Skip to main content
Log in

The determination of precision of qualitative measurement methods by interlaboratory experiments

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In analogy to quantitative measurements, the precision of qualitative measurement methods can be characterised by the repeatability standard deviation and the reproducibility standard deviation of the sensitivity. In order to determine these standard deviations, the ISO 5725-2 approach is used. A simulation study and an example demonstrate the advantages of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO 5725-1 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 1: general principles and definitions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. ISO 5725-2 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 2: basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  3. ISO 16140 (2003) Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—protocol for the validation of alternative methods. Annex M. Interlaboratory study of qualitative methods: criteria of accordance, concordance and concordance odds ratio. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  4. Langton SD, Chevennement R, Nagelkeke N, Lombard B (2002) Analysing collaborative trials for qualitative microbiological methods: accordance and concordance. Int J Food Microbiol 79:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Voet H, van Raamsdonk WD (2004) Estimation of accordance and concordance in inter-laboratory trials of analytical methods with qualitative results. Int J Food Microbiol 95:231–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandel J (1997) Repeatability and reproducibility for pass/fail data. J Test Eval 25:151–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Tilmann Deutler, Christophe Perruchet and Hartmut Weiss, who read the final manuscript, for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter-Th. Wilrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilrich, PT. The determination of precision of qualitative measurement methods by interlaboratory experiments. Accred Qual Assur 15, 439–444 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0661-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0661-1

Keywords

Navigation