Abstract
The impact of recombination on variant classification and the use of different genomic regions to identify virus variants were investigated using a diversity study performed on grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV). Three surveys were conducted to investigate the genetic diversity of GRSPaV and to compare the ability of the GRSPaV coat protein and replicase domains to classify virus variants. GRSPaV variants identified in the surveys clustered into five of the six currently recognised lineages, and a seventh, previously unclassified lineage was detected. A correlation was observed between the detection of recombinant GRSPaV sequences and inconsistencies in classification when using different genome regions for analysis.
References
Meng B, Gonsalves D (2007) Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus: a decade of research and future perspectives. Plant Viruses 1:52–62
Glasa M, Predajňa L, Šoltys K et al (2017) Analysis of Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus in Slovakia reveals differences in intra-host population diversity and naturally occurring recombination events. Plant Pathol J 33:34–42. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.07.2016.0158
Habili N, Farrokhi N, Lima MF et al (2006) Distribution of Rupestris stem-pitting-associated virus variants in two Australian vineyards showing different symptoms. Ann Appl Biol 148:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00041.x
Lima MF, Alkowni R, Uyemoto JK et al (2006) Molecular analysis of a California strain of Rupestris stem pitting-associated virus isolated from declining Syrah grapevines. Arch Virol 151:1889–1894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-006-0742-y
Meng B, Li C, Wang W et al (2005) Complete genome sequences of two new variants of Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus and comparative analyses. J Gen Virol 86:1555–1560. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.80815-0
Nakaune R, Inoue K, Nasu H et al (2008) Detection of viruses associated with rugose wood in Japanese grapevines and analysis of genomic variability of Rupestris stem pitting-associated virus. J Gen Plant Pathol 74:156–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-008-0079-3
White EJ, Venter M, Hiten NF, Burger JT (2008) Modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method improves robustness and versatility: the benchmark for plant RNA extraction. Biotechnol J 3:1424–1428. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200800207
Carra A, Gambino G, Schubert A (2007) A cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-based method to extract low-molecular-weight RNA from polysaccharide-rich plant tissues. Anal Biochem 360:318–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2006.09.022
Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M, et al (2015) RDP4: detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus Evol 1:vev003. https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/vev003
Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
Meng B, Rowhani A (2017) Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus. In: Meng B, Martelli G, Golino D, Fuchs M (eds) Grapevine viruses: molecular biology, diagnostics and management. Springer, Cham, pp 257–287
Adams MJ, Antoniw JF, Bar-Joseph M et al (2004) The new plant virus family Flexiviridae and assessment of molecular criteria for species demarcation. Arch Virol 149:1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-004-0304-0
Simon-Loriere E, Holmes EC (2011) Why do RNA viruses recombine? Nat Rev Microbiol 9:617–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2614
Roratto PA, Buchmann D, Santos S, Bartholomei-Santos ML (2008) PCR-mediated recombination in development of microsatellite markers: mechanism and implications. Genet Mol Biol 31:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572008000100012
Alabi OJ, Martin RR, Naidu RA (2010) Sequence diversity, population genetics and potential recombination events in grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus in Pacific North-West vineyards. J Gen Virol 91:265–276. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.014423-0
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the owners of the wine estates for permission to sample vineyards and for providing information on sampled vines, Winetech for project funding (GenUS 15/2), and the National Research Foundation (NRF) for personal funding (Miss Ilani Mostert). Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. The authors also thank Dr. Rachelle Bester and Mr. Dirk Aldrich for assisting in sampling, processing and RNA extractions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Sead Sabanadzovic.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Fig. S1
Comparison of lineage classification of clones based on the CPreg and pREP regions within each survey. Classification results based on both regions were more or less consistent. Recombinant sequences were not taken into consideration. No group IIc could be discerned within tree topologies based on CPreg sequences (PDF 205 kb)
Table S1
Summary of the primers used in this study. The name, sequence, annealing temperature in °C (TA), extension time (Ext), and expected amplicon size are given (PDF 69 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mostert, I., Burger, J.T. & Maree, H.J. Genetic diversity and identification of putative recombination events in grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus. Arch Virol 163, 2491–2496 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-018-3883-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-018-3883-x