Abstract
Rapakivi granite is characterized by its unique structure, which has important implications for tectonic settings, magmatic processes, and crust–mantle interactions. In this study, we conducted a combined analysis of the petrography, mineral chemistry, geochemistry, and zircon U–Pb dating and Lu–Hf isotopic compositions of the Niujiaoshan Early Paleozoic rapakivi-textured granite from the North Qinling Belt. Zircon U–Pb dating yielded a crystallization age of 447 ± 7 Ma, which is younger than the ultra-high-pressure (UHP) metamorphic age (~ 500 Ma) but similar to the granulite facies retrograde age (~ 450 Ma) of UHP eclogites and felsic gneisses in the North Qinling Belt. The rapakivi feldspar phenocrysts have ovoid K-feldspar cores, which are rich in mineral inclusions, such as amphibole, biotite, quartz, and plagioclase, indicating early crystallization. The ovoid K-feldspar cores are mantled by oligoclase, whreras the matrix comprises biotite, amphibole, and coarse-grained plagioclase. The amphibole and biotite in the granite are rich in Mg and are indicative of a crust–mantle origin. The εHf (t) values of the zircons range from − 2.04 to + 3.63, suggesting formation via crust–mantle interactions. The rapakivi-textured granite displays high-K meta-aluminous I-type granite affinity, with high SiO2, K2O, and Na2O contents. Based on the geological background and results of this study, we propose that the Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granite was formed via the mixing of crustal materials induced by upper mantle magma during the exhumation of the North Qinling UHP metamorphic terrane, which occurred in a post-orogenic setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The petrographic texture and genetic implications of rapakivi granite are unique. Sederholm (1891) first defined the texture of typical rapakivi as plagioclase-mantled alkali feldspar ovoids in granitoid rocks, and this texture has since been observed in numerous granitic systems worldwide (Vorma 1976; Haapala and Rämö 1992, 1999 and Haapala 1995, 2005). Rapakivi granite is of considerable geological interest as it provides information about tectonic and crustal evolution (Larin et al. 2021; Prasanth et al. 2023). Most typical Proterozoic rapakivi granites are found in cratons, with an A-type affinity that is commonly associated with continental rifts (Anderson 1980; Haapala and Rämö 1992, 1999 and Haapala 1995; Haapala et al. 2005). However, some rapakivi-textured granites occur in orogenic belts, including the Tataleng pluton in the Northern Qaidam Orogen (Lu et al. 2007a; Hu et al. 2008), the Shahewan pluton in the Qinling Orogenic Belt (QOB; Wang et al. 2003, 2005; Zhou et al. 2008; Sun 2017), and the Jangart Complex in the South Tien Shan (Konopelko et al. 2007; Solomovich and Trifonov 2014; Fig. 1). Although these Phanerozoic orogenic rapakivi-textured granites exhibit A-type and I-type features (Lu et al. 2003, 2007b; Wang et al. 2003, 2005; Konopelko et al. 2007; Zhou et al. 2008; Gong et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2013a; Solomovich and Trifonov 2014; Sun 2017; Chen et al. 2019b), their crystallization process and tectonic setting remain a subject of debate. The main point of contention is whether they were formed during a transitional stage from compression to extension, marking the end of the main orogenic collision and the beginning of intracontinental orogeny (Lu et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2003, 2005; Gong et al. 2009; Larin 2009; Solomovich and Trifonov 2014; Sun 2017). Studies on rapakivi-textured feldspars have provided important records of plutonic processes (Sederholm 1891; Nekvasil 1991 and Haapala 1995; Haapala et al. 2005; Larin et al. 2021); however, the crystallization process of these feldspars is still controversially discussed (Hibbard 1981; Nekvasil 1991; Bussy 1990; Dempster et al. 1994; O’Brien et al. 2019; Alves et al. 2021).
Voluminous Paleozoic granites in the North Qinling Belt (NQB) preserve important information regarding tectonic evolution (Wang et al. 2013) and crust–mantle interactions (Qin et al. 2020). Paleozoic granites in the QOB can be divided into three stages: ~500, ~ 450, and 400–420 Ma (Wang et al. 2009, 2015; Zhang et al. 2013). However, controversy remains regarding the tectonic environment corresponding to each stage, particularly the second stage (~ 450 Ma), which is associated with the first retro-metamorphic event. A rapakivi-textured granite deposit is located in the Niujiaoshan area of Lushi County, western Henan Province, China. This rapakivi-textured granite intruded into the paragneiss of the Qinling Complex (Fig. 2), covering an area of approximately 0.25 × 2 km2 (China Geological Survey Department 1993). Further research on this rapakivi-textured granite could enhance our understanding of the crystallization processes of rapakivi feldspar, as well as the tectonic and crustal evolution of the QOB. Therefore, this study utilized detailed geological and field observations, as well as mineral chemistry analysis of plagioclase, biotite, amphibole, and K-feldspar of Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granite. By combining this information with whole-rock geochemistry, the study explored the origin and crystallization history of this granite to provide important information for understanding the tectonic and crustal evolution of the orogeny in the QOB.
Geological setting
The QOB is an east–west trending composite continental collisional orogen situated between the North China Block (NCB) and South China Block (SCB). It has a complex composition and evolutionary history (Zhang et al. 2001). From north to south, it is divided into four secondary tectonic units: the southern margins of the NCB, NQB, the South Qinling Belt, and the northern margin of the SCB, with some fault zones as the boundaries (Zhang et al. 2001; Fig. 2). The NQB comprises the northern region of the QOB between the Shangzhou–Danfeng and the Luonan–Luanchuan fault zones, and tectonic deformation and metamorphism in the QOB were the strongest and most complex in this area (Dong and Santosh 2016). Based on the material composition and metamorphic deformation characteristics, the NQB is divided from north to south into the Kuangping, Erlangping, Qinling, and Danfeng complexes, separated by several major faults (Zhang et al. 2001, 2019).
The Qinling Complex is known for its highly active metamorphic and magmatic activities. It is a prominent area in the core region of the NQB, specifically between the Shangzhou–Danfeng and Zhuyangguan–Xiaguan faults (Zhang et al. 2001). The main body of the complex consists of various gneisses, schists, migmatites, and graphite gneisses as well as lenses of eclogite and garnet amphibolite, which have been intruded by numerous Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic granitic intrusions (Zhang et al. 2001; Dong and Santosh 2016). The NQB experienced ultra-high-pressure (UHP) metamorphism and deep continental subduction. Zircon U–Pb dating studies have indicated that peak UHP metamorphism occurred at ~ 500 Ma, and there were two retrograde metamorphism events, the granulite and amphibolite facies, occurring at ~ 450 and ~ 420 Ma, respectively (Cheng et al. 2011, 2012; Zhang et al. 2011a; Liu et al. 2013b; Wang et al. 2013, 2014; Wu and Zheng 2013; Gong et al. 2016; Liao et al. 2016; Liao 2018; Chen et al. 2019a).
