Advertisement

Journal of Neural Transmission

, Volume 121, Issue 8, pp 799–817 | Cite as

Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the healthy brain

  • Y. Zhou
  • N. C. DanboltEmail author
Open Access
Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Review Article

Abstract

Glutamate is the most abundant free amino acid in the brain and is at the crossroad between multiple metabolic pathways. Considering this, it was a surprise to discover that glutamate has excitatory effects on nerve cells, and that it can excite cells to their death in a process now referred to as “excitotoxicity”. This effect is due to glutamate receptors present on the surface of brain cells. Powerful uptake systems (glutamate transporters) prevent excessive activation of these receptors by continuously removing glutamate from the extracellular fluid in the brain. Further, the blood–brain barrier shields the brain from glutamate in the blood. The highest concentrations of glutamate are found in synaptic vesicles in nerve terminals from where it can be released by exocytosis. In fact, glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system. It took, however, a long time to realize that. The present review provides a brief historical description, gives a short overview of glutamate as a transmitter in the healthy brain, and comments on the so-called glutamate–glutamine cycle. The glutamate transporters responsible for the glutamate removal are described in some detail.

Keywords

Glutamate uptake EAAT2 EAAT1 EAAT3 slc1a2 slc1a1 slc1a3 Glutamate Glutamate transporter Immunocytochemistry Neuropil 

Abbreviations

AMPA

α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid

l-AP4

l-2-Amino-4-phosphonobutanoate

ATP

Adenosine triphosphate

CNS

Central nervous system

EAAC1

Glutamate transporter number 3 (EAAT3; slc1a1; Kanai and Hediger 1992)

EAAT

Excitatory amino acid transporter (synonymous to glutamate transporter)

GABA

γ-Aminobutyric acid

GLAST

Glutamate transporter number 1 (EAAT1; slc1a3; Storck et al. 1992; Tanaka 1993a)

GLT-1

Glutamate transporter number 2 (EAAT2; slc1a2; Pines et al. 1992)

GLUL

Glutamine synthetase

NMDA

N-Methyl-d-aspartate

TBOA

dl-threo-β-benzyloxyaspartate

Introduction

Outside the community of biomedical scientists, glutamate is probably best known as “monosodium glutamate” or “MSG” which is the sodium salt of glutamic acid and a white crystalline solid used as a flavor or taste enhancer in food (food additive number E620). This, however, is not the reason for the enormous scientific interest in glutamate. The main motivation for the ongoing worldwide research on glutamate is that glutamate is the major excitatory transmitter in the brain.

Like other signaling substances, the signaling effect of glutamate is not dependent on the chemical nature of glutamate, but on how cells are programmed to respond when exposed to it. Because the glutamate receptor proteins are expressed on the surface of the cells in such a way that they can only be activated from the outside, it follows that glutamate exerts its neurotransmitter function from the extracellular fluid. Consequently, control of receptor activation is achieved by releasing glutamate to the extracellular fluid and then removing glutamate from it. Because there are no enzymes extracellularly that can degrade glutamate, low extracellular concentrations require cellular uptake. This uptake is catalyzed by a family of transporter proteins located at the cell surface of both astrocytes and neurons (e.g. Danbolt 2001; Grewer and Rauen 2005; Tzingounis and Wadiche 2007; Vandenberg and Ryan 2013).

Because glutamate is the major mediator of excitatory signals as well as of nervous system plasticity, including cell elimination, it follows that glutamate should be present at the right concentrations in the right places at the right time. It further follows that cells should have the correct sensitivity to glutamate and have energy enough to withstand normal stimulation, and that glutamate should be removed with the appropriate rates from the right locations. Both too much glutamate and too little glutamate are harmful. Excessive activation of glutamate receptors may excite nerve cells to their death in a process now referred to as “excitotoxicity”. This toxicity was initially perceived as a paradox like “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde”, but it is now clear that glutamate is toxic, not in spite of its importance, but because of it. As outlined before (Danbolt 2001), the intensity of glutamatergic stimulation that a given cell can tolerate, depends on several factors. As long as one variable is not extreme, it will be the combination of several factors that will determine the outcome.

It took a long time to realize that glutamate is a neurotransmitter in part because of its abundance in brain tissue and in part because it is at the crossroad of multiple metabolic pathways (e.g. Erecinska and Silver 1990; Broman et al. 2000; McKenna 2007; Hertz 2013). There is 5–15 mmol glutamate per kg brain tissue, depending on the region, more than that of any other amino acid (Schousboe 1981). So although it was noted early on that glutamate plays a central metabolic role in the brain (Krebs 1935), that brain cells have a very high glutamate uptake activity (Stern et al. 1949) and that glutamate has an excitatory effect (Hayashi 1954; Curtis et al. 1959, 1960), the transmitter role was not realized until the early 1980s (for review see Fonnum 1984).

In fact, glutamate metabolism is complex and compartmentalized (Berl et al. 1961, 1962; Van den Berg and Garfinkel 1971; Balcar and Johnston 1975). The important role of glutamate uptake in the control of the excitatory action of glutamate was recognized (Logan and Snyder 1971, 1972; Wofsey et al. 1971; Balcar and Johnston 1972). This became a hot research topic. A number of different glutamate and aspartate analogues were synthesized, and heterogeneity within glutamate uptake was uncovered suggesting more than one uptake mechanism (Ferkany and Coyle 1986; Robinson et al. 1991, 1993; Fletcher and Johnston 1991; Balcar and Li 1992; Rauen et al. 1992).

Similarly, several families of glutamate receptor proteins were identified with molecular cloning (for review see Niswender and Conn 2010; Traynelis et al. 2010; Nicoletti et al. 2011). The receptors were classified as N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (Gonda 2012; Bonaccorso et al. 2011; Santangelo et al. 2012), AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid) receptors (Rogawski 2013), kainate receptors (Lerma and Marques 2013) and metabotropic receptors (Gregory et al. 2013). Most, if not all, cells in the nervous system express at least one type of glutamate receptor (Steinhauser and Gallo 1996; Vernadakis 1996; Forsythe and Barnes-Davies 1997; Wenthold and Roche 1998; Petralia et al. 1999; Conti et al. 1999; Shelton and McCarthy 1999; Bergles et al. 2000). The locations and functional properties of each type are beyond the scope of this review.

Medicinal chemists continued to synthesize new compounds and it is now possible to differentiate pretty well between the various receptors and transporters. Considering the relatively large number of proteins with ability to bind glutamate, it may seem strange that it is possible to find compounds that can distinguish between them. The reason is the high flexibility of the glutamate molecule which permits several conformations that are only minimally less favorable energetically at body temperature than the lowest energy conformation (Bridges et al. 1991). This implies that glutamate can take many shapes and explains, in part, why the various glutamate binding proteins (transporters, receptors, enzymes) can have quite different binding sites and still be able to bind glutamate. A large number of compounds are now available, and there are a number of excellent reviews on the topic (e.g. Bräuner-Osborne et al. 1997; Jensen and Bräuner-Osborne 2004; Shigeri et al. 2004; Ritzen et al. 2005; Thompson et al. 2005; Bridges and Esslinger 2005; Shimamoto 2008; Bridges et al. 2012a, b; Gregory et al. 2013; Gonda 2012; Bonaccorso et al. 2011).

Identification of plasma membrane glutamate transporters

A glutamate transporter, now known as EAAT2 (GLT-1; slc1a2; Pines et al. 1992), was purified in an active form from rat brain by employing reconstitution of transport as the assay to monitor the purification process (Danbolt et al. 1990). The purification was based on solubilization of rat brain membranes with a detergent and fractionation by conventional chromatographic techniques. This resulted in a 30-fold increase in specific activity, but due to inactivation, the purification ratio was closer to 100-fold. It was hard to convince ourselves that this moderate enrichment was sufficient to yield a pure preparation, and it was even harder to convince others. The fact that the protein tends to give wide bands in electrophoresis gels did not make the task any easier (see Danbolt 1994). Nevertheless, this was a pure preparation (Levy et al. 1993; Lehre and Danbolt 1998). Antibodies were raised to the purified protein and used to localize it in the brain (Danbolt et al. 1992; Levy et al. 1993) and to screen expression libraries. The sequence of the isolated cDNA predicted correctly a protein of 573 amino acids (Pines et al. 1992). Simultaneously, but independently of each other, three other research teams succeeded in cloning another two glutamate transporters using completely different approaches. Storck et al. (1992) were purifying a galactosyltransferase from rat brain and observed that a 66 kDa hydrophobic glycoprotein copurified with this protein. The purified protein was subjected to limited proteolysis. Partial amino acid sequences were obtained and used for synthesizing degenerate oligonucleotide probes for screening of a rat brain cDNA library. This resulted in the identification of 543 amino acid residues long protein now referred to as EAAT1 (GLAST; slc1a3; Storck et al. 1992). EAAT3 (EAAC1; slc1a1) was isolated from a rabbit jejunum by Xenopus laevis oocyte expression cloning (Kanai and Hediger 1992). The cDNA sequence contains an open reading frame coding for a protein of 524 amino acids. The rat brain equivalent is 89.9 % identical and 523 amino acids long (Kanai et al. 1993; Bjørås et al. 1996). The three human counterparts were quickly identified and named excitatory amino acid transporter (EAAT)1–3 (Arriza et al. 1994). Another two glutamate transporters were found later: EAAT4 (Fairman et al. 1995) and EAAT5 (Arriza et al. 1997). All the EAATs catalyze coupled transport of 1H+, 3Na+, and 1K+ with one substrate molecule (Klöckner et al. 1993; Zerangue and Kavanaugh 1996a; Levy et al. 1998; Owe et al. 2006). l-Glutamate and dl-aspartate are transported with similar affinities while d-glutamate is not. It is important to note that the transporters are performing exchange in addition to net uptake. Exchange is a process whereby the transporters exchange external and internal substrate molecules in a 1:1 relationship (see Fig. 5 in Danbolt 2001). Thus, when transportable uptake inhibitors are added to cell cultures, the inhibitors induce glutamate release from the cells (e.g. Volterra et al. 1996; Danbolt 2001) Table 1.
Table 1

