Abstract
Piezoelectric and piezomagnetic layers are known to enhance material properties and increase load capacity. However, most studies focused on the effects of mechanical and thermal loads on these structures. This work aimed to investigate the complex external condition of uniformed load, thermal load, moisture parameter and electric–magnetic potentials of the smart electric magnetic panel using an analytical approach. The core of the panel is made of graphene platelets, and the two outer layers consist of barium titanate (BaTiO3) and cobalt ferric oxide (CoFe2O4). The Ready’s first-order shear deformation and Hamilton’s theory are proposed to govern the basic equation. After that, the stress function is introduced, and then apply the Galerkin method to determine the natural frequency and dynamic response of the panel. The final chapter analyzes the relationship between the natural frequency and amplitude of the electromagnetic panel with simplified assumptions. The numerical results are highlighted using the Runge–Kutta method, including the influence of the piezoelectric outer layer, geometry parameters, imperfection, elastic foundations, graphene volume fraction, thermal loads and electric and magnetic fields of the electromagnetic panel. The reliability of this computational theory is validated by other publications. In addition, the new influence of electrical and magnetic field parameters on the panel’s natural frequency is also emphasized.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dinzart, F., Sabar, H.: Magneto-electro-elastic coated inclusion problem and its application to magnetic-piezoelectric composite materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 48, 2393–2401 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2011.04.010
Siddharth Mangalasseri, A., Vinyas, M., Mahesh, V., Ponnusami, S.A., Harursampath, D.: Investigation on the interphase effects on the energy harvesting characteristics of three phase magneto-electro-elastic cantilever beam. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2022.2062630
Vinyas, M.: Interphase effect on the controlled frequency response of three-phase smart magneto-electro-elastic plates embedded with active constrained layer damping: FE study. Mater. Res. Express (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab6649
Vinyas, M.: Nonlinear pyrocoupled deflection of viscoelastic sandwich shell with CNT reinforced magneto-electro-elastic facing subjected to electromagnetic loads in thermal environment. Eur. Phys. J. Plus (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01751-y
Vinyas, M.: A numerical investigation on the nonlinear pyrocoupled dynamic response of blast loaded magnetoelectroelastic multiphase porous plates in thermal environment. Eur. Phys. J. Plus (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02795-4
Ke, L.L., Wang, Y.S.: Free vibration of size-dependent magneto-electro-elastic nanobeams based on the nonlocal theory. Phys. E Low Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 63, 52–61 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYSE.2014.05.002
Yan, Z., Jiang, L.Y.: The vibrational and buckling behaviors of piezoelectric nanobeams with surface effects. Nanotechnology 22, 245703 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/22/24/245703
Sahmani, S., Aghdam, M.M.: Nonlocal strain gradient shell model for axial buckling and postbuckling analysis of magneto-electro-elastic composite nanoshells. Compos. B Eng. 132, 258–274 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2017.09.004
Sahmani, S., Aghdam, M.M.: Imperfection sensitivity of the size-dependent postbuckling response of pressurized FGM nanoshells in thermal environments. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 17, 623–638 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACME.2017.01.004
Dat, N.D., Quan, T.Q., Mahesh, V., Duc, N.D.: Analytical solutions for nonlinear magneto-electro-elastic vibration of smart sandwich plate with carbon nanotube reinforced nanocomposite core in hygrothermal environment. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 186, 105906 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105906
Zhang, X.L., Xu, Q., Zhao, X., Li, Y.H., Yang, J.: Nonlinear analyses of magneto-electro-elastic laminated beams in thermal environments. Compos. Struct. 234, 111524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111524
Sobhani, E., Masoodi, A.R.: On the frequencies of graphene nanoplatelet agglomerated nanocomposite paired paraboloidal-cylindrical shells under arbitrary boundary conditions. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 128, 107782 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AST.2022.107782
