Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of reanalysis-based, satellite-based, and “bias-correction”-based datasets for capturing extreme precipitation in Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares seven global gridded daily precipitation datasets against gauged precipitation to evaluate their accuracy for capturing extreme precipitation in Iran. We evaluated the performance of satellite-based (CHIRPS and MSWEP-V220), reanalysis-based (CFSR and MERRA-2), ensemble-based (MRE3ensemble), and “bias-correction”-based (MRE3ensemble, EWEMBI, and W5E5) precipitation datasets for the period of 1980–2016. The extreme precipitation indices that we examined consist of intensity indices [the maximum consecutive 1-day precipitation (Rx1day) and simple precipitation intensity (SDII)], duration indices [the consecutive dry days (CDD) and the consecutive wet days (CWD)], and frequency indices [heavy precipitation events (R10mm) and very heavy precipitation events (R20mm)]. The results showed that MSWEP-V220 had the best performance in Iran and Bias-Correction W5E5 was the second-best dataset to estimate precipitation in Iran. Although RMSE and MBE statistics showed high error and bias for all precipitation datasets in northern Iran, the evaluation of the PBIAS showed the share of bias value in the northern regions of Iran compared to the total precipitation in the climate zone of Iran is less than 5%. In contrast, most datasets showed a high percentage of bias in the eastern and interior regions of Iran. The results showed that all the studied datasets in the rainy areas of Iran (Cfa, Csa, and Dsa) underestimate maximum one-day precipitation (Rx1day), precipitation intensity (SDII), and heavy and very heavy precipitation (precipitation > 10 and 20 mm). In addition, MERRA-2 and CFSR overestimate the indices related to intensity and frequency in the most desert (BW) and semi-desert (BS) climates of Iran, respectively. CHIRPS data in all climate zones of Iran—except the CWD index in Cfa climate zone – overestimate the CDD index and underestimated the CWD. Accordingly, CHIRPS data show a drier climate for Iran unrealistically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

MRE3ensemble: https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/create-ip/, MERRA-2: https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/reanalysis/MERRA-2/, CFSR: https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/create-ip/, CHIRPS V2.0: https://www.chc.ucsb.edu/data/chirps, MSWEP _V220: http://www.gloh2o.org/mswep/, W5E5: https://dataservices.gfz-potsdam.de/pik/showshort.php?id=escidoc:4855898, EWEMBI: https://dataservices.gfz-potsdam.de/pik/showshort.php?id=escidoc:1809891.

Code Availability

The R package used in this paper is available on github (https://github.com/ECCC-CDAS/RClimDex).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Abbasali Dadashi-Roudbari was supported by a grant from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (No. FUM 14002794075). We would like to thank the Iran Meteorological Organization (IRIMO) for providing the necessary data and information.

Funding

Vice Chancellor for Research of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceived and designed the analysis: AZ and AD-R. Collected the data: AZ and AD-R. Contributed data or analysis tools: AZ and AD-R. Performed the analysis: AZ and AD-R. Wrote the paper: AD-R. Writing—review, and editing: AZ. Corresponding author: AZ.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azar Zarrin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Clemens Simmer.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zarrin, A., Dadashi-Roudbari, A. Evaluation of reanalysis-based, satellite-based, and “bias-correction”-based datasets for capturing extreme precipitation in Iran. Meteorol Atmos Phys 134, 67 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-022-00903-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-022-00903-8

Navigation