Abstract
Pregnancy intention is reported to be associated with the risk of postpartum depression (PPD), but the impact of feelings toward being pregnant on PPD is unknown. We aimed to examine whether feelings toward being pregnant are associated with PPD at 1 month after childbirth. In our nationwide study between 2011 and 2014 in Japan, we used multivariate logistic regression analyses to examine the associations between pregnancy intention and feelings toward being pregnant with PPD [Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS score > 9 or > 12)] among Japanese women. Among 92,431 women, 14.0 and 5.4% had PPD with EPDS scores > 9 and > 12, respectively. Compared with women who felt very happy to be pregnant, those whose pregnancy was unintended but happy, unintended and confused, those who felt troubled, and those who felt no emotion toward being pregnant had increased risks of PPD [multivariable odds ratios (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) = 1.17 (1.11–1.22), 1.39 (1.29–1.49), 1.74 (1.42–2.14), and 1.58 (1.22–2.02), respectively, for EPDS score > 9]. Those associations were more evident without antenatal possible mental illness (K6 score < 13). Women whose pregnancy was unintended should be regarded as targets for the early detection and prevention of PPD irrespective of whether they felt happy or confused.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Postpartum depression (PPD) is a major concern in reproductive health (O’Hara and McCabe 2013). The prevalence of PPD differs by the diagnosis criteria and timing (O’Hara and Swain 1996) but is reported to be between 9 and 24% among Japanese women (Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare 2013; Norhayati et al. 2015) and between 10 and 15% among US women (Patel et al. 2012). Recently, the time period of diagnosis was stated in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5), and PPD is defined as depressive episodes that occur during pregnancy and within 4 weeks of childbirth (American Psychiatric Association 2013). Thus, monitoring and evaluating the prevalence and risk factors for PPD according to the defined period are essential. PPD is associated with adverse health outcomes for infants (Stein et al. 1991; Kingston et al. 2012) as well as for mothers (van Wijngaarden et al. 2004; Pearlstein et al. 2009); therefore, efforts to detect and decrease the prevalence of PPD have been made (Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare 2013; Ko et al. 2017). In Japan, the national and municipal government began financially supporting postpartum assessment for PPD screening at 2 weeks and 1 month after childbirth (Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2017).
On the other hand, half of all pregnancies have been reported as unintended in both low- and high-income countries (Sedgh et al. 2014; Finer and Zolna 2016). Previous studies have shown the association of unintended pregnancies with PPD. A multi-center study conducted with 290 Japanese women reported that women not desiring to be pregnant had a higher proportion of major depressive episodes during pregnancy and at three postpartum months (Kitamura et al. 2006); however, they did not examine the association between the desire for pregnancy and major depressive episodes probably because of the small number of participants. A hospital-based study conducted with 2076 Korean women reported the association of unintended pregnancy with the risk of PPD at 1, 4, 12, and 24 postpartum months, but they did not include information on the antenatal possible mental illness of the studied women (Bahk et al. 2015). Another hospital-based study conducted with 688 US women has revealed the association of unintended pregnancy with the risk of PPD at 3 and 12 postpartum months (Mercier et al. 2013). However, besides its moderate sample size, pregnancy intention was examined during the second trimester in that study, which might have led to a recall bias.
According to the literatures mentioned above, unintended pregnancy is a risk factor for PPD; however, not all unintended pregnancies are regarded as unhappy. In a study conducted on pregnant women in the USA, half of the unintended pregnancies were perceived as happy (Sable and Libbus 2000). There might be ambiguous feelings toward being pregnant. Therefore, it might be difficult to dichotomously express feelings (intended or unintended, happy or unhappy), and combined categories of feelings may be useful to reflect the actual emotional status of pregnant women. To the best of our knowledge, no study has evaluated the association of feelings toward being pregnant with PPD at one postpartum month with a large sample size.