Vinyas, M.: Porosity effect on the nonlinear deflection of functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic smart shells under combined loading. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 29, 2707–2725 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.1875086
Vinyas, M., Kattimani, S.C., Ame, N., Yas, V.: Static behavior of thermally loaded multilayered magneto-electro-elastic beam (2017)
Vinyas, M., Harursampath, D.: Large deflection analysis of functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic porous flat panels. Eng. Comput. 38, 1615–1634 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01270-x
Vinyas, M.: Nonlinear damping of auxetic sandwich plates with functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic facings under multiphysics loads and electromagnetic circuits. Compos. Struct. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115523
Shen, H.S.: Nonlinear analysis of functionally graded fiber reinforced composite laminated beams in hygrothermal environments, Part I: theory and solutions. Compos. Struct. 125, 698–705 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2014.12.024
Shen, H.S.: Hygrothermal effects on the postbuckling of shear deformable laminated plates. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43, 1259–1281 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00058-8
Chao, L.P., Shyu, S.L.: Nonlinear buckling of fiber-reinforced composite plates under hygrothermal effects. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 19, 657–667 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.1996.9677831
Boukhoulda, B.F., Adda-Bedia, E., Madani, K.: The effect of fiber orientation angle in composite materials on moisture absorption and material degradation after hygrothermal ageing. Compos. Struct. 74, 406–418 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2005.04.032
Attukur Nandagopal, R., Narasimalu, S., Chai, G.B.: Study of statistically significant strength degradation of hygrothermal aged CFRP and its weibull analysis. Compos. Commun. 23, 100566 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COCO.2020.100566
Mansouri, L., Djebbar, A., Khatir, S., Abdel Wahab, M.: Effect of hygrothermal aging in distilled and saline water on the mechanical behaviour of mixed short fibre/woven composites. Compos. Struct. 207, 816–825 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2018.09.067
Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A.K., Morozov, S.V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S.V., Grigorieva, I.V., Firsov, A.A.: Electric field in atomically thin carbon films. Science 1979(306), 666–669 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1102896/SUPPL_FILE/NOVOSELOV.SOM.PDF
Pan, H.H., Lai, T.Z., Chaipanich, A., Wittinanon, T.: Effect of graphene on the piezoelectric properties of cement-based piezoelectric composites. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 346, 113882 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SNA.2022.113882
Lee, C., Wei, X., Kysar, J.W., Hone, J.: Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 1979(321), 385–388 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1157996/SUPPL_FILE/LEE-SOM.PDF
Balandin, A.A., Ghosh, S., Bao, W., Calizo, I., Teweldebrhan, D., Miao, F., Lau, C.N.: Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 8, 902–907 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/NL0731872/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/NL-2007-031872_0005.GIF
Du, X., Skachko, I., Barker, A., Andrei, E.Y.: Approaching ballistic transport in suspended graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008(3), 491–495 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.199
de Guzmán, V.R., Miravete, A.: Mechanical model to evaluate the effect of the dispersion in nanocomposites. Acta Mater. 55, 3025–3031 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2007.01.007
Esmaeili, H.R., Kiani, Y., Beni, Y.T.: Vibration characteristics of composite doubly curved shells reinforced with graphene platelets with arbitrary edge supports. Acta Mech. 233, 665–683 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00707-021-03140-Z/FIGURES/10
Cong, P.H., Duc, N.D.: New approach to investigate the nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of a functionally graded multilayer graphene nanocomposite plate on a viscoelastic Pasternak medium in a thermal environment. Acta Mech. 229, 3651–3670 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00707-018-2178-3
Duc, N.D., Lam, P.T., Quan, T.Q., Quang, P.M., van Quyen, N.: Nonlinear post-buckling and vibration of 2D penta-graphene composite plates. Acta Mech. 231, 539–559 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-019-02546-0
