Skip to main content
Log in

On the accuracy of micro Winkler titration procedures: a case study

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accuracy data (expressed as precision and trueness) presented by the authors of three different micro modifications of the Winkler titration procedure for dissolved oxygen concentration determination are critically evaluated. Tentative uncertainty estimates are extracted from the data based on the single-laboratory validation approach (originally published in the Nordtest Technical Report 537) and they lead to expanded uncertainty (k = 2) estimates in the range from 0.13 to 0.27 mg l−1 for the three procedures. It is demonstrated that, in all cases, the authors have presented the accuracy and/or precision estimates of the procedures in a way that can lead to too optimistic conclusions about the uncertainty of their procedures. This case study demonstrates the usefulness and flexibility of the single-laboratory validation approach to uncertainty estimation, even in the case of insufficient data, and can be of interest to laboratory workers dealing with measurement procedures from the literature. It is also expected to be of interest to university instructors of analytical chemistry and metrology in chemistry as a real-life example of the critical evaluation of the literature data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hitchman ML (1978) Measurement of dissolved oxygen. Wiley, New York, pp 71–123

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mancy KH, Jaffe T (1966) Analysis of dissolved oxygen in natural and waste waters. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center, Cincinnati, Ohio

  3. Winkler LW (1888) Ber Dtsch Chemischen Ges 21:2843–2855. doi:10.1002/cber.188802102122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carpenter JH (1965) Limnol Oceanogr 10:135–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carritt DE, Carpenter JH (1966) J Mar Res 24:286–318

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1983) Water quality—determination of dissolved oxygen—Iodometric method, ISO 5813. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  7. Mortimer CH (1981) Mitt Int Ver Limnol 22:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benson BB, Krause D Jr (1980) Limnol Oceanogr 25:662–671

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jalukse L, Leito I (2007) Meas Sci Technol 18:1877–1886. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/18/7/013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1990) Water quality—determination of dissolved oxygen—electrochemical probe method. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  11. Winkler LW (1891) Ber Dtsch Chemischen Ges 24:3602–3610. doi:10.1002/cber.189102402237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fox CJJ (1907) Publ Circ Cons Explor Mer 41:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fox CJJ (1909) Trans Faraday Soc 5:68–87. doi:10.1039/tf9090500068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Richards FA, Corwin N (1956) Limnol Oceanogr 1:263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Benson BB, Krause D Jr, Peterson MA (1979) J Solution Chem 8:655–690. doi:10.1007/BF01033696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fox HM, Wingfield CA (1938) J Experim Biol 15:437–445

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Krogh A (1935) J Industr Eng Chem 7:131–133

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Krogh A (1935) J Industr Eng Chem 7:130–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Whitney RJ (1938) J Exp Biol 15:564–570

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jalukse L, Vabson V, Leito I (2006) Accredit Qual Assur 10:562–564. doi:10.1007/s00769-005-0058-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. European Federation of National Associations of Measurement, Testing and Analytical Laboratories (EUROLAB) (2007) Measurement uncertainty revisited: alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation. EUROLAB technical report no. 1/2007. EUROLAB, Paris, France. Available online at: http://www.eurolab.org/docs/technical%20report/Technical_Report_Measurement_Uncertainty_2007.pdf

  22. Magnusson B, Näykki T, Hovind H, Krysell M (2004) Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories: edition 2. Nordtest technical report TR 537. Nordtest, Espoo, Finland. Available online at: http://www.nordicinnovation.net/nordtestfiler/tec537.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Estonian Science Foundation, grant no. 7449.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivo Leito.

Electronic supplementary material

Calculations with original data not described in detail in the text are available as electronic supplementary material. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM1 (PDF 73 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jalukse, L., Helm, I., Saks, O. et al. On the accuracy of micro Winkler titration procedures: a case study. Accred Qual Assur 13, 575–579 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-008-0419-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-008-0419-1

Keywords

Navigation