Overview of the nomenclature of plasma membrane glutamate transporters

HUGO name

Other names

Excitatory amino acid transporter 1 (EAAT1; slc1a3)

GLAST (Storck et al. 1992; Tanaka 1993b; Arriza et al. 1994)

Excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2; slc1a2)

GLT-1; GLT1 (Pines et al. 1992; Arriza et al. 1994)

Excitatory amino acid transporter 3 (EAAT3; slc1a1)

EAAC1 (Kanai and Hediger 1992; Arriza et al. 1994)

Excitatory amino acid transporter 4 (EAAT4; slc1a6)

(Fairman et al. 1995)

Excitatory amino acid transporter 5 (EAAT5; slc1a7)

(Arriza et al. 1997)

Glutamate transporters belong to the solute carrier (slc) family 1 (high-affinity glutamate and neutral amino acid transporter family; Hediger et al. 2013). Although there are several proteins with ability to transport glutamate, the term “glutamate transporter” is usually used to describe the five “high-affinity glutamate transporters” also called “excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs)”. The actual meanings of the acronyms (GLAST glutamate–aspartate transporter, GLT1 glutamate transporter, EAAC excitatory amino acid carrier, EAAT excitatory amino acid transporter) are not important, as they do not reflect functional differences among the transporters. The nomenclature used here is the one adopted by the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (Hediger et al. 2013)

The substrate selectivities are not reviewed here. We will only point out (a) that the commonly used uptake inhibitor dihydrokainate (DHK; CAS 52497-36-6) blocks EAAT2 with high selectivity over the other EAATs (Arriza et al. 1994; Bridges et al. 1999), and (b) that dl-threo-β-benzyloxyaspartate (TBOA; CAS 205309-81-5) and its variants (e.g. PMB-TBOA and TFB-TBOA) block all the five EAATs (Bridges et al. 1999; Shimamoto 2008). These compounds are competitive inhibitors that are not transportable. This implies that they block both uptake and exchange (for a detailed explanation, see sect. 6.5 in Danbolt 2001). For more information, we recommend the outstanding review by Bridges et al. (1999) as an introduction and more recent reviews for the last updates (e.g. Jensen and Bräuner-Osborne 2004; Shigeri et al. 2004; Bridges and Esslinger 2005; Shimamoto and Shigeri 2006; Shimamoto 2008; Sagot et al. 2008).

The EAAT-type of transporters also functions as chloride channels (Fairman et al. 1995; Zerangue and Kavanaugh 1996a; Wadiche et al. 1995a, b; Ryan and Mindell 2007; Takayasu et al. 2009). EAAT4 and EAAT5 have the largest chloride conductance (Mim et al. 2005; Gameiro et al. 2011), and may function more as inhibitory glutamate receptors than as transporters (Dehnes et al. 1998; Veruki et al. 2006; Schneider et al. 2014). Arachidonic acid elicits a substrate-gated proton current associated with the glutamate transporter EAAT4 (Fairman et al. 1998; Tzingounis et al. 1998). In addition, a general feature of sodium coupled transport appears to be transport of water (MacAulay et al. 2001, 2004).

Even though the mammalian transporters have not yet been crystallized, we already know quite a lot about their complex structure (Kanner 2007; Gouaux 2009; Kanner 2013; Vandenberg and Ryan 2013). The EAAT2 and EAAT3 proteins are believed to be homotrimers where the subunits are non-covalently connected (Haugeto et al. 1996). This is in agreement with studies of glutamate transporters from Bacillus Caldotenax and Bacillus stearothermophilus (Yernool et al. 2003) although crosslinking studies of the mammalian transporters indicate that there may be differences between the EAAT subtypes (Dehnes et al. 1998). These proteins are integral membrane proteins and they depend on the lipid environment, and are influenced by fatty acids such as arachidonic acid (Barbour et al. 1989; Trotti et al. 1995; Zerangue et al. 1995) and by oxidation (Trotti et al. 1996; Trotti et al. 1998). The recent determination of the crystall structure of a glutamate transporter homologue (GltPh) from Pyrococcus horikoshii (Yernool et al. 2004) and other transporters (Penmatsa and Gouaux 2013) implies a milestone similar to the cloning of the first transporters in the early 1990s and the generation of knockout mice in the late 1990s. GltPh appear to be a bowl-shaped trimer with a solvent-filled extracellular basin extending halfway across the membrane bilayer. At the bottom of the basin are three independent binding sites (Yernool et al. 2004). This structure is, as uncovered recently, ideal to facilitate rapid transport (Leary et al. 2011).

The glutamate-cystine exchanger

Another transporter that has got quite a lot of attention lately is the so called glutamine-cystine exchanger (xCT; slc7a11). This transporter was first described in human fibroblasts as an electroneutral 1:1 cystine-glutamate exchanger that carries cystine into the cell in exchange for internal glutamate (Bannai 1986). Thus, the physiological role of this transporter is to act as a cystine transporter that uses the transmembrane gradient of glutamate as driving force. It follows from this that extracellular glutamate inhibits uptake of cystine and that uptake of cystine causes glutamate release. The transporter responsible for this uptake has been identified by molecular cloning (Sato et al. 1999). It is a heterooligomer consisting of two different subunits: the 4F2hc surface antigen (slc3a2) the xCT protein (slc7a11). The substrate selectivities are excellently reviewed by Bridges et al. (2012a, b).

There are several reasons why xCT has become a hot topic (Conrad and Sato 2012; Lewerenz et al. 2013; Bridges et al. 2012a, b). The first important observation was that glioma express high levels of xCT and low levels of EAATs suggesting that they release glutamate and that glutamate toxicity may be a mechanism facilitating their invasion of normal tissue (e.g. Ye et al. 1999; Sontheimer 2004; Takeuchi et al. 2013). Another reason for the interest is that cystine is a source of cysteine needed for synthesis of glutathione (Dringen 2000). There are, however, a number of transporters that can transport cysteine. These comprise EAAT3 (Zerangue and Kavanaugh 1996b), the two alanine-serine-cysteine transporters (Arriza et al. 1993; Shafqat et al. 1993; Hofmann et al. 1994), ASCT1 (slc1a4) and ASCT2 (slc1a5) as well as several others (Bröer 2008). So if cystine is reduced to cysteine at the cell surface, then cysteine can be taken up independently of xCT. Nevertheless, xCT-deficient mice display redox imbalance suggesting that xCT does play a role in glutathione production (Sato et al. 2005). A third reason for the interest in xCT is that xCT has been suggested to be a major source of extracellular glutamate (Baker et al. 2002). This has been highly controversial, but a recent paper based on the xCT-deficient mice is supporting the idea (De Bundel et al. 2011). There are, however, a number of unresolved issues. The distribution of xCT in the brain has not yet been definitively determined, and available data suggest low levels (Sato et al. 2002). If the above observations are due to direct actions of xCT, then there must be enough xCT molecules present to perform the proposed functions. Thus, both the expression levels and the speed which xCT operates (translocation cycles per second per xCT molecule) are important to determine. As xCT is highly inducible (Sato et al. 2001, 2004), it is should be kept in mind that expression levels may change in stressful situations. Finally, if xCT exchanges glutamate and cystine in a 1:1 relationship, then a massive glutamate release can only be mediated by xCT if there is a similar transport of cystine (or another substrate) in the other direction. In conclusion, more work is needed before we fully understand the roles that xCT plays.

Intracellular glutamate carriers

When glutamate enters the cytoplasm, it may undergo further redistribution to mitochondria or synaptic vesicles (Erecinska and Silver 1990; Nicholls 1993). (A) Mitochondrial glutamate transport: Several of the enzymes for which glutamate is a substrate are located in mitochondria. In agreement, mitochondria possess mechanisms for glutamate translocation. In fact, there are four different carriers: AGC1 (Slc25a12; aralar1; del Arco and Satrustegui 1998), AGC2 (Slc25a13; citrin; aralar2; Kobayashi et al. 1999; Yasuda et al. 2000), GC1 (Slc25a22; Fiermonte et al. 2002) and GC2 (Slc25a18; Fiermonte et al. 2002).

These transporters are very different from the glutamate transporters in the plasma membranes and will not be discussed further here (for review see Palmieri 2013). (B) Glutamate transporters in synaptic vesicles: In glutamatergic nerve terminals, glutamate is carried into synaptic vesicles by means of the so called vesicular glutamate transporters (VGLUTs). These are also very different from those in the plasma membrane (for review see El Mestikawy et al. 2011; Omote et al. 2011) by being independent of sodium and potassium, and by having lower affinity (km around 1 mM). There are three different isoforms: VGLUT1 (Slc17a7; Ni et al. 1994; Bellocchio et al. 1998, 2000; Takamori et al. 2000), VGLUT2 (Slc17a6; DNPI; Aihara et al. 2000) and VGLUT3 (Slc17a8; Takamori et al. 2002).

Release of glutamate

Glutamate is continuously being released to the extracellular fluid, and inhibition of glutamate uptake leads to extracellular buildups of glutamate within seconds (Jabaudon et al. 1999). Although most of the focus has been on synaptic release of glutamate from nerve terminals by exocytosis of synaptic vesicles, this is not the only mechanism able to supply the extracellular fluid with glutamate (Danbolt 2001). In fact, there are several different non-vesicular (non-exocytotic) mechanisms that appear to be important. One is through anion channels (Kimelberg et al. 1990; Kimelberg and Mongin 1998; Wang et al. 2013) and another is via reversed operation of the glutamate transporting proteins at the plasma membrane (e.g. Levi and Raiteri 1993; Longuemare and Swanson 1995; Roettger and Lipton 1996; Jensen et al. 2000; Rossi et al. 2000; Jabaudon et al. 2000; Sontheimer 2008). A third is via xCT as explained above. A fourth mechanism that has been vividly debated over the last decade is whether mature brain astrocytes in situ also have the ability to release glutamate by exocytosis (Bezzi et al. 2004). The differences in opinions can to some extent be explained by the use of different model systems. For instance, primary astrocytes in culture differ from mature astrocytes in the brain (Cahoy et al. 2008) so observations from cultures are not necessarily valid for the intact living brain. Nevertheless, it seems likely that also mature astrocytes in situ may release glutamate (Malarkey and Parpura 2008; Nedergaard and Verkhratsky 2012; Wang et al. 2013), but exocytosis of vesicles similar to those in nerve terminals is questionable (Hamilton and Attwell 2010). In fact, a recent paper refutes the notion that astrocytes express vesicular glutamate transporters (Li et al. 2013). Thus, this does not entirely rule out the concept of gliotransmitters because glutamate may be released via other mechanisms as explained above, but it does suggest critical evaluation of the literature.

Regulation of the EAAT-type of transporters

Considering the importance of the glutamate transporters, pharmacological manipulation of transporter function may prove to be highly interesting from a therapeutic point of view (Sheldon and Robinson 2007). Although there are several examples where dysregulation of transporters contributes to the pathogenetic process, there are few examples of transporters being the primary cause (e.g. Danbolt 2001; Sattler and Rothstein 2006; Lauriat and Mcinnes 2007; Bröer and Palacin 2011). For instance, it is clear that complete absence of EAAT2 results in spontaneous epilepsy (Tanaka et al. 1997) and increased extracellular glutamate (Mitani and Tanaka 2003; Takasaki et al. 2008), but studies of humans with epilepsy have not uncovered any direct link to glutamate transporter expression (Tessler et al. 1999; Akbar et al. 1997; Bjørnsen et al. 2007). Nevertheless, studies from knockout mice and from humans with mutated transporters show links to disease (for a recent short update see Zhou and Danbolt 2013). Consequently, uncovering regulatory mechanisms is something that has been a hot topic and has interested a large number of researchers. A full account is beyond the scope of this review. Here we only mention a few points.

The first observation revealing regulation of glial glutamate transporter expression came from lesion experiments (Levy et al. 1995). Unilateral ablation of the neocortex in young adult rats resulted in ipsilateral down regulation of EAAT1 and EAAT2 in the striatum. The lesions did not penetrate the corpus callosum so striatum was not directly affected. However, the neocortical lesion eliminated the cell bodies that are responsible for the corticostriatal axons resulting in a loss of glutamatergic terminals in the striatum. Because astrocytes reduced their levels of EAAT1 and EAAT2 in response to the removal of these terminals, it was assumed that neuro-glia interactions were important in the regulation of transporter expression (Levy et al. 1995). This was followed up in cell cultures. Astrocytes cultured in the absence of neurons hardly expressed EAAT2 at all, while addition of neuron conditioned medium turned on EAAT2 expression (e.g., Gegelashvili et al. 1996, 1997, 2000, 2001; Plachez et al. 2000). This regulation turned out to be via several different pathways. Further, glutamate transporters are regulated by protein kinase C (Casado et al. 1993; reviewed by: Gonzalez and Robinson 2004; Vandenberg and Ryan 2013), by zinc (Vandenberg et al. 1998; Mitrovic et al. 2001; Vandenberg and Ryan 2013), and by arachidonic acid as mentioned above. In fact, there is regulation on more or less all levels from transcription to posttranslational modification and trafficking (for review see Seal and Amara 1999; Bergles et al. 1999; Hediger 1999; Kullmann 1999; Sims and Robinson 1999; Danbolt 2001; Robinson 2006; Sattler and Rothstein 2006). The most exciting discovery so far from a drug development point of view is the finding that beta-lactam antibiotics, e.g. Ceftriaxone, increase EAAT2 expression (Rothstein et al. 2005; Berry et al. 2013). Another team has also started high-throughput screening in order to identify translational activators of glial glutamate transporter EAAT2 (Colton et al. 2010) and have identified some pyridazine derivatives that may serve as lead compounds for drug development (Xing et al. 2011). Another interesting finding is a spider toxin that enhances EAAT2 transport activity (Fontana et al. 2007), but the compound responsible has not yet been identified.

Approaches used to localize glutamate transporters

Early attempt to localize glutamate uptake sites were done using autoradiography in combination with tissue slices or synaptosome preparations (e.g. Minchin and Beart 1975; McLennan 1976; Beart 1976; Storm-Mathisen 1981; Storm-Mathisen and Wold 1981). To obtain higher resolution, thinner sections were needed. By using dry mount autoradiography (Young and Kuhar 1979; Danbolt et al. 1993) in combination with “sodium-dependent binding” of excitatory amino acids the uptake sites (for references see Danbolt 1994), higher resolution seemed to be within reach. However, heteroexchange complicated the interpretations as the amount of retained radioactively labeled ligand was dependent on both the number of transporter molecules and by the amount of endogenous dicarboxylic amino acid trapped within the membranes (Danbolt and Storm-Mathisen 1986a, b; Danbolt 1994).

From the early days of glutamate research, it was believed that glutamate is taken up by glutamatergic nerve terminals (Fonnum 1984), but the finding that glial glutamate transporters are down-regulated after glutamatergic denervation (Levy et al. 1995), weakened the evidence (for a discussion, see sect. 4.2 in Danbolt 2001). By incubating tissue slices in d-aspartate and fixing the slices, it was possible to detect fixed d-aspartate with antibodies. With this technique, uptake in both astrocytes and nerve terminals was demonstrated at the electron microscopic level (Gundersen et al. 1993). d-aspartate is often used instead of l-glutamate as a probe for glutamate uptake because it is slowly metabolized in brain tissue (Davies and Johnston 1976).

After the protein sequences of the transporters were known, synthetic peptides could be used to generate antibodies to the transporters themselves (Danbolt et al. 1998) rather than to the substrates. This led to an explosion in the use of antibodies to transporters, but, unfortunately, not all investigators validated their antibodies and procedures well enough (for detailed discussion see Holmseth et al. 2005, 2006, 2012a). The most difficult part is to obtain good negative controls. Antibodies may react with seemingly unrelated proteins (Holmseth et al. 2005; Zhou et al. 2014). In fact, antibody binding can always be achieved (see for instance Fig. 3 in: Holmseth et al. 2005). This is just a question of adjusting the assay conditions. Without a good negative control (e.g. tissue from knockout mice processed in parallel with tissue from wild-type mice), it is not possible to prove that the binding is to the antigen of interest. Therefore, antibody binding does not in itself prove that a given antigen is present. In this context it should be noted that the so called pre-adsorption test can easily give a false impression of specificity (Holmseth et al. 2012a). Whenever possible, it is a good idea to use additional methods, including in situ hybridization and Western blotting in combination with immunocytochemistry. TaqMan Real Time PCR is an excellent method for getting a first approximation of expression levels (e.g. Lehre et al. 2011; Zhou et al. 2012a). Another approach is to search available transcriptome and proteome datasets. For instance, proteome data from rat proximal tubules (http://dir.nhlbi.nih.gov/papers/lkem/pttr/) confirms the presence of EAAT3, but does not confirm expression of any of the other EAATs. Similarly, EAAT2 is in liver, but the other EAATs were not detected (http://141.61.102.16/), and neither the EAATs nor the VGLUTs were detected by proteome analysis of mouse pancreas (Zhou et al. 2014). Together, these data cast doubt over a large number of immunocytochemistry reports. The reason is obvious. Labeling with antibodies can always be obtained, and without good negative controls, it is not possible to tell if the labeling represents the antigen of interest or artifacts (see Holmseth et al. 2012a). Further, rapid post mortem proteolysis represents and additional challenge when studying human samples (Beckstrøm et al. 1999; Tessler et al. 1999; Li et al. 2012). Also note that water soluble proteins present in the samples may inhibit binding of transporters to the blotting membranes (Zhou et al. 2012b). Thus, strong upregulation of other proteins should be considered a potential source of error when estimating transporter levels by immunoblotting. Electron microscopy in combination with pre-embedding immunocytochemistry without detergents on unfrozen tissue is ideal for identification of labeled cell types, but is not ideal for subcellular distribution as the peroxidase reaction product diffuses some distance before precipitating. (Depending on the strength of the reaction, the reaction product may diffuse a couple of hundred nanometers.) In contrast, post-embedding immunogold is better for collecting semi-quantitative data and gives better intracellular resolution, but when cell membranes are labeled and cells are close to each other as they typically are in the brain, then immunogold cannot tell which membrane labeling belongs to (for description of these methods, see Danbolt et al. 1998; Amiry-Moghaddam and Ottersen 2013). Another problem with post-embedding immunogold is that there must be a sufficient number of target molecules in the plane of the section. This is case for EAAT1, EAAT2 and EAAT4. These proteins are present at very high concentrations (Dehnes et al. 1998; Lehre and Danbolt 1998) making them ideal targets for immunogold investigations. This explains, in part, why our early localization studies were so successful (Chaudhry et al. 1995; Dehnes et al. 1998). In contrast, EAAT3 is expressed at lower levels resulting in too few molecules per micrometer plasma membrane length to distinguish real labeling from background noise (Holmseth et al. 2012b). It should be recalled that the tissue sections used for electron microscopy are thin (40–60 nm) and thereby only slightly thicker than the outer diameter of synaptic vesicles (40 nm), and only two/three times thicker than the width of the synaptic cleft (20 nm). The antibodies do not penetrate well into the sections. To maximize labeling, the section may be mounted so that they can be labeled on both sides. Thus, the sensitivity of the post-embedding immunogold technique is limited by the number of proteins in the exact section plane. Another challenge follows from the vulnerability of the sections and thereby also the labeling. These sections are easily damaged during processing. Consequently, there is variability and this leads to another challenge: avoiding sampling error. This challenge comes in addition to those mentioned above (specificity, proteolysis, etc.).