Guo, L.J., Mao, J.J., Zhang, W., Liu, Y.Z., Chen, J., Zhao, W.: Modeling and analyze of behaviors of functionally graded graphene reinforced composite beam with geometric imperfection in multiphysics. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 127, 107722 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AST.2022.107722
Niu, Y., Yao, M.: Linear and Nonlinear Vibrations of Graphene Platelet Reinforced Composite Tapered Plates and Cylindrical Panels. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2021)
Shen, H.S., Xiang, Y., Fan, Y.: Postbuckling of functionally graded graphene-reinforced composite laminated cylindrical panels under axial compression in thermal environments. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 135, 398–409 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMECSCI.2017.11.031
Zhao, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., Yang, J., Kitipornchai, S.: Buckling of functionally graded hydrogen-functionalized graphene reinforced beams based on machine learning-assisted micromechanics models. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 96, 104675 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EUROMECHSOL.2022.104675
Arefi, M., Mohammad-Rezaei Bidgoli, E., Rabczuk, T.: Effect of various characteristics of graphene nanoplatelets on thermal buckling behavior of FGRC micro plate based on MCST. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 77, 103802 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EUROMECHSOL.2019.103802
Song, M., Kitipornchai, S., Yang, J.: Free and forced vibrations of functionally graded polymer composite plates reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Compos. Struct. 159, 579–588 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2016.09.070
Wu, H., Yang, J., Kitipornchai, S.: Dynamic instability of functionally graded multilayer graphene nanocomposite beams in thermal environment. Compos. Struct. 162, 244–254 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2016.12.001
Mao, J.J., Zhang, W.: Buckling and post-buckling analyses of functionally graded graphene reinforced piezoelectric plate subjected to electric potential and axial forces. Compos. Struct. 216, 392–405 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2019.02.095
Eringen, A.C., Wegner, J.L.: Nonlocal continuum field theories. Appl. Mech. Rev. 56, B20–B22 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1553434
Gholami, R., Ansari, R., Gholami, Y., Ansari, R., Gholami, R.: Nonlocal free vibration in the pre- and post-buckled states of magneto-electro-thermo elastic rectangular nanoplates with various edge conditions. Smart Mater. Struct. 25, 095033 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/9/095033
Ansari, R., Gholami, R., Rouhi, H.: Size-dependent nonlinear forced vibration analysis of magneto-electro-thermo-elastic Timoshenko nanobeams based upon the nonlocal elasticity theory. Compos. Struct. 126, 216–226 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2015.02.068
Vinyas, M.: A higher-order free vibration analysis of carbon nanotube-reinforced magneto-electro-elastic plates using finite element methods. Compos. B Eng. 158, 286–301 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.086
Vinyas, M., Harursampath, D.: Nonlinear deflection analysis of CNT/magneto-electro-elastic smart shells under multi-physics loading. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 29, 1047–1071 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2020.1805059
Vinyas, M., Mangalasseri, A.S.: Agglomeration effects of CNTs on the energy harvesting performance of multifield interactive magneto-electro-elastic/nanocomposite unimorph smart beam. Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2022.2144886
Vinyas, M., Harursampath, D.: Nonlinear vibrations of magneto-electro-elastic doubly curved shells reinforced with carbon nanotubes. Compos. Struct. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112749
Vinyas, M.: Active control of nonlinear coupled transient vibrations of multifunctional sandwich plates with agglomerated FG-CNTs core/magneto-electro-elastic facesheets. Thin-Walled Struct. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.109547
Zhang, P., Qi, C., Fang, H., Sun, X.: A semi-analytical approach for the flexural analysis of in-plane functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic plates. Compos. Struct. 250, 112590 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2020.112590
Zhao, Y.-F., Zhang, S.-Q., Wang, X., Ma, S.-Y., Zhao, G.-Z., Kang, Z.: Nonlinear analysis of carbon nanotube reinforced functionally graded plates with magneto-electro-elastic multiphase matrix. Compos. Struct. 297, 115969 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2022.115969