The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) assessed information about feelings toward being pregnant, including pregnancy intention and PPD at 1 month after childbirth using large nationwide population samples. Using these data, we compared the risk of PPD among women who felt very happy to be pregnant, and those whose pregnancy was unintended but felt happy, unintended and felt confused, felt troubled, and those who felt no emotion toward being pregnant.
Materials and methods
Study population
The JECS is a nationwide government-funded birth cohort study that began recruiting expectant mothers in January 2011. Fifteen Regional Centers (Hokkaido, Miyagi, Fukushima, Chiba, Kanagawa, Koshin, Toyama, Aichi, Kyoto, Osaka, Hyogo, Tottori, Kochi, Fukuoka, and South Kyushu/Okinawa) were selected. Women were recruited during early pregnancy at obstetrics clinics/hospitals and/or local municipal offices issuing mother and child health handbooks. Recruitment started in January 2011 and continued until March 2014. The JECS protocol has been published elsewhere (Kawamoto et al. 2014; Michikawa et al. 2018). The details of the JECS have been described in previous studies (Michikawa et al. 2015; Suzuki et al. 2016). The study included data measured at enrollment during the first trimester, at pregnancy checkup examination during the second trimester, at delivery, and at postpartum 1 month by pregnant women and obstetricians.
Participants
Among 103,099 pregnancies, we only included those with a live singleton infant (n = 98,259). The complete information on pregnancy intention and their feelings toward being pregnant, and PPD status was available for 92,431 pregnancies out of the 98,259 recruited pregnancies (94.1%).
Ethical issues
The JECS protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ministry of the Environment’s Institutional Review Board on Epidemiological Studies and by the Ethics Committees of all participating institutions. The JECS was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and other nationally valid regulations and guidelines.
Variables
Data on women’s feelings toward being pregnant, including pregnancy intention, were collected at the time of the registration generally during the first trimester. Data were primarily combined and categorized into five groups according to the women’s answers to the question “When you recognized the current pregnancy, how did you feel?” (1) Very happy, (2) unintended but happy, (3) unintended and confused, (4) troubled, and (5) no emotion.
We collected a Japanese-language Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score at 1 month after childbirth. EPDS (Cox et al. 1987), which comprises 10 items listed in a four-point Likert scale from 0 to 3 according to the increasing severity of symptoms, ranges from “Yes, most of the time,” “Yes, sometimes,” “Not very often,” to “No, not at all.” Okano et al. translated the EPDS into Japanese, back-translated the scale, conducted the test–retest method to examine reliability, and calculated Cronbach’s α (0.78) (Okano et al. 1996). Okano et al. reported that the appropriate cutoff point for detecting PPD was 9 or higher, with 75% sensitivity and 93% specificity (Yamaoka et al. 2016; Muchanga et al. 2017), whereas 12 or higher is generally used as the cutoff point worldwide (Cox et al. 1987). A recent study on Japanese women has shown the optimal cutoff of EPDS score for major depressive episode during pregnancy as 12 (Usuda et al. 2017). We, therefore, used both cutoff points > 9, and > 12, in this study.
The covariates included women’s age, parity, marital status, smoking habit, education, annual family equivalent income, intimate partner verbal violence at pregnancy (IPV), possible mental illness during a month prior to enrollment, history of antidepressant use for the past 1 year, and residential area. Marital status, smoking habit, IPV, and antenatal possible mental illness were obtained using the medical records at the registration; education and income during the second trimester; parity at delivery from the obstetrician, and age were obtained from the obstetrician’s record 1 month after childbirth. The information in the medical records was transcribed by physicians, midwives/nurses, or research coordinators. Women’s age was categorized as 5-year age groups; parity as primiparous or multiparous; marital status as married, never (not yet), divorced, and widowed; smoking as never smokers, former smokers who previously smoked but quit before pregnancy, quit smokers who stopped smoking during pregnancy, and continued smokers who continued to smoke during pregnancy; education as junior high school, high school, vocational school, junior college, and university and higher; and IPV as none, rarely, sometimes, and often. Equivalent income was calculated by dividing the average amount in 6-scale family income categories by the square root of the number of family members and re-categorized into quartiles.
