Skip to main content
Log in

Redefining the mole: the perspective of teaching and learning

  • Discussion Forum
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This commentary draws on the perspective of teaching and learning to discuss the issue of redefining the mole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kolb D (1978) The mole. J Chem Educ 55(11):728–732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Furió C, Azcona R, Guisasola J (2002) The learning and teaching of the concepts “amount of substance” and “mole”: a review of the literature. Rev Res Pract 3(3):277–292

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnstone AH, Morrison TI, Sharp D (1971) Topic difficulties in chemistry. Educ Chem 6(8):212–213

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dierks W (1981) Teaching the mole. Eur J Sci Educ 3:145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Staver JR, Lumpe AT (1993) A content analysis of the presentation of the mole concept in chemistry textbooks. J Res Sci Teach 30(4):321–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabel D, Bunce D (1994) Research on problem solving: chemistry. In: Gabel D (ed) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, vol 11. Macmillan, New York, pp 301–326

    Google Scholar 

  7. Strömdahl H, Tullberg A, Lybeck L (1994) The qualitatively different conceptions of 1 mole. Int J Sci Educ 16(1):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tullberg A, Strömdahl H, Lybeck L (1994) Students’ conceptions of 1 mole and educators’ conceptions of how they teach “the mole”. Int J Sci Educ 16(2):145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Staver JR, Lumpe AT (1995) Two investigations of students’ understanding of the mole concept and its use in problem solving. J Res Sci Teach 32(2):177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Padilla K, Furió C (2008) The importance of history and philosophy of science in correcting distorted views of amount of substance and mole concepts in chemistry teaching. Sci Educ 17(4):403–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang S-C, Hart C, Clarke DJ (2014) Unpacking the meaning of the mole concept foe secondary teachers and students. J Chem Educ 91(3):351–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Strömdahl H (1997) One mole and amount of substance: a study of the dynamics of concept formation and concept attainment. D. Ed thesis, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

  13. De Bièvre P (2014) CCQM owes chemists a description of the concept ‘amount of substance’. Accred Qual Assur 19(4):323–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cervellati R, Montuschi A, Perugini D, Grimellini-Tomasini N, Balandi BP (1982) Investigation of secondary school students’ understanding of the mole concept in Italy. J Res Sci Teach 59(10):852–856

    Google Scholar 

  15. Padilla K, Ponce-de-Leon A, Rembado F, Garritz A (2008) Undergraduate professors’ pedagogical content knowledge: the case of amount of substance. Int J Sci Educ 30(10):1389–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burns DT, Korte EH (2013) The background and implications of the “New SI” for analytical chemists. J Assoc Public Anal (Online) 41:28–44

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barański A (2011) The atomic mass unit, the Avogadro constant, and the mole: a way to understanding. J Chem Educ 89(1):97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Furió C, Azcona R, Guisasola J, Ratcliffe M (2000) Difficulties in teaching the concepts of “amount of substance” and “mole”. Int J Sci Educ 22(12):1285–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mills I, Milton M (2009) Amount of substance and the mole. Chem Int 31:3–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. De Bièvre P (2013) Second opportunity for chemists to re-think the mole. Accred Qual Assur 18(6):537–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeannin Y (2010) What is mole? A fixed Avogadro constant or a fixed carbon-12 molar mass: which one to choose? Chem Int 32(1):8–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fang S-C (2011) Teaching and learning the mole concept: an investigation of science secondary classrooms in Australia and Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

  23. Vogel D (1992) Atomless chemistry? Why scientists believe what they cannot actually see. Sci Teach 56(8):32–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Su-Chi Fang.

Additional information

Papers published in this section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Editors, the Editorial Board and the Publisher.

A critical and constructive debate in the Discussion Forum or a Letter to the Editor is strongly encouraged!

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, SC., Hart, C. & Clarke, D. Redefining the mole: the perspective of teaching and learning. Accred Qual Assur 20, 215–217 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1102-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1102-3

Keywords

Navigation