Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic ensembles of thermodynamic potentials

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The provision of uncertainty estimates along with measurement results or values computed thereof is metrologically mandatory. This is in particular true for observational data related to climate change, and thermodynamic properties of geophysical substances derived thereof, such as of air, seawater or ice. The recent International Thermodynamic Equation of Seawater 2010 (TEOS-10) provides such properties in a comprehensive and highly accurate way, derived from empirical thermodynamic potentials released by the International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam (IAPWS). Currently, there are no generally recognised algorithms available for a systematic and comprehensive estimation of uncertainties for arbitrary properties derived from those potentials at arbitrary input values, based on the experimental uncertainties of the laboratory data that were used originally for the correlations during the construction process. In particular, standard formulas for the uncertainty propagation which do not account for mutual uncertainty correlations between different coefficients tend to systematically and significantly overestimate the uncertainties of derived quantities, which may lead to practically useless results. In this paper, stochastic ensembles of thermodynamic potentials, derived from randomly modified input data, are considered statistically to provide analytical formulas for the computation of the covariance matrix of the related regression coefficients, from which in turn uncertainty estimates for any derived property can be computed a posteriori. For illustration purposes, simple analytical application examples of the general formalism are briefly discussed in greater detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BIPM (2010) Signature of the CIPM MRA by the WMO. http://www.bipm.org/en/events/wmo-bipm_workshop/signature_cipm_mra.html

  2. BIPM (2010) WMO-BIPM workshop on measurement challenges for global observation systems for climate change monitoring: traceability, stability and uncertainty. 30 March–1 April 2010, WMO Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.bipm.org/utils/en/pdf/WMO-BIPM_programme.pdf

  3. WMO (2010) Background information on WMO-BIPM workshop—1 April 2010. http://www.wmo.ch/pages///mediacentre/news/documents/WMO_BIPM_WS.pdf

  4. VIM (2008) International vocabulary of metrology, 3rd ed, [JCGM 200:2008], http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html

  5. Seitz S, Feistel R, Wright DG, Weinreben S, Spitzer P, de Bievre P (2010) Metrological traceability of oceanographic salinity measurement results. Ocean Sci Disc 7:1303–1346 http://www.ocean-sci-discuss.net/7/1303/2010/

    Google Scholar 

  6. IOC, SCOR, IAPSO (2010) The international thermodynamic equation of seawater—2010: calculation and use of thermodynamic properties, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, Manuals and Guides No. 56, UNESCO (English), http://www.TEOS-10.org

  7. Sharqawy MH, Lienhard VJH, Zubair SM (2010) Thermophysical properties of seawater: a review of existing correlations and data. Desal Water Treat 16:354–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibbs JW (1873) Graphical methods in the thermodynamics of fluids. Trans Conn Acad Arts Sci 2:309–342

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feistel R, Wagner W (2006) A new equation of state for H2O ice Ih. J Phys Chem Ref Data 35:1021–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alberty RA (2001) Use of Legendre transforms in chemical thermodynamics. Pure Appl Chem 73:1349–1380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fofonoff NP (1962) Physical properties of sea-water. In: Hill MN (ed) The sea. Wiley, New York, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keenan JH, Keyes FG, Hill PG, Moore JG (1969) Steam tables; thermodynamic properties of water including vapour, liquid, and solid phases. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haar L, Gallagher JS, Kell GS (1984) NBS/NRC steam tables. Hemisphere and McGraw-Hill, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feistel R (1993) Equilibrium thermodynamics of seawater revisited. Progr Oceanogr 31:101–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feistel R (2008) A Gibbs function for seawater thermodynamics for −6 to 80 °C and salinity up to 120 g/kg. Deep-Sea Res I 55:1639–1671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feistel R (2008) Thermodynamics of water, vapour, ice and seawater. Accred Qual Assur 13:593–599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tillner-Roth R (1998) Fundamental equations of state. Shaker Verlag, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  18. Span R (2000) Multiparameter equations of state—an accurate source of thermodynamic property data. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wagner W, Pruß A (2002) The IAPWS formulation 1995 for the thermodynamic properties of ordinary water substance for general and scientific use. J Phys Chem Ref Data 31:387–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. IAPWS (2009) Revised release on the IAPWS formulation 1995 for the thermodynamic properties of ordinary water substance for general and scientific use. The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam, Doorwerth, The Netherlands, September 2009, http://www.iapws.org

  21. IAPWS (2009) Revised release on the equation of state 2006 for H2O ice Ih. The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam, Doorwerth, The Netherlands, September 2009, http://www.iapws.org

  22. IAPWS (2008) Release on the IAPWS formulation 2008 for the thermodynamic properties of seawater, The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam, Berlin, Germany, September 2008, http://www.iapws.org

  23. Feistel R, Wright DG, Miyagawa K, Harvey AH, Hruby J, Jackett DR, McDougall TJ, Wagner W (2008) Mutually consistent thermodynamic potentials for fluid water, ice and seawater: a new standard for oceanography. Ocean Sci 4:275–291. http://www.ocean-sci.net/4/275/2008/

    Google Scholar 

  24. Feistel R, Wright DG, Kretzschmar HJ, Hagen E, Herrmann S, Span R (2010) Thermodynamic properties of sea air. Ocean Sci 6:91–141. http://www.ocean-sci.net/6/91/2010/

    Google Scholar 

  25. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (2008) Evaluation of measurement data—supplement 1 to the ‘Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement’—propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 101. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_101_2008_E.pdf

  26. Dolan KT, Neiman A (2002) Surrogate analysis of coherent multichannel data. Phys Rev E 65:026108. http://www.umsl.edu/~neurodyn/assets/pdf/DolanMultichannel.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jiménez-Montaño MA, Feistel R, Diez-Martínez O (2004) On the information hidden in signals and macromolecules. I. Symbolic time-series analysis. Nonlin Dyn Psychol Life Sci 8:445–478

    Google Scholar 

  28. GUM (2008) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Guide 98-3:2008 [JCGM 100:2008], Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html

  29. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1983) Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  31. Anishchenko VS, Astakhov V, Neiman A, Vadivasova T, Schimansky-Geier L (2007) Nonlinear dynamics of chaotic and stochastic systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor BN, Kuyatt CE (1994) Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. NIST Technical Note 1297, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, September 1994. http://www.physics.nist.gov/Pubs/guidelines/appa.html

  33. Arras KO (1998) An introduction to error propagation: derivation, meaning and examples of equation C Y  = F X C X F T X . Techn Rep No EPFL-ASL-TR-98-01 R3 of the Autonomous Systems Lab, Institute of Robotic Systems, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), September 1998. http://www.nada.kth.se/~kai-a/papers/arrasTR-9801-R3.pdf

  34. Feistel R, Wagner W (2005) High-pressure thermodynamic Gibbs functions of ice and sea ice. J Mar Res 63:95–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gantmacher FR (1970) Matrizenrechnung Teil 1. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bienaymé IJ (1853) Considérations à l’appui de la découverte de Laplace sur la loi de probabilité dans la méthode des moindres carrés. Compt Rend Acad Sci Paris 37:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  37. Margenau H, Murphy GM (1943) The mathematics of physics and chemistry. D. van Nostrand Company, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Feistel R, Wright DG, Jackett DR, Miyagawa K, Reissmann JH, Wagner W, Overhoff U, Guder C, Feistel A, Marion GM (2010) Numerical implementation and oceanographic application of the thermodynamic potentials of liquid water, water vapour, ice, seawater and humid air—Part 1: Background and equations. Ocean Sci 6:633–677 http://www.ocean-sci.net/6/633/2010/

  39. Wright DG, Feistel R, Reissmann JH, Miyagawa K, Jackett DR, Wagner W, Overhoff U, Guder C, Feistel A, Marion GM (2010) Numerical implementation and oceanographic application of the thermodynamic potentials of liquid water, water vapour, ice, seawater and humid air—Part 2: The library routines. Ocean Sci 6:695–718. http://www.ocean-sci.net/6/695/2010/

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is dedicated to Lutz Schimansky-Geier on the occasion of his 60th birthday. The author thanks Allan Harvey and Wolfgang Wagner for helpful discussions and hints on literature, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions. The paper contributes to the tasks of the SCOR/IAPSO Working Group 127 on Thermodynamics and Equation of State of Seawater.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Feistel.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Issue “Quality Assurance of Thermodynamic Data”.

