Abstract
Between 1998 and 2007, the governing body of the Treaty of the Metre conducted three strategic reviews of future global measurement needs. This critical review examines those reports with a view to determine whether or not this institution is capable of resolving the impasse, discussed in Part 1, that has existed for many decades in the manner of communicating the results of chemical measurements. Examining both the main substantial recommendation and the explicitly stated common presuppositions of the three reports leads to the regretful conclusion that the institution can neither resolve the impasse nor meet significant future global measurement needs. Therefore, the onus is on chemistry itself to consider carefully the units with which the results of chemical measurements may be communicated clearly and concisely to their users without the semantic confusions inherent in the International System (SI) of measurement units discussed in Part 1. At the larger level, the institutional failure of the Treaty to fully grasp the dynamism of 21st century science, technology and industry raises concerns for world trade and global economic coordination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blevin W (1998) National and international needs relating to metrology: international collaborations and the role of the BIPM. A report prepared by the CIPM for the governments of the member states of the convention of the metre. The intergovernmental organisation of the convention of the metre. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/blevin1998.zip
Kaarls R (2003) Evolving needs for metrology in trade, industry and society: a report prepared for the governments of the member states of the metre convention and associates of the CGPM. The international organisation of the metre convention. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/kaarls2003.zip
Kaarls R (2007) Evolving needs for metrology in trade, industry and society and the role of the BIPM. The international organisation of the metre convention. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/Kaarls2007.pdf
Petley B (1985) The fundamental physical constants and the frontiers of metrology. Adam Hilger, Bristol ISBN 0852744277
Birge R (1941) A new table of the general physical constants. Rev Mod Phys 13:233–239
Dorsey N (1944) The velocity of light. Transactions of the American Physical Society, 34, part 1, October
Birge R (1957) A survey of the systematic evaluation of the physical constants. Il Nuovo Cimento (1955–1965) 6(supplement 1):36–67
Uzan J (2003) The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations. Rev Mod Phys 75:403–455. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.403 (arXiv:hep-ph/0205340)
Barrow J (1999) Cosmologies with varying light speed. Phys Rev D 59:043515. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD59.043515 arXiv:astro-ph/9811022
Sheldrake R (1994) Seven experiments that could change the world: a do-it-yourself guide to revolutionary science. Fourth Estate Ltd, GB
Butterfield H (1949) The Origins of Modern Science, 1300–1800. G Bell & sons, London
Baird D (1993) Analytical chemistry and the “big” scientific instrumentation revolution. Ann Sci 50:267–290
Cullis C, Firth J (1981) Detection and measurement of hazardous gases. Heinemann Educational Books, London
Beck C (1991) Classical analysis: a look at past, present and future. Anal Chem 63:993A–1003A
Morris P (ed) (2002) From classical to modern chemistry: the instrumental revolution. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge
Finkelstein L (1982) Theory and philosophy of measurement: In: Sydenham P (ed) Handbook of measurement science, vol 1. Wiley, London
De Bievre P (2007) Making the definitions of measurement units independent from arbitrary decisions (of worldly powers). Accred Qual Assur 12:1–2. doi:10.1007/s00769-006-0202-0
Price G (1996) On practical metrology and chemical analysis: legal, institutional and technical evolutions in the Australian national measurement system. Accred Qual Assur 1:150–159. doi:10.1007/s007690050053
Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity, Free Press ISBN 0-684-84530-x
Dirac P (1974) Cosmological models and the large numbers hypothesis. Proc R Soc A338:439–446
de Bray E (1934) Velocity of light. Nature 133:948
Feynman R (1970) 7 lectures on physics. Addison Wesley Longman
Ellis G (2007) Note on varying speed of light cosmologies. Gen Relativ Gravit 39:511–520. doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0396-4
Troitskii V (1987) Physical constants and the evolution of the universe. Astrophys Space Sci 139:389–411
Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Olson M (1982) The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation and social rigidities. Yale University Press, London
Price G (2003) Traceability to units. Accred Qual Assur 8:475–476. doi:10.1007/s00769-003-0599-7
Soros G (2009) A global problem only the world can fix. Australian Financial Review December 29 2009–January 3 2010:54
Acknowledgments
I again thank the editors and referees for their engagement and tolerance. Their dialogue has resulted in a much better discussion. It is still fallible and all errors are my responsibility. I join the editors in cordially inviting further discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Papers published in this section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Editors, the Editorial Board and the Publisher.
A critical and constructive debate in the Discussion Forum or a Letter to the Editor is strongly encouraged!
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Price, G. Failures of the global measurement system. Part 2: institutions, instruments and strategy. Accred Qual Assur 15, 477–484 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0662-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0662-0