Nie, B., Ren, S., Li, W., Zhou, L., Liu, C.: The hygro-thermo-electro-mechanical coupling edge-based smoothed point interpolation method for the response of functionally graded piezoelectric structure under hygrothermal environment. Eng. Anal. Bound Elem. 130, 29–39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGANABOUND.2021.05.004
Gholami, M., Afrasiab, H., Baghestani, A.M., Fathi, A.: A novel multiscale parallel finite element method for the study of the hygrothermal aging effect on the composite materials. Compos. Sci. Technol. 217, 109120 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2021.109120
Wang, Y.L., Guo, X.Y., Huang, P.Y., Huang, K.N., Yang, Y., Chen, Z.B.: Finite element investigation of fatigue performance of CFRP-strengthened beams in hygrothermal environments. Compos. Struct. 234, 111676 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2019.111676
Li, M., Liu, M., Zhou, L.: The static behaviors study of magneto-electro-elastic materials under hygrothermal environment with multi-physical cell-based smoothed finite element method. Compos. Sci. Technol. 193, 108130 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2020.108130
Vinyas, M., Kattimani, S.C.: Finite element evaluation of free vibration characteristics of magneto-electro-elastic rectangular plates in hygrothermal environment using higher-order shear deformation theory. Compos. Struct. 202, 1339–1352 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2018.06.069
Vinyas, M., Ponnusami, S.A.: Nonlinear damped transient response of sandwich auxetic plates with porous magneto-electro-elastic facesheets. Eur. Phys. J. Plus. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02756-x
Vinyas, M., Kattimani, S.: Finite element simulation of controlled frequency response of skew multiphase magneto-electro-elastic plates. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 30, 1757–1771 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X19843674
Reddy, J.N.: Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells: theory and analysis. Mech. Laminated Compos. Plates Shells (2003). https://doi.org/10.1201/B12409
Singh, P.N., Sundararajan, V., Das, Y.C.: Large amplitude vibration of some moderately thick structural elements. J. Sound Vib. 36, 375–387 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(74)80217-8
Chen, L.W., Doong, J.L.: Large amplitude vibration of an initially stressed moderately thick plate. J. Sound Vib. 89, 499–508 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(83)90351-6
Yifeng, Z., Yu, W.: A variational asymptotic approach for hygrothermal analysis of composite laminates. Compos. Struct. 93, 3229–3238 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2011.06.003
Bhimaraddi, A.: Large amplitude vibrations of imperfect antisymmetric angle-ply laminated plates. J. Sound Vib. 162, 457–470 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1006/JSVI.1993.1133
Wang, Z.X., Shen, H.S.: Nonlinear vibration and bending of sandwich plates with nanotube-reinforced composite face sheets. Compos. B Eng. 43, 411–421 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2011.04.040
Opelt, C.V., Paiva, J.M.F., Cândido, G.M., Rezende, M.C.: A fractographic study on the effects of hygrothermal conditioning on carbon fiber/epoxy laminates submitted to axial compression. Eng. Fail. Anal. 79, 342–350 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFAILANAL.2017.05.006
Li, Y., Li, R., Huang, L., Wang, K., Huang, X.: Effect of hygrothermal aging on the damage characteristics of carbon woven fabric/epoxy laminates subjected to simulated lightning strike. Mater. Des. 99, 477–489 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2016.03.030
Duc, N.D., Vuong, P.M.: Nonlinear vibration response of shear deformable FGM sandwich toroidal shell segments. Meccanica 57, 1083–1103 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11012-021-01470-9/FIGURES/26
Duc, N.D., Manh, D.T., Khoa, N.D., Nguyen, P.D.: Mechanical stability of eccentrically stiffened auxetic truncated conical sandwich shells surrounded by elastic foundations. Mech. Compos. Mater. 58, 365–382 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11029-022-10035-0
Vinyas, M., Sunny, K.K., Harursampath, D., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Loja, M.A.R.: Influence of interphase on the multi-physics coupled frequency of three-phase smart magneto-electro-elastic composite plates. Compos. Struct. 226, 111254 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2019.111254
Annigeri, A.R., Ganesan, N., Swarnamani, S.: Free vibrations of simply supported layered and multiphase magneto-electro-elastic cylindrical shells. Smart Mater. Struct. 15, 459 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/15/2/027
Li, J.Y.: Magnetoelectroelastic multi-inclusion and inhomogeneity problems and their applications in composite materials. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 38, 1993–2011 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7225(00)00014-8
van Quyen, N., Duc, N.D.: Vibration and nonlinear dynamic response of nanocomposite multi-layer solar panel resting on elastic foundations. Thin-Walled Struct. 177, 109412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TWS.2022.109412
Zhang, L.X., Bai, Z.F., Zhao, Y., Cao, X.: Bin: Dynamic response of solar panel deployment on spacecraft system considering joint clearance. Acta Astronaut. 81, 174–185 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAASTRO.2012.07.020
Wu, X., Li, Y., Cai, W., Guo, K., Zhu, L.: Dynamic responses and energy absorption of sandwich panel with aluminium honeycomb core under ice wedge impact. Int. J. Impact Eng. 162, 104137 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJIMPENG.2021.104137
Shi, G., Araby, S., Gibson, C.T., Meng, Q., Zhu, S., Ma, J.: Graphene platelets and their polymer composites: fabrication, structure, properties, and applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1706705 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/ADFM.201706705
Acknowledgements
This research is funded by the Project number CN.22.11 of VNU Hanoi – University of Engineeing and Technology. The author is grateful for this support. Also, the author acknowledges The University of Melbourne and the Melbourne Research Scholarship for doctoral degrees research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Appendix 5
Appendix 6
\(\begin{aligned} l_{1}^{1} & = l_{1} + c_{1} l_{4} + c_{11} l_{5} , \\ l_{2}^{1} & = l_{2} + c_{2} l_{4} + c_{12} l_{5} , \\ l_{3}^{1} & = l_{3} + c_{3} l_{4} + c_{13} l_{5} , \\ l_{4}^{1} & = l_{0} + \\ & \quad + \left( {c_{7} l_{10} + c_{17} l_{11} } \right)\Delta T + \left( {c_{8} l_{10} + c_{18} l_{11} } \right)\Delta m \\ & \quad + \left( {c_{9} l_{10} + c_{19} l_{11} } \right)\phi_{0} + \left( {c_{10} l_{10} + c_{20} l_{11} } \right)\psi_{0} , \\ l_{5}^{1} & = c_{5} l_{10} + c_{15} l_{11} - \lambda_{m}^{2} , \\ l_{6}^{1} & = c_{6} l_{10} + c_{16} l_{11} - \delta_{n}^{2} , \\ l_{7}^{1} & = l_{7} + c_{1} l_{10} + c_{11} l_{11} , \\ l_{8}^{1} & = l_{8} + c_{2} l_{10} + c_{12} l_{11,} \\ l_{9}^{1} & = l_{9} + c_{3} l_{10} + c_{13} l_{11} , \\ l_{10}^{1} & = l_{12} + c_{4} l_{4} + c_{14} l_{5} , \\ l_{11}^{1} & = l_{13} + c_{4} l_{10} + c_{14} l_{11} , \\ l_{12}^{1} & = c_{5} l_{4} + c_{15} l_{5} , \\ l_{13}^{1} & = l_{14} \frac{1}{{R_{x} }} + c_{6} l_{4} + c_{16} l_{5} , \\ l_{14}^{1} & = \left( {c_{7} l_{4} + c_{17} l_{5} } \right)\Delta T + \left( {c_{8} l_{4} + c_{18} l_{5} } \right)\Delta m \\ & \quad + \left( {c_{9} l_{4} + c_{19} l_{5} } \right)\phi_{0} + \left( {c_{10} l_{4} + c_{20} l_{5} } \right)\psi_{0} , \\ \end{aligned}\) | \(\begin{aligned} l_{21}^{1} & = l_{21} + c_{1} l_{24} + c_{11} l_{25} , \\ l_{22}^{1} & = l_{22} + c_{2} l_{24} + c_{12} l_{25} , \\ l_{23}^{1} & = l_{23} + c_{3} l_{24} + c_{13} l_{25} , \\ l_{24}^{1} & = l_{27} + c_{4} l_{24} + c_{14} l_{25} , \\ l_{25}^{1} & = c_{5} l_{24} + c_{15} l_{25} , \\ l_{26}^{1} & = c_{6} l_{24} + c_{16} l_{25} , \\ l_{27}^{1} & = \left( {c_{7} l_{24} + c_{17} l_{25} } \right)\Delta T + \left( {c_{8} l_{24} + c_{18} l_{25} } \right)\Delta m \\ & \quad + \left( {c_{9} l_{24} + c_{19} l_{25} } \right)\phi_{0} + \left( {c_{10} l_{24} + c_{20} l_{25} } \right)\psi_{0} , \\ l_{31}^{1} & = l_{31} + c_{1} l_{34} + c_{11} l_{35,} \\ l_{32}^{1} & = l_{32} + c_{2} l_{34} + c_{12} l_{35} , \\ l_{33}^{1} & = l_{33} + c_{3} l_{34} + c_{13} l_{35} , \\ l_{34}^{1} & = l_{37} + c_{4} l_{34} + c_{14} l_{35} , \\ l_{35}^{1} & = c_{5} l_{34} + c_{15} l_{35} , \\ l_{36}^{1} & = c_{6} l_{34} + c_{16} l_{35} , \\ l_{37}^{1} & = \left( {c_{7} l_{34} + c_{17} l_{35} } \right)\Delta T + \left( {c_{8} l_{34} + c_{18} l_{35} } \right)\Delta m \\ & \quad + \left( {c_{9} l_{34} + c_{19} l_{35} } \right)\phi_{0} + \left( {c_{10} l_{34} + c_{20} l_{35} } \right)\psi_{0} , \\ \end{aligned}\) |
\(\begin{aligned} & c_{0} = \overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} - \overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} , \\ & c_{1} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{21} }} - \overline{{a_{1} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} }}{{c_{0} }},\,c_{2} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{22} }} - \overline{{a_{2} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} }}{{c_{0} }}, \\ & c_{3} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{23} }} - \overline{{a_{3} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} }}{{c_{0} }},\,c_{4} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{26} }} - \overline{{a_{6} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} }}{{c_{0} }}, \\ & c_{5} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{27} }} a_{30} - \overline{{a_{7} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} a_{10} }}{{\overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} - \overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} }}, \\ & c_{6} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{27} }} a_{29} - \overline{{a_{7} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} a_{9} }}{{\overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} - \overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} }}, \\ & c_{7} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{28} }} - \overline{{a_{8} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} }}{{c_{0} }},\,c_{8} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{29} }} - \overline{{a_{9} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} }}{{c_{0} }}, \\ & c_{9} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{30} }} - \overline{{a_{10} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} }}{{c_{0} }},\,c_{10} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{31} }} - \overline{{a_{11} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} }}{{c_{0} }}, \\ \end{aligned}\) | \(\begin{aligned} & c_{11} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{1} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} - \overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{21} }} }}{{c_{0} }},\,c_{12} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{2} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} - \overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{22} }} }}{{c_{0} }}, \\ & c_{13} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{3} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} - \overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{23} }} }}{{c_{0} }},\,c_{14} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{6} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} - \overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{26} }} }}{{c_{0} }}, \\ & c_{15} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{7} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} a_{10} - \overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{27} }} a_{30} }}{{\overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} - \overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} }}, \\ & c_{16} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{7} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} a_{9} - \overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{27} }} a_{29} }}{{\overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{25} }} - \overline{{a_{5} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} }}, \\ & c_{17} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{8} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} - \overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{28} }} }}{{c_{0} }},\,c_{18} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{9} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} - \overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{29} }} }}{{c_{0} }}, \\ & c_{19} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{10} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} - \overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{30} }} }}{{c_{0} }},\,c_{20} = \frac{{\overline{{a_{11} }} \overline{{a_{24} }} - \overline{{a_{4} }} \overline{{a_{31} }} }}{{c_{0} }}, \\ \end{aligned}\) |
Appendix 7
\(\begin{aligned} & \overline{{n_{0} }} = n_{1} n_{22} - n_{2} n_{21} ,\,\overline{{n_{1} }} = \frac{{n_{3} n_{22} - n_{2} n_{23} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }} \\ & \overline{{n_{2} }} = \frac{{n_{4} n_{22} - n_{2} n_{24} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }},\,\overline{{n_{3} }} = \frac{{n_{5} n_{22} - n_{2} n_{25} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }} \\ & \overline{{n_{4} }} = \frac{{n_{6} n_{22} - n_{2} n_{26} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }},\,\overline{{n_{5} }} = \frac{{n_{7} n_{22} - n_{2} n_{27} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }} \\ & \overline{{n_{6} }} = \frac{{n_{8} n_{22} - n_{2} n_{28} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }},\,\overline{{n_{7} }} = \frac{{n_{9} n_{22} - n_{2} n_{29} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }} \\ & \overline{{n_{8} }} = \frac{{n_{10} n_{22} - n_{2} n_{30} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }} \\ & n_{1} = 1 - c_{5} m_{4} - c_{15} m_{5} ,\,\, \\ & n_{2} = - \left( {c_{6} m_{4} + c_{16} m_{5} } \right), \\ & n_{3} = m_{1} + c_{1} m_{4} + c_{11} m_{5} , \\ & n_{4} = m_{2} + c_{2} m_{4} + c_{12} m_{5} , \\ & n_{5} = m_{3} + c_{3} m_{4} + c_{13} m_{5} , \\ & n_{6} = m_{6} + c_{4} m_{4} + c_{14} m_{5} , \\ & n_{7} = m_{8} + c_{8} m_{4} + c_{18} m_{5} , \\ & n_{8} = m_{8} + c_{8} m_{4} + c_{18} m_{5} , \\ & n_{9} = m_{9} + c_{9} m_{4} + c_{19} m_{5} , \\ & n_{10} = m_{10} + c_{10} m_{4} + c_{20} m_{5} , \\ \end{aligned}\) | \(\begin{gathered} \overline{{n_{21} }} = \frac{{n_{1} n_{23} - n_{3} n_{21} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }},\,\,\,\,\,\overline{{n_{22} }} = \frac{{n_{1} n_{24} - n_{4} n_{21} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }} \hfill \\ \overline{{n_{23} }} = \frac{{n_{1} n_{25} - n_{5} n_{21} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }},\,\,\,\,\,\overline{{n_{24} }} = \frac{{n_{1} n_{26} - n_{6} n_{21} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }} \hfill \\ \overline{{n_{25} }} = \frac{{n_{1} n_{27} - n_{7} n_{21} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }},\,\,\,\,\,\overline{{n_{26} }} = \frac{{n_{1} n_{28} - n_{8} n_{21} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }} \hfill \\ \overline{{n_{27} }} = \frac{{n_{1} n_{29} - n_{9} n_{21} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }},\,\,\,\,\,\overline{{n_{28} }} = \frac{{n_{1} n_{30} - n_{10} n_{21} }}{{\overline{{n_{0} }} }} \hfill \\ n_{21} = - \left( {c_{5} m_{24} + c_{15} m_{25} } \right),\, \hfill \\ n_{22} = \left( {1 - c_{6} m_{24} - c_{16} m_{25} } \right) \hfill \\ n_{23} = m_{21} + c_{1} m_{24} + c_{11} m_{25} \hfill \\ n_{24} = m_{22} + c_{2} m_{24} + c_{12} m_{25} \hfill \\ n_{25} = m_{23} + c_{3} m_{24} + c_{13} m_{25} \hfill \\ n_{26} = m_{26} + c_{4} m_{24} + c_{14} m_{25} \hfill \\ n_{27} = m_{27} + c_{7} m_{24} + c_{17} m_{25} \hfill \\ n_{28} = m_{28} + c_{8} m_{24} + c_{18} m_{25} \hfill \\ n_{29} = m_{29} + c_{9} m_{24} + c_{19} m_{25} \hfill \\ n_{30} = m_{30} + c_{10} m_{24} + c_{20} m_{25} \hfill \\ \end{gathered}\) |
\(\begin{aligned} & m_{0} = \overline{{A_{1} }} \overline{{B_{2} }} - \overline{{A_{2} }} \overline{{B_{1} }} , \\ & m_{1} = \frac{4}{{mn\pi^{2} }}\left( {\delta_{n}^{2} \overline{{I_{1} }} - \frac{{\overline{{B_{2} }} }}{{R_{x} m_{0} }}} \right), \\ & m_{2} = \frac{4}{{mn\pi^{2} }}\left[ {\delta_{n}^{2} \overline{{I_{2} }} + \frac{{\overline{{A_{3} }} \overline{{B_{2} }} - \overline{{A_{2} }} \overline{{B_{3} }} }}{{m_{0} }}\lambda_{m} } \right], \\ & m_{3} = \frac{4}{{mn\pi^{2} }}\left[ {\delta_{n}^{2} \overline{{I_{3} }} + \frac{{\overline{{A_{4} }} \overline{{B_{2} }} - \overline{{A_{2} }} \overline{{B_{4} }} }}{{m_{0} }}\delta_{n} } \right], \\ & m_{4} = \frac{4}{{mn\pi^{2} }}\left[ {\delta_{n}^{2} \overline{{I_{4} }} + \frac{{\overline{{A_{2} }} \overline{{B_{5} }} - \overline{{A_{5} }} \overline{{B_{2} }} }}{{m_{0} }}} \right], \\ & m_{5} = \frac{4}{{mn\pi^{2} }}\left[ {\delta_{n}^{2} \overline{{I_{5} }} + \frac{{\overline{{A_{2} }} \overline{{B_{7} }} - \overline{{A_{7} }} \overline{{B_{2} }} }}{{m_{0} }}} \right], \\ & m_{6} = \frac{1}{8}\frac{{\overline{{B_{2} }} \lambda_{m}^{2} - \overline{{A_{2} }} \delta_{n}^{2} }}{{m_{0} }},m_{7} = \frac{{\overline{{A_{2} }} \overline{{B_{9} }} - \overline{{A_{9} }} \overline{{B_{2} }} }}{{m_{0} }}, \\ & m_{8} = \frac{{\overline{{A_{2} }} \overline{{B_{9}^{*} }} - \overline{{A_{9}^{*} }} \overline{{B_{2} }} }}{{m_{0} }},m_{9} = \frac{{\overline{{A_{2} }} \overline{{B_{6} }} - \overline{{A_{6} }} \overline{{B_{2} }} }}{{m_{0} }}, \\ & m_{10} = \frac{{\overline{{A_{2} }} \overline{{B_{8} }} - \overline{{A_{8} }} \overline{{B_{2} }} }}{{m_{0} }}, \\ \end{aligned}\) | \(\begin{aligned} & m_{21} = \frac{4}{{mn\pi^{2} }}\left( {\lambda_{m}^{2} \overline{{I_{1} }} + \frac{{\overline{{B_{1} }} }}{{R_{x} m_{0} }}} \right), \\ & m_{22} = \frac{4}{{mn\pi^{2} }}\left[ {\lambda_{m}^{2} \overline{{I_{2} }} + \frac{{\overline{{A_{1} }} \overline{{B_{3} }} - \overline{{A_{3} }} \overline{{B_{1} }} }}{{m_{0} }}\lambda_{m} } \right], \\ & m_{23} = \frac{4}{{mn\pi^{2} }}\left[ {\lambda_{m}^{2} \overline{{I_{3} }} + \frac{{\overline{{A_{1} }} \overline{{B_{4} }} - \overline{{A_{4} }} \overline{{B_{1} }} }}{{m_{0} }}\delta_{n} } \right], \\ & m_{24} = \frac{4}{{mn\pi^{2} }}\left[ {\lambda_{m}^{2} \overline{{I_{4} }} + \frac{{\overline{{A_{5} }} \overline{{B_{1} }} - \overline{{A_{1} }} \overline{{B_{5} }} }}{{m_{0} }}} \right], \\ & m_{25} = \frac{4}{{mn\pi^{2} }}\left[ {\lambda_{m}^{2} \overline{{I_{5} }} + \frac{{\overline{{A_{7} }} \overline{{B_{1} }} - \overline{{A_{1} }} \overline{{B_{7} }} }}{{m_{0} }}} \right], \\ & m_{26} = \frac{1}{8}\frac{{\overline{{A_{1} }} \delta_{n}^{2} - \overline{{B_{1} }} \lambda_{m}^{2} }}{{m_{0} }},m_{27} = \frac{{\overline{{A_{9} }} \overline{{B_{1} }} - \overline{{A_{1} }} \overline{{B_{9} }} }}{{m_{0} }}, \\ & m_{28} = \frac{{\overline{{A_{9}^{*} }} \overline{{B_{1} }} - \overline{{A_{1} }} \overline{{B_{9}^{*} }} }}{{m_{0} }},m_{29} = \frac{{\overline{{A_{6} }} \overline{{B_{1} }} - \overline{{A_{1} }} \overline{{B_{6} }} }}{{m_{0} }}, \\ & m_{30} = \frac{{\overline{{A_{8} }} \overline{{B_{1} }} - \overline{{A_{1} }} \overline{{B_{8} }} }}{{m_{0} }}, \\ \end{aligned}\) |
Appendix 8
\(\begin{aligned} & \overline{{p_{0} }} = p_{22} p_{33} - p_{23} p_{32} \\ & \overline{{p_{1} }} = \frac{{p_{23} p_{31} - p_{21} p_{33} }}{{p_{0} }} + \frac{{l_{36} p_{23} - l_{26} p_{33} }}{{p_{0} }}, \\ & \overline{{p_{2} }} = \frac{{p_{23} p_{34} - p_{24} p_{33} }}{{p_{0} }}, \\ & \overline{{p_{3} }} = \frac{{p_{23} p_{35} - p_{25} p_{33} }}{{p_{0} }}, \\ \end{aligned}\) | \(\begin{aligned} & \overline{{p_{21} }} = \frac{{p_{21} p_{32} - p_{22} p_{31} }}{{p_{0} }} + \frac{{l_{26} p_{32} - l_{36} p_{22} }}{{p_{0} }}, \\ & \overline{{p_{22} }} = \frac{{p_{24} p_{32} - p_{22} p_{34} }}{{p_{0} }}, \\ & \overline{{p_{23} }} = \frac{{p_{25} p_{32} - p_{22} p_{35} }}{{p_{0} }}, \\ \end{aligned}\) |
\(\begin{aligned} p_{1} & = l_{1}^{1} + l_{12}^{1} \overline{{n_{1} }} + l_{13}^{1} \overline{{n_{21} }} \\ p_{2} & = l_{2}^{1} + l_{12}^{1} \overline{{n_{2} }} + l_{13}^{1} \overline{{n_{22} }} \\ p_{3} & = l_{3}^{1} + l_{12}^{1} \overline{{n_{3} }} + l_{13}^{1} \overline{{n_{23} }} \\ p_{4} & = l_{4}^{1} + \left( {l_{5}^{1} \overline{{n_{5} }} + l_{6}^{1} \overline{{n_{25} }} } \right)\Delta T\\ &\quad + \left( {l_{5}^{1} \overline{{n_{6} }} + l_{6}^{1} \overline{{n_{26} }} } \right)\Delta m \\ & \quad + \left( {l_{5}^{1} \overline{{n_{7} }} + l_{6}^{1} \overline{{n_{27} }} } \right)\phi_{0}\\ &\quad + \left( {l_{5}^{1} \overline{{n_{8} }} + l_{6}^{1} \overline{{n_{28} }} } \right)\psi_{0} \\ p_{5} & = l_{7}^{1} + l_{5}^{1} \overline{{n_{1} }} + l_{6}^{1} \overline{{n_{21} }} \\ p_{6} & = l_{8}^{1} + l_{5}^{1} \overline{{n_{2} }} + l_{6}^{1} \overline{{n_{22} }} \\ p_{7} & = l_{9}^{1} + l_{5}^{1} \overline{{n_{3} }} + l_{6}^{1} \overline{{n_{23} }} \\ p_{8} & = l_{10}^{1} + l_{12}^{1} \overline{{n_{4} }} + l_{13}^{1} \overline{{n_{24} }} \\ p_{9} & = l_{11}^{1} + l_{5}^{1} \overline{{n_{4} }} + l_{6}^{1} \overline{{n_{24} }} \\ p_{10} & = \left( {l_{12}^{1} \overline{{n_{5} }} + l_{13}^{1} \overline{{n_{25} }} } \right)\Delta T\\ &\quad + \left( {l_{12}^{1} \overline{{n_{6} }} + l_{13}^{1} \overline{{n_{26} }} } \right)\Delta m \\ & \quad + \left( {l_{12}^{1} \overline{{n_{7} }} + l_{13}^{1} \overline{{n_{27} }} } \right)\phi_{0}\\ &\quad + \left( {l_{12}^{1} \overline{{n_{8} }} + l_{13}^{1} \overline{{n_{28} }} } \right)\psi_{0} + l_{14}^{1} \\ \end{aligned}\) | \(\begin{gathered} p_{21} = l_{21}^{1} + l_{25}^{1} \overline{{n_{1} }} + l_{26}^{1} \overline{{n_{21} }} \hfill \\ p_{22} = l_{22}^{1} + l_{25}^{1} \overline{{n_{2} }} + l_{26}^{1} \overline{{n_{22} }} \hfill \\ p_{23} = l_{23}^{1} + l_{25}^{1} \overline{{n_{3} }} + l_{26}^{1} \overline{{n_{23} }} \hfill \\ p_{24} = l_{24}^{1} + l_{25}^{1} \overline{{n_{4} }} + l_{26}^{1} \overline{{n_{24} }} \hfill \\ p_{25} = \left( {l_{25}^{1} \overline{{n_{5} }} + l_{26}^{1} \overline{{n_{25} }} } \right)\Delta T\\ + \left( {l_{25}^{1} \overline{{n_{6} }} + l_{26}^{1} \overline{{n_{26} }} } \right)\Delta m \hfill \\ + \left( {l_{25}^{1} \overline{{n_{7} }} + l_{26}^{1} \overline{{n_{27} }} } \right)\phi_{0}\\ + \left( {l_{25}^{1} \overline{{n_{8} }} + l_{26}^{1} \overline{{n_{28} }} } \right)\psi_{0} \\ + l_{27}^{1} \hfill \\ \end{gathered}\) \(\begin{aligned} p_{31} & = l_{31}^{1} + l_{35}^{1} \overline{{n_{1} }} + l_{36}^{1} \overline{{n_{21} }} \\ p_{32} & = l_{32}^{1} + l_{35}^{1} \overline{{n_{2} }} + l_{36}^{1} \overline{{n_{22} }} \\ p_{33} & = l_{33}^{1} + l_{35}^{1} \overline{{n_{3} }} + l_{36}^{1} \overline{{n_{23} }} \\ p_{34} & = l_{34}^{1} + l_{35}^{1} \overline{{n_{4} }} + l_{36}^{1} \overline{{n_{24} }} \\ p_{35} & = \left( {l_{35}^{1} \overline{{n_{5} }} + l_{36}^{1} \overline{{n_{25} }} } \right)\Delta T\\ &\quad + \left( {l_{35}^{1} \overline{{n_{6} }} + l_{36}^{1} \overline{{n_{26} }} } \right)\Delta m \\ & \quad + \left( {l_{35}^{1} \overline{{n_{7} }} + l_{36}^{1} \overline{{n_{27} }} } \right)\phi_{0}\\ &\quad + \left( {l_{35}^{1} \overline{{n_{8} }} + l_{36}^{1} \overline{{n_{28} }} } \right)\psi_{0} + l_{37}^{1} \\ \end{aligned}\) |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khoa, N.D. Free vibration and nonlinear dynamic behaviors of the imperfect smart electric magnetic FG-laminated composite panel in a hygrothermal environments. Acta Mech 234, 2617–2658 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-023-03505-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-023-03505-6