Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of a simple logarithmic and equivalent neutral wind approaches for converting buoy-measured wind speed to the standard height: special emphasis to North Indian Ocean

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The difference between the transferred wind speed to 10-m height based on the equivalent neutral wind approach (U n) and the logarithmic approach (U log) is studied using in situ observations from the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic Oceans, with special emphasis given to the North Indian Ocean. The study included U nU log variations with pressure, relative humidity, wind speed, air temperature, and sea surface temperature (SST). U nU log variation with respect to air temperature (T a) reveals that U nU log is out of phase with air temperature. Further analysis found that U nU log is in phase with SST (T s) − T a and varies between −1.0 and 1.0 m/s over the North Indian Ocean, while for the rest of the Oceans, it is between −0.3 and 0.8 m/s. This higher magnitude of U nU log over the North Indian Ocean is due to the higher range of T sT a (−4 to 6 °C) in the North Indian Ocean. Associated physical processes suggested that the roughness length and friction velocity dependence on the air–sea temperature difference contributes to the U nU log difference. The study is further extended to evaluate the behavior of U nU log under cyclonic conditions (winds between 15 and 30 m/s), and it was found that the magnitude of UnU log varies 0.5–1.5 m/s under the cyclonic wind conditions. The increasing difference with the wind speed is due to the increase in the momentum transfer coefficient with wind speed, which modifies the friction velocity significantly, resulting in U n higher than U log. Thus, under higher wind conditions, U nU log can contribute up to half the retrieval error (5 % of the wind speed magnitude) to the satellite validation exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhat GS (2006) Near-surface temperature inversion over the Arabian Sea due to natural aerosols. Geophys Res Lett 33:L02802. doi:10.1029/2005GL024157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourlès B et al (2008) The PIRATA program: history, accomplishments, and future directions. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 89:1111–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capps SB, Zender CS (2008) Observed and CAM3 GCM sea surface wind speed distributions: characterization, comparison, and bias reduction. J Climate 21:6569–6585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelton DB, Schlax MG, Freilich MH, Milliff RF (2004) Satellite measurements reveal persistent small-scale features in ocean winds. Science 303:978–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel K (2005) Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature 436:686–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grima N, Bentamy A, Katsaros K, Quilfen Y, Delecluse P, Levy C (1999) Sensitivity of an oceanic general circulation model forced by satellite wind stress field. J Geophys Res 104:7967–7989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackert EC, Busalacchi AJ, Murtugudde R (2001) A wind-comparison study using an ocean general circulation model for the 1997–1998 El Niño. J Geophys Res 106:2345–2363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kara AB, Wallcraft AJ, Bourassa MA (2008) Air–sea stability effects on the 10 m winds over the global ocean: evaluations of air–sea flux algorithms. J Geophys Res 113:C04009. doi:10.1029/2007JC004324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu WT, Tang W (1996) Equivalent neutral wind. JPL Publication 96-17, Pasadena, CA

  • Liu WT, Katsaros KB, Businger JA (1979) Bulk parameterization of the air–sea exchange of heat and water vapor including the molecular constraints at the interface. J Atmos Sci 36:1722–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhaden MJ et al (1998) The Tropical Ocean–Global Atmosphere (TOGA) observing system: a decade of progress. J Geophys Res 103:14169–14240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhaden MJ, Meyers G, Ando K, Masumoto Y, Murty VSN, Ravichandran M, Syamsudin F, Vialard J, Yu L, Yu W (2009) RAMA: The Research Moored Array for African–Asian–Australian Monsoon Analysis and Prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:459–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears CA, Smith DK, Went FJ (2001) Comparison of special sensor microwave imager and buoy-measured wind speeds from 1987 to 1997. J Geophys Res 106:11719–11729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan AH (2006) The probability distribution of sea surface wind speeds. Part I: Theory and SeaWinds observations. J Climate 19:497–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parekh A, Gnanaseelan C, Jayakumar A (2011) Impact of improved momentum transfer coefficients on the dynamics and thermodynamics of the North Indian Ocean. J Geophys Res 116:C01004. doi:10.1029/2010JC006346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peixoto JP, Oort AH (1992) American Institute of Physics, 31.25 pb, 520 pp. ISBN 0-88318-712-4

  • Premkumar K, Ravichandran M, Kalsi SR, Sengupta D, Gadgil S (2000) First result from a new observational system over the Indians seas. Curr Sci 78:323–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott FA, McCreary JP (2001) The monsoon circulation of the Indian Ocean. Prog Oceanogr 51(1):1–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta D, Senan R, Goswami BN (2001) Origin of intraseasonal variability of circulation in the tropical central Indian Ocean. Geophys Res Lett 28:1267–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servain J, Busalacchi AJ, McPhaden MJ, Moura AD, Reverdin G, Vianna M, Zebiak SE (1998) A Pilot Research Moored Array in the Tropical Atlantic (PIRATA). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:2019–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethuraman S, Raynor GS (1975) Surface drag coefficient dependence on the aerodynamics roughness of the sea. J Geophys Res 36:4983–4988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma R, Agarwal N, Basu S, Agarwal VK (2007) Impact of satellite-derived forcings on numerical ocean model simulations and study of sea surface salinity variations in the Indian Ocean. J Climate 20:871–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SD (1988) Coefficients for sea surface wind stress, heat flux, and wind profiles as a function of wind speed and temperature. J Geophys Res 93:15467–15472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup HU, Munk WH (1947) Wind, sea and swell. Theory of relations for forecasting. U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office, Washington, Publication No. 601, 44 pp

  • Verschell MA, Bourassa MA, Weissman DE, O'Brien JJ (1999) Model validation of the NASA scatterometer winds. J Geophys Res 104:11359–11374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissman DE, Davidson KL, Brown RA, Friehe CA, Li F (1994) The relationship between the microwave radar cross section and both wind speed and stress: model function studies using frontal air–sea interaction experiment data. J Geophys Res 99:10087–10108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyrtki K (1973) An equatorial jet in the Indian Ocean. Science 181:262–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Director IITM for his kind support for this study. This work is supported by a grant from the Space Applications Centre (ISRO), Government of India, for the validation program of the Oceansat-II. The authors are also thankful to Samir Pokhrel and Aditi Despande for English correction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anant Parekh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, P., Parekh, A. & Attada, R. Comparison of a simple logarithmic and equivalent neutral wind approaches for converting buoy-measured wind speed to the standard height: special emphasis to North Indian Ocean. Theor Appl Climatol 111, 455–463 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0674-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0674-2

Keywords

Navigation