Abstract
In analogy to quantitative measurements, the precision of qualitative measurement methods can be characterised by the repeatability standard deviation and the reproducibility standard deviation of the sensitivity. In order to determine these standard deviations, the ISO 5725-2 approach is used. A simulation study and an example demonstrate the advantages of the method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ISO 5725-1 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 1: general principles and definitions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
ISO 5725-2 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 2: basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
ISO 16140 (2003) Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—protocol for the validation of alternative methods. Annex M. Interlaboratory study of qualitative methods: criteria of accordance, concordance and concordance odds ratio. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Langton SD, Chevennement R, Nagelkeke N, Lombard B (2002) Analysing collaborative trials for qualitative microbiological methods: accordance and concordance. Int J Food Microbiol 79:171–181
van der Voet H, van Raamsdonk WD (2004) Estimation of accordance and concordance in inter-laboratory trials of analytical methods with qualitative results. Int J Food Microbiol 95:231–234
Mandel J (1997) Repeatability and reproducibility for pass/fail data. J Test Eval 25:151–153
Acknowledgments
The author thanks Tilmann Deutler, Christophe Perruchet and Hartmut Weiss, who read the final manuscript, for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilrich, PT. The determination of precision of qualitative measurement methods by interlaboratory experiments. Accred Qual Assur 15, 439–444 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0661-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0661-1