Archives of Women's Mental Health

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 295–305 | Cite as

Prevalence and incidence of postnatal depression: what can systematic reviews tell us?

Review Article



Postnatal depression (PND) has a significant impact on maternal mental health. Systematic reviews provide a useful tool to summarise research, however little is known about the quantity and quality of existing systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence of PND.


The objective of this paper is to provide a systematic overview of existing systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence of PND in the first 12 postnatal months.


Medline, Embase, Cinahl, PsychInfo and the Cochrane Library were searched for systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence of PND which met the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) criteria. Characteristics of selected reviews, completeness of reporting results and methodological quality were evaluated.


Five reviews were selected for appraisal. Only one systematic review was identified; four reviews were non-systematic. Only two reviews provided a quantitative summary estimate of prevalence of PND. Completeness of reporting results using published guidelines was not undertaken by any review. The methodological quality of four reviews revealed limitations.


Limited generalisable evidence exists in the form of high-quality systematic reviews to inform current knowledge of the prevalence and incidence of PND. The implication of this represents an important limitation for health services planning and service delivery.


Postnatal depression Prevalence Incidence Overview Appraisal 


  1. Altman DG, Bland MJ (1994) Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ 309:102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, text revision (DSM-IV-TR), 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews G, Sanderson K, Corry J, Lapsley HM (2000) Using epidemiological data to model efficiency in reducing the burden of depression. J Mental Health Policy Econ 3:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker LA, Oxman AD (2009) Overviews of reviews [Chapter 22]. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.2 [updated Sept 2009] The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available from
  5. Centre for Reviews & Dissemination (2009) York, University of York. Available from
  6. Chisholm D, Sanderson K, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Saxena S (2004) Reducing the global burden of depression: population-level analysis of intervention cost-effectiveness in 14 world regions. Br J Psychiatry 184:393–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Coghill SR, Caplan HL, Alexander H (1986) Impact of maternal depression on cognitive development of young children. BMJ 292:1165–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Consort (2010) Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Group., Accessed 2nd March 2010
  9. Downs S, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:377–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (eds) (2001a) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. BMJ, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M (2001b) Systematic reviews of observational studies. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (eds) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. BMJ, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T (2005) Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol 106:1071–1083PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, Lohr K, Swinson T, Gartlehner G, Brody S, Miller W (2005) Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 119. Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodman JH (2004) Postpartum depression beyond the early postpartum period. JOGN Nursing 33:410–420Google Scholar
  15. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD (2009) Medicine’s methodological debt to the social sciences. James Lind Library. Available at [, Accessed 17th September
  16. Halbreich U, Karkun S (2006) Cross-cultural and social diversity of prevalence of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord 91:97–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Mayrent SL (1987) Epidemiology in medicine. Little, Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. Hewitt CE, Gilbody SM, Brealey S, Paulden M, Palmer S, Mann R, Green J, Morrell J, Barkham M, Light K, Richards D (2009) Methods to identify postnatal depression in primary care: an integrated evidence synthesis and value of information analysis. Health Technology Assessment 13(36)Google Scholar
  19. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2009) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.2 [updated Sept 2009], The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available from
  20. Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M (1999) The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trial for meta-analysis. JAMA 282:1054–1060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas KR, Rush AJ, Walters EE, Wang PS (2003) The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 289:3095–3105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Leahy-Warren P, Mccarthy G (2007) Postnatal depression: prevalence, mothers’ perspectives, and treatments. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 21:91–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup D (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 354:1896–1900CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Murray CJ, Lopez AD (eds) (1996) The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from disease, injuries and risk factors in 1990. Harvard School of Public Health on behalf of the World Bank, Harvard University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  25. Murray L, Cooper P, Hipwell A (2003) Mental health of parents caring for infants. Arch Womens Ment Health 6(Suppl 2):s71–s77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Murray L, Cooper PJ (1996) The impact of postpartum depression and child development. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence (2007) Antenatal and post-natal mental health, the nice guideline on clinical management and service guidance. The British Psychological Society & The Royal College of Psychiatrists, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Nicholson P (1998) Post-natal depression, psychology, science and the transition to motherhood. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nielsen Forman D, Videbech P, Hedegaard M, Dalby Salvig J, Secher NJ (2000) Postpartum depression: identification of women at risk. BJOG 107:1210–1217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Hara MW, Swain AM (1996) Rates and risk of postpartum depression: a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oates M (2003) Postnatal depression and screening: too broad a sweep? B J Gen Pract 53:596–597Google Scholar
  32. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH (1991) Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol 44:1271–1278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Paulden M, Palmer S, Hewitt C, Gilbody S (2009) Screening for postnatal depression in primary care: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 339:b5203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pope S, Watts J, Evans S, Mcdonald S, Henderson J (2000) Post-natal depression- a systematic review of published scietific literature to 1999. National Health and Medical Research CouncilGoogle Scholar
  35. Ross LE, Dennis C-L (2009) The prevalence of postpartum depression amongst women with substance use, an abuse history, or chronic illness: A systematic review. J Womens Health 18(4):475–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (2002 ) Postnatal depression and puerperal psychosis (SIGN Publication No. 60). Edinburgh,
  37. Shea B, Dube C, Moher D (2001) Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews: the QUOROM statement compared to other tools. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (eds) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analyses in context, 2nd edn. BMJ, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Shea B, Grimshaw J, Wells G, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter A, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter L (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB, Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Group (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Strobe initiative (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335:806–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Brownwer WS (1997) Case-finding instruments for depression: two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med 12:439–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. World Health Organisation (2007) ICD-10: international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: tenth revision, 2nd edn. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Available from Google Scholar
  43. Yonkers KA, Chantilis SJ (1995) Recognition of depression in obstetric/gynecology practices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:632–638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yonkers KA, Ramin SM, Rush AJ, Navarrete CA, Carmody T, March D, Heartwell SF, Leveno KJ (2001) Onset and persistence of postpartum depression in an inner-city maternal health clinic system. Am J Psychiatry 158:1856–1863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  3. 3.Hull York Medical SchoolUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations