Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating measurement uncertainty in an afternoon. A case study in the practical application of measurement uncertainty

  • Practioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ISO/IEC 17025:1999 standard requires chemical testing laboratories to have an estimate of the uncertainty of their measurements. This is a new requirement for many laboratories and there is confusion as to how to estimate uncertainty. Concerns have been raised about the time and effort required to obtain uncertainty estimates.

Uncertainty budgets were prepared for the measurement of benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylenes (BTEX) in water using purge and trap coupled with GC/MS. A time limit of one working afternoon (2 pm–5.30 pm) was imposed for preparing the uncertainty estimate. Details of the uncertainty estimate for toluene are described.

The method in question had been in routine use for several years and the laboratory held third party (NATA) accreditation for the test. Consequently a considerable amount of performance data was readily available. Relevant information was extracted from the documented test method, validation data, instrument calibration and from routine quality control. This data was combined according to the principles of the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty, as promulgated in the Eurachem document "Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement."

The uncertainty estimates were compared to estimates obtained from generalised empirical models (the Horwitz and Lowthian equations), and from interlaboratory studies of this analysis.

A traceability chain from routine measurements to the SI units of metre, kilogram and mole is described.

Realistic and useful uncertainty estimates were obtained with a few hours work using data extant in the laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO/IEC (1999) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025:1999 International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland

  2. ISO (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  3. Eurachem CITAC (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement 2nd edn. Eurachem CITAC. www.eurachem.ul.pt

  4. ISO (1993) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology, 2nd edn. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  5. Miller JC, Miller JN (1993) Statistics for analytical chemistry, 3rd edn. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK

  6. Horwitz W (1982) Anal Chem 54:67A–76A

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson M, Lowthian PJ (1993) Analyst 120:271–272

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson M (2000) Analyst 125:385–386

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. National Analytical Reference Laboratory (2000) AQA 00-03 BTEX and gasoline range organic petroleum hydrocarbons in water. National Analytical Reference Laboratory, Perth, Australia

  10. Lawn RE, Thompson M, Walker RF (1997) Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank his AGAL colleagues Koon-Bay Ho and Peter Anstis for discussions of the test method and for providing the validation and quality control data. Thanks also to Hilary Cadman, Laurie Besley, Rod Millar, Paula McLay and Bernard King for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Armishaw.

Additional information

Presented at INTERACT 2002 Conference, July 21–25, 2002, Sydney, Australia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armishaw, P. Estimating measurement uncertainty in an afternoon. A case study in the practical application of measurement uncertainty. Accred Qual Assur 8, 218–224 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0610-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0610-3

Keywords

Navigation