti A (2004) Survey of the knowledge, attitudes and practice of Italian beef and dairy cattle veterinarians concerning the use of antibiotics. Vet Rec 155:733–738

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the useful and constructive suggestions of the anonymous reviewer. No ethical issues were identified requiring approval. Participants in the PT were informed of the potential use of the data in anonymous form. There is no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Maria Ferrini.

Additional information

Presented at the Eurachem PT Workshop, October 2017, Portoroz, Slovenia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrini, A.M., Appicciafuoco, B., Massaro, M.R. et al. Proficiency testing as an instrument to assess the analytical performance and the methods routinely implemented: the Italian experience for the screening of antibiotic residues in milk in the official control. Accred Qual Assur 24, 85–91 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-018-1352-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-018-1352-6

Keywords

Navigation