Granite in the QOB can be divided into three major developmental stages based on its age and geochemical characteristics: Neoproterozoic, Paleozoic, and Mesozoic. Within these, the distribution range of Paleozoic granite bodies in the Qinling Complex, such as the Huichizi, Piaochi, Huangbacha, and Zaoyuan plutons, is relatively large (Wang et al. 2009, 2015; Zhang et al. 2013). The Paleozoic granites can be further subdivided into three periods based on their formational age and petrological characteristics: 495–507, 445–464, and 400–420 Ma (Wang et al. 2009, 2015; Zhang et al. 2013; Liu 2014). The first period (495–507 Ma) is represented by Piaochi S-type granites, which were products of the partial melting of crustal rocks under a background of crustal thickening (Zhang et al. 2013). Huichizi I-type granites were formed in the second period (445–464 Ma), which was accompanied by contemporaneous mafic dike intrusions (Chen et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2008), and are representative of the most intense granitic magmatic activity in the NQB. The rocks exhibit large Si variations and are high-alkali, sodium-calcium alkaline to high K2O calc-alkaline peraluminous rocks (Zhang et al. 2013). The origin of second-period granite is contested. The debate centers on whether the granites are products of the exhumation of a deeply subducted slab (Zhang et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2019a) or the subduction of the Shangdan Ocean (Wu and Zheng 2013; Dong and Santosh 2016). The third period of granitic magmatism (400–420 Ma) is characterized by the formation of a small, undeformed body resulting from the melting and magmatic activity of continental crustal materials in an extensional environment. Anjiping S-type granite is representative of this granitic type (Zhang et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2015).
Analytical methods
All analyses were conducted at the State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, Xi’an, China.
Sample collection and specimen preparation for petrographic analysis
Fieldwork involved collecting 7 kg of fresh samples from every pluton location (Fig. 2c), followed by indoor washing with clear water to eliminate surface residues for subsequent petrographic, geochemical, and U–Pb age studies. Petrography and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) involved the preparation of six polished thick Sect. (50 μm) and four thin Sect. (30 μm). Additionally, three samples from each location were retained for geochemical analysis.
Analysis of mineral composition
The predominant mineral components were quantified using a JXA-8230 electron probe microanalyzer (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), operated at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV, beam current of 1 × 10− 8 A, and beam spot size of 1 μm, under chamber vacuum pressure conditions of approximately 2.7 × 10− 4 Pa. Microstructural analysis was complemented with back-scattered electron images using EPMA, maintaining a working distance of 10.0 mm. Analysis targeted crystals using thallium acid phthalate (TAP: Si, Al, Mg, and Na), lithium fluoride (LiF: Fe and Mn), and pentaerythritol (PET: K, Ca, Ti, and P) as standards. Natural standards included Si (quartz), Al (jadeite), Mg (olivine), Mn (rhodonite), Fe (hemat ite), K (sanidine), Na (jadeite), Ca (diopside), and Ti (rutile), with continuum intensity total Z (atomic number) absorption fluorescence (CITZAF) corrections applied. EPMA examination encompassed various zoning bands and inclusion minerals within phenocrysts and major minerals within the matrix. FeOT represents total iron (oxide) content. The numbers of cations in feldspars were calculated after Ribbe (1983), in amphiboles after Hawthorne et al. (2012), and for biotite mica after Rieder et al. (1998), which all calculated based on the oxygen atom in a molecule.
U–Pb age dating of zircon
Up to 1500 zircons were extracted from approximately 8 kg of fresh granite samples using heavy liquid and magnetic separation techniques. These zircons were then meticulously examined under an optical microscope (Nikon SMZ800N, Shanghai, China) and embedded in epoxy resin. Following polishing with a corundum polishing liquid and removal of surface residues using an ultrasonic cleaner, the zircon grains underwent observation via optical (transmitted and reflected light) and cathodoluminescence (CL) techniques to reveal their internal texture.
Subsequently, the zircon grains underwent analysis for U–Th–Pb isotopes using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA–ICP–MS). CL imaging of the selected zircons was conducted using a Quanta 400 FEG environmental scanning electron microscope equipped with an Oxford energy-dispersive spectroscopy system and a Gatan CL3 + detector.
For zircon trace element analysis and U–Pb age dating, an Agilent 7500a ICP–MS from Hewlett Packard, the ComPex102 Excimer laser (working gas ArF, wavelength 193 nm) from Lambda Physik (Germany), and a GeoLas 200 M optical system from MicroLas were employed. The laser beam possessed a spot diameter of 33 μm, and the laser ablation depth on the sample was 40 μm.
Isotope ratios and trace element concentrations were calculated offline using GLITTER (Ver. 4.0), with standard zircon 91500 utilized as an external standard for isotope ratio correction. NIST 610 served as the external standard, and 29Si as the internal standard for elemental concentration calculations. Zircon U–Th–Pb age calculations and Concordia diagram plotting were performed using Isoplot (Ver 4.16, Ludwig 2003).
Lu–Hf isotope analyses of zircon
In situ Lu–Hf isotope analysis of zircon was conducted using a Nu PlasmaII MC–ICP–MS, with a laser spot size of 44 μm. Isotope fractionation correction for Lu–Hf was computed using an exponential law. To ensure precise 176Hf values, corrections were applied for the isobaric interference with 176Hf caused by 176Lu and 176Yb, with respective ratios of 176Lu/175Lu = 0.02656 and 176Yb/173Yb = 0.78696. Normalization of Yb and Hf isotope ratios was carried out against 173Yb/171Yb = 1.12346 and 179Hf/177Hf = 0.7325, respectively, to rectify instrumental mass bias.
Calibration of isotope fractionation utilized two external standards, zircon standard 91,500 and Mud Tank, with analyses performed once every 12 analyses. Data acquisition employed the time-resolved analysis mode with an integration time of 0.2 s. Background acquisition time was set at 30 s, while sample integration time was 50 s.
Calculation of εHf values employed a decay constant of 1.867 × 10− 11 yr− 1 for 176Lu, with chondritic ratios of 176Hf/177Hf = 0.282772 and 176Lu/177Hf = 0.0332 (Blichert-Toft and Albarède 1997), and a U–Pb crystallization age of 447 Ma. Single-stage model ages (TDM1) were determined with respect to the depleted mantle, characterized by a present-day 176Hf/177Hf ratio of 0.28325 and a 176Lu/177Hf ratio of 0.0384 (Griffin et al. 2000). Two-stage model ages (TDM2) were calculated by projecting the initial 176Lu/177Hf values of zircon back to the depleted mantle growth curve using 176Lu/177Hf = 0.015 to represent the average continental crust.
Bulk whole-rock main and trace element geochemistry
All samples designated for whole-rock chemistry underwent a process of pulverization and crushing to achieve a particle size of 5–10 mm, accomplished using both a jaw crusher and a tungsten-carbide shatter box with a 200 mesh sieve. Given the substantial size of rapakivi granite minerals, the samples underwent multiple rounds of mixing via the reduction method to ensure the homogeneity of the powdered composition. In the course of sample preparation, 0.70 g of dried sample powder was meticulously weighed and blended with LiF (0.40 g), Li2B4O7 (5.20 g), and NH4NO3 (0.30 g). Subsequently, the mixture was subjected to heating for 8 min at 1200 °C in an electric high-frequency furnace, resulting in the formation of fused bead sheets suitable for testing.
Major element analysis was conducted using an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (Rigaku RIX 2100) equipped with an automated sample introduction system. Standards BCR-2 and GBM07105 were utilized, with duplicates analyzed every 10 samples. The acquired data exhibited a relative standard deviation of approximately 2%.
Trace and rare earth elements (REE) were analyzed employing an Agilent 7500a ICP–MS, with BHVO-2 and AGV-2 serving as standard reference materials. Blanks were analyzed for every 10 samples. Approximately 50 mg of powder underwent dissolution in an HF-HNO3-HClO4 mixture via a series of heating and evaporation procedures to prepare the sample. The resultant solution was then diluted with deionized water to a volume of 80 g in a PET bottle, with Rh employed as the internal standard. Notably, the relative error (RE) for the trace element test data predominantly exceeded 10% (Yuan et al. 2008).