Appendix: Selected elements of matrix calculus used in the text

Appendix: Selected elements of matrix calculus used in the text

The mathematical product of two matrices A, B is defined as the matrix C that has as its elements the scalar products of the row vector of the first factor with the column vector of the second, for example,

$$ {\mathbf{AB}} \equiv \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {a_{11} } & {a_{12} } \\ {a_{21} } & {a_{22} } \\ \end{array} } \right)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {b_{11} } & {b_{12} } \\ {b_{21} } & {b_{22} } \\ \end{array} } \right) = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {a_{11} b_{11} + a_{12} b_{21} } & {a_{11} b_{12} + a_{12} b_{22} } \\ {a_{21} b_{11} + a_{22} b_{21} } & {a_{21} b_{12} + a_{22} b_{22} } \\ \end{array} } \right) \equiv {\mathbf{C}}. $$

The number of columns of the first factor must equal the number of rows of the second factor. Transposition is indicated by the superscript T and obeys the equation C T = B T A T:

$$ {\mathbf{B}}^{\text{T}} {\mathbf{A}}^{\text{T}} \equiv \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {b_{11} } & {b_{21} } \\ {b_{12} } & {b_{22} } \\ \end{array} } \right)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {a_{11} } & {a_{21} } \\ {a_{12} } & {a_{22} } \\ \end{array} } \right) = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {a_{11} b_{11} + a_{12} b_{21} } & {a_{21} b_{11} + a_{22} b_{21} } \\ {a_{11} b_{12} + a_{12} b_{22} } & {a_{21} b_{12} + a_{22} b_{22} } \\ \end{array} } \right) \equiv {\mathbf{C}}^{\text{T}} . $$

Vectors may be represented as matrices having just one column and n rows. Depending on the sequence of the factors, the result of a product of two vectors a, b is either a (1×1) matrix, namely the usual scalar product that is written in vector notation as \( \left( {{\mathbf{ab}}} \right) = \left( {{\mathbf{ba}}} \right) \), and in matrix notation in the form,

$$ {\mathbf{a}}^{\text{T}} {\mathbf{b}} \equiv \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {a_{1} } & {a_{2} } \\ \end{array} } \right)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {b_{1} } \\ {b_{2} } \\ \end{array} } \right) = \left( {a_{1} b_{1} + a_{2} b_{2} } \right), $$

or a (n×n) matrix, the dyadic product, written in vector notation as \( \left( {{\mathbf{a}} \otimes {\mathbf{b}}} \right) \), and in matrix notation in the form,

$$ {\mathbf{ab}}^{\text{T}} \equiv \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {a_{1} } \\ {a_{2} } \\ \end{array} } \right)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {b_{1} } & {b_{2} } \\ \end{array} } \right) = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {a_{1} b_{1} } & {a_{1} b_{2} } \\ {a_{2} b_{1} } & {a_{2} b_{2} } \\ \end{array} } \right). $$

In particular, the quadratic form of a dyadic product can be written as a product of scalar products, in matrix notation, \( {\mathbf{x}}^{\text{T}} \left( {{\mathbf{ab}}^{\text{T}} } \right){\mathbf{y}} = \left( {{\mathbf{x}}^{\text{T}} {\mathbf{a}}} \right)\left( {{\mathbf{b}}^{\text{T}} {\mathbf{y}}} \right) \), or in vector notation, \( {\mathbf{x}}\left( {{\mathbf{a}} \otimes {\mathbf{b}}} \right){\mathbf{y}} = \left( {{\mathbf{xa}}} \right)\left( {{\mathbf{by}}} \right) \).

The inverse of a transpose equals the transpose of the inverse, \( \left( {{\mathbf{A}}^{\text{T}} } \right)^{ - 1} = \left( {{\mathbf{A}}^{ - 1} } \right)^{\text{T}} \). A matrix S is symmetric if it equals its transpose, \( {\mathbf{S}}^{\text{T}} = {\mathbf{S}} \). The inverse of a symmetric matrix is symmetric. If a non-zero vector e obeys the equation \( {\mathbf{Ae}} = \lambda {\mathbf{e}} \), e is termed an eigenvector and λ an eigenvalue of the quadratic matrix A. Eigenvalues of symmetric real matrices are real. The rank of a quadratic matrix is the number of its non-zero eigenvalues. Rayleigh’s theorem states that for any column vector x the quadratic form x T Sx satisfies the inequality \( \lambda_{\min } \left( {\mathbf{x}}^{\text{T}} {\mathbf{x}} \right) \le {\mathbf{x}}^{\text{T}} {\mathbf{Sx}} \le \lambda_{\max } \left( {{\mathbf{x}}^{\text{T}} {\mathbf{x}}} \right) \) if λ min, λ max are the minimum and the maximum eigenvalue, respectively, of the symmetric matrix S.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feistel, R. Stochastic ensembles of thermodynamic potentials. Accred Qual Assur 16, 225–235 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0695-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0695-4

Keywords

Navigation