It is also important to consider if any detected proteins are expressed at physiologically relevant levels. The number of molecules needed to accomplish a given task depends on what that task is. This consideration is particularly relevant for neurotransmitter transporters because the transport process is fairly slow. The cycling time of EAAT2 and EAAT3 are in the order of 30 glutamate molecules per second at Vmax (Otis and Jahr 1998; Otis and Kavanaugh 2000; Bergles et al. 2002; Grewer and Rauen 2005) and EAAT5 is even slower (Gameiro et al. 2011). The cycling time of the GABA transporters appear to be comparable to those of the EAATs (Mager et al. 1993; Sacher et al. 2002; Karakossian et al. 2005; Gonzales et al. 2007). This means that the number of transporters must be high. There is a rapid extracellular turnover of glutamate (Jabaudon et al. 1999), and despite this, the resting levels of extracellular glutamate in normal brains are low, possibly as low as 25 nm (Herman and Jahr 2007). Because the km-values are about 1,000 times higher (Danbolt 2001), maintenance of such low extracellular levels implies a vast excess of transporter proteins (Bergles and Jahr 1997; Dehnes et al. 1998; Lehre and Danbolt 1998; Otis and Kavanaugh 2000).

Cellular and subcellular distribution of glutamate transporters in normal mature brain tissue

A large number of papers on transporter distributions have been published, and it is not easy to navigate in the literature as many of the statements are corrected in later publications. Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of the distributions of EAAT1, EAAT2 and EAAT3 in the forebrain.
Fig. 1

A schematic illustration of glutamate transporter distributions around synapses close to a blood vessel in the hippocampus. Four glutamatergic nerve terminals (T) are shown forming synapses onto dendritic spines (S). Astrocyte branches are indicated (G). Note that astrocytes have very high densities (Lehre et al. 1995; Ginsberg et al. 1995; Lehre and Danbolt 1998) of both EAAT2 (red dots) and EAAT1 (blue dots). The highest densities of EAAT1 and EAAT2 are in the astrocyte membranes facing neuropil, while the membranes facing the endothelium have low levels. Also note that glutamate transporters have not been detected in the endothelium. EAAT1 is selective for astrocytes (Lehre et al. 1995; Ginsberg et al. 1995), while EAAT2 is predominantly expressed in astrocytes (Danbolt et al. 1992), but there is also some (about 10 %) in hippocampal nerve terminals (Furness et al. 2008). EAAT3 (green dots) is selective for neurons, but is expressed at levels two orders of magnitude lower than EAAT2 and is targeted to dendrites and cell bodies (Holmseth et al. 2012b). Also note that the endfeet may actually overlap with no gaps in between them (Mathiisen et al. 2010) (Copyright: Neurotransporter AS; Reproduced with permission)

EAAT1 (GLAST; slc1a3) is selectively expressed in astrocytes throughout the CNS (Lehre et al. 1995). This conclusion is supported both by in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry (e.g. Ginsberg et al. 1995; Rothstein et al. 1995 Schmitt et al. 1997; Berger and Hediger 1998, 2000) and appears to be valid for all parts of the central nervous system including the regions where EAAT1 is the predominant transporter (Lehre et al. 1995; Lehre and Danbolt 1998; Takatsuru et al. 2007; Takayasu et al. 2009): the retina (Rauen et al. 1996; Lehre et al. 1997; Rauen et al. 1998; Rauen 2000; Rauen and Wiessner 2000), the inner ear (Furness and Lehre 1997; Takumi et al. 1997), and the circumventricular organs (Berger and Hediger 2000). Thus, there is no disagreement here. Other statements can be found in the literature, but these have been corrected by the authors themselves.

After having determined the cell types expressing EAAT1 (Lehre et al. 1995), immunogold was performed to obtain additional information (Chaudhry et al. 1995). This revealed that EAAT1 is preferentially targeted to the plasma membranes, and that plasma membranes facing neuropil have higher densities than those facing cell bodies, pia mater and endothelium (Fig. 1).

Mice lacking EAAT1 (Watase et al. 1998) develop normally, but show symptoms of insufficient glutamate uptake in regions where EAAT1 is the major glutamate transporter (Watase et al. 1998; Hakuba et al. 2000; Harada et al. 1998). The EAAT1 knockout mice also display poor nesting behavior; abnormal sociability, reduced alcohol intake and reward (Watase et al. 1998; Stoffel et al. 2004; Karlsson et al. 2009, 2012). Lack of GLAST does not lead to spontaneous seizures like those seen in connection with EAAT2-deficiency (Tanaka et al. 1997), but GLAST deficiency increases seizure duration and severity (Watanabe et al. 1999). EAAT1 mutations in humans are linked to episodic ataxia (Bröer and Palacin 2011; Jen et al. 2005; de Vries et al. 2009).

EAAT2 (GLT-1; slc1a2) was the first glutamate transporter to be localized immunocytochemically. In the mature and normal brain it is predominantly expressed in astrocytes (Danbolt et al. 1992; Levy et al. 1993; Rothstein et al. 1994; Lehre et al. 1995). There is no disagreement here either, and this conclusion is supported both by later immunocytochemistry (e.g. Schmitt et al. 1996; Kugler and Schmitt 2003; Berger et al. 2005; Holmseth et al. 2009) and in situ hybridization (Torp et al. 1994, 1997; Berger and Hediger 2000, 2001) as well as by data obtained with EAAT2 eGFP BAC reporter mice (de Vivo et al. 2010a).

EAAT2 is the only one of the EAAT-type of glutamate transporters that is required for survival under non-challenging conditions (Tanaka et al. 1997; Danbolt 2001). This is in agreement with biochemical data showing that the EAAT2 protein represents about 1 % of the total forebrain protein and that it is about four times more abundant than EAAT1 in the hippocampus and six times less abundant than EAAT1 in the cerebellum (Lehre and Danbolt 1998). Based on immunoadsorption of transport activity EAAT2 was shown to account for 95 % of the total glutamate uptake activity in young adult forebrain tissue (Danbolt et al. 1992; Haugeto et al. 1996). This conclusion was confirmed by deletion of the EAAT2 gene in mice (Tanaka et al. 1997; Voutsinos-Porche et al. 2003; Matsugami et al. 2006; Kiryk et al. 2008; Holmseth et al. 2012b) as well as by electrophysiological recordings of glutamate transporter currents (Otis and Kavanaugh 2000).

The discussion about EAAT2 distribution concerns expression in neurons. Having said that, there is consensus that EAAT2 is expressed in cultured neurons from hippocampus and neocortex; in particular if these are cultured in the absence of astrocytes (Mennerick et al. 1998; Wang et al. 1998; Plachez et al. 2000) in agreement with observations that EAAT2 is transiently localized on growing axons of the mouse spinal cord before establishing astrocytic expression (Yamada et al. 1998). There is also consensus that EAAT2 is present in neurons in the normal and mature mammalian retina (Rauen et al. 1996, 1999; Rauen and Kanner 1994; Euler and Wassle 1995; Rauen 2000).

The controversy is related to expression of EAAT2 in neurons in the normal and mature brain (cerebrum and cerebellum). All studies, however, agree that there is EAAT2 mRNA in CA3 hippocampal neurons (Torp et al. 1994, 1997; Berger and Hediger 2000, 2001; de Vivo et al. 2010a) and that their axon-terminals express the protein, at least in the CA1 (Chen et al. 2004; Furness et al. 2008; Melone et al. 2009, 2011). Further, all of the glutamate uptake activity in glutamatergic terminals in CA1 is due to EAAT2 (Furness et al. 2008).

The remaining controversy concerns (a) the expression of EAAT2 in axon-terminals in other parts of the brain, and (b) the physiological importance of the uptake into terminals. Why was about half of all d-aspartate taken up by hippocampus slices found in axon-terminals when terminals only contain around 10 % of the EAAT2 protein (Furness et al. 2008)? This disproportionally large uptake cannot simply be disregarded as an in vitro artifact due to a higher rate of heteroexchange than net uptake (Zhou et al. 2013), but it might still be an artifact because the possibility has not been ruled out that astrocytes release glutamate via anion channels or similar. Preliminary data from selective deletion of EAAT2 in axon-terminals indicate disturbances in synaptic transmission (Sun et al. 2012), and thereby may suggest that EAAT2 in terminals is functionally relevant. However, further studies are required before definite conclusions can be made.

In contrast to EAAT1, there is very little EAAT2 in mice and rats at birth and in the first postnatal week (Ullensvang et al. 1997; Furuta et al. 1997). This explains why EAAT2-knockout mice are inconspicuous at birth. But at 3 weeks, when the EAAT2-levels in wild-type mice have increased to 50 % of adult levels, the EAAT2-deficient mice can readily be identified because they are hyperactive, epileptic and smaller than their wild-type littermates. They have increased extracellular glutamate levels (Mitani and Tanaka 2003; Takasaki et al. 2008), and about half of them die from spontaneous seizures before they reach 4 weeks of age (Tanaka et al. 1997). The heterozygote EAAT2 knockout mice (±) have only half the EAAT2-concentrations as wild-type mice, but do not show any apparent morphological brain abnormalities (Kiryk et al. 2008), but are more vulnerable to traumatic spinal cord injury (Lepore et al. 2011).

EAAT3 (EAAC1; slc1a1) has been particular hard to localize. Nevertheless, the first studies were basically correct (Kanai and Hediger 1992; Rothstein et al. 1994). EAAT3 is a neuronal transporter, and is not expressed in glial cells (Holmseth et al. 2012b; Shashidharan et al. 1997). It appears to be expressed in the majority if not all neurons throughout the CNS, but has a unique sorting motif (Cheng et al. 2002) selectively targeting it to somata and dendrites avoiding axon terminals (Holmseth et al. 2012b; Shashidharan et al. 1997).

The highest levels of EAAT3 in the brain are found in the hippocampus and neocortex, but the total tissue content in young adult rat brains is about 100 times lower than that of EAAT2 (Holmseth et al. 2012b). It is also expressed in the kidney and in the ileum. In agreement, mice lacking EAAT3 (Peghini et al. 1997) develop dicarboxylic aminoaciduria, but do not show signs of neurodegeneration at young age and do not have epilepsy (Peghini et al. 1997; Aoyama et al. 2006; Berman et al. 2011). Humans lacking EAAT3 develop dicarboxylic aminoaciduria (Bailey et al. 2011) and EAAT3 polymorphisms are associated with obsessive–compulsive disorders (Brandl et al. 2012; Walitza et al. 2010).

EAAT4 (slc1a6) is predominantly found in the cerebellar Purkinje cells (Fairman et al. 1995; Dehnes et al. 1998) where it is targeted to the dendrites, the spines in particular (Dehnes et al. 1998), but there is also some EAAT4 in a subset of forebrain neurons (Dehnes et al. 1998; Massie et al. 2008; de Vivo et al. 2010b) and in vestibular hair cells and calyx endings (Dalet et al. 2012). EAAT4 knockout mice are viable and appear normal (Huang et al. 2004) albeit with some alteration of receptor activation (Nikkuni et al. 2007).

EAAT5 (slc1a7) is preferentially expressed in the retina, while the levels in the brain are low (Arriza et al. 1997; Eliasof et al. 1998). EAAT5 is also expressed in vestibular hair cells and calyx endings (Dalet et al. 2012). There is more than one isoform in the retina due to variable splicing (Eliasof et al. 1998). As explained above, EAAT4 and EAAT5 are not very efficient as transporters, but are efficient chloride channels suggesting that they may be more important as inhibitory glutamate receptors than as transporters. Some investigators have tried to determine the exact cellular and subcellular localization of EAAT5, but the validity of these studies is hard to judge at present because nobody has as yet made an EAAT5 knockout mouse that could serve as negative control for validation of the immunolabeling. We have previously shown how important this control is and also how inadequate the so called pre-adsorption test is (Holmseth et al. 2012a). So, validated information on EAAT5 distribution remains to be provided.

Comments on the glutamine-glutamate cycle

Glutamate taken up by astroglial cells can be metabolized via the tricarboxylic acid cycle and be used in protein synthesis or converted to glutamine. Glutamine can be released to the extracellular fluid by a sodium neutral amino transporter in the astrocytic membrane by SNAT3 (Boulland et al. 2002, 2003; Mackenzie and Erickson 2004; Nissen-Meyer et al. 2011) and SNAT5 (SN2; slc38a5) (Hamdani et al. 2012) because it is inactive in the sense that it cannot activate glutamate receptors (for review: Erecinska and Silver 1990; Danbolt 2001; Hertz 2013). The conversion of glutamate to glutamine is catalyzed by the enzyme glutamine synthetase (GLUL) in an ATP-dependent manner (Erecinska and Silver 1990; Marcaggi and Coles 2001). Glutamine synthetase plays important roles in the brain and in other organs from implantation to high age. This is evident from studies of glutamine deficiency in man and mice (He et al. 2007, 2010a, b; Haberle et al. 2011, 2012). Further, reduced glutamine synthetase levels are associated with some forms of epilepsy (Eid et al. 2004).

The prevailing view has been that glutamine from astrocytes is the predominant source of glutamate in glutamatergic terminals (Sibson et al. 2001; Hertz 2013), but this hypothesis implies that the supply of glutamine to terminals keeps up with glutamate release. And although there are many observations in cultured cells suggesting the existence of glutamine transporters in glutamatergic terminals, it is important to keep in mind that cultured astrocytes are different from mature astrocytes (e.g. Plachez et al. 2000; Cahoy et al. 2008). Further, it is important to note that glutamine transporters have so far not been positively identified in terminals in brain tissue (Mackenzie and Erickson 2004; Chaudhry et al. 2002; Conti and Melone 2006). The only positive identifications of SNAT2 (SAT2; slc38a2) and SNAT1 (SAT1; GlnT; slc38a1) are in dendrites and cell bodies of neurons (e.g. Jenstad et al. 2009; Solbu et al. 2010; Conti and Melone 2006). One possibility is that they have evaded detection in glutamatergic terminals due to methodological challenges. Another possibility is that they have not been detected simply because they are not there. This would be in line with studies suggesting that SNAT1 and SNAT2 play no role in delivering glutamine for glutamatergic transmission (Grewal et al. 2009). There could be other glutamine transporters, however. For instance, ASCT2 (slc1a5) has ability to transport glutamine (Bröer et al. 1999), but is expressed at low levels in the mature brain (Utsunomiya-Tate et al. 1996; Bröer and Brookes 2001). There are also other potential candidates within the slc38-family. On the other hand, lack of significant glutamine uptake activities in terminals would be is in line with some old reports (e.g. Hertz et al. 1980; Yu and Hertz 1982; McMahon and Nicholls 1990). Another possibility is whether glutamate may be formed in a glutamine-independent manner (Hassel and Bråthe 2000; McKenna et al. 2000), but this is also debated. A third source is direct uptake by glutamate transporters in terminals themselves (Gundersen et al. 1993). As explained above, there is EAAT2 in terminals and this uptake is highly active (Furness et al. 2008). Another complicating factor is that nerve terminals in different brain regions may differ. While terminals in several forebrain regions (e.g. neocortex, hippocampus and striatum) have been shown to posses glutamate uptake activity (e.g. Gundersen et al. 1993), this is more uncertain in the cerebellar cortex (e.g. Wilkin et al. 1982). In conclusion, the glutamine-glutamate cycle has been studied and debated for about 50 years and we still do not have the final answer!

Glutamate transporters at the blood brain barrier

The nervous system isolates itself from blood by means of barriers (e.g. Abbott 2005; Alvarez et al. 2013). This is important for a number of reasons. One of them is the fact that serum glutamate is typically in the range 50–200 μm (Zlotnik et al. 2011a, b, c) which is orders of magnitude higher than the concentrations that are toxic to neurons (Danbolt 2001).

The blood–brain barrier is between blood and the interstitial fluid of the brain. It is in mammals formed by the endothelial cells after influence from brain cells. Another barrier is in the choroid plexus epithelium which secretes cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). These barriers are important both from a physiological point of view because they are essential for brain homeostasis, and from a pharmacological point of view because they prevent drugs from entering brain tissue (Deboer and Gaillard 2007; Teichberg 2007). The literature is extensive and full of conflicting reports. A full account is beyond the scope of this review. Here we only want to point out (Fig. 1) that brain barrier endothelial cells do not express significant levels of EAAT1-3 (Lehre et al. 1995; Berger and Hediger 2000; Holmseth et al. 2009, 2012b). There are, however, huge amounts of glutamate transporters in the astrocytic endfeet surrounding the blood vessels (Fig. 1). When isolating brain microvessels, the preparations are likely to be contaminated by endfeet and this may explain some of the data. Thus, it seems that no significant transport of glutamate can occur through a normal and intact blood–brain barrier. In agreement, injection of radiolabeled glutamate and aspartate does not result in accumulation of radioactivity in the brain (Klin et al. 2010). On the other hand, there is an efflux mechanism for glutamate as blood-mediated scavenging is reported to reduce glutamate in the cerebrospinal fluid (Gottlieb et al. 2003). There is some evidence that this may offer some protection (Zlotnik et al. 2008; Teichberg et al. 2009; Zlotnik et al. 2010; Nagy et al. 2010). The mechanism, however, of release from the brain remains to be identified. This illustrates that brain water homeostasis and transport mechanisms between the blood and the extracellular fluid in brain are incompletely understood. Recent work from Nedergaard and co-workers may represent a leap in our understanding. They introduce the term “glymphatics” (Iliff et al. 2012; Nedergaard 2013) to describe flow of fluid from the arachnoid space along blood vessels into brain tissue. This may reconcile a number of apparently conflicting reports. Perhaps this also will explain why the betaine-GABA transporter (BGT1; slc6a12; Zhou et al. 2012b) and the taurine transporting GABA transporter 2 (GAT2; slc6a13; Zhou et al. 2012a) are expressed in the leptomeninges.

Concluding remarks

As outlined above, substantial progress has been made over the last decades. But there are major gaps in our understanding of key processes. One example is transport of metabolites across the blood brain barrier. Another unknown is the uptake in glutamatergic nerve endings and the relevance of the glutamate-glutamine cycle for transmitter glutamate. A third topic is why the body needs several different glutamate transporters, and how they can be pharmacologically modulated.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Gunnar Lothe for help with Fig. 1. This work was supported by stimulation funds from the University of Oslo, by the Norwegian Research Council (FUGE II-183727-S10) and by private funds.

