Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling and metrology

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The result of a measurement refers in principle only to the amount of substance actually contributing to the analytical signal. However, an appropriate definition of the measurand must include a specification of the system for which the result of the measurement should apply. All systems being inherently heterogeneous, representativity assumes importance for the metrological quality of a measurement, and the process needed to ascertain representativity is sampling. The contribution from this characteristic must be included when expressing the uncertainty of the reported value of the measurand. Representative sampling of systems that are infinite or non-uniform was developed by Pierre Gy in his Theory of Sampling. Finite systems can achieve uniformity by mechanical treatment and mixing; the heterogeneity of these systems can be characterized by a sampling constant, expressed in units of weight, for each particular species being determined. Examples of the contribution of sampling to the uncertainty of analytical results are discussed for some biological materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Bièvre P (2004) Accred. Qual. Assur. 9(3):132-136

  2. EURACHEM/CITAC (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn. LGC, Teddington, UK

  3. ISO/FDIS (2002) 11648-1: Statistical aspects of sampling from bulk materials. Part 1: General principles. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson AD (1964) Analyst 89:18–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Visman J (1969) Mater Res Standard 9(11):8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kurfürst U, Grobecker KH, Stoeppler M (1984) Trace Elem 3:591

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geelhoed B, Glass Hylke-Jan (2001) Geostandard Newslett 25:325–332

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ingamells CO, Switzer P (1973) Talanta 20:547–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ingamells CO, Pitard FF (1985) Applied geochemical analysis. Monographs on analytical chemistry and its applications, vol 88. Wiley, New York

  10. Pitard FF (1989) Pierre Gy’s sampling theory and sampling practice. CRC, Boca Raton, FL

  11. Gy P (1998) Sampling for analytical purposes. Wiley, Chichester, UK

  12. ISO (1993) GUM: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

  13. ISO (1981) Guide 31. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

  14. Heydorn K (1984) Neutron activation analysis for clinical trace element research, vol 1. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, p 35

  15. Heydorn K, Damsgaard E (1987) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 110:539–553

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chatt A, Rao RR, Jayawickreme CK, McDowell LS (1990) Fresen J Anal Chem 338:399–407

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Heydorn K (1991) Mikrochim Acta III:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  18. IAEA (2002) TECDOC-1295: Reference materials for microanalytical nuclear techniques. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, p 103

  19. Heydorn K, Damsgaard E, Rietz B (1980) Anal Chem 52:1045–1049

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ingamells CO (1974) Talanta 21:141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Esbensen K, Heydorn K (2004) Chemometrics Intell Lab Syst (in press)

Download references

Acknowledgements

One of the authors (KH) acknowledges financial and mental support from Thomas Anglov and other GUPpies at Novo Nordisk Quality Support, Bagsværd, Denmark.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaj Heydorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heydorn, K., Esbensen, K. Sampling and metrology. Accred Qual Assur 9, 391–396 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-004-0808-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-004-0808-z

Keywords

Navigation