Women’s possible mental illness during the past month prior to enrollment was assessed using a Japanese version of the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. The K6 score is originally used for screening “serious mental illness” (Kessler et al. 2003) or mood and anxiety disorders (Furukawa et al. 2003) in the general population, with a cutoff point of 13 or higher (Kessler et al. 2003; Furukawa et al. 2003). A Japanese version of K6 was developed and validated with a similar cutoff point (12/13) (Furukawa et al. 2008) Therefore, we regarded K6 score > 13 as possible mental illness. The history of antidepressant use was determined by a question regarding the use of antidepressants in the past year. Residential areas were represented by the locations of the 15 Regional Centers where the data were collected.
Statistical analyses
Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the association between feelings toward being pregnant and the risk of PPD. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated after adjusting for potential confounders. Using the category of women with a “very happy” feeling as the reference group, we estimated the risk of PPD (EPDS score > 9 and > 12) among women whose pregnancy was unintended but happy, unintended and confused, felt troubled, and those who had no emotion toward being pregnant. We also used multivariable logistic regression analyses stratified by women’s antenatal possible mental illness to examine whether the antenatal possible mental illness modifies the association between the feelings toward being pregnant and PPD (EPDS score > 9 and > 12). All analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis Software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Table 1 shows the characteristics of 92,431 women. Among them, 14.0 and 5.4% had PPD with EPDS scores > 9 and > 12, respectively. Women who regarded their pregnancy as unintended and confused, felt troubled, and those who felt no emotion toward being pregnant had higher proportions of PPD than those who regarded their pregnancy as very happy. High proportions of PPD were also seen in younger, in primiparous, in never married, divorced, or widowed women, in women who quit or continued smoking when pregnant, in women with lower education, in women who experienced IPV, in women with a mental illness (K6 score > 13), and in women with a history of antidepressant use.
Compared with women who felt very happy to be pregnant, women who felt their pregnancy was unintended but happy, unintended and confused, or those who felt no emotion toward being pregnant had an increased risk of PPD: OR (95% CI) = 1.25 (1.20–1.31), 1.64 (1.53–1.76), and 1.67 (1.30–2.13), respectively, for EPDS score ≥ 9, and OR (95% CI) = 1.36 (1.27–1.46), 1.67 (1.51–1.85), and 1.78 (1.26–2.50), respectively, for EPDS score ≥ 12 (Table 2). Women who felt their pregnancy was troubled had the largest risk of PPD compared with those with other feelings: OR (95% CI) = 2.25 (1.83–2.75) for EPDS score ≥ 9 and 2.85 (2.23–3.64) for EPDS score ≥ 12.
The associations between feelings toward being pregnant and the risk of PPD stratified by antenatal possible mental illness are shown in Table 3. Those associations were generally stronger among women without possible mental illness (K6 score < 13). In those with possible mental illness (K6 score > 13), increased risks for PPD were observed only among women who felt their pregnancy as unintended and confused.
Discussion and conclusions
In this nationwide study, we found that women who felt their pregnancy was unintended but happy, those who felt their pregnancy was unintended and confused, and those who felt no emotion toward being pregnant had increased risks of PPD (EPDS score > 9 and > 12) after adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and antenatal mental factors. We also found that women who felt troubled with their pregnancy had the highest risk of PPD. The risks of PPD with EPDS score > 12 were generally higher than those of PPD with EPDS score > 9.
Our result that unintended pregnancy was associated with increased risk of PPD was consistent with previous findings in Japan and other high-income countries (Mercier et al. 2013; Kitamura et al. 2006; O’Hara and McCabe 2013; Bahk et al. 2015; Beck 2001).
In the present study, we unexpectedly found an increased risk of PPD among women who felt their pregnancy was unintended but happy. There was a previous report in African-American and Latin populations stating that pregnancy intentions and happiness were strongly associated, but happiness was a better predictor of reduced PPD rather than intention (Blake et al. 2007). Our finding did not meet this notion possibly due to differences in ethnicity, culture, and participants’ characteristics.
In the analysis stratified by antenatal possible mental illness, the associations were weaker among women with possible mental illness, which implies that antenatal possible mental illness modified the association between their feelings toward being pregnant and risk of PPD.
The biological mechanism underlying PPD remains unclear (Patel et al. 2012). Changes in the levels of several hormones after delivery have been suggested to induce PPD, but the findings were inconsistent (Soares and Zitek 2008; Patel et al. 2012; O’Hara and McCabe 2013). In contrast, regarding psychological mechanisms, the feeling toward being pregnant plays a role in PPD; in addition to history of depression and antenatal possible mental illness, antenatal anxiety, perinatal stress, feeling pessimistic during the antenatal period, and fear of childbirth have been considered to be predictors of PPD (O’Hara et al. 1991; Kitamura et al. 2006; Beck 2001, Condon and Watson 1987; Räisänen et al. 2013). Regarding the mechanism by which negative feelings or antenatal possible mental illnesses may affect the risk of PPD, the bonding of mother to fetus may play a role. An association between anxiety during pregnancy and risk of PPD was shown to be mediated by bonding failure (Kokubu et al. 2012). Considering mother-to-infant bonding, which comprises two factors; “anger and rejection” and “lack of affection” (Cattell 1966; Taylor et al. 2005), feeling troubled by being pregnant may correspond to “anger and rejection” component, and feeling no emotion may correspond to “lack of affection” component. Bonding failure between mother and fetus may persist after childbirth.
The major strengths of this study include a cohort study with a large sample size, in which the information on pregnancy intention and antenatal possible mental illness was collected during early pregnancy, precluding the possibility of recall bias. We adjusted for potential confounding variables such as maternal demographic characteristics, socioeconomic factors, and antenatal possible mental illness. Another strength is that the outcome was shown as both PPD with EPDS scores > 9 and > 12, and was evaluated during postpartum 1 month. The findings of this study may be useful to prevent and control PPD through the early detection of high-risk individuals. Antenatal screening for PPD through a questionnaire on feelings toward being pregnant is possible using antenatal regular check-ups at obstetrics clinics/hospitals or at local municipal offices issuing mother and child health handbooks.
This study is one of the few studies that demonstrate the association between feelings toward being pregnant and risk of PPD. However, several limitations should be addressed. First, the intention and feelings were not assessed separately. The questionnaire had missed some combinations such as unintended but very happy pregnancies, and intended but troubled pregnancies. Second, the questionnaire on pregnancy intention and feelings toward being pregnant was not validated. However, it is logically difficult because of no measurement golden standards for the comparison. Third, our measurements, EPDS and K6, are self-reported and not diagnosed by psychiatrists. However, EPDS and K6 are commonly used in research and are well-validated, reliable measurement; therefore, the impact of this error is expected to be small. Fourth, residual confounding could have occurred from unmeasured confounding variables, such as mothers’ chronic diseases.
In conclusion, our findings show that women whose pregnancy was unintended but felt happy had an increased risk of PPD. Women who regarded their pregnancies as unintended and felt confused, felt troubled, or had no specific emotion were also associated with an increased risk of PPD. These high-risk women should be regarded as targets for the early detection and prevention of PPD.
References
American Psychiatric Association (ed) (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC
Bahk J, Yun SC, Kim YM, Khang YH (2015) Impact of unintended pregnancy on maternal mental health: a causal analysis using follow up data of the Panel Study on Korean Children (PSKC). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15:85
Beck CT (2001) Predictors of postpartum depression: an update. Nurs Res 50:275–285
Blake SM, Kiely M, Gard CC, el-Mohandes AAE, el-Khorazaty MN, the NIH-DC Initiative (2007) Pregnancy intentions and happiness among pregnant black women at high risk for adverse infant health outcomes. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 39:194–205
Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1:245–276
Condon JT, Watson TL (1987) The maternity blues: exploration of a psychological hypothesis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 76:164–171
Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 150:782–786
Finer LB, Zolna MR (2016) Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. N Engl J Med 374:843–852
Furukawa TA, Kessler RC, Slade T, Andrews G (2003) The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Psychol Med 33:357–362
Furukawa TA, Kawakami N, Saitoh M, Ono Y, Nakane Y, Nakamura Y, Tachimori H, Iwata N, Uda H, Nakane H, Watanabe M, Naganuma Y, Hata Y, Kobayashi M, Miyake Y, Takeshima T, Kikkawa T (2008) The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 17:152–158
Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017) The expected practice of postpartum women’s health checkup. http://www.jaog.or.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/sanpukenkoukensa.pdf. , Accessed 12 May 2017
Kawamoto T, Nitta H, Murata K et al (2014) Rationale and study design of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). BMC Public Health 14:25
Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Normand SLT, Manderscheid RW, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM (2003) Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60:184–189
Kingston D, Tough S, Whitfield H (2012) Prenatal and postpartum maternal psychological distress and infant development: a systematic review. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 43:683–714
Kitamura T, Yoshida K, Okano T, Kinoshita K, Hayashi M, Toyoda N, Ito M, Kudo N, Tada K, Kanazawa K, Sakumoto K, Satoh S, Furukawa T, Nakano H (2006) Multicentre prospective study of perinatal depression in Japan: incidence and correlates of antenatal and postnatal depression. Arch Womens Ment Health 9:121–130
Ko JY, Rockhill KM, Tong VT, Morrow B, Farr SL (2017) Trends in postpartum depressive symptoms—27 states, 2004, 2008, and 2012. MMWR 66:153–158
Kokubu M, Okano T, Sugiyama T (2012) Postnatal depression, maternal bonding failure, and negative attitudes towards pregnancy: a longitudinal study of pregnant women in Japan. Arch Womens Ment Health 15:211–216
Mercier RJ, Garrett J, Thorp J, Siega-Riz AM (2013) Pregnancy intention and postpartum depression: secondary data analysis from a prospective cohort. BJOG 120:1116–1122
Michikawa T, Nitta H, Nakayama SF, Ono M, Yonemoto J, Tamura K, Suda E, Ito H, Takeuchi A, Kawamoto T (2015) The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS): a preliminary report on selected characteristics of approximately 10 000 pregnant women recruited during the first year of the study. J Epidemiol 25:452–458
Michikawa T, Nitta H, Nakayama SF, Yamazaki S, Isobe T, Tamura K, Suda E, Ono M, Yonemoto J, Iwai-Shimada M, Kobayashi Y, Suzuki G, Kawamoto T, the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group (2018) Baseline profile of participants in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). J Epidemiol 28:99–104
Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (2013) Final evaluation of “Health parents and children 21”, reported on 28, Nov 2013. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/0000030389.html. Accessed 20 Feb. 2017 (in Japanese)
Muchanga SMJ, Yasumitsu-Lovell K, Eitoku M, Mbelambela EP, Ninomiya H, Komori K, Tozin R, Maeda N, Fujieda M, Suganuma N (2017) Preconception gynecological risk factors of postpartum depression among Japanese women: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). J Affect Disord 217:34–41
Norhayati MN, Hazlina NHN, Asrenee AR, Emilin WMAW (2015) Magnitude and risk factors for postpartum symptoms: a literature review. J Affect Disord 175:34–52
O’Hara MW, McCabe JE (2013) Postpartum depression: current status and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 9:379–407
O’Hara MW, Schlechte JA, Lewis DA, Varner MW (1991) Controlled prospective study of postpartum mood disorders: psychological, environmental, and hormonal variables. J Abnorm Psychol 100:63–73
O’Hara MW, Swain AM (1996) Rates and risk of postpartum depression—a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:37–54
Okano T, Murata M, Musuji F et al (1996) Validation and reliability of Japanese version of EPDS (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale). Arch Psychiatr Diagn Clin Eval 7:523–533