References

  1. Abbott NJ (2005) Dynamics of CNS barriers: evolution, differentiation, and modulation. Cell Mol Neurobiol 25:5–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aihara Y, Mashima H, Onda H, Hisano S, Kasuya H, Hori T, Yamada S, Tomura H, Yamada Y, Inoue I, Kojima I, Takeda J (2000) Molecular cloning of a novel brain-type Na+-dependent inorganic phosphate cotransporter. J Neurochem 74:2622–2625PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Akbar MT, Torp R, Danbolt NC, Levy LM, Meldrum BS, Ottersen OP (1997) Expression of glial glutamate transporters GLT-1 and GLAST is unchanged in the hippocampus in fully kindled rats. Neuroscience 78:351–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvarez JI, Katayama T, Prat A (2013) Glial influence on the blood brain barrier. Glia 61:1939–1958. doi: 10.1002/glia.22575 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Amiry-Moghaddam M, Ottersen OP (2013) Immunogold cytochemistry in neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 16:798–804. doi: 10.1038/nn.3418 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Aoyama K, Suh SW, Hamby AM, Liu J, Chan WY, Chen Y, Swanson RA (2006) Neuronal glutathione deficiency and age-dependent neurodegeneration in the EAAC1 deficient mouse. Nat Neurosci 9:119–126. doi: 10.1038/nn1609 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Arriza JL, Kavanaugh MP, Fairman WA, Wu YN, Murdoch GH, North RA, Amara SG (1993) Cloning and expression of a human neutral amino acid transporter with structural similarity to the glutamate transporter gene family. J Biol Chem 268:15329–15332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Arriza JL, Fairman WA, Wadiche JI, Murdoch GH, Kavanaugh MP, Amara SG (1994) Functional comparisons of three glutamate transporter subtypes cloned from human motor cortex. J Neurosci 14:5559–5569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Arriza JL, Eliasof S, Kavanaugh MP, Amara SG (1997) Excitatory amino acid transporter 5, a retinal glutamate transporter coupled to a chloride conductance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:4155–4160PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bailey CG, Ryan RM, Thoeng AD, Ng C, King K, Vanslambrouck JM, Auray-Blais C, Vandenberg RJ, Bröer S, Rasko JE, Weinstein N, Hodgins HS, Ryan RM (2011) Loss-of-function mutations in the glutamate transporter SLC1A1 cause human dicarboxylic aminoaciduria. J Clin Invest 121:446–453. doi: 10.1172/JCI44474 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Baker DA, Xi ZX, Shen H, Swanson CJ, Kalivas PW (2002) The origin and neuronal function of in vivo nonsynaptic glutamate. J Neurosci 22:9134–9141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Balcar VJ, Johnston GA (1972) The structural specificity of the high affinity uptake of l-glutamate and l-aspartate by rat brain slices. J Neurochem 19:2657–2666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Balcar VJ, Johnston GA (1975) High affinity uptake of l-glutamine in rat brain slices. J Neurochem 24:875–879PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Balcar VJ, Li Y (1992) Heterogeneity of high affinity uptake of l-glutamate and l-aspartate in the mammalian central nervous system. Life Sci 51:1467–1478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bannai S (1986) Exchange of cystine and glutamate across plasma membrane of human fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 261:2256–2263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Barbour B, Szatkowski M, Ingledew N, Attwell D (1989) Arachidonic acid induces a prolonged inhibition of glutamate uptake into glial cells. Nature 342:918–920. doi: 10.1038/342918a0 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Beart PM (1976) The autoradiographic localization of l-[3H] glutamate in synaptosomal preparations. Brain Res 103:350–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Beckstrøm H, Julsrud L, Haugeto Ø, Dewar D, Graham DI, Lehre KP, Storm-Mathisen J, Danbolt NC (1999) Interindividual differences in the levels of the glutamate transporters GLAST and GLT, but no clear correlation with Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci Res 55:218–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bellocchio EE, Hu H, Pohorille A, Chan J, Pickel VM, Edwards RH (1998) The localization of the brain-specific inorganic phosphate transporter suggests a specific presynaptic role in glutamatergic transmission. J Neurosci 18:8648–8659PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bellocchio EE, Reimer RJ, Fremeau RT Jr, Edwards RH (2000) Uptake of glutamate into synaptic vesicles by an inorganic phosphate transporter. Science 289:957–960PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Berger UV, Hediger MA (1998) Comparative analysis of glutamate transporter expression in rat brain using differential double in situ hybridization. Anat Embryol (Berl) 198:13–30Google Scholar
  22. Berger UV, Hediger MA (2000) Distribution of the glutamate transporters GLAST and GLT-1 in rat circumventricular organs, meninges and dorsal root ganglia. J Comp Neurol 421:385–399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Berger UV, Hediger MA (2001) Differential distribution of the glutamate transporters GLT-1 and GLAST in tanycytes of the third ventricle. J Comp Neurol 433:101–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Berger UV, Desilva TM, Chen WZ, Rosenberg PA (2005) Cellular and subcellular mRNA localization of glutamate transporter isoforms GLT1a and GLT1b in rat brain by in situ hybridization. J Comp Neurol 492:78–89. doi: 10.1002/cne.20737 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bergles DE, Jahr CE (1997) Synaptic activation of glutamate transporters in hippocampal astrocytes. Neuron 19:1297–1308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bergles DE, Diamond JS, Jahr CE (1999) Clearance of glutamate inside the synapse and beyond. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:293–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bergles DE, Roberts JD, Somogyi P, Jahr CE (2000) Glutamatergic synapses on oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the hippocampus. Nature 405:187–191. doi: 10.1038/35012083 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Bergles DE, Tzingounis AV, Jahr CE (2002) Comparison of coupled and uncoupled currents during glutamate uptake by GLT-1 transporters. J Neurosci 22:10153–10162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Berl S, Lajtha A, Waelsch H (1961) Amino acid and protein metabolism. VI. Cerebral compartments of glutamic acid metabolism. J Neurochem 7:186–197Google Scholar
  30. Berl S, Takagaki G, Clarke DD, Waelsch H (1962) Metabolic compartments in vivo: ammonia and glutamic acid metabolism in brain and liver. J Biol Chem 237:2562–2569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Berman AE, Chan WY, Brennan AM, Reyes RC, Adler BL, Suh SW, Kauppinen TM, Edling Y, Swanson RA (2011) N-acetylcysteine prevents loss of dopaminergic neurons in the EAAC1(−/−) mouse. Ann Neurol 69:509–520. doi: 10.1002/ana.22162 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Berry JD, Shefner JM, Conwit R, Schoenfeld D, Keroack M, Felsenstein D, Krivickas L, David WS, Vriesendorp F, Pestronk A et al (2013) Design and initial results of a multi-phase randomized trial of ceftriaxone in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS One 8:e61177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061177 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bezzi P, Gundersen V, Galbete JL, Seifert G, Steinhauser C, Pilati E, Volterra A (2004) Astrocytes contain a vesicular compartment that is competent for regulated exocytosis of glutamate. Nat Neurosci 7:613–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bjørås M, Gjesdal O, Erickson JD, Torp R, Levy LM, Ottersen OP, Degree M, Storm-Mathisen J, Seeberg E, Danbolt NC (1996) Cloning and expression of a neuronal rat brain glutamate transporter. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 36:163–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bjørnsen LP, Eid T, Holmseth S, Danbolt NC, Spencer DD, de Lanerolle NC (2007) Changes in glial glutamate transporters in human epileptogenic hippocampus: inadequate explanation for high extracellular glutamate during seizures. Neurobiol Dis 25:319–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Bonaccorso C, Micale N, Ettari R, Grasso S, Zappala M (2011) Glutamate binding-site ligands of NMDA receptors. Curr Med Chem 18:5483–5506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Boulland JL, Osen KK, Levy LM, Danbolt NC, Edwards RH, Storm-Mathisen J, Chaudhry FA (2002) Cell-specific expression of the glutamine transporter SN1 suggests differences in dependence on the glutamine cycle. Eur J Neurosci 15:1615–1631PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Boulland JL, Rafiki A, Levy LM, Storm-Mathisen J, Chaudhry FA (2003) Highly differential expression of SN1, a bidirectional glutamine transporter, in astroglia and endothelium in the developing rat brain. Glia 41:260–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Brandl EJ, Muller DJ, Richter MA (2012) Pharmacogenetics of obsessive-compulsive disorders. Pharmacogenomics 13:71–81. doi: 10.2217/pgs.11.133 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Bräuner-Osborne H, Nielsen B, Stensbol TB, Johansen TN, Skjaerbaek N, Krogsgaard-Larsen P (1997) Molecular pharmacology of 4-substituted glutamic acid analogues at ionotropic and metabotropic excitatory amino acid receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 335:R1–R3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Bridges RJ, Esslinger CS (2005) The excitatory amino acid transporters: pharmacological insights on substrate and inhibitor specificity of the EAAT subtypes. Pharmacol Ther 107:271–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bridges RJ, Stanley MS, Anderson MW, Cotman CW, Chamberlin AR (1991) Conformationally defined neurotransmitter analogues. Selective inhibition of glutamate uptake by one pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylate diastereomer. J Med Chem 34:717–725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Bridges RJ, Kavanaugh MP, Chamberlin AR (1999) A pharmacological review of competitive inhibitors and substrates of high-affinity, sodium-dependent glutamate transport in the central nervous system. Curr Pharm Des 5:363–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Bridges R, Lutgen V, Lobner D, Baker DA (2012a) Thinking outside the cleft to understand synaptic activity: contribution of the cystine-glutamate antiporter (System xc-) to normal and pathological glutamatergic signaling. Pharmacol Rev 64:780–802. doi: 10.1124/pr.110.003889 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bridges RJ, Natale NR, Patel SA (2012b) System xc cystine/glutamate antiporter: an update on molecular pharmacology and roles within the CNS. Br J Pharmacol 165:20–34PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Bröer S (2008) Amino acid transport across mammalian intestinal and renal epithelia. Physiol Rev 88:249–286. doi: 10.1152/physrev.0 0018.2006PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Bröer S, Brookes N (2001) Transfer of glutamine between astrocytes and neurons. J Neurochem 77:705–719PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Bröer S, Palacin M (2011) The role of amino acid transporters in inherited and acquired diseases. Biochem J 436:193–211. doi: 10.1042/BJ20101912 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Bröer A, Brookes N, Ganapathy V, Dimmer KS, Wagner CA, Lang F, Bröer S (1999) The astroglial ASCT2 amino acid transporter as a mediator of glutamine efflux. J Neurochem 73:2184–2194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Broman J, Hassel B, Rinvik E, Ottersen OP (2000) Biochemistry and anatomy of transmitter glutamate. In: Handbook of chemical neuroanatomy, vol 18. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–44Google Scholar
  51. Cahoy JD, Emery B, Kaushal A, Foo LC, Zamanian JL, Christopherson KS, Xing Y, Lubischer JL, Krieg PA, Krupenko SA, Thompson WJ, Barres BA (2008) A transcriptome database for astrocytes, neurons, and oligodendrocytes: a new resource for understanding brain development and function. J Neurosci 28:264–278. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4178-07.2008 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Casado M, Bendahan A, Zafra F, Danbolt NC, Aragón C, Giménez C, Kanner BI (1993) Phosphorylation and modulation of brain glutamate transporters by protein kinase C. J Biol Chem 268:27313–27317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Chaudhry FA, Lehre KP, Campagne MV, Ottersen OP, Danbolt NC, Storm-Mathisen J (1995) Glutamate transporters in glial plasma membranes: highly differentiated localizations revealed by quantitative ultrastructural immunocytochemistry. Neuron 15:711–720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Chaudhry FA, Reimer RJ, Edwards RH (2002) The glutamine commute: take the N line and transfer to the A. J Cell Biol 157:349–355PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Chen W, Mahadomrongkul V, Berger UV, Bassan M, DeSilva T, Tanaka K, Irwin N, Aoki C, Rosenberg PA (2004) The glutamate transporter GLT1a is expressed in excitatory axon terminals of mature hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 24:1136–1148. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1586-03.2004 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Cheng C, Glover G, Banker G, Amara SG (2002) A novel sorting motif in the glutamate transporter excitatory amino acid transporter 3 directs its targeting in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells and hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 22:10643–10652PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Colton CK, Kong Q, Lai L, Zhu MX, Seyb KI, Cuny GD, Xian J, Glicksman MA, Lin C-LG (2010) Identification of translational activators of glial glutamate transporter EAAT2 through cell-based high-throughput screening: an approach to prevent excitotoxicity. J Biomol Screen 15:653–662PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Conrad M, Sato H (2012) The oxidative stress-inducible cystine/glutamate antiporter, system xc−: cystine supplier and beyond. Amino Acids 42:231–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Conti F, Melone M (2006) The glutamine commute: lost in the tube? Neurochem Int 48:459–464. