Skip to main content
Log in

pH buffer assessment and Pitzer’s equations

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traceable measurement of the quantity pH in media outside the limits of the recent IUPAC recommendation requires an alternative to the Bates–Guggenheim convention. The Pitzer’s approach to ion interactions is widely appraised and offers a suitable approach to the estimation of single-ion activity coefficients. For this purpose, the underlying electrolyte data need to be consistent and the uncertainty in existing Pitzer’s data needs to be assessed. Such an assessment is attempted in this study for pH in potassium acetate buffer medium. The re-evaluation of Pitzer’s data from potassium nitrate data revealed inconsistencies and wide uncertainty margins. The uncertainty contribution from binary Pitzer’s parameters to an assessment of pH in seawater resulted in an uncertainty in pH of about 0.03 (95% confidence interval). This contribution has to be taken into account in the overall uncertainty budget. Lack of appropriate data for other pH buffer systems (e.g., phosphate buffers) is noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bates RG (1981) CRC Critical Rev Anal Chem 10:247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Buck RP, Rondinini S, Covington AK, Baucke FGK, Brett CMA, Camoes MF, Milton MJT, Mussini T, Naumann R, Pratt KW, Spitzer P, Wilson GS (2002) Pure Appl Chem 74:2169–2220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Harvie CE, Moller N, Weare JH (1984) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Das B (2004) J Solution Chem 33:33–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. ISO/IEC (2008) Uncertainty of measurement—Part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). ISO, Geneva/CH

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISO/IEC (2008) Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method (GUM Supplement 1). ISO, Geneva/CH

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marion GM, Millero FJ, Camoes MF, Spitzer P, Feistel R, Chen CTA unpublished

  8. Wielgosz RI (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 374:767–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baucke FGK (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 374:772–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim HT, Frederick WJ (1988) J Chem Eng Data 33:278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall SL, May PM, Hefter GT (1995) 40: 1041–1052

  12. Meinrath G (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 374:796–805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meinrath G, Schneider P (2007) Quality assurance in chemistry and environmental science. Springer, Heidelberg/FRG

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher RA (1925) Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim HT, Frederick WJ (1988) J Chem Eng Data 33:177–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Efron B (1979) Ann Statist 7:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beran R (2003) Stat Sci 18:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamer WJ, Wu YC (1972) J Phys Ref Data 1:1047–1088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Efron B (1987) J Am Stat Assoc 82:171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Harvie CE, Weare JH (1980) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 44:981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Königsberger E, Schmidt P, Gamsjäger H (1992) J Solution Chem 21:1195–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Millero FJ, Thurmond V (1983) J Solution Chem 12:401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barriada JL, Brandariz I, Sastre de Vicente ME (2000) J Chem Eng Data 45:1173–1178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Partanen JI, Kärki MH, Juusola PM (1995) Acta Chem Scand 49:865–870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. EURACHEM/CITAC (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn. LGC, Teddington/UK

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dickson AG, Sabine CL, Christian JR (2007) Guide to best practices for ocean CO2 measurements PICES special publication 3. Carbon Dioxide Information and Analysis Center Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Knoxville/TN USA, p 191

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Spitzer.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Issue “Quality Assurance of Thermodynamic Data”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spitzer, P., Fisicaro, P., Meinrath, G. et al. pH buffer assessment and Pitzer’s equations. Accred Qual Assur 16, 191–198 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0743-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0743-0

Keywords

Navigation