Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agrometeorological study of crop drought vulnerability and avoidance in northeast of Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drought is one of the crucial environmental factors affecting crop production. Synchronizing crop phenology with expected or predicted seasonal soil moisture supply is an effective approach to avoid drought impact. To assess the potential for drought avoidance, this study investigated the long-term climate data of four locations (Bojnourd, Mashhad, Sabzevar, and Torbat Heydarieh) in Khorasan province, in the northeast of Iran, with respect to the four dominant crops (common bean, lentil, peanut, and potato). Weekly water deficit defined as the difference between weekly precipitation and weekly potential evapotranspiration was calculated. Whenever the weekly water deficit was larger than the critical water demand of a crop, the probability for drought was determined. Results showed that Sabzevar has the highest average maximum temperature (24.6 °C), minimum temperature (11.7 °C), weekly evapotranspiration (32.1 mm), and weekly water deficit (28.3 mm) and has the lowest average weekly precipitation (3.8 mm). However, the lowest mean maximum temperature (19.7 °C), minimum temperature (6.9 °C), weekly evapotranspiration (22.5 mm), and weekly water deficit (17.5 mm) occur in Bojnourd. This location shows the shortest period of water deficit during the growing season for all crops except potato, which also experienced drought at the end of the growing season. Sabzevar and Torbat Heydarieh experienced the highest probability of occurrence and longest duration of drought during the growing season for all crops. The result of this study will be helpful for farmers in order to reduce drought impact and enable them to match crop phenology with periods during the growing season when water supply is more abundant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Rome, FAO

    Google Scholar 

  • Araya A, Stroosnijder L (2011) Assessing drought risk and irrigation need in northern Ethiopia. Agric For Meteorol 151:425–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ati OF, Stigter CJ, Oladipo EO (2001) A comparison of methods to determine the onset of the growing season in northen Nigeria. Int J Climatol 22:731–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannayan M, Sanjani S, Alizadeh A, Lotfabadi SS, Mohamadian A (2010) Association between climate indices, aridity index, and rainfed crop yield in northeast of Iran. Field Crops Res 118:105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannayan M, Lotfabadi S, Sanjani S, Mohamadian A, Agaalikhani M (2011a) Effects of precipitation and temperature on cereal yield variability in northeast of Iran. Int J Biometeorol 55:387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannayan M, Lakzian A, Gorbanzadeh N, Roshani A (2011b) Variability of growing season indices in northeast of Iran. Theor Appl Climatol 105:485–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassu S, Asseng S, Motzo R, Giunta F (2009) Optimising sowing date of durum wheat in a variable Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Res 111:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (2009) Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Res 112:119–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J, Van Lanen HA (1986) Transfer functions and threshold values: from soil characteristics to land qualities. In: Beek KJ, Burrough PA, McCormack DE (eds) Quantified land evaluation procedures: Proceedings of the international workshop on quantified land evaluation procedures held in Washington, D.C. 27 April–2 May 1986. ITC, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper PJM, Gregory PJ, Tully D, Harris HC, Loomis RS (1987) Improving water use efficiency of annual crops in the rainfed farming systems of West Asia and North Africa. Exp Agric 23:113–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debaeke P, Aboudrare A (2004) Adaptation of crop management to water-limited environments. Europ J Agronomy 21:433–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2004) The state of food insecurity in the world. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 41

  • Farah SM, Arar A, Miller DE (1988) Water and the irrigation management of pea, lentil, faba bean and chickpea crops. In: Summerfield RJ (ed) World crops: cool season food legumes. Kluwer, the Netherlands, pp 911–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholipoor M, Soltani A (2008) Assessing potential drought avoidance for five crops in Iran using long-term weather data. Int J Agric Res 3(3):202–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giunta F, Motzo R, Deidda M (1993) Effect of drought on yield and yield components of durum wheat and triticale in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Res 33:399–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SC, Larson WE (1979) Estimating soil water retention characteristics from particle size distribution, organic matter percent and bulk density. Water Resour Res 15:1633–1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim RR (2002) A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. B Am Meteorol Soc 83:1149–1165