Results
Petrographic observations
This study investigated grayish-white Niujiaoshan granite with a rapakivi texture. The studied granite predominantly appeared massive (Fig. 3a), with localized occurrences of dark enclaves (Fig. 3b). Feldspar phenocrysts in the granite ranged in size from approximately 0.2 × 0.2 to 1.3 × 1.5 cm, constituting approximately 55% of the total volume. Phenocrysts consisted mainly of ovoid K-feldspars, some of which were surrounded by irregular white plagioclase rims of different widths (Fig. 3c, d). The matrix was primarily composed of plagioclase, K-feldspar, quartz, a small quantity of biotite, and amphibole (Fig. 3e). Additionally, a mafic enclave composed of biotite, amphibole, plagioclase, and needle apatites was discovered (Fig. 3f). The phenocryst cores consisted of single crystal or intergrown K-feldspars composed of multiple crystals, several of which were perthites (Fig. 4a), and these were rich in microscopic inclusions (such as plagioclase, quartz, biotite, and amphibole) (Fig. 4b). The mantle was composed of oligoclase with a few quartz inclusions, and the boundary between the ovoid K-feldspar and mantle was irregular (Fig. 4c, d).
(a and b) Field occurrences and (c-f) microtextures of Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granite. (a) Rapakivi-textured granite. (b) Mafic enclave with plagioclase phenocrysts in the host rapakivi-textured granite. (c) and (d) Rapakivi texture feldspar in granite. (e) Mineral assemblage in matrix. (f) Mafic enclave mineral assemblage. (Kfs: K-feldspar, Pl: plagioclase, Qz: quartz, Amp: amphibole, Bt: biotite, mineral abbreviations after Whitney and Evans 2010)
Micrograph and back-scattered electron (BSE) images of rapakivi-textured granite. (a) Exsolution albite of porphyritic core. (b) Inclusion assemblage in the nucleus of phenocryst K-feldspar. (c) Mineral assemblage in the matrix and rapakivi-textured phenocrysts. (d) Irregular boundary between the phenocryst K-feldspar and mantle oligoclase (Ab: albite; Ep: epidote; mineral abbreviations after Whitney and Evans 2010)
Mineral chemical composition
Through EPMA analysis, we determined the chemical composition of the various zoning bands and inclusion minerals in the phenocrysts, as well as the major minerals in the matrix. The results are summarized in Table 1 and S1.
Alkali feldspar
The alkali feldspar in the rock primarily consisted of K-feldspar in the phenocryst core, a small amount of perthite, and a small amount of K-feldspar in the matrix. The EPMA results showed that the composition of the K-feldspar in the phenocryst core and matrix was similar. The K2O content ranged from 16.09 to 16.66%, with end-member compositions of Or93.10–94.63Ab5.37–6.90 and Or92.83–97.09Ab2.75–7.17. The exsolution lamellae of the K-feldspar were composed of albite (with end-member compositions of Ab97.41–98.86Or1.07–1.41; Fig. 5a).
(a) Plagioclase classification diagram (Smith and Brown 1988). (b) BSE image and composition profile of plagioclase in the matrix
Plagioclase (Pl)
The plagioclase was divided into four subcategories based on texture: inclusions in the phenocryst cores (Pl1), coarse-grained plagioclase in the matrix (Pl2), plagioclase mantle surrounding the K-feldspar phenocryst (Pl3), and fine-grained plagioclase feldspar in the matrix (Pl4). Most of the plagioclase grains had an oligoclase composition, with only a small number of andesine grains in the matrix (Fig. 5a). The end-member compositions of the different occurrences of plagioclase were as follows: Pl1: Ab72.98–77.42An21.80–25.62, Pl2: Ab68.62–80.14An18.84–32.09, Pl3: Ab76.00–84.20An14.92–23.31, and Pl4: Ab72.05–73.50An25.68–26.68. There were no marked variations among the plagioclase components of the different occurrences, but the An component of the rims of the coarse-grained plagioclase (Pl2) and An-rich oligoclase (Pl3) in the ring plagioclase were relatively higher (Fig. 4b). Variations in the composition of coarse-grained plagioclase (Pl2) in the matrix were observed, showing an increasing trend in the An component from the core to the rim (Fig. 5b).
Amphibole (Amp)
Amphibole grains were found inside the feldspar phenocrysts and also within the matrix. However, the compositions of both were not significantly different, falling within the range of magnesio-hornblende in the A(Na + K + 2Ca) versus C(Al + Fe3++2Ti) amphibole classification diagram, except for one tremolite amphibole in the matrix. The only difference was the wide variation in the amphibole composition of the matrix (Fig. 6a).
(a) Diagram of A(Na + K + 2Ca) versus C(Al + Fe3++2Ti) for amphibole (from Hawthorne et al. 2012). (b) Diagram of Mg-(AlVI+Fe3++Ti)- (Fe2++Mn) for biotite (from Foster 1960). Data sources: orogenic rapakivi-textured granites (Wang et al. 2003; Hu et al. 2008; Zhou et al. 2008, Liu et al. 2013); rapakivi granites (Rämö and Haapala 1995; Elliott 2001; Scandolara et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2018; Larin et al. 2021)
Biotite (Bt)
Two types of biotite were identified: inclusions in the feldspar phenocrysts and matrix minerals. In the classification diagram of biotite based on chemical composition [Mg-(AlVI+Fe3++Ti)-(Fe2++Mn)], both fell within the magnesian biotite field, but the biotite in the matrix was relatively rich in Mg (Fig. 6b).
U–Pb dating of zircon
The zircons from the samples were typically transparent, colorless, automorphic crystals. The grain size of the zircon ranged from 50 to 300 μm. Most grains exhibited completely polycrystalline shapes, but a few particles were spherical in nature (Fig. 7a). Most zircon grains showed core–rim structures. The cores showed clear oscillatory zoning; their U and Th contents and Th/U values ranged 92.00–2904, 49.40–734, and 0.25–1.07 ppm, respectively (Table 2). The normalized REE patterns showed light REE (LREE) depletion, heavy REE (HREE) enrichment, positive Ce anomalies, and negative Eu anomalies, characteristic of magmatic zircons (Fig. 7b). The rims of the zircons were gray–black and showed poor luminescence in the CL images. Their U and Th contents and Th/U values ranged 189–945, 71.04–282, and 0.20–0.65 ppm, respectively. The zircon rims were also typical of magmatic zircons, except that the rim Th and U contents showed slightly decreasing trends. Few zircons exhibited inherited residual cores with better luminescence, weak oscillatory zoning, and the characteristic REE distribution pattern of magmatic zircon. The LA–ICP–MS dating results (Table 3) indicated no significant difference in age between the core and rim zoning of the zircon crystals. The 206Pb/238U ages of the core ranged from 443 to 452 Ma, whereas those of the rim varied from 443 to 453 Ma. These ages collectively formed a concentrated age cluster in the U–Pb Concordia diagram. The weighted average age of the core was 447 ± 7 Ma (mean squared weighted deviation [MSWD] = 0.089, n = 14). However, because of the loss of Pb in several inherited core regions, accurate ages could not be obtained for these specific data points. Individual analyses of these points yielded concordant 207Pb/235U ages of 1391 ± 11 Ma (Fig. 7c, d).
