Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of fabric method on instability behavior of granular material

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well known that the specimen preparation method and the resulting sand fabric significantly affect sand behavior and sand liquefaction resistance. In many cases, the fabric and behavior of reconstituted sand samples do not represent those of in-situ deposits. Therefore, understanding the influence of specimen preparation and sand fabric on its behavior, particularly at the critical state, is important for relating the behavior of laboratory reconstituted specimens to in-situ soil response. In this study, the effect of sand fabric and specimen preparation method on the shearing behavior of sand is studied using triaxial shear tests. Dry funnel pluviation (DFP) and wet tamping (WT) are used to prepare the specimens. The results from instability lines and stress–strain curves indicate that the liquefaction resistance of specimens prepared with the DFP method is more than specimens reconstituted by the WT method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vaid P.Y., Sivathayalan S., Stedman D.: Influence of specimen reconstituting method on the undrained response of sand. Geotech. Test. J. 22, 187–195 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishihara K.: Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique 43, 351–415 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wood, F.M., Yamamuro, J.A.: The effect of depositional method on the liquefaction behavior of silty sand. In: Proceedings 13th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference. The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; CD-ROM (1999)

  4. Benahmed N., Canou J.J., Dupla J.C.: Structure initiale et propriétés de liquéfaction statique d’un sable. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 332, 887–894 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wood F.M., Yamamuro J.A., Lade P.V.: Effect of depositional method on the undrained response of silty sand. Can. Geotech. J. 45, 1525–1537 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamuro J.A., Wood F.M., Lade P.V.: Effect of depositional method on the microstructure of silty sand. Can. Geotech. J. 45, 1538–1555 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Della N., Arab A., Belkhatir M.: Effect of confining pressure and depositional method on the undrained response of medium dense sand. J. Iber. Geol. 37, 37–44 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuerbis R., Vaid Y.P.: Sand sample preparation—the slurry deposition method. Soils Found 28, 107–118 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kramer S.L., Seed H.B.: Initiation of soil liquefaction under static loading conditions. J. Geotech. Eng. 114, 412–430 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Papadimitriou A.G., Dafalias Y.F., Yoshimine M.: Plasticity modeling of the effect of sample preparation method on sand response. Soils Found. 45, 109–123 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wood, F.M.: Influence of specimen reconstitution method on the undrained response and microstructure of silty sand. Thesis completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University (1999)

  12. Yamamuro J.A., Lade P.V.: Static liquefaction of very loose sands. Can. Geotech. J. 34, 905–917 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Della N., Arab A., Belkhatir M., Missoum H.: Identification of the behaviour of the Chlef sand to static liquefaction. C. R. Mechanique 337, 282–290 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshimine M., Robertson P.K., Wride C.E.: Undrained shear strength of clean sands to trigger flow liquefaction. Can. Geotech. J. 36, 891–906 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Castro, G.: Liquefaction of sands. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA (1969)

  16. Kramer S.L.: Geothechnical Earthquake Engineering, pp. 653. Prentice Hall, NJ (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leong W.K., Chu J., Teh C.I.: Liquefaction and instability of a granular fill material. Geotech. Test. J 23, 178–192 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lade, P.V.: Instability of granular materials. In: Lade, P.V., Yamamuro, J.A. (eds.) Physics and mechanics of soil liquefaction, pp. 3–16. Balkema, Rotterdam (1999)

  19. National Research Council: Liquefaction of soils during earthquakes. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1985)

  20. Lade P.V.: Static instability and liquefaction of loose sandy slopes. J Geotech Eng 118, 51–71 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lade P.V.: Initiation of static instability in the submarine Nerlerk berm. Can Geotech J 30, 895–904 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Olson S.M., Stark T.D., Walton W.H., Castro G.: 1907 Static liquefaction flow failure of the north dike of wachusett dam. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126, 1184–1193 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chu J., Leong W.K.: Effects of lines on instability behaviour of loose sand. Geotechnique 52, 751–755 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noureddine Della.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Della, N., Belkhatir, M., Arab, A. et al. Effect of fabric method on instability behavior of granular material. Acta Mech 225, 2043–2057 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-013-1083-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-013-1083-z

Keywords

Navigation