Skip to main content
Log in

A statistical strategy for discouraging collusion in split-level proficiency testing schemes

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A statistical strategy for discouraging collusion in split-level proficiency testing schemes was developed. When the samples are randomly labeled, the difference in the analyte levels in the two samples can be designed to maximize the probability of detecting collusion when it occurs, so that participants who colluded cannot easily receive satisfactory assessments. This favors providing convictive assessments of participants’ proficiency and giving the participants a level playing field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO Guide 43–1:1997, Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons – Part 1: Development and operation of proficiency testing schemes, International Organization for Standardization, Genève 1997

  2. APLAC T030, Food Microbiological Proficiency Testing Program— Final Report, China National Accreditation Board for Laboratories, Beijing 2002

  3. APLAC PT002–2003, Testing Interlaboratory comparisons, APLAC, 2003

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiang Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, W., Zheng, J., Tholen, D.W. et al. A statistical strategy for discouraging collusion in split-level proficiency testing schemes. Accred Qual Assur 10, 140–143 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0915-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0915-5

Keywords

Navigation