(a) Cathodoluminescence (CL) images, U–Pb dating (white circles), and εHf(t) values (yellow circles) of zircons from rapakivi-textured granite. (b) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of zircons from rapakivi-textured granite. (c) U–Pb Concordia diagrams. (d) Enlarged image of U–Pb Concordia diagrams and weighted average age
Lu–Hf isotopic composition of zircon
To investigate the origin of the granite, Lu–Hf isotope analyses were conducted on the core and rim of zircon crystals based on U–Pb dating. The results revealed that the 176Hf/177Hf values in the core ranged from 0.282439 to 0.282602, whereas those in the rim ranged from 0.282478 to 0.282556. Based on the calculated crystallization age of the rapakivi-textured granite, which is 447 ± 7 Ma, the corresponding εHf (t) values of the core and rim ranged from − 2.04 to + 3.63 (with an average of − 0.36) and − 0.79 to + 2.11 (with an average of 0.47), respectively. Except for one measurement point, most rim data points had slightly higher εHf (t) values than those of the core regions. The TDM2 ages corresponding to the core region and rim were 1195–1553 and 1290–1474 Ma, respectively (Table 4). In the εHf (t) versus t diagram, both were located near the evolution line of chondrite (Fig. 8), indicating that the source rock was mainly composed of ancient crustal material with a small amount of mantle-derived material.
Geochemistry
Major elements
The SiO2 content of the rapakivi granite ranged from 67.54 wt% to 67.71 wt%, and the Al2O3 content varied between 15.09 wt% and 15.22 wt%, and was rich in alkalis (Na2O + K2O = 7.51–7.76 wt%). The Na2O/K2O value ranged from 1.09 to 1.19, the CaO content ranged from 3.1 wt% to 3.21 wt%, the Fe2O3T content varied between 2.7 wt% and 2.8 wt%, and the MgO and MnO contents ranged from 1.74 wt% to 1.79 wt% and 0.04 wt% to 0.05 wt%, respectively (Table 5). The rock had high Mg# (Mg# = Mg2+/[Mg2+ + Fe2+] = 55.7–56.1) and an A/CNK (molecular Al2O3/[Na2O + K2O + CaO]) value ranging from 0.92 to 0.94, indicating that it belonged to a peraluminous rock series (Fig. 9a). In the Na2O versus K2O granite-type discrimination diagram, the samples were classified as I-type granites (Fig. 9b, d). In the K2O versus SiO2 magma series discrimination diagram, they fell within the high-potassium calc-alkaline region (Fig. 9c).
Classificatory diagrams of granite. (a) A/CNK versus A/NK diagram (from Maniar and Piccoli 1989). (b) K2O versus Na2O diagram (from Collins et al. 1982). (c) SiO2 versus K2O diagram (from Peccerillo and Taylor 1976). (d) An-Ab-Or diagram (from Barker 1979). Data sources: ~450 Ma granites in the QOB (same as in Fig. 7); orogenic rapakivi-textured granite and rapakivi granites (same as in Fig. 5)
Trace elements
The total REE contents were relatively low in all analyzed samples (ΣREE = 98.70–109 ppm) with little variation. Clear fractionation was observed between LREE and HREE, with (La/Yb)N ranging from 24.93 to 26.69. The overall pattern was characterized by LREE enrichment and relative HREE depletion, displaying a rightward-inclined chondrite-normalized REE distribution curve, and featuring a weak negative Eu anomaly (δEu = 0.85–0.86). The primitive mantle-normalized spider diagram showed an overall depletion of high field strength elements (HFSEs), such as Nb, Ta, and Ti, slight enrichment of large-ion lithophile elements (LILEs), such as Ba, Th, and K, and significant Pb enrichment (Fig. 10).
Discussion
Emplacement age of Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granite
Most zircons in the Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granite were found to have evident core–rim structures, and both the core and rim comprised distinct or weak magmatic oscillatory zone structures. However, the rims showed decreasing Th contents and Th/U trends. The LA–ICP–MS dating results indicated that with the exception of one inherited core for which an older inherited age of 1391 ± 11 Ma was obtained, the 206Pb/238U ages of all other core and rim measurement points varied from 440 to 453 Ma, and the results were consistent within an error range. The Th/U value of all zircons was > 0.2, indicating that the zircons exhibited magmatic origin characteristics, which include HREE enrichment, LREE depletion, and distinct negative Eu anomalies (Hoskin and Schaltegger 2003). By combining these results with the petrographic characteristics, we inferred that the zircons underwent two growth stages or late-stage modifications after core formation. Therefore, we obtained a weighted mean age of 447 ± 7 Ma (MSWD = 0.089, n = 14) from 14 points in the zircon core, representing the formation age of the granite (Fig. 7).
Origin of rapakivi-textured feldspar
The petrographic features and mineral chemistry analysis results indicated that the minerals in the Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granite underwent at least two stages of secondary growth. In the early stages, the representative minerals comprised K-feldspar in the core of the porphyritic crystals, enclosed biotite (Bt1), amphibole (Amp1), plagioclase (Pl1), and quartz. In the late stages, the representative minerals comprised biotite (Bt2), amphibole (Amp2), K-feldspar, coarse-grained plagioclase (Pl2), quartz in the matrix, and oligoclase (Pl3) surrounding the rims of the K-feldspar porphyritic crystals. There are multiple opinions about the formation mechanism of the rapakivi-textured feldspar. However, three widely accepted explanations are (1) the mixing of mafic and granitic magmas (Hibbard 1981; Bussy 1990; O’Brien et al. 2019; Alves et al. 2021), (2) the formation of plagioclase along the mantle due to sub-isothermal decompression during the ascent of granitic magma (Nekvasil 1991; Eklund and Shebanov 1999), and (3) the formation of rapakivi texture through the subsolidus exsolution of plagioclase in the alkali feldspars (Dempster et al. 1994). Our results support the first explanation based on the following evidence: first, the mineralogical chemical analysis indicates that the compositions of biotite and amphibole fall within the region of crust–mantle magma mixing on the discrimination diagram (Fig. 11) (Ding 1988; Xie and Zhang 1990; Yang et al. 2017). Second, the amphibole and biotite in the matrix are relatively enriched in Mg. The An component at the edge of the coarse plagioclase in the matrix exhibits reverse zonation. This suggests that the Ca and Mg components in the magma were relatively high at the time when the minerals in the matrix crystallized, and this corresponds to the crystallization process during the mixing of late basic magma (Wang and Wang 2009); however, this supposition would contradict the latter two viewpoints, as they propose a closed system through sub-isothermal decompression or subsolidus exsolution. Third, the εHf (t) values of the zircon cores range from − 2.04 to 3.63, with an average of − 0.36, and those of the zircon rims range from − 0.79 to 2.11, with an average of 0.47. These positive and negative εHf (t) values indicate the addition of mantle-derived material to the magma source region, which is consistent with the chemical characteristics of the mineral (Wu et al. 2007). Fourth, the presence of a small number of dark inclusions within the granite suggests that magma mixing occurred. The presence of needle apatite in these dark inclusions also serves as evidence for magma mixing (Fig. 3f; Wang et al. 2003; Lux et al. 2007). Lastly, contemporaneous intrusions of mafic dikes, such as the Sifangtai pluton, were derived from a mantle source (Chen et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2008). The granites also exhibit higher Mg# (55.7–56.1) values than melts that were solely formed by the melting of the lower crust (Rapp and Watson 1995). These characteristics indicate the presence of mantle components in the source region of the granites.
In general, the mixing of mafic and acidic magmas alters crystallization conditions and composition, thereby causing instability of the previously crystallized alkali feldspar. This leads to the resorption and formation of irregular boundaries (Fig. 4c, d; Wang and Wang 2009). Under these conditions of disequilibrium, plagioclase tends to nucleate on the surface of preexisting K-feldspar crystals and rapidly crystallizes, forming plagioclase mantles instead of new crystals (Hibbard 1981; O’Brien et al. 2019). During rapid cooling, alkali feldspar reacts with calcium from the mantle-derived melt to generate an oligoclase mantle and quartz blebs in the mantle (Fig. 4d); the alkali feldspar then undergoes exsolution, causing perthitic intergrowth (Fig. 4a; Parsons et al. 2015). Therefore, the plagioclase mantles were formed through rapid condensation and crystallization when mafic magma originating from the mantle was introduced into granitic magma.
