Abstract
The limit of detection (LOD) is based strictly on an accepted probability for a false positive decision (type 1 error). For the needed standard deviation of the blank, a basic value for the calculation, three experimental different methods are described, which should be applicable in every case. Table values for simple but exact calculation, not only for single, but also for mean values, and with probabilities for the type 1 error of 1% and 5% are presented. Demands for an acceptable uncertainty of the LOD and for the validation of the result are specified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kaiser HZ (1965) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 209:1–18
DIN 32645
IUPAC. Orange book: Compendium of analytical nomenclature, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford
Funk W, Dammann V, Donnevert G (1992) Qualitätssicherung in der Analytischen Chemie. VCH, Weinheim
Fleming J, Albus H, Neidhart B, Wegscheider W (1997) Accred Qual Assur 2:51–52
Huber W (2002) Accred Qual Assur 7:256–257
Huber W (1997) Accred Qual Assur 2:376
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1997) Open File Report, pp 99–193
Vogelgesang J, Hädrich J (1998) Accred Qual Assur 3:243–255
DIN 32 645, Leerwertmethode
Huber W (2001) GIT 45:1308–1309
The definition of a Method detection limit MLD=sx t (USEPA) is similar, but neglects that there are two uncertainties (blank and sample), and not just one
DIN 32 645, Kalibriergeradenmethode
A very long list of papers with this factor begins with (1) and ends with (5)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huber, W. Basic calculations about the limit of detection and its optimal determination. Accred Qual Assur 8, 213–217 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0626-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0626-8