Abstract
ISO/IEC 17025 requires that testing laboratories establish the traceability of their measurements, preferably to the SI units of measurement. The responsibility for establishing traceability lies with each individual laboratory and must be achieved by following a metrological approach.
The results of measurements made in such a way are traceable to the standards used in method validation and to the calibration standards used during the measurement process. If these standards are traceable to SI then the measurements will also be traceable to SI.
Participation in appropriate proficiency studies (an ISO/IEC 17025 requirement) enables laboratories to demonstrate the comparability of their measurements. If the materials used for the studies have traceable assigned values, then proficiency testing also provides information about measurement accuracy and confirms, or otherwise, that appropriate traceability has been established. This paper will report on a new approach for the establishment of traceable assigned values for chemical testing proficiency studies. The work is conducted at a "fit for purpose" level of measurement uncertainty, with costs contained at a level similar to previous "consensus" based proficiency studies. By establishing traceable assigned values in a cost effective way, NARL aims to demonstrate the added value of the metrological approach to participant laboratories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thompson M, Wood R (1993) JAOAC Intl 76:926–940
ISO (1997) Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. Part 1. Development and operation of proficiency testing schemes. ISO Guide 43-1, ISO, Geneva
Lawn RE, Thompson M, Walker RF (1997) Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry. RSC, Cambridge, UK
ISO (1994) Quality systems model for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation and servicing. ISO 9001, ISO, Geneva
ISO (1999) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025, ISO, Geneva
ILAC (2000) Guidelines for the requirements of the competence of providers of proficiency testing schemes. ILAC-G13:2000, International Laboratory Accreditation Co-operation (ILAC)
Fearn T, Thompson M (2001) Analyst 126:1414–1417
ISO (1993) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISO, Geneva
EURACHEM/CITAC (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn. LGC, UK
Hasselbarth W, Bremser W, Predel R (1998) Fresenius J Anal Chem 360:317–321
Millar RG (2001) NARL Analytical Quality Assurance Study No. 01-04, Australian Govt. Analytical Laboratories, Cottesloe, Western Australia
Thompson M, Lowthian PJ (1995) Analyst 120:271–272
van der Veen MH, Horvat M, Milačič R, Bučar T, Repinc U, Ščančar J, Jaćimović R (2001) Accred Qual Assur 6:264–268
Baldan A, van der Veen MH, Prauß D, Recknagel A, Boley N, Evans S, Woods D (2000) Accred Qual Assur 6:164–167
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Australian Government Analyst for permission to publish and wish to acknowledge the contribution of NARL staff to the successful operation of the NARL proficiency program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Armishaw, P., King, B. & Millar, R.G. Achieving traceability in chemical measurement—a metrological approach to proficiency testing. Accred Qual Assur 8, 184–190 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0625-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0625-9