Comparison between rapakivi and rapakivi-textured granite
Typical rapakivi granites, such as the Finnish pluton (Sederholm 1891), Korosten pluton, Salmi pluton (Rämö and Haapala 1995), Miyun rapakivi granite (Yang et al. 2005), and Kodar Complex (Larin et al. 2021) as well as orogenic rapakivi-textured granites such as the Jangart Complex (Konopelko et al. 2007; Solomovich and Trifonov 2014), Itu batholith (Pereira et al. 2023), Deer Isle pluton (Lux et al. 2007; O’Brien et al. 2019), Shahewan pluton (Wang et al. 2003; Zhou et al. 2008), and Tataleng pluton (Lu et al. 2007a; Hu et al. 2008), have a common rapakivi texture characterized by ovoid alkali feldspar porphyry mantled by oligoclase. Despite their remarkable petrological similarity, the mafic mineral chemistry (Fig. 6) and geochemistry (Figs. 9 and 10) of the Phanerozoic orogenic rapakivi-textured granites typically differ.
The Early Paleozoic Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granite is an I-type granite whereas typical rapakivi granites differ (Figs. 9 and 10), suggesting that they were emplaced in different settings. The I-type granites in the QOB region exhibit post-orogenic features (Wang et al. 2003, 2005; Zhou et al. 2008). Additionally, there are post-collisional rapakivi-textured granites with an A2-type affinity (Solomovich and Trifonov 2014; Pereira et al. 2023). A2-type granites are generally compatible with post-orogenic tectonic settings and crustal orogeny (Eby 1990). Their trace elements also differ: typical rapakivi granite exhibits evident negative Eu anomalies, whereas rapakivi-textured granites have weak negative Eu anomalies. Eu anomalies in melt and anatectic systems are controlled by the bulk rock composition, the phase assemblage (including plagioclase, alkali feldspar, and other minerals), and oxygen fugacity (Trail et al. 2012; Yakymchuk et al. 2023). The weak negative Eu anomalies observed in rapakivi-textured granites may be due to higher pressure (Deng et al. 2004) and oxygen fugacity (Trail et al. 2012; Yakymchuk et al. 2023). Biotite and amphibole in rapakivi-textured granites are rich in Mg (Fig. 6) rather than Fe, which distinguishes them from most typical rapakivi granites. These differences are possibly attributed to the differences in the tectonic setting in which they were formed.
Rapakivi-textured granite is found within collisional orogens that also contain UHP metamorphic rocks (Fig. 1); however, the granite was formed after the UHP metamorphism, indicating that it appeared after the orogen collision. However, UHP orogens are more common than rapakivi-textured granite (Liou et al. 2009; Solomovich and Trifonov 2014), indicating that rapakivi-textured granite was formed under more restricted conditions. Indeed, rapakivi and rapakivi-textured granites are generally emplaced in large-scale extensional settings, such as an anorogenic or post-orogenic environment.
Geological significance: implications of crust–mantle interactions
Zircon U–Pb dating revealed that the Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granite was formed at approximately 447 ± 7 Ma. It was contemporaneous with the development of second-stage granites (~ 450 Ma) in the QOB (Wang et al. 2009, 2015; Zhang et al. 2013). Comparisons of their geochemical characteristics suggest that the Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granite is similar to that of ~ 450 Ma granites in the QOB, suggesting a comparable tectonic setting (Figs. 9 and 10). There are two different opinions redarding the formation of this granite stage. One opinion associates it with the continental deep subduction of the NQB, and this is supported by the proximity of the intrusion age and the retrograde metamorphic age of high pressure to UHP metamorphic rocks in the NQB (Zhang et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2016). Considering the field occurrence and geochemical characteristics of the granite rocks, the NQB metamorphic rocks are believed to be the magmatic response of the subducted slab rollback process (Zhang et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2019a). In contrast, other researchers believe that these granites are island arc magmas formed during the northward subduction process of the Shangdan Ocean, as they are positioned on the northern side of the Shangdan suture zone and lack clear metamorphism (Wu and Zheng 2013; Dong and Santosh 2016).
The Al2O3 and K2O + Na2O contents of the Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granite are high, with LREE and LILE enrichment and HFSE depletion in elements such as Nb, Ta, and Ti. In the structural environment discrimination diagram (Fig. 12), the rapakivi-textured granite falls within the collision uplift zone, indicating that it was formed during the post-collisional decompression stage (Küster and Harms 1998). Zircons found in the granite exhibit two-stage model ages ranging from 1.20 to 1.55 Ga, which aligns with the formation age of the Neoproterozoic metasediments in the Qinling Group (Gong 2017; Shi et al. 2018). These findings suggest that the granite may have originated from the melting of Neoproterozoic metasediments in the Qinling Group. Additionally, the granites exhibit high Mg# values and are located in the crust–mantle origin field on the biotite and amphibole plot (Fig. 11). This suggests that the sources of this magmatism include both crustal materials from early subduction and collision stages, as well as a considerable amount of upwelling mantle materials (Barbarin 1999).
The detailed petrographic and mineralogical analyses of this study indicate that the rapakivi structure of feldspar reflects the characteristics of crust–mantle magma mixing. Additionally, contemporaneous mafic dikes have developed within the QOB (Chen et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2008), representing extensional and depressurization events. Based on the geochemical characteristics, the granite during this period more likely formed in a decompressional environment associated with slab rollback and uplift, rather than a compressional environment associated with the sustained subduction of the Shangdan Ocean. Large amounts of HP/UHP metamorphic rocks have been found in the Qinling Complex. These rocks underwent peak metamorphism at ~ 500 Ma followed by heating and decompression at ~ 450 Ma, resulting in the retrograde metamorphism of the granulite facies (Liu et al. 2013b; Wang et al. 2013, 2014; Wu and Zheng 2013; Gong et al. 2016; Liao et al. 2016). This corresponds to an environment of deep subduction and slab detachment associated with rollback. In the post-collision stage, when the continental lithosphere converged from compression to relaxation, the lower ocean crust of the subducting plate generated a downward drag force, whereas the continental crust exhibited upward buoyancy owing to the low overall density. The existence of these two opposite forces inevitably led to the break-off of the lower part of the subducted plate at an appropriate time and the retraction of the upper continental crustal plate (Boutelier and Chemenda 2008). The tectonic environment changed from compression to extension, which inevitably resulted in the upwelling of a large amount of mantle materials and the partial melting of a large range of crustal materials. Thus, a large amount of high-potassium calc-alkaline magmatism occurred (Zhang et al. 2013).
In localized areas, crust–mantle interactions occurred at a rapid pace, with mafic magma intruding into partially crystallized granite and causing rapid changes in the composition and temperature of the magma system. Under such conditions, plagioclase crystals tended to nucleate and crystallize on already crystallized K-feldspar surfaces, forming rapakivi-textured feldspar (Hibbard 1981; O’Brien et al. 2019). Therefore, we believe that the Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granites of ~ 450 Ma, as well as other widely distributed granites and a small number of mafic rocks in the Qinling Complex, were formed as a response to this tectonic transitional event.
