Skip to main content
Log in

Traceability and comparability of results in food measurements: a CCQM workshop at BIPM on “comparability and traceability in food analysis”

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Those presentations have not been included in this issue, interesting as they were. Some other presentations (NIST, IRMM) were not submitted (for the same reason?) despite insisting to do so.

References

  1. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (1993) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology. ISO, Genève

  2. Commonwealth Parliament of Australia (1948) Hansard (9 June 1948), Second Reading Speech, Weights and Measures (National Standards) Bill 1948. Commonwealth Parliament of Australia, p 1788. Thanks are due to G Price for this reference from Hansard, the Official Record of Parliament, Canberra

  3. P De Bièvre (2003) How to disseminate traceability? A workshop for national measurement institutes at CCQM. Accred Qual Assur 8 (2003) 445–447; Accred Qual Assur 9 (2004) 1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul De Bièvre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Bièvre, P. Traceability and comparability of results in food measurements: a CCQM workshop at BIPM on “comparability and traceability in food analysis”. Accred Qual Assur 9, 521–522 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-004-0841-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-004-0841-y

Keywords

Navigation