Patel M, Bailey RK, Jabeen S, Ali S, Barker NC, Osiezagha K (2012) Postpartum depression: a review. J Health Care Poor Underserved 23:534–542
Pearlstein T, Howard M, Salisbury A, Zlotnick C (2009) Postpartum depression. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:357–364
Räisänen S, Lehto SM, Nielsen HS, Gissler M, Kramer MR, Heinonen S (2013) Fear of childbirth predicts postpartum depression: a population-based analysis of 511 422 singleton births in Finland. BMJ Open 3:e004047
Sable MR, Libbus MK (2000) Pregnancy intention and pregnancy happiness: are they different? Matern Child Health J 4:191–196
Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R (2014) Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plan 45:301–314
Soares CN, Zitek B (2008) Reproductive hormone sensitivity and risk for depression across the female life cycle: a continuum of vulnerability? J Psychiatry Neurosci 33:331–343
Stein A, Gath DH, Bucher J, Bond A, Day A, Cooper PJ (1991) The relationship between post-natal depression and mother-child interaction. Br J Psychiatry 158:46–52
Suzuki K, Shinohara R, Sato M, Otawa S, Yamagata Z (2016) Association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and birth weight: an appropriately adjusted model from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. J Epidemiol 26:371–377
Taylor A, Atkins R, Kumar R, Adams D, Glover V (2005) A new Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale: links with early maternal mood. Arch Womens Ment Health 8:45–51
Usuda K, Nishi D, Okazaki E, Makino M, Sano Y (2017) Optimal cut-off score of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for major depressive episode during pregnancy in Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 71:836–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12562
van Wijngaarden B, Schene AH, Koeter MWJ (2004) Family caregiving in depression: impact on caregivers’ daily life, distress, and help seeking. J Affect Disord 81:211–222
Yamaoka Y, Fujiwara T, Tamiya N (2016) Association between maternal postpartum depression and unintentional injury among 4-month-old infants in Japan. Matern Child Health J 20:326–336
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all participants who have taken part in the JECS. We would like to also thank all staff members of the JECS.
Members of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS), as of 2017 (principal investigator, Toshihiro Kawamoto), are as follows: Hirohisa Saito (National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan), Reiko Kishi (Hokkaido Regional Center for JECS, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan), Nobuo Yaegashi (Miyagi Regional Center for JECS, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan), Koichi Hashimoto (Fukushima Regional Center for JECS, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan), Chisato Mori (Chiba Regional Center for JECS, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan), Shuichi Ito (Kanagawa Regional Center for JECS, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan), Zentaro Yamagata (Koshin Regional Center for JECS, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan), Hidekuni Inadera (Toyama Regional Center for JECS, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan), Michihiro Kamijima (Aichi Regional Center for JECS, Nagoya City University, Aichi, Japan), Takeo Nakayama (Kyoto Regional Center for JECS, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan), Hiroyasu Iso (Osaka Regional Center for JECS, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan), Masayuki Shima (Hyogo Regional Center for JECS, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan), Yasuaki Hirooka (Tottori Regional Center for JECS, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan), Narufumi Suganuma (Kochi Regional Center for JECS, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan), Koichi Kusuhara (Fukuoka Regional Center for JECS, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan), and Takahiko Katoh (South Kyushu/Okinawa Regional Center for JECS, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan).
Funding
This study was funded and supported by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. The findings and conclusions of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the above government agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author Sachiko Baba, Author Takashi Kimura, Author Satoyo Ikehara, Author Kaori Honjo, Author Ehab S Eshak, Author Takuyo Sato, and Author Hiroyasu Iso declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Baba, S., Kimura, T., Ikehara, S. et al. Impact of intention and feeling toward being pregnant on postpartum depression: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). Arch Womens Ment Health 23, 131–137 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0938-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0938-7