Conclusions
(i) The Niujiaoshan rapakivi-textured granite was formed at 447 ± 7 Ma. Granites of the same age during the Paleozoic in the QOB were likely formed in a tectonic environment in which the Qinling Group UHP terrane underwent exhumation, transitioning from compression to extension. (ii) The rapakivi texture feldspars were formed by magma mixing during crust–mantle interactions. (iii) Typical rapakivi and orogenic rapakivi-textured granites are generally emplaced in large-scale extensional settings, such as an anorogenic or post-orogenic environment. (iv) A limitation of this study is the uncertainty associated with the model of magma mixing and how this might have influenced the formation of rapakivi texture. Further investigations on rapakivi-textured granite from orogens should be conducted to elucidate its formation mechanism, which will assist in better understanding orogen evolution and crust–mantle interactions.
References
Alves A, Janasi VA, Pereira GDS, Prado FA, Munoz PRM (2021) Unravelling the hidden evidences of magma mixing processes via combination of in situ Sr isotopes and trace elements analyses on plagioclase crystals. Lithos 404–405:106435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106435
Anderson JL (1980) Mineral Equilibria and crystallization conditions in the late precambrian Wolf River Rapakivi Massif, Wisconsin. Am J Sci 280:289–332. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.280.4.289
Barbarin B (1999) A review of the relationships between granitoid types, their origins and their geodynamic environments. Lithos 46:605–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00085-1
Barker F (1979) Trondhjemite: definition, environment and hypotheses of origin. In: Barker F (ed) Trondhjemites, dacites and related rocks. Developments in Petrology, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-41765-7.50006-x
Batchelor RA, Bowden P (1985) Petrogenetic interpretation of granitoid rock series using multicationic parameters. Chem Geol 48:43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(85)90034-8
Blichert-Toft J, Albarède F (1997) The Lu-Hf isotope geochemistry of chondrites and the evolution of the mantle-crust system. Earth Planet Sci Lett 148:243–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00198-2
Boutelier DA, Chemenda AI (2008) Exhumation of UHP/LT rocks due to local reduction of the interplate pressure: thermo-mechanical physical modelling. Earth Planet Sci Lett 271:226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.04.011
Bussy F (1990) The rapakivi texture of feldspars in a plutonic mixing environment: a dissolution-recrystallization process? Geol J 25:319–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3350250314
Chen JL, He SP, Wang HL, Xu XY, Zeng ZX, Wang ZQ, Yan QR (2006) Zircon LA-ICPMS U-Pb age of mafic dykes in the area between the Qinling and the Qilian orogenic belts and its geological implications. Acta Petrol Mineral 25:455–462 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Chen DL, Liu L, Liao XY, Ren YF, Gong XK (2019a) The distribution, P-T-t evolution and formation mechanism of HP-HUP metamorphic rocks in the North Qinling Orogenic Belt. Earth Sci 44:4017–4027 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2019.256
Chen QM, Guo QM, Wang Q, Wang Z, Guo Y (2019b) Zircon U-Pb age and geochemical characteristics of Qinlingliang rapakivi granite from western Qinling Orogenic Belt in Shaanxi. Geol Bull China 38:213–222 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Cheng H, Zhang C, Vervoort JD, Li X, Li Q, Zheng S, Cao D (2011) Geochronology of the transition of eclogite to amphibolite facies metamorphism in the North Qinling Orogen of Central China. Lithos 125:969–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2011.05.010
Cheng H, Zhang C, Vervoort JD, Li X, Li Q, Wu YB, Zheng S (2012) Timing of eclogite facies metamorphism in the North Qinling by U-Pb and Lu-Hf geochronology. Lithos 136–139:46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2011.06.003
China Geological Survey Department (1993) Shiziping [geologic map]. 1:50000, Shannxi/Xi’an: China Geological Survey, p. I49e014012
Collins WJ, Beams SD, White AJR, Chappell BW (1982) Nature and origin of A-type granites with particular reference to southeastern Australia. Contrib Mineral Petrol 80:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374895
Dempster TJ, Jenkin GRT, Rogers G (1994) The origin of rapakivi texture. J Petrol 35:963–981. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/35.4.963
Deng JF, Mo XX, Zhao HL, Wu ZX, Luo ZH, Su SG (2004) A new model for the dynamic evolution of Chinese lithosphere: ‘continental roots–plume tectonics’. Earth Sci Rev 65:223–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2003.08.001
Ding XS (1988) Study of typomorphic characteristics of micas from granitoids in central-southern Xizang and their geological significance. Bull Inst Mineral Deposits 1:33–50Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences(in Chinese with English abstract)
Dong YP, Santosh M (2016) Tectonic architecture and multiple orogeny of the Qinling Orogenic Belt, central China. Gondwana Res 29:1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.06.009
Dong YP, Zhang GW, Neubauer F, Liu X, Genser J, Hauzenberger C (2011) Tectonic evolution of the Qinling orogen, China: review and synthesis. J Asian Earth Sci 41:213–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.03.002
Eby GN (1990) The A-type granitoids: a review of their occurrence and chemical characteristics and speculations on their petrogenesis. Lithos 26:115–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-4937(90)90043-Z
Eklund O, Shebanov AD (1999) The origin of rapakivi texture by sub-isothermal decompression. Precambrian Res 95:129–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-9268(98)00130-2
Elliott BA (2001) Crystallization conditions of the Wiborg rapakivi batholith, SE Finland: an evaluation of amphibole and biotite mineral chemistry. Mineral Petrol 72:305–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007100170021
Foster MD (1960) Interpretation of the composition of trioctahedral micas. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 354:11–49. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp354B
Gong XK (2017) Metamorphism, composition and forming age of the Qinling group in the eastern Qinling orogen. Dissertation, Northwest University (in Chinese with English abstract)
Gong HJ, Zhu LM, Sun BY, Li B, Guo B (2009) Zircon U-Pb ages and hf isotope characteristics and their geological significance of the Shahewan, Caoping and Zhashui granitic plutons in the south Qinling orogen. Acta Petrol Sin 25:248–264 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Gong XK, Chen DL, Ren YF, Liu L, Gao S, Yang SJ (2016) Identification of coesite-bearing amphibolite in the north Qinling and its geological significance. Chin Sci Bull 61:1365–1378 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.1360/N972015-01277
Griffin WL, Pearson NJ, Belousova E, Jackson SE, van Achterbergh E, O’Reilly SY, Shee SR (2000) The hf isotope composition of cratonic mantle: LAM-MC-ICPMS analysis of zircon megacrysts in kimberlites. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00343-9
Haapala I, Rämö OT (1992) Tectonic setting and origin of the proterozoic rapakivi granites of southeastern Fennoscandia. Earth Environ Sci Trans R Soc Edinb 83:165–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263593300007859
Haapala I, Rämö OT (1999) Rapakivi granites and related rocks: an introduction. Precambrian Res 95:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(98)00124-7
Haapala I, Rämö OT, Frindt S (2005) Comparison of Proterozoic and phanerozoic rift-related basaltic-granitic magmatism. Lithos 80:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2004.04.057
Hawthorne FC, Oberti R, Harlow GE, Maresch WV, Martin RF, Schumacher JC, Welch MD (2012) Nomenclature of the amphibole supergroup. Am Mineral 97:2031–2048. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2012.4276
Hibbard MJ (1981) The magma mixing origin of mantled feldspars. Contrib Mineral Petrol 76:158–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00371956
Hoskin PWO, Schaltegger U (2003) The composition of zircon and igneous and metamorphic petrogenesis. Rev Mineral Geochem 53:27–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501509322-005
Hu NG, Wang XX, Sun YG, Lin W, Shen WH, Chen YJ (2008) Petrography and geochemistry of the Tataleng rapakivi granite on the northern margin of the Qaidam Basin, northwestern China. Geol Bull China 27:1923–1932 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Jiang CY, An SY (1984) On chemical characteristics of calcic amphiboles from igneous rocks and their petrogenesis significance. J Mineral Petrol 3:1–9
Konopelko D, Biske G, Seltmann R, Eklund O, Belyatsky B (2007) Hercynian post-collisional A-type granites of the Kokshaal Range, Southern Tien Shan, Kyrgyzstan. Lithos 97:140–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2006.12.005
Küster D, Harms U (1998) Post-collisional potassic granitoids from the southern and northwestern parts of the late Neoproterozoic East African Orogen: a review. Lithos 45:177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00031-0
Larin AM (2009) Rapakivi granites in the geological history of the earth. Part 1, magmatic associations with rapakivi granites: age, geochemistry, and tectonic setting. Stratigr Geol Correl 17:235–258. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869593809030010
Larin AM, Kotov AB, Kovach VP et al (2021) Rapakivi granites of the Kodar complex (Aldan Shield): age, sources, and tectonic setting. Petrology 29:277–299. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869591121030036
Liao XY (2018) Continental deep subduction-exhumation process of North Qinling Belt: constraints on Early Paleozoic tectonic evolution. Dissertation, Northwest University (in Chinese with English abstract)
Liao XY, Liu L, Wang YW, Cao YT, Chen DL, Dong YP (2016) Multi-stage metamorphic evolution of retrograde eclogite with a granulite-facies overprint in the Zhaigen area of the North Qinling Belt, China. Gondwana Res 30:79–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.09.012
Liou JG, Ernst WG, Zhang RY, Tsujimori T, Jahn BM (2009) Ultrahigh-pressure minerals and metamorphic terranes – the view from China. J Asian Earth Sci 35:199–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.10.012
Liu BX (2014) Magmatism and crustal evolution in the eastern North Qinling terrain. Dissertation, University of Science and Technology of China (in Chinese with English abstract)
Liu JF, Sun Y, Feng T, Hu YH, Sun WD (2008) Geochemistry and petrogenesis of Sifangtai mafic-ultramafic complex from North Qinling. Geochimica 37:174–186 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.19700/j.0379-1726.2008.02.009
Liu CH, Wu CL, Gao YH, Lei M, Qin H, Li M (2013a) Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating and Lu-Hf isotopic system of Machihe country and Shahewan granitoid masses, South Qinling Belt, central China. Earth Sci Front 20:36–56 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Liu L, Liao XY, Zhang CL, Chen DL, Gong XK, Kang L (2013b) Multi-metamorphic timings of HP-UHP rocks in the North Qinling and their geological implications. Acta Petrol Sin 29:1634–1656 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Liu L, Liao XY, Wang YW, Wang C, Santosh M, Yang M, Zhang C, Chen D (2016) Early paleozoic tectonic evolution of the North Qinling Orogenic Belt in central China: insights on continental deep subduction and multiphase exhumation. Earth Sci Rev 159:58–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.05.005
Lu XX, Wang XX, Xiao QH, Yu XD, Dong Y (2003) A reply to ‘A query on the so-called rapakivi granite in the Qinling orogen’. Geol Rev 02:146–154 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Lu XX, Wang XX, Xiao QH, Xing ZY (2007a) Comparison of Qinling-Kunlun orogenic-type rapakivi granite with world typical rapakivi granite. Geol Sci Technol Inf 15:1–1
Lu XX, Zhang YG, Zhang XT, Xiao Q, Wang X, Wei X, Gu D (2007b) The SHRIMP age of Tatalin rapakivi granite at the north margin of Qaidam Basin. Acta Geol Sin 81:620–634 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Ludwig KR (2003) User’s Manual for a Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel (Isoplot/Ex version 3.0). Berkeley Geochronological Cent Special Publication 4:1–71
Lux DR, Hooks B, Gibson D, Hogan JP (2007) Magma interactions in the deer Isle granite complex, Maine: field and textural evidence. Can Mineral 45:131–146. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscanmin.45.1.131
Maniar PD, Piccoli PM (1989) Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. Geol Soc Am Bull 101(5):635–643. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101<0635:TDOG>2.3.CO;2
Nekvasil H (1991) Ascent of felsic magmas and formation of rapakivi. Am Mineral 76:1279–1290. https://doi.org/0003-004x/9 l /0708-l 279$02.00
O’Brien WD, Dorais MJ, Christiansen EH, Gibson D (2019) Formation of rapakivi feldspar in the Deer Isle granite complex, coastal Maine: in situ lead isotope and trace-element analysis. Contrib Mineral Petrol 174:56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-019-1591-5
Parsons I, Fitz Gerald JD, Lee MR (2015) Routine characterization and interpretation of complex alkali feldspar intergrowths. Am Mineral 100:1277–1303. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2015-5094
Pearce JA, Harris NBW, Tindle AG (1984) Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. J Petrol 25:956–983. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/25.4.956
Peccerillo A, Taylor SR (1976) Geochemistry of Eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, northern Turkey. Contrib Mineral Petrol 58:63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384745
Pereira GDS, Janasi VA, Andrade S, Alves A, Hernandez VMM (2023) Sources, evolution and ages of A-type granites from the post-orogenic Itu batholith, SE Brazil: inferences from zircon U–Pb dating, Lu–Hf isotope ratios and trace-element geochemistry. J South Am Earth Sci 131:104619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2023.104619
Prasanth MM, Sharma ASP, Santosh M, Yang CX, Hari KR (2023) Insights into the petrogenetic evolution of the Khallari layered intrusion and coeval granites of the Paleoproterozoic Dongargarh Supergroup, Bastar Craton, India. Precambrian Res 391:107040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2023.107040
Qin JF, Lai SC, Long XP, Zhang ZZ, Ju YJ, Zhu RZ, Wang XY, Li YF, Wang JB, Li T (2020) Thermotectonic evolution of the paleozoic granites along the Shangdan suture zone (central China): crustal growth and differentiation by magma underplating in an orogenic belt. Bull Geol Soc Am 133:523–538. https://doi.org/10.1130/B35466.1
Rämö OT, Haapala I (1995) One hundred years of rapakivi granite. Mineral Petrol 52(3):129–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01163243
Rämö OT, Haapala I (2005) Chap. 12 Rapakivi granites. In: Lehtinen M, Nurmi PA, Rämö OT (eds), Precambrian geology of Finland key to the evolution of the Fennoscandian shield. Developments in Precambrian geology, vol. 14, p 533–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2635(05)80013-1
Rapp R, Watson E (1995) Dehydration melting of metabasalt at 8–32 kbar: implications for continental growth and crust-mantle recycling. J Petrol 6:891–931. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/36.4.891
Ribbe PH (1983) Chemistry, structure and nomenclature of feldspars. In: Rev Mineral Ribbe PH (ed.): Feldspar mineralogy. vol. 2: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501508547-006
Rieder M, Cavazzini G, D’yakonov YS, Frank-Kamenetskii VA, Gottardi G, Guggenheim S, Koval PV, Müller G, Neiva AMR, Radoslovich EW, Robert JL, Sassi FP, Takeda H, Weiss Z, Wones DR (1998) Nomenclature of the micas. Mineral Mag 63:267–279. https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.1999.063.2.13
Scandolara JE, Fuck RA, Dall‘Agnol R, Dantas EL (2013) Geochemistry and origin of the early mesoproterozoic mangerite–charnockite–rapakivi granite association of the serra da Providência suite and associated gabbros, central–eastern Rondnia, sw Amazonian Craton, Brazil. J South Am Earth Sci 45:166–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2013.03.003
Sederholm JJ (1891) I. Ueber die finnländischen rapakiwigesteine. Tschermak’s Mineral Petrogr Mitt 12:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02993378
Shi Y, Huang QW, Liu XJ, Krapež B, Yu JH, Bai Z (2018) Provenance and tectonic setting of the supra-crustal succession of the Qinling complex: implications for the tectonic affinity of the North Qinling Belt, central China. J Asian Earth Sci 158:112–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.02.011
