Erratum to: Theor Appl Climatol

DOI 10.1007/s00704-014-1273-1

The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes. The latitude and longitude values of Fig. 4a(i-vi) should be read as: 31.0-36.0 N and 73.0-80.0 E; for Fig. 4c(i-vi) as: 23.0-29.5 N and 88.0-97.5 E. The italic values of Table 3 are for: Year 1991-2000: CH: Average rainfall trend (0.18); Year 1951-1980: EH: Average rainfall trend (-0.04); Year 1951-1980: EH: Maximum rainfall trend (-0.43); Year 1951-1980: CH: Extreme rainfall trend (-0.20); Year 1951-1980: EH: Extreme rainfall trend (-0.29); Year 1951-2007: WH: Maximum rainfall trend (-0.12); and Year 1951-2007: WH: Extreme rainfall trend (-0.08).

The corrected Fig. 4 and Table 3 are given below.

Figure 4
figure 1

Percentage departure of the decadal JJAS rainfall from the long-term average (1951–2007) is represented for a WH, b CH, and c EH. The notations (i) to (vi) indicate six decadal periods as: 1951–1960, 1961–1970, 1971–1980, 1981–1990, 1991–2000, and 2001–2007, respectively

Table 3 Sen’s estimator of slope (mm/day) for the seasonal average, maximum, and extreme rainfall events