Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editors,
We read with interest the recent published review by Dressler and Johnson (2022) and would like to offer some important updates and corrections to some of the statements made to avoid misconceptions that unfortunately persist to this day from previous work (Pickett 2011).
First, we must clarify Ipsen’s cell-based assay which is fully implemented for abobotulinumtoxinA product supplied to the European Union, United States (US) and Canada, and that these important changes were well publicized in 2019 and 2020, respectively (Ipsen 2019, 2020a). The US prescribing information notes that the “…primary release procedure for DYSPORT uses a cell-based potency assay to determine the potency relative to a reference standard” (Ipsen 2020b). In addition, several other regions and countries have since added to the list without press release.
Second, we cannot condone any intimation that certain botulinum toxin products are comparable. Specifically, we are concerned that by saying abobotulinumtoxinA has “idiosyncratic potency labelling”, the reader may mistakenly infer that other available botulinum toxin type A products (e.g., onabotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA) are comparable—when there is no consensus on this. In fact, regulatory agencies in the US, Europe, and most other countries worldwide require a statement that botulinum toxin units are not interchangeable from one product to another. This reflects the fact that these are biological products and, as Dressler and Johnson highlight in their review, have clear differences in the manufacturing processes, formulations, and assay methods used to determine units of biological activity. Furthermore, each product may behave differently depending on where it is targeted (Brin et al. 2014).
While conversion ratios abound in the literature, the practical implications of non-interchangeability of current botulinum toxin products are crucial to understand, because it means that the risk–benefit ratio for each of the products (including efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and duration of action) must always be considered individually. In the absence of well-designed comparative studies, the best way to do this is to consider the evidence of safety and efficacy for each product based on their indication. Our stance will almost certainly change in the future when recombinant technologies become clinically available (Fonfria et al. 2018) and potency units obsolete.
Respectfully
Alberto Esquenazi, Mark Elliott, Andreas Lysandropoulos
References
Brin MF, James C, Maltman J (2014) Botulinum toxin type A products are not interchangeable: a review of the evidence. Biologics 8:227–241
Dressler D, Johnson EA (2022) Botulinum toxin therapy: past, present and future developments. J Neural Transm (vienna). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-022-02494-5
Fonfria E, Maignel J, Lezmi S, Martin V, Splevins A, Shubber S, Kalinichev M, Foster K, Picaut P, Krupp J (2018) The expanding therapeutic utility of botulinum neurotoxins. Toxins 10(5):208
Ipsen (2019) Press release available at https://www.ipsen.com/websites/Ipsen_Online/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/01155324/00-IAW-POSITION-STATEMENT-US-and-CN-approvals-01-02-2019.pdf. Last accessed 15 June 2022
Ipsen (2020a) Press release available at https://www.ipsen.com/websites/Ipsen_Online/wp-content/uploads/2020a/03/06103815/00-IAW-ONLINE-POSITION-STATEMENT_Ipsens-CBA-implementation-EN-2020-02-25.pdf. Last accessed 15 June 2022
Ipsen (2020b) Dysport (abobotulinumtoxinA) for injection, for intramuscular use. Full US prescribing information, 2020. Available at http://dysport.com. Last accessed 15 June 2022
Pickett A (2011) Evaluating botulinum toxin products for clinical use requires accurate, complete, and unbiased data. Clin Ophthalmol 5:1287–1290
Funding
Alberto Esquenazi reports research funding from Ipsen, Allergan/AbbVie, and Merz, and consultancy for Ipsen, Allergan/AbbVie, and Shionogi. Mark Elliott and Andreas Lysandropoulos are employed by Ipsen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A reply to this letter can be read here: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-022-02535-z.
This letter refers to the original publication available here: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-022-02494-5
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Esquenazi, A., Elliott, M. & Lysandropoulos, A. Corrections required for Dressler and Johnson 2022. J Neural Transm 129, 1307–1308 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-022-02534-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-022-02534-0