Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical approach to the rational selection of experimental subjects

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whilst human and animal experimentation receives much attention every year by the general media, the public and the scientific community, little has been done on how to reduce the number of living subjects to be submitted to experimental research. Researchers who design human and animal experiments are conscious that trials on such subjects present a problem, which is not only scientific, but also ethical. The national research and ethics committees regulate the selection and number of patients or mammals to be treated and make the justification of the number of living subjects an aspect of paramount importance in different scientific disciplines. However, a rational methodology to estimate a sensible number that is in accordance with the parameters of the Association of Research Ethics Committees has not been well explored. In this article, a simple statistical approach for the study of the confidence in a model is proposed. The approach can pave the way to a potentially useful method to estimate a sensible number of subjects which is in accordance with the general principles of ethical bodies from all over the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hyun JK, Kyle S, Kwang WY, Yong-Seok O, Tae GY, Suk-Min Y (2002) Auton Neurosci 102:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. June K, Dunnick LT, Burka JM, Robert S (2003) Toxicology 183:221–234

    Google Scholar 

  3. Loudon ISL, Pease JC, Cooke AM (1953) BMJ 1:911–913

    Google Scholar 

  4. Muralikrishnan G, Amalan SV, Sadasivan PK (2000) Cancer Letters 169:115–120

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schenk D, Barbour R, Dunn W, Gordon G, Grajeda H, Guido T, Hu K, Huang J, Johnson-Wood K, Khan K, Kholodenko D, Lee M, Liao Z, Lieberburg I, Motter R, Mutter L, Soriano F, Shopp G, Vasquez N, Vandevert C, Walker S, Wogulis M, Yednock T, Games D, Seubert P (1999) Nature 400:173–177

    Google Scholar 

  6. Konnert A, Berding C (2004) Accred Qual Assur 9:457–463

    Google Scholar 

  7. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/CadreListeTraites.htm

  8. Festing MFW (1997) Nature 388:321–322

    Google Scholar 

  9. http://www.city.ac.uk/ads/ec/checklist.htm

  10. Allus MA, Brereton RG, Nickless G (1989) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 6:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  11. Araujo P, Brereton R (1997) Analyst 122:621–630

    Google Scholar 

  12. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters, an introduction to design, data analysis and model building.Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental designs. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Finney DJ (1957) Experimental design and its statistical basis. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moberg L, Karlberg B (2001) Anal Chim Acta 450:143–153

    Google Scholar 

  16. Analytical Methods Committee (1994) Analyst 119:2363–2366

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Araujo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Araujo, P., Frøyland, L. Statistical approach to the rational selection of experimental subjects. Accred Qual Assur 10, 185–189 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0907-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0907-5

Keywords

Navigation