Abstract
The tentative arguments mentioned by Paul De Bievre are discussed and alternatives are given that may lead to different insights.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
De Bièvre P (2016) Accred Qual Assur 21(87):88. doi:10.1007/s00769-016-1191-2
iis PT reports. http://www.iisnl.com
Mäkinen I (2009) Accred Qual Assur 14:35–41. doi:10.1007/s00769-008-0462-y
Visser R (2004) Accred Qual Assur 9:717–723. doi:10.1007/s00769-004-0888-9
Thompson M, Ellison SLR (2006) Accred Qual Assur 11:373–378. doi:10.1007/s00769-006-0137-5
Wong SK (2005) Accred Qual Assur 10:409–414. doi:10.1007/s00769-005-0029-0
Bryden A (1998) Opening lecture of ILAC seminar. NATA, Sydney
King B (1998) The ILAC 1998 seminar papers, 18–23 Oct 1998. NATA, Sydney
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Papers published in this section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Editors, the Editorial Board and the Publisher.
A critical and constructive debate in the Discussion Forum or a Letter to the Editor is strongly encouraged!
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Visser, R.G. Reaction to Paul’s Column “Where do we find the graphs from PT programmes showing measurement performance?”. Accred Qual Assur 21, 237–238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-016-1210-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-016-1210-3