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2005.11.016 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Conti F, Barbaresi P, Melone M, Ducati A (1999) Neuronal and glial localization of NR1 and NR2a/b subunits of the NMDA receptor in the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 9:110–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Curtis DR, Phillis JW, Watkins JC (1959) Chemical excitation of spinal neurons. Nature 183:611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Curtis DR, Phillis JW, Watkins JC (1960) The chemical excitation of spinal neurons by certain acidic amino acids. J Physiol 150:656–682PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Dalet A, Bonsacquet J, Gaboyard-Niay S, Calin-Jageman I, Chidavaenzi RL, Venteo S, Desmadryl G, Goldberg JM, Lysakowski A, Chabbert C (2012) Glutamate transporters EAAT4 and EAAT5 are expressed in vestibular hair cells and calyx endings. PLoS One 7:e46261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046261 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Danbolt NC (1994) The high affinity uptake system for excitatory amino acids in the brain. Prog Neurobiol 44:377–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Danbolt NC (2001) Glutamate uptake. Prog Neurobiol 65:1–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Danbolt NC, Storm-Mathisen J (1986a) Na+-dependent “binding” of D-aspartate in brain membranes is largely due to uptake into membrane-bounded saccules. J Neurochem 47:819–824PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Danbolt NC, Storm-Mathisen J (1986b) Inhibition by K+ of Na+-dependent D-aspartate uptake into brain membrane saccules. J Neurochem 47:825–830PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Danbolt NC, Pines G, Kanner BI (1990) Purification and reconstitution of the sodium- and potassium-coupled glutamate transport glycoprotein from rat brain. Biochemistry 29:6734–6740PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Danbolt NC, Storm-Mathisen J, Kanner BI (1992) An [Na+ + K+]coupled l-glutamate transporter purified from rat brain is located in glial cell processes. Neuroscience 51:295–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Danbolt C, Hansen TWR, Øyasaeter S, Storm-Mathisen J, Bratlid D (1993) In vitro binding of [3H]bilirubin to neurons in rat brain sections. Biol Neonate 63:35–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Danbolt NC, Lehre KP, Dehnes Y, Chaudhry FA, Levy LM (1998) Localization of transporters using transporter-specific antibodies. Methods Enzymol 296:388–407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Davies LP, Johnston GA (1976) Uptake and release of d- and l-aspartate by rat brain slices. J Neurochem 26:1007–1014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. De Bundel D, Schallier A, Loyens E, Fernando R, Miyashita H, Van Liefferinge J, Vermoesen K, Bannai S, Sato H, Michotte Y, Smolders I, Massie A (2011) Loss of system x(c) formula does not induce oxidative stress but decreases extracellular glutamate in hippocampus and influences spatial working memory and limbic seizure susceptibility. J Neurosci 31:5792–5803PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. de Vivo L, Melone M, Bucci G, Rothstein JD, Conti F (2010a) Quantitative analysis of EAAT4 promoter activity in neurons and astrocytes of mouse somatic sensory cortex. Neurosci Lett 474:42–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.03.003 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. de Vivo L, Melone M, Rothstein JD, Conti F (2010b) GLT-1 Promoter Activity in Astrocytes and Neurons of Mouse Hippocampus and Somatic Sensory Cortex. Front Neuroanat 3:31. doi: 10.3389/neuro.05.031.2009 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. de Vries B, Mamsa H, Stam AH, Wan J, Bakker SL, Vanmolkot KR, Haan J, Terwindt GM, Boon EM, Howard BD, Frants RR, Baloh RW, Ferrari MD, Jen JC, van den Maagdenberg AM (2009) Episodic ataxia associated with EAAT1 mutation C186S affecting glutamate reuptake. Arch Neurol 66:97–101. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2008.535 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Deboer AG, Gaillard PJ (2007) Drug targeting to the brain. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 47:323–355Google Scholar
  78. Dehnes Y, Chaudhry FA, Ullensvang K, Lehre KP, Storm-Mathisen J, Danbolt NC (1998) The glutamate transporter EAAT4 in rat cerebellar Purkinje cells: a glutamate- gated chloride channel concentrated near the synapse in parts of the dendritic membrane facing astroglia. J Neurosci 18:3606–3619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. del Arco A, Satrustegui J (1998) Molecular cloning of Aralar, a new member of the mitochondrial carrier superfamily that binds calcium and is present in human muscle and brain. J Biol Chem 273:23327–23334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Dringen R (2000) Metabolism and functions of glutathione in brain. Prog Neurobiol 62:649–671PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Eid T, Thomas MJ, Spencer DD, Rundenpran E, Lai JCK, Malthankar GV, Kim JH, Danbolt NC, Ottersen OP, Delanerolle NC (2004) Loss of glutamine synthetase in the human epileptogenic hippocampus: possible mechanism for raised extracellular glutamate in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Lancet 363:28–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. El Mestikawy S, Wallen-Mackenzie A, Fortin GM, Descarries L, Trudeau L-E (2011) From glutamate co-release to vesicular synergy: vesicular glutamate transporters. Nat Rev Neurosci 12:204–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Eliasof S, Arriza JL, Leighton BH, Amara SG, Kavanaugh MP (1998) Localization and function of five glutamate transporters cloned from the salamander retina. Vis Res 38:1443–1454PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Erecinska M, Silver IA (1990) Metabolism and role of glutamate in mammalian brain. Prog Neurobiol 35:245–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Euler T, Wassle H (1995) Immunocytochemical identification of cone bipolar cells in the rat retina. J Comp Neurol 361:461–478. doi: 10.1002/cne.903610310 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Fairman WA, Vandenberg RJ, Arriza JL, Kavanaugh MP, Amara SG (1995) An excitatory amino-acid transporter with properties of a ligand-gated chloride channel. Nature 375:599–603. doi: 10.1038/375599a0 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Fairman WA, Sonders MS, Murdoch GH, Amara SG (1998) Arachidonic acid elicits a substrate-gated proton current associated with the glutamate transporter EAAT4. Nat Neurosci 1:105–113. doi: 10.1038/355 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Ferkany J, Coyle JT (1986) Heterogeneity of sodium-dependent excitatory amino acid uptake mechanisms in rat brain. J Neurosci Res 16:491–503. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490160305 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Fiermonte G, Palmieri L, Todisco S, Agrimi G, Palmieri F, Walker JE (2002) Identification of the mitochondrial glutamate transporter: bacterial expression, reconstitution, functional characterization, and tissue distribution of two human isoforms. J Biol Chem 277:19289–19294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Fletcher EJ, Johnston GA (1991) Regional heterogeneity of l-glutamate and l-aspartate high-affinity uptake systems in the rat CNS. J Neurochem 57:911–914PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Fonnum F (1984) Glutamate: a neurotransmitter in mammalian brain. J Neurochem 42:1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Fontana AC, Beleboni RO, Wojewodzic MW, Dos SWF, Coutinho-Netto J, Grutle NJ, Watts SD, Danbolt NC, Amara SG (2007) Enhancing glutamate transport: mechanism of action of Parawixin1, a neuroprotective compound from Parawixia bistriata spider venom. Mol Pharmacol 72:1228–1237. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.037127 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Forsythe ID, Barnes-Davies M (1997) Synaptic transmission: well-placed modulators. Curr Biol 7:R362–R365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Furness DN, Lehre KP (1997) Immunocytochemical localization of a high-affinity glutamate-aspartate transporter, GLAST, in the rat and guinea-pig cochlea. Eur J Neurosci 9:1961–1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Furness DN, Dehnes Y, Akhtar AQ, Rossi DJ, Hamann M, Grutle NJ, Gundersen V, Holmseth S, Lehre KP, Ullensvang K, Wojewodzic M, Zhou Y, Attwell D, Danbolt NC (2008) A quantitative assessment of glutamate uptake into hippocampal synaptic terminals and astrocytes: new insights into a neuronal role for excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2). Neuroscience 157:80–94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.043 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Furuta A, Rothstein JD, Martin LJ (1997) Glutamate transporter protein subtypes are expressed differentially during rat CNS development. J Neurosci 17:8363–8375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Gameiro A, Braams S, Rauen T, Grewer C (2011) The discovery of slowness: low-capacity transport and slow anion channel gating by the glutamate transporter EAAT5. Biophys J 100:2623–2632. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.04.034 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Gegelashvili G, Civenni G, Racagni G, Danbolt NC, Schousboe I, Schousboe A (1996) Glutamate receptor agonists up-regulate glutamate transporter GLAST in astrocytes. Neuroreport 8:261–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Gegelashvili G, Danbolt NC, Schousboe A (1997) Neuronal soluble factors differentially regulate the expression of the GLT1 and GLAST glutamate transporters in cultured astroglia. J Neurochem 69:2612–2615PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Gegelashvili G, Dehnes Y, Danbolt NC, Schousboe A (2000) The high-affinity glutamate transporters GLT1, GLAST and EAAT4 are regulated via different signalling mechanisms. Neurochem Int 37:163–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Gegelashvili G, Robinson MB, Trotti D, Rauen T (2001) Regulation of glutamate transporters in health and disease. Prog Brain Res 132:267–286. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(01)32082-4 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Ginsberg SD, Martin LJ, Rothstein JD (1995) Regional deafferentation down-regulates subtypes of glutamate transporter proteins. J Neurochem 65:2800–2803PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Gonda X (2012) Basic pharmacology of NMDA receptors. Curr Pharm Des 18:1558–1567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Gonzales AL, Lee W, Spencer SR, Oropeza RA, Chapman JV, Ku JY, Eskandari S (2007) Turnover rate of the gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter GAT1. J Membr Biol 220:33–51PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Gonzalez MI, Robinson MB (2004) Neurotransmitter transporters: why dance with so many partners? Curr Opin Pharmacol 4:30–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Gottlieb M, Wang Y, Teichberg VI (2003) Blood-mediated scavenging of cerebrospinal fluid glutamate. J Neurochem 87:119–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Gouaux E (2009) Review. The molecular logic of sodium-coupled neurotransmitter transporters. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:149–154. doi: 10.1098/rstb 2008.0181PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Gregory KJ, Noetzel MJ, Niswender CM (2013) Pharmacology of metabotropic glutamate receptor allosteric modulators: structural basis and therapeutic potential for CNS disorders. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 115:61–121. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394587-7.00002-6 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Grewal S, Defamie N, Zhang X, De Gois S, Shawki A, Mackenzie B, Chen C, Varoqui H, Erickson JD (2009) SNAT2 amino acid transporter is regulated by amino acids of the SLC6 gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter subfamily in neocortical neurons and may play no role in delivering glutamine for glutamatergic transmission. J Biol Chem 284:11224–11236PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Grewer C, Rauen T (2005) Electrogenic glutamate transporters in the CNS: molecular mechanism, pre-steady-state kinetics, and their impact on synaptic signaling. J Membr Biol 203:1–20. doi: 10.1007/s00232-004-0731-6 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Gundersen V, Danbolt NC, Ottersen OP, Storm-Mathisen J (1993) Demonstration of glutamate/aspartate uptake activity in nerve endings by use of antibodies recognizing exogenous D-aspartate. Neuroscience 57:97–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Haberle J, Shahbeck N, Ibrahim K, Hoffmann GF, Ben-Omran T (2011) Natural course of glutamine synthetase deficiency in a 3 year old patient. Mol Genet Metab 103:89–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Haberle J, Shahbeck N, Ibrahim K, Schmitt B, Scheer I, O’Gorman R, Chaudhry FA, Ben-Omran T (2012) Glutamine supplementation in a child with inherited GS deficiency improves the clinical status and partially corrects the peripheral and central amino acid imbalance. Orphanet J Rare Dis 7:48. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-48 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Hakuba N, Koga K, Gyo K, Usami SI, Tanaka K (2000) Exacerbation of noise-induced hearing loss in mice lacking the glutamate transporter GLAST. J Neurosci 20:8750–8753PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Hamdani EH, Gudbrandsen M, Bjorkmo M, Chaudhry FA (2012) The system N transporter SN2 doubles as a transmitter precursor furnisher and a potential regulator of NMDA receptors. Glia 60:1671–1683Google Scholar
  116. Hamilton NB, Attwell D (2010) Do astrocytes really exocytose neurotransmitters? Nat Rev Neurosci 11:227–238. doi: 10.1038/nrn2803 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Harada T, Harada C, Watanabe M, Inoue Y, Sakagawa T, Nakayama N, Sasaki S, Okuyama S, Watase K, Wada K, Tanaka K (1998) Functions of the two glutamate transporters GLAST and GLT-1 in the retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:4663–4666PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Hassel B, Bråthe A (2000) Neuronal pyruvate carboxylation supports formation of transmitter glutamate. J Neurosci 20:1342–1347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Haugeto Ø, Ullensvang K, Levy LM, Chaudhry FA, Honoré T, Nielsen M, Lehre KP, Danbolt NC (1996) Brain glutamate transporter proteins form homomultimers. J Biol Chem 271:27715–27722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Hayashi T (1954) Effects of sodium glutamate on the nervous system. Keio J Med 3:183–192Google Scholar
  121. He Y, Hakvoort TB, Vermeulen JL, Lamers WH, Van Roon MA (2007) Glutamine synthetase is essential in early mouse embryogenesis. Dev Dyn 236:1865–1875PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. He Y, Hakvoort TB, Kohler SE, Vermