Skip to main content
Log in

Achieving traceability in chemical measurement—a metrological approach to proficiency testing

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

ISO/IEC 17025 requires that testing laboratories establish the traceability of their measurements, preferably to the SI units of measurement. The responsibility for establishing traceability lies with each individual laboratory and must be achieved by following a metrological approach.

The results of measurements made in such a way are traceable to the standards used in method validation and to the calibration standards used during the measurement process. If these standards are traceable to SI then the measurements will also be traceable to SI.

Participation in appropriate proficiency studies (an ISO/IEC 17025 requirement) enables laboratories to demonstrate the comparability of their measurements. If the materials used for the studies have traceable assigned values, then proficiency testing also provides information about measurement accuracy and confirms, or otherwise, that appropriate traceability has been established. This paper will report on a new approach for the establishment of traceable assigned values for chemical testing proficiency studies. The work is conducted at a "fit for purpose" level of measurement uncertainty, with costs contained at a level similar to previous "consensus" based proficiency studies. By establishing traceable assigned values in a cost effective way, NARL aims to demonstrate the added value of the metrological approach to participant laboratories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson M, Wood R (1993) JAOAC Intl 76:926–940

    Google Scholar 

  2. ISO (1997) Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. Part 1. Development and operation of proficiency testing schemes. ISO Guide 43-1, ISO, Geneva

  3. Lawn RE, Thompson M, Walker RF (1997) Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry. RSC, Cambridge, UK

  4. ISO (1994) Quality systems model for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation and servicing. ISO 9001, ISO, Geneva

  5. ISO (1999) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025, ISO, Geneva

  6. ILAC (2000) Guidelines for the requirements of the competence of providers of proficiency testing schemes. ILAC-G13:2000, International Laboratory Accreditation Co-operation (ILAC)

  7. Fearn T, Thompson M (2001) Analyst 126:1414–1417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ISO (1993) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISO, Geneva

  9. EURACHEM/CITAC (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn. LGC, UK

  10. Hasselbarth W, Bremser W, Predel R (1998) Fresenius J Anal Chem 360:317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Millar RG (2001) NARL Analytical Quality Assurance Study No. 01-04, Australian Govt. Analytical Laboratories, Cottesloe, Western Australia

  12. Thompson M, Lowthian PJ (1995) Analyst 120:271–272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Veen MH, Horvat M, Milačič R, Bučar T, Repinc U, Ščančar J, Jaćimović R (2001) Accred Qual Assur 6:264–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baldan A, van der Veen MH, Prauß D, Recknagel A, Boley N, Evans S, Woods D (2000) Accred Qual Assur 6:164–167

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Australian Government Analyst for permission to publish and wish to acknowledge the contribution of NARL staff to the successful operation of the NARL proficiency program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roderick G. Millar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armishaw, P., King, B. & Millar, R.G. Achieving traceability in chemical measurement—a metrological approach to proficiency testing. Accred Qual Assur 8, 184–190 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0625-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0625-9

Keywords

Navigation