Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring atmospheric carbon dioxide—the calibration challenge

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measurement of CO2 in the atmosphere presents a significant metrology and quality assurance challenge. While global trends can be well determined with just a few sampling sites, the plethora of natural processes involved in exchange of CO2 with the atmosphere makes the identification of those most effective in regulating the long–term atmospheric levels elusive. To unambiguously link particular processes with significant global trends requires continuous monitoring of small spatial and temporal differences in the atmospheric mixing ratio of CO2 (and related tracers) over the major global CO2–exchanging regions. Such differences are often comparable in magnitude to the precision of conventional non–dispersive infrared or gas chromatograph analysers, and much smaller than the uncertainty in the link to a primary standard. In general, laboratories cannot currently merge data at high precision and thus achieve adequate global coverage. We describe an improvement in precision (and operating cost) of the conventional infrared analyser technique. Apart from immediate biogeochemical applications, the new system has demonstrated outstanding diagnostic capabilities and revealed a number of unsuspected sources of bias affecting conventional measurement and calibration methods. In addressing these biases, opportunities are created to improve the link between CO2 measurement and fundamental constants, and to improve the propagation of CO2 standards to field measurement systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Etheridge DM, Steele LP, Langenfelds RL, Francey RJ, Barnola JM, Morgan VI (1996) J Geophys Res 101:4115–4128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Etheridge DM, Steele LP, Francey RJ, Langenfelds RL (1998) J Geophys Res 103:15979–15993

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Francey RJ, Allison CE, Etheridge DM, Trudinger CM, Enting IG, Leuenberger M, Langenfelds RL, Michel E, Steele LP (1999) Tellus 51B: 170–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Houghton JT and others (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 944

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matear RJ, Hirst AC (1999) Tellus 51B: 722–733

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarmiento JL, Hughes TMC (1999) Tellus 51B: 560–561

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones CD, Spall SA, Totterdell IJ (2000) Nature 408:184–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Freidlingstein P, Bopp L, Ciais P, Dufrene JL, Fairhead L, LeTruet H, Monfray P, Orr J (2001) Geophys Res Let 28:1543–1546

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pearman GI, Hyson P, Fraser PJ (1983) J Geophys Res 88:3581–3590

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Enting IG, Trudinger CM, Francey RJ (1995) Tellus 47B: 35–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. GLOBALVIEW–CO2 (2000): Cooperative Atmospheric Data Integration Project — Carbon Dioxide. CD–ROM, NOAA CMDL, Boulder, Colorado

  12. Bousquet PP, Ciais P, Peylin P, Ramonet M, Monfray P (1999) J Geophys Res 104:26,161–26,178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gurney KR., Law RM, Denning AS, Rayner PJ, Baker D, Bousquet P, Bruhwiler L, Chen YH, Ciais P, Fan S, Fung IY, Gloor M, Heimann M, Higuchi K, John J, Maki T, Maksyutov S, Masarie K, Peylin P, Prather M, Pak BC, Randerson J, Sarmiento J, Taguchi T, Takahashi T, Yuen CW (2002) Nature 415:626–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rayner PJ, O'Brien D (2001) Geophys Res Let 28:175–178

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Francey RJ, Rayner PJ, Allison CE (2001) In: Schulze ED and others (eds) Global biogeochemical cycles in the climate system. Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp 245–252

  16. World Meteorological Organization (1981) Report of the WMO/UNEP/ICSU Meeting on Instruments, Standardization and Measurement Techniques for Atmospheric CO2, 8–11 September 1981, Geneva

  17. Pearman GI (1993) Report of the Seventh WMO Meeting of Experts on Carbon Dioxide Concentration and Isotopic Measurement Techniques, WMO TD–669, GAW No 88. WMO, Geneva

  18. Peterson JP Trans PP, Kitzis D (1999) Report of the Ninth WMO Meeting of Experts on Carbon Dioxide Concentration and R:elated Tracer Measurement Techniques, WMO TD–952, GAW No 132. WMO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  19. Masarie KA, Langenfelds RL, Allison CE, Conway TJ, Dlugokencky EJ, Francey RJ, Novelli PC, Steele LP, Tans PP, Vaughn B., White JWC (2001) J Geophys Res 106:20445–20464

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao,C, Tans PP, Thoning K (1997) J Geophys Res 102:5885–5894

    Google Scholar 

  21. Trivett N, Köhler A (1999) Guide on Sampling and Analysis Techniques for Chemical Constituents and Physical Properties in Air and Precipitation as Applied at Stations of the Global Atmosphere Watch: pt. 1, Carbon Dioxide, WMO TD–980, GAW No 134. WMO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  22. Da Costa GA, Steele LP (1999) Report of the ninth WMO Meeting of Experts on Carbon Dioxide Concentration and Related Tracer Measurement Techniques, Aspendale, Vic. WMO TD–952, GAW No 132. WMO, Geneva, pp 16–20

  23. Langenfelds RL (2002). Studies of the Global Carbon Cycle using Atmospheric Oxygen and Associated Tracers. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania xviii, p 320

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper owes much to the CSIRO Atmospheric Research LOFLO construction team of John Bennett, Russell Howden, Ian Morrissey, Bernard Petraitis, Craig Smith, Darren Spencer, Marcel van der Schoot and Grant Da Costa. Ray Langenfelds provided valuable insights into system performance using mass spectrometry. Laurie Besley, CSIRO National Measurement Laboratory, provided valuable advice and assistance with the concept of developing a new generation of gravimetric standards. External support for the development of the LOFLO analyser system has come from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, CSIRO Marine Research, the Australian Greenhouse Office, and the CNRS/CEA and European Commission via Dr Philippe Ciais.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger James Francey.

Additional information

Presented at The INTERACT 2002 Conference, 21–25 July 2002, Sydney, Australia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francey, R.J., Steele, L.P. Measuring atmospheric carbon dioxide—the calibration challenge. Accred Qual Assur 8, 200–204 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0620-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0620-1

Keywords

Navigation