Abstract
In this study, we investigated turkey reovirus (TReoV) in tissue samples from young birds, aged 15 days. RT-PCR for TReoV detected 3.3 % positive samples and TReoV was successfully isolated in Vero cells. Histological analysis of positive bursa of Fabricius (BF) revealed atrophied follicles and lymphocyte depletion. The number of CD8+, CD4+ and IgM+ cells was lower in infected BF. Phylogenetic analysis based on S3 gene showed that the Brazilian TReoV isolates clustered in a single group with 98-100 % similarity to TReoV strains circulating in the United States. This is the first indication that TReoV infection may be a contributing factor to immunosuppression in young birds.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The Brazilian turkey industry ranks second in the world. However, enteritis in young flocks continues to result in significant economic losses each year. Poult enteritis and mortality syndrome (PEMS), resulting from a coronavirus, was reported in 2006 [25]. Additionally, poult enteritis complex (PEC) has been associated with enteritis and growth rate reductions in commercial turkeys worldwide [4–6, 13–15, 19–21, 23, 24]. To date, turkey coronavirus (TCoV), turkey astroviruses 1 and 2 (TAstV-1 and TAstV-2), and turkey rotavirus (TRotV) have been described to be circulating among poult breeders in Brazil [3, 7, 9, 18]. In contrast, turkey reovirus (TReoV) had never been detected so far.
Avian orthoreoviruses (ARVs) cause economically important diseases in poultry. They belong to the genus Orthoreovirus, subfamily Spinareovirinae, family Reoviridae [12]. ARVs have a segmented double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) genome comprised of three large (L1-L3), three medium (M1-M3), and four small (S1-S4) genomic segments [10]. In turkeys, a group of TReoVs has been described that are genetically distinct, based on sequence analysis of their S3 genomic segments, from the other members of the genus Orthoreovirus [10]. These TReoVs were originally isolated from commercial turkey flocks, especially those in the southeastern United States, affected by PEC [8, 13–15, 19–21, 23, 24]. TReoVs can induce enteric disease and immunosuppression in turkeys; their pathogenicity is restricted to poults, however [19]. The aim of the present study was to isolate and molecularly characterize the first documented TReoV affecting immunosuppressed young poults in Brazil.
Samples of young poults (15 days old) from a farm with more than 20,000 birds, kept in five separate houses, were investigated in September of 2012. The principal claim was related to low growth performance and weight losses. Samples were taken from individual houses containing approximately 4,000 birds each, and 14 % of the turkeys showed signs of deep depression but not of enteritis. Fifty samples from the bursa of Fabricius (BF), thymus, and intestinal contents and tissues were collected and sent to the laboratory. The samples were divided evenly into two groups. In the first group, samples were fixed in 10 % neutral buffered formalin for histology analysis. In the second, samples were frozen for virologic procedures.
The latter samples were homogenized with a twofold volume of MEM (Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA), clarified by centrifugation (2,500×g for 20 min), and filtered twice using 0.45- and 0.22-μm syringe filters [9]. The suspensions were propagated in Vero cells for no more than four passages. When >80 % of the cells exhibited a cytopathic effect (CPE), the remaining adherent cells were scraped, and all cellular material was pelleted and frozen at −80 °C for RNA extraction. All samples were tested by RT-PCR as described in a previous study [21] for the presence of TCoV, TAstV-1 and 2 and TRotV to exclude co-infections. TReoV was isolated only from BF suspensions of affected poults. Three consecutive blind passages in semi-confluent Vero cell monolayers resulted in rounded floating cells, followed by the generation of some giant multinucleated cells via fusion (Fig. 1).
To confirm TReoV infection, viral RNA was extracted from each sample (the BF, thymus, and intestinal contents and tissues) and also from the cell culture isolates using a Pure Link Viral RNA/DNA Kit (Invitrogen®, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR was performed as described previously [9, 11]. A portion of the δ 2 S3 gene was amplified using 10 pmol of the oligonucleotide primers Reo S3F (5’-ATGGAGGTACGTGTGCCAAACT-3’) and Reo S3R (5’-CCAACCACACTCCACAACAG-3’) [8, 16, 22]. The expected products (1.1 kb) were analyzed by gel electrophoresis (1.5 % agarose gels with ethidium bromide) and UV illumination. TReoV infection was confirmed by amplifying the S3 gene using RT-PCR from Vero cells and BF tissue (data not shown). Although no virus was isolated from the intestinal contents and tissues, three samples were detected by RT-PCR.
The PCR products were purified using a commercial purification kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced directly using an ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer. Nucleotide sequences from this study have been deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: KC683824 and KC683827 (TReoV detected in intestinal contents), KC683825 (TReoV detected in intestinal tissues), and KC683826 (TReoV detected and isolated from the BF and Vero cells). Sequences for the δ 2 protein (S3) mRNA of AY444910 (TReoV TX99), AY444911 (TReoV TX98); AY444912 (TReoV ATCC VR-818), and AY44913 (TReoV PEMS 85) were obtained from GenBank for the phylogenetic analysis. Sequences were assembled using SeqMan Pro, and genome annotation was done using SeqBuilder (DNASTAR, Inc., v. 8.0.2). Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences were aligned using Clustal-W in MegAlign (DNASTAR, Inc.). A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on amino acid alignments using BLAST analysis (www.blast.ncib.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The positive amplified S3 segments obtained from the BF suspension were genetically identical to the TReoV isolated from the same biological source. A phylogenetic tree showed that the nucleotide sequence from the present analysis had 98 % similarity to TReoV TX99 and ATCC/VR-818, and 100 % to TReoV PEMS 85 and TX98 (Fig. 2).
Tissues were fixed in 10 % neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin [2, 9]. Sections were cut into 4- to 5-μm thin sections and stained with standard hematoxilin and eosin (HE). In all cases, the BF was subjected to histological examination and scored based on lymphoid necrosis, lymphoid depletion, multifocal bursa hemorrhage, and follicle atrophy [19]. Damage intensity was scored semi-quantitatively using a four-point scale. A score of 1 represented mild damage; a score of 2, moderate damage; a score of 3, intense damage; and a score of 4 represented very intense damage.
Unstained sections (field samples and experimentally infected cells) were used for histology evaluation and IFA. The IFA was conducted on BF sections in order to analyze their lymphocyte subpopulations (CD4+, CD8+, and IgM+) as described previously [2]. Instead of using frozen sections, the IFA was performed with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded BF sections collected from field samples with BF sections from healthy poults as a control. Heat-induced epitope retrieval was conducted first using citrate buffer (pH 6.1) for 15 min at 700 W as a pre-treatment for reactivating viral antigens, which are normally damaged by formaldehyde fixation [2, 9]. Sections were then deparaffinized and rehydrated by washing with PBS containing 0.1 % Tween 80, and the slides were then boiled in water. Monoclonal antibodies against CD4+ and CD8+ (100 μL/slide; mouse anti-chicken CD4+ and CD8+ FITC, MCA2164F and MCA2166F, AbD serotec, Bio-Rad Company) and IgM+ (100 μL/slide anti-chicken IgM, Sigma-Aldrich) was applied overnight in the dark at room temperature in a 1:100 dilution in PBS with 5 % bovine serum albumin (BSA). The samples were washed as described previously [2], and rabbit anti-mouse conjugated to fluorescein (1:200; Sigma-Aldrich) was added to IgM+ sections. The samples were kept in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. The images were collected under an AxioImager® A.1 light and an ultraviolet (UV) microscope connected to an AxioCam®MRc (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The images were processed using AxioVision® 4.8 software (Carl Zeiss) for each antigen, and values were determined by automatic counting of positive cells/mm2. For CD4+, CD8+ and IgM+ cells, significant differences between groups were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All statistical analyses were performed using Prism software (GraphPad®, CA, USA). Major histological damage was described as severe multifocal lymphoid follicle atrophy (data not shown) and was directly associated with a low number of CD4+, CD8+ and IgM+ lymphocyte cells (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3A, B and C).
The roles of different viruses in enteric disease have not been well defined, and in commercial flocks, it is not uncommon to find clinically normal birds infected with enteric viruses [5]. The present study describes, for the first time, immunosuppressed young poults (aged less than 15 days) that were affected by only TReoV. In spite of this finding, TAstV-1 and TCoV have also been described in commercial flocks in Brazil. The clinical sign most commonly associated with PEMS worldwide is enteritis [6, 13–15, 19–21, 23–25]. In a recent study, PEMS, TAstV-1 and TCoV were the viruses most frequently associated with enteric disorders that were detected in commercial Brazilian flocks [18].
The BF tissue suspensions were the only samples from which virus could be isolated. In order to promote TReoV isolation, other studies have used many cell types, such as primary chicken embryo fibroblasts, chicken embryo livers, kidney cells, and hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and Marek’s disease turkey cells and lymphoblastoid cells [17, 22]. In all cell types, the cytopathic effects included detached enlarged cells, syncytia, cell death, and cell sloughing, which are similar to those described here. In recent studies, low passages of TReoV strains in Vero cells have been used to avoid genetic changes [19]. In this study, TReoV was passaged three times in Vero cells and then isolated with no genetic changes.
One effect of reovirus infection is immunosuppression, which predisposes the host to infection with other pathogens. This could account for the diversity of syndromes associated with reoviruses [11]. The bursal lymphoid depletion caused by TReoV isolates may induce transient and possibly permanent immunosuppression in turkeys [19]. This was confirmed here by analyzing BF histological sections from field cases for the presence of CD4+, CD8+, and IgM+ lymphocytes. According to previous studies, severe BF lesions in the cortical and medullary areas are associated with positive lymphocytes [19]. Although several studies also describe intestinal lesions associated with both natural and experimental TReoV infection [13–15, 19–21, 23, 24], in this study, this kind of tissue damage was not documented.
A previous study demonstrated that programmed cell death, also known as apoptosis, could be the mechanism by which TReoV triggers disease in the host [1, 19]. This biological mechanism could explain, for instance, the lymphocyte depletion observed here, although lymphocytes are not considered a target for reovirus replication [11]. Importantly, the death of lymphocytes before two weeks of age can result in permanent immunosuppression [11]. The lack of inflammation in the BF and of histological changes in the thymus suggests that the infection observed in this study was in its initial phase. However, the observation of severe BF lesions and isolation of TReoV from these samples, along with the confirmation of TReoV in intestinal tissues and contents via PCR, means that these cases can be considered non-classical enteritis [1].
The δ 2 protein sequences encoded by the S3 gene segments that were sequenced demonstrated that Brazilian isolates clustered and were 98-100 % similar to USA isolates. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that these TReoV isolates separated from subgroups 1 and 3 orthoreoviruses isolates and clustered within the subgroup 2 clade [8, 16]. The results of this study indicate for the first time that this strain of TReoV shares genomic sequences and biological features with those described in flocks suffering from PEMS worldwide. Further studies are still necessary for investigating the pathogenicity of South American isolates, however.
References
Benavente J, Martinez-Costas J (2007) Avian reovirus: structure and biology. Virus Res 123:105–119
Cardoso TC, Castanheira TL, Teixeira MC, Rosa AC, Hirata KY, Astolphi RD, Luvizotto MC (2008) Validation of an immunohistochemistry assay to detect turkey coronavirus: a rapid and simple screening tool for limited resource settings. Poult Sci 87:1347–1352
Cardoso TC, Ferrari HF, Bregano LC, Silva-Frade C, Rosa AC, Andrade AL (2010) Visual detection of turkey coronavirus RNA in tissues and feces by reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) with hydroxynaphthol blue dye. Mol Cell Probes 24:415–417
Cavanagh D, Mawditt K, Sharma M, Drury SE, Ainsworth HL, Britton P, Gough RE (2001) Detection of a coronavirus from turkey poults in Europe genetically related to infectious bronchitis virus of chickens. Avian Pathol 30:355–368
Cavanagh D (2005) Coronaviruses in poultry and other birds. Avian Pathol 34:439–448
Culver F, Dziva F, Cavanagh D, Stevens MP (2006) Poult enteritis and mortality syndrome in turkeys in Great Britain. Vet Rec 159:209–210
Da Silva SE, Bonetti AM, Petrocelli AT, Ferrari HF, Luvizotto MC, Cardoso TC (2008) Detection of Turkey astrovirus in young poults affected with poult enteritis complex in Brazil. J Vet Med Sci 70:629–631
Day JM, Pantin-Jackwood MJ, Spackman E (2007) Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the S1 genome segment of turkey-origin reoviruses. Virus Genes 35:235–242
Gomes DE, Hirata KY, Saheki K, Rosa AC, Luvizotto MC, Cardoso TC (2010) Pathology and tissue distribution of turkey coronavirus in experimentally infected chicks and turkey poults. J Comp Pathol 143:8–13
Guardado Calvo P, Fox GC, Hermo Parrado XL, Llamas-Saiz AL, Costas C, Martinez-Costas J, Benavente J, van Raaij MJ (2005) Structure of the carboxy-terminal receptor-binding domain of avian reovirus fibre sigmaC. J Mol Biol 354:137–149
Heggen-Peay CL, Qureshi MA, Edens FW, Sherry B, Wakenell PS, O’Connell PH, Schat KA (2002) Isolation of a reovirus from poult enteritis and mortality syndrome and its pathogenicity in turkey poults. Avian Dis 46:32–47
ICTV (2012) Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego
Jindal N, Patnayak DP, Ziegler AF, Lago A, Goyal SM (2009) Experimental reproduction of poult enteritis syndrome: clinical findings, growth response, and microbiology. Poult Sci 88:949–958
Jindal N, Patnayak DP, Chander Y, Ziegler AF, Goyal SM (2010) Detection and molecular characterization of enteric viruses from poult enteritis syndrome in turkeys. Poult Sci 89:217–226
Jindal N, Patnayak DP, Chander Y, Ziegler AF, Goyal SM (2010) Detection and molecular characterization of enteric viruses in breeder turkeys. Avian Pathol 39:53–61
Kapczynski DR, Sellers HS, Simmons V, Schultz-Cherry S (2002) Sequence analysis of the S3 gene from a turkey reovirus. Virus Genes 25:95–100
Kawaguchi T, Nomura K, Hirayama Y, Kitagawa T (1987) Establishment and characterization of a chicken hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, LMH. Cancer Res 47:4460–4464
Moura-Alvarez J, Chacon JV, Scanavini LS, Nunez LF, Astolfi-Ferreira CS, Jones RC, Piantino Ferreira AJ (2013) Enteric viruses in Brazilian turkey flocks: single and multiple virus infection frequency according to age and clinical signs of intestinal disease. Poult Sci 92:945–955
Pantin-Jackwood MJ, Spackman E, Day JM (2007) Pathology and virus tissue distribution of Turkey origin reoviruses in experimentally infected Turkey poults. Vet Pathol 44:185–195
Pantin-Jackwood MJ, Spackman E, Day JM, Rives D (2007) Periodic monitoring of commercial turkeys for enteric viruses indicates continuous presence of astrovirus and rotavirus on the farms. Avian Dis 51:674–680
Pantin-Jackwood MJ, Day JM, Jackwood MW, Spackman E (2008) Enteric Viruses Detected by Molecular Methods in Commercial Chicken and Turkey Flocks in the United States Between 2005 and 2006. Avian Dis 52:235–244
Simmons VM, Koci MD, Kapczynski DR, Schultz-Cherry S (2000) Initial characterization of an avian reovirus isolate from turkey poults with poult enteritis and mortality syndrome. Poult Sci 79:120–126
Spackman E, Kapczynski D, Sellers H (2005) Multiplex real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for the detection of three viruses associated with poult enteritis complex: turkey astrovirus, turkey coronavirus, and turkey reovirus. Avian Dis 49:86–91
Spackman E, Day JM, Pantin-Jackwood MJ (2010) Astrovirus, reovirus, and rotavirus concomitant infection causes decreased weight gain in broad-breasted white poults. Avian Dis 54:16–21
Teixeira MC, Luvizotto MC, Ferrari HF, Mendes AR, da Silva SE, Cardoso TC (2007) Detection of turkey coronavirus in commercial turkey poults in Brazil. Avian Pathol 36:29–33
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Fundação Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Grants 2010/52465-9 and 2011/50845-1) for their support. TC Cardoso is a recipient of CNPq (Brazilian Council for Research) funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosa, A.C.G., Ferreira, H.L., Gomes, D.E. et al. Isolation and molecular characterization of Brazilian turkey reovirus from immunosuppressed young poults. Arch Virol 159, 1453–1457 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-013-1947-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-013-1947-5