Skip to main content
Log in

Graecophile’s view of the SI notation

  • Discussion Forum
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this article was to oppose the article of M. P. Foster “Principles for constructing notation in unit systems and their application to the SI” that was published in the discussion forum of this journal in 2012 and which submitted a proposal for some changes in the notation of the International System of Units (SI). Although this proposal is relatively well elaborated and responsible, it can still bring more problems than benefits. These problems are analysed, and the proposal is refuted in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bureau international des poids at mesures (2006) Le Système international d’unités (SI), 8 e édition 2006. STEDI Media, Paris. ISBN 92-822-2213-6. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/si_brochure_8.pdf

  2. Bureau international des poids at mesures (1998) Le Système international d’unités (SI), 7e édition 1998. Stedi, Paris. ISBN 92-822-2154-7

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foster MP (2012) Principles for constructing notation in unit systems and their application to the SI. Accred Qual Assur 17:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Foster MP (2009) Disambiguating the SI notation would guarantee its correct parsing. Proc R Soc A 465:1227–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mills I (2009) Conventions for writing the values of quantities in the SI. Proc R Soc A 465:2313–2316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Foster MP (2009) Response to Mill’s comments on the SI notation. Proc R Soc A 465:2317–2318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Foster MP (2010) The next 50 years of the SI: a review of the opportunities of the e-science age. Metrologia 47:R41–R51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Foster MP (2013) Quantities, units and computing. Comput Stand Interfac 35:529–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ISO (2006–2009) 80000, Parts 1–14. Quantities and units. ISO, Genève

  10. Vorsätze für Maßeinheiten (2014) Wikipedia. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vors%C3%A4tze_f%C3%BCr_Ma%C3%9Feinheiten

  11. ISO (1983) 2955. Information processing —representation of SI and other units in systems with limited character sets. ISO, Genève

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karoulla-Vrikki D (2013) Which alphabet on car number-plates in Cyprus? Lang Probl Lang Plan 37:249–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pražák D, Šíra M, Vičar M (2014) On the future of the SI prefixes. Technol Forecast Soc Change. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.013

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mohr PJ, Phillips WD (2015) Dimensionless units in the SI. Metrologia 52:40–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Anna Charvátová Campbell for her help with corrections.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Pražák.

Additional information

Papers published in this section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Editors, the Editorial Board and the Publisher.

A critical and constructive debate in the Discussion Forum or a Letter to the Editor is strongly encouraged!

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pražák, D. Graecophile’s view of the SI notation. Accred Qual Assur 20, 219–222 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1121-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1121-8

Keywords

Navigation