Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reliability of proficiency test results for metals and phthalates in plastics

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent article it was concluded that the Horwitz curve could not be used for evaluation of results from analysis of plastics. This conclusion was based on 15 different proficiency tests of which 11 were organized by the Institute for Interlaboratory Studies. The authors suggest that part of the poor interlaboratory reproducibility can be explained by the inhomogeneity of consumer plastic products. Also, the lack of standard methods has been mentioned as problematic. The value of the iis data sets used by the authors is discussed in this paper. More recent data are also investigated to determine whether the situation with regard to analysis of plastics is as bad as suggested by Ritter and Meyer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Horwitz W, Kamps LR, Boyer KW (1980) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 63:1344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson M, Wood R (2006) Accredit Qual Assur 10:471. doi:10.1007/s00769-005-0040-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Horwitz W, Albert R, Deutsch MJ, Thompson JN (1990) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 73:661

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Horwitz W, Albert R (1996) J AOAC Int 79(3):589

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ritter A, Meyer VR (2005) Polym Test 24:988–993. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.08.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson M, Lowthian PJ (1993) Analyst (Lond) 120:271. doi:10.1039/an9952000271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Audier M, Visser RG (2001) iis01P01. Institute for Interlaboratory Studies (iis), Spijkenisse

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leung W (2007) iis07P01X. Institute for Interlaboratory Studies (iis), Spijkenisse

    Google Scholar 

  9. EN 14372 (2004) Child use and care articles: cutlery and feeding utensils: safety requirements and tests. CEN, Brussels

  10. EN 1122 (2001) Plastics: determination of cadmium: wet decomposition method. CEN, Brussels

  11. Starink RJ (2008) iis08P01. Institute for Interlaboratory Studies (iis), Spijkenisse

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nakano K, Nakamura T, Nakai I, Kawase A, Imai M, Hasegawa M, Ishibashi Y, Inamoto I, Sudou K, Kozaki M, Tsuruta A, Ono A, Kakita K, Sakata M (2006) Anal Sci 22:1265. doi:10.2116/analsci.22.1265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. ISO 13528 (2005) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. ISO, Switzerland

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Interlaboratory Studies (iis), Spijkenisse, The Netherlands

    Rob G. Visser

Authors
  1. Rob G. Visser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob G. Visser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visser, R.G. Reliability of proficiency test results for metals and phthalates in plastics. Accred Qual Assur 14, 29–34 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-008-0465-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-008-0465-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation