Abstract
The Avogadro constant is generally considered to be the relevant physical invariant for stoichiometry, intimately associated with the SI base unit for the amount of a specified substance. Unfortunately, it has dimensions of reciprocal amount rather than of amount itself, and this appears to be the source of the widespread confusion permeating this subject. It would make sense, instead, to use its reciprocal—an amount consisting of a single representative entity—as the fundamental invariant for amount. Major simplifications in comprehension then result. In particular, the mole would be redefined in a straightforward way as a designated exact number of elementary entities, making stoichiometric calculations much more easily comprehended. Unfortunately, acceptance by the CIPM of recent CCU recommendations for redefining the mole and kilogram (while keeping the inexactly known carbon-12-based dalton definition) would inject even more confusion into this subject, because the proposed definitions violate a basic compatibility condition relating the mole, kilogram and dalton, stemming from the fundamental concept of the mole itself. However, there are a number of alternative mole-concept-compatible and easily comprehended definitions worthy of consideration, where, in each case, a compatible dalton must be an exact sub-multiple of the (redefined) kilogram. These alternatives should receive much wider discussion before final decisions are made in the major restructuring of the international system of units.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Morikawa T, Newbold BT (2004) ‘Amount of substance’ and a single elementary entity. Chemistry (Bulg J Chem Educ) 13:431–435
Leonard BP (2007) The atomic-scale unit, entity: key to a direct and easily understood definition of the SI base unit for amount of substance. Metrologia 44:402–406
Taylor BN (2009) Molar mass and related quantities in the New SI. Metrologia 46:L16–L19
Cohen ER et al (2007) Quantities, units and symbols in physical chemistry, 3rd edn. RSC Publishing, London, p 3
Mills IM, Mohr PJ, Quinn TJ, Taylor BN, Williams ER (2006) Redefinition of the kilogram, ampere, kelvin and mole: a proposed approach to implementing CIPM recommendation 1 (CI-2005). Metrologia 43:227–246
Milton MJT, Mills IM (2009) Amount of substance and the proposed redefinition of the mole. Metrologia 46:332–338
Mills IM, Quinn TJ, Taylor BN (2010) Draft chapter 2 for SI Brochure, following redefinitions of the base units http://www.bipm.org/cc/CCU/Allowed/20/Watermark_SI_Brochure_Draft_Ch2_29Sep10.pdf
Mills IM (2009) Personal communication via email
Taylor BN (2010) Personal communication via email
Becker P, De Bièvre P, Fujii K, Glaeser M, Inglis B, Luebbig H, Mana G (2007) Considerations on future redefinitions of the kilogram, the mole and other units. Metrologia 44:1–14
De Bièvre P, Peiser HS (1992) ‘Atomic weight’—the name, its history, definition, and units. Pure Appl Chem 64:1535–1543
Cabiati F, Bich W (2009) Thoughts on a changing SI. Metrologia 46:457–466
Petley BW (2007) The atomic units, the kilogram and the other proposed changes to the SI. Metrologia 44:69–72
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leonard, B.P. Why the invariant atomic-scale unit, entity, is essential for understanding stoichiometry without ‘Avogadro anxiety’. Accred Qual Assur 16, 133–141 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0742-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0742-1