Smith JV, Brown WL (1988) Feldspar minerals 1: Crystal structures, physical, chemical, and microtextural properties, vol 1. Springer, p 828
Solomovich LI, Trifonov BA (2014) Rapakivi granites within phanerozoic collisional orogens as a possible consequence of continental subduction and following exhumation of the precambrian crust: evidences from the Permian Jangart rapakivi in South Tien Shan collisional belt, Eastern Kyrgyzstan. J Asian Earth Sci 96:332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.09.028
Sun LL (2017) The petrological characteristics and the crust-mantle magmatic mixing evidence of the mafic microgranular enclave in Shahewan pluton, North Qinling. Dissertation, Chang’an University (in Chinese with English abstract)
Sun SS, McDonough WF (1989) Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes. SP Geol Soc Lond Special Publications Lond 42:313–345. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19
Trail D, Bruce Watson E, Tailby ND (2012) Ce and Eu anomalies in zircon as proxies for the oxidation state of magmas. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 97:70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.08.032
Vorma AI (1976) On the petrochemistry of rapakivi granites with special reference to the Laitila massif, southwestern Finland. Bull Geol Surv Finl 285. http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=PASCALGEODEBRGM7720326979
Wang XX, Wang T (2009) Research on the origin of rapakivi texture: taking the mesozoic granites in Qinling Orogenic Belt as example. National Workshop on Petrology and Geodynamics. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Wang XX, Wang T, Lu XX, Xiao QH (2003) Laojunshan and Qinlingliang rapakivi-textured granitoids in North Qinling and their tectonic setting: a possible orogenic-type rapakivi granitoids. Acta Petrol Sin 19:650–660 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Wang XX, Wang T, Haapala I, Lu XX (2005) Genesis of mafic enclaves from rapakivi-textured granites in the Qinling and its petrological significance: evidence of elements and nd, Sr isotopes. Acta Petrol Sin 21:935–946 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Wang T, Wang XX, Tian W, Zhang CL, Li WP, Li S (2009) North Qinling paleozoic granite associations and their variation in space and time: implications for orogenic processes in the orogens of central China. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci 52:1359–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-0129-5
Wang H, Wu YB, Gao S, Liu XC, Gong HJ, Li QL, Li XH, Yuan HL (2011) Eclogite origin and timings in the North Qinling terrane, and their bearing on the amalgamation of the South and North China blocks. J Metamorph Geol 29:1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.2011.00955.x
Wang H, Wu YB, Gao S, Liu XC, Liu Q, Qin ZW, Xie SW, Zhou L, Yang SH (2013) Continental origin of eclogites in the North Qinling terrane and its tectonic implications. Precambrian Res 230:13–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2012.12.010
Wang H, Wu YB, Gao S, Zheng JP, Liu Q, Liu XC, Qin ZW, Yang SH, Gong HJ (2014) Deep subduction of continental crust in accretionary orogen: evidence from U-Pb dating on diamond-bearing zircons from the Qinling orogen, central China. Lithos 190–191:420–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2013.12.021
Wang XX, Wang T, Zhang CL (2015) Granitoid magmatism in the Qinling orogen, central China and its bearing on orogenic evolution. Sci China Earth Sci 58:1497–1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-5150-2
Wang XX, Wang T, Castro A, Ke CH, Yang Y, Hu NG (2018) Magmatic evolution and source of a proterozoic rapakivi granite complex in the North China Craton: new evidence from zircon U–Pb ages, mineral compositions, and geochemistry. J Asian Earth Sci 167:165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.10.019
Whitney DL, Evans BW (2010) Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals. Am Mineral 95:185–187. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2010.3371
Wu YB, Zheng YF (2013) Tectonic evolution of a composite collision orogen: an overview on the Qinling-Tongbai-Hong’an-Dabie-Sulu Orogenic Belt in central China. Gondwana Res 23:1402–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.09.007
Wu FY, Li XH, Zheng YF, Gao S (2007) Lu-Hf isotopic systematics and their applications in petrology. Acta Petrol Sin 23:185–220 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Xie YW, Zhang YQ (1990) Peculiarities and genetic significance of hornblende from granite in the Hengduanshan region. Acta Mineral Sin 10:35–45 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Yakymchuk C, Holder RM, Kendrick J, Moyen JF (2023) Europium anomalies in zircon: a signal of crustal depth? Earth Planet Sci Lett 622:118405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118405
Yang JH, Wu FY, Liu XM, Xie L (2005) Zircon U-Pb ages and hf isotopes and their geological significance of the Miyun rapakivi granites from Beijing, China. Acta Petrol Sin 21:1633–1644 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Yang Y, Wang XX, Yu XW, Ke CH, Wang LG, Guo RP, Wang SA, Li XX (2017) Chemical composition of biotite and amphibole from mesozoic granites in northwestern Jiaodong Peninsula, China, and their implications. Acta Petrol Sin 33:3123–3136 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Yuan HL, Gao S, Dai MN, Zong CL, Günther D, Fontaine GH, Liu XM, Diwu CR (2008) Simultaneous determinations of U-Pb Age, Hf isotopes and trace element compositions of zircon by excimer laser-ablation quadrupole and multiple-collector ICP-MS. Chem Geol 247:100–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.10.003
Zhang LJ, Ma CQ, Wang LX, She ZB, Wang SM (2011b) Discovery of Paleoproterozoic rapakivi granite on the northern margin of the Yangtze block and its geological significance. Chin Sci Bull 56:306–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-4236-7
Zhang GW, Zhang BR, Yuan XC, Xiao QH (2001) Qinling Orogenic Belt and continental dynamics. Science, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhang JX, Yu SY, Meng FC (2011a) Polyphase early paleozoic metamorphism in the northern Qinling Orogenic Belt. Acta Petrol Sin 27:1179–1190 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhang CL, Liu L, Wang T, Wang XX, Li L, Gong QF, Li XF (2013) Granitic magmatism related to early paleozoic continental collision in North Qinling. Chin Sci Bull 58:4405–4410 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-6064-z
Zhang GW, Guo AL, Dong YP, Yao A (2019) Rethinking of the Qinling orogen. J Geomech 25:746–768 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhao QQ, Pang CJ, Wen SN, Wang XC, Huang XL, Krapež B, Luo XS, Bai LA, Dai Y (2023) Petrology and geochemistry of late triassic rapakivi-type granites in the Dupangling area, South China: role of fluid-rock interaction in the origin of rapakivi texture. Lithos 460–461:107365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2023.107365
Zhou B, Wang FY, Sun Y, Sun WD, Ding X, Hu YH, Ling MX (2008) Geochemistry and tectonic affinity of Shanewan orogenic rapakivi from Qinling. Acta Petrol Sin 24(6):1261–1272 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank Mr. Jiangfeng Qin from the State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Department of Geology, Northwest University for his constructive suggestions. We express our appreciation to the Editor-in-Chief Dr. Maarten A. T. M. Broekmans, the Associate Editor Dr. Nanfei Cheng, the reviewer Dr. Ryan M. Currier, and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments relating to this manuscript.
Funding
The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42172010 and 41972058).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Fenhong Luo and Hujun Gong wrote the main manuscript text, Hang Liu did the experiment and field trip. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Editorial handling: N. Cheng.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, F., Gong, H. & Liu, H. Early-paleozoic rapakivi-textured granite from the North Qinling (Central China): implications for crust–mantle interactions in a post-collisional setting. Miner Petrol 118, 281–303 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-024-00861-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-024-00861-6