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmuth ME, Osgood DE, Hess U, Moorhead A, Bhojwani H. (eds) (2009) Index insurance and climate risk: prospects for development and disaster management. Climate and Society No. 2. International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI), Columbia University, New York

  • Johansen C, Saxena NP, Chauhan YS (1989) Drought resistance characteristics for crops. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on varietal improvement of chickpea, pigeonpea, and other upland crops in rice-based and other cropping systems, Kathmandu, Nepal, 19–23 March 1989

  • Kogan FN (1997) Global drought watch from space. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78(4):621–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousari MR, Ekhtesasi MR, Tazeh M, Saremi Naeini MA, Asadi Zarch MA (2010) An investigation of Iranian climatic changes by considering the precipitation, temperature, and relative humidity parameters. Theor Appl Climatol 103:321–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakzian A, Bannayan M, Gorbanzadeh N (2010) Comparison of pattern recognition, artificial neural network and pedotransfer functions for estimation of soil water parameters. Not Sci Biol 2(3):114–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow MM, Muchow RC (1990) A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv Agron 43:107–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merdun H, Cinar O, Meral R, Apan M (2006) Comparison of artificial neural network and regression pedotransfer functions for prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil and Tillage Res 90:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny B, McBratney AB (2002) The neuro-m method for fitting neural network parametric pedotransfer functions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:352–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny B, Hopmans JW, Harter T, Eching SO, Tuli A, Denton MA (2004) Neural networks prediction of soil hydraulic functions for alluvial soils using multistep outflow data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:417–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture (Iran) (2009) www.agri-jahad.ir/amar. Accessed 3 April 2009

  • Mkhabela M, Bullock P, Gervais M, Finlay G, Sapirstein H (2010) Assessing indicators of agricultural drought impacts on spring wheat yield and quality on the Canadian prairies. Agric For Meteorol 150:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell LC, Sinclair TR, McNew RW (2003) Drought avoidance assessment for summer annual crops using long-term weather data. Agron J 95:1566–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff LF, Ritchie JT, Cassel DK (1983) Field-measured limits of soil water availability as related to laboratory-measured properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:770–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray JD, Sinclair TR (1998) The effect of pot size on growth and transpiration of maize and soybean during water deficit stress. J Exp Bot 49:1381–1386

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR, Muchow RC (2001) System analysis of plant traits to increase grain yield on limited water supplies. Agron J 93:263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR, Hammond LC, Harisson J (1998) Extractable soil water and transpiration rate of soybean on sandy soils. Agron J 90:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M (2000) The application of climatic data for planning and management of sustainable rainfed and irrigated crop production. Agric For Meteorol 103:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler CMT, Maman N, Zhang X, Mason SC, Hoogenboom G (2008) Determining optimum planting dates for pearl millet for two contrasting environments using a modelling approach. J Agric Sci 146:445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CB, Sinclair TR (1983) Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search? In: Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR (eds) Limitations to efficiency water use in crop production. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Unganai LS, Kogan FN (1998) Drought monitoring and corn yield estimation in Southern Africa from AVHRR data. Remote Sens Environ 63:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virmani SJ, Sivakummar MVK, Reddy SJ (1982) Rainfall probability estimates for selected locations of semiarid India. Research Bulletin No. 1. ICRISAT, Patancheru

  • Wilhelmi OV, Wilhite DA (2002) Assessing vulnerability to agricultural drought: a Nebraska case study. Nat Hazard 25:37–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wosten JHM, Finke PA, Jansen MJW (1995) Comparison of class and continuous pedotransfer functions to generate soil hydraulic characteristics. Geoderma 66:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and the Editor, Professor H. Graßl as due to their comments and corrections the manuscript highly improved.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91775-1163, Mashhad, Iran

    A. Lashkari & M. Bannayan

Authors
  1. A. Lashkari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Bannayan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Bannayan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lashkari, A., Bannayan, M. Agrometeorological study of crop drought vulnerability and avoidance in northeast of Iran. Theor Appl Climatol 113, 17–25 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0769-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0769-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation