Abstract
Last year marked the tenth anniversary of the conference Strategies to Set Global Quality Specifications in Laboratory Medicine, which was held in Stockholm. The main outcome of this conference was a hierarchy of models to set metrological requirements, commonly known as the Stockholm Consensus. Belief in the appropriateness and scientific rigour of this Consensus has since been disseminated around the world. The Stockholm Consensus has made the biological variation model the model that is most commonly used to set metrological requirements. However, this model is not objective, because it is based on the selection of the one of three multiplication factors that reflects the mean biological variation. In addition to this lack of objectivity and other weaknesses of the biological variation model, the so-called Stockholm Consensus was not a true consensus process. Since our knowledge of this field continues to grow, the setting of metrological requirements should be a matter of true consensus based on the state of the art, rather than a “pseudo-objective” process. Metrological requirements should ensure that clinical laboratories do not produce measurement results that are less precise than their measuring systems allow.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hyltoft Petersen P, Fraser CG (2010) Accred Qual Assur 15:323–330. doi:10.1007/s00769-009-0630-8
Kenny D, Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Kallner A (1999) Scand J Clin Lab Invest 59:585–586
Elevitch FR (ed)(1977) Proceedings of the 1976 Aspen Conference on Analytical Goals in Clinical Chemistry. College of American Pathologists, Skokie
Harris EK (1979) Am J Clin Pathol 72:374–382
Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Libeer JC, Ricos C (1997) Ann Clin Biochem 34:8–12
Fuentes-Arderiu X, Miró-Balagué J (2000) Clin Chem 46:1715–1716
Fuentes-Arderiu X (2002) Scand J Clin Lab Invest 62:561–564
Bundersärztekammer (2008) Deutsches Ärzteblatt 105:A341-A355. http://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/downloads/RiliLabor2008Korr.pdf
ISO/DIS (2001) Technical report—determination on analytical performance goals for laboratory procedures based on medical needs (ISO/DIS 15196). ISO, Geneva
ISO (2003) In vitro diagnostic test systems—requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus (ISO 15197). ISO, Geneva
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2006) Statistical quality control for quantitative measurement procedures: principles and definitions; approved guideline, 3rd edn (CLSI doc C24–A3). CLSI, Wayne
European Council (1976) Council Directive 76/764/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States on clinical mercury-in-glass, maximum reading thermometers. European Council, Brussels (see http://eur-lex.europa.eu)
European Council (1983) Council Directive 83/128/EEC of 28 March 1983 amending Directive 76/764/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States on clinical mercury-in-glass, maximum-reading thermometers. European Council, Brussels (see http://eur-lex.europa.eu)
European Commission (1984) Commission Directive 84/414/EEC of 18 July 1984 adapting to technical progress Directive 76/764/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to clinical mercury-in-glass maximum-reading thermometers. European Commission, Brussels (see http://eur-lex.europa.eu)
Klee GG (2010) Clin Chem 56:714–722
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Papers published in this section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Editors, the Editorial Board and the Publisher.
A critical and constructive debate in the Discussion Forum or a Letter to the Editor is strongly encouraged!
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuentes-Arderiu, X. Remembering the Stockholm Consensus. Accred Qual Assur 15, 581–584 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0675-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0675-8