Abstract
This commentary draws on the perspective of teaching and learning to discuss the issue of redefining the mole.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kolb D (1978) The mole. J Chem Educ 55(11):728–732
Furió C, Azcona R, Guisasola J (2002) The learning and teaching of the concepts “amount of substance” and “mole”: a review of the literature. Rev Res Pract 3(3):277–292
Johnstone AH, Morrison TI, Sharp D (1971) Topic difficulties in chemistry. Educ Chem 6(8):212–213
Dierks W (1981) Teaching the mole. Eur J Sci Educ 3:145–158
Staver JR, Lumpe AT (1993) A content analysis of the presentation of the mole concept in chemistry textbooks. J Res Sci Teach 30(4):321–337
Gabel D, Bunce D (1994) Research on problem solving: chemistry. In: Gabel D (ed) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, vol 11. Macmillan, New York, pp 301–326
Strömdahl H, Tullberg A, Lybeck L (1994) The qualitatively different conceptions of 1 mole. Int J Sci Educ 16(1):17–26
Tullberg A, Strömdahl H, Lybeck L (1994) Students’ conceptions of 1 mole and educators’ conceptions of how they teach “the mole”. Int J Sci Educ 16(2):145–156
Staver JR, Lumpe AT (1995) Two investigations of students’ understanding of the mole concept and its use in problem solving. J Res Sci Teach 32(2):177–193
Padilla K, Furió C (2008) The importance of history and philosophy of science in correcting distorted views of amount of substance and mole concepts in chemistry teaching. Sci Educ 17(4):403–424
Fang S-C, Hart C, Clarke DJ (2014) Unpacking the meaning of the mole concept foe secondary teachers and students. J Chem Educ 91(3):351–356
Strömdahl H (1997) One mole and amount of substance: a study of the dynamics of concept formation and concept attainment. D. Ed thesis, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
De Bièvre P (2014) CCQM owes chemists a description of the concept ‘amount of substance’. Accred Qual Assur 19(4):323–325
Cervellati R, Montuschi A, Perugini D, Grimellini-Tomasini N, Balandi BP (1982) Investigation of secondary school students’ understanding of the mole concept in Italy. J Res Sci Teach 59(10):852–856
Padilla K, Ponce-de-Leon A, Rembado F, Garritz A (2008) Undergraduate professors’ pedagogical content knowledge: the case of amount of substance. Int J Sci Educ 30(10):1389–1404
Burns DT, Korte EH (2013) The background and implications of the “New SI” for analytical chemists. J Assoc Public Anal (Online) 41:28–44
Barański A (2011) The atomic mass unit, the Avogadro constant, and the mole: a way to understanding. J Chem Educ 89(1):97–102
Furió C, Azcona R, Guisasola J, Ratcliffe M (2000) Difficulties in teaching the concepts of “amount of substance” and “mole”. Int J Sci Educ 22(12):1285–1304
Mills I, Milton M (2009) Amount of substance and the mole. Chem Int 31:3–7
De Bièvre P (2013) Second opportunity for chemists to re-think the mole. Accred Qual Assur 18(6):537–540
Jeannin Y (2010) What is mole? A fixed Avogadro constant or a fixed carbon-12 molar mass: which one to choose? Chem Int 32(1):8–10
Fang S-C (2011) Teaching and learning the mole concept: an investigation of science secondary classrooms in Australia and Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Vogel D (1992) Atomless chemistry? Why scientists believe what they cannot actually see. Sci Teach 56(8):32–35
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Papers published in this section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Editors, the Editorial Board and the Publisher.
A critical and constructive debate in the Discussion Forum or a Letter to the Editor is strongly encouraged!
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, SC., Hart, C. & Clarke, D. Redefining the mole: the perspective of teaching and learning. Accred Qual Assur 20, 215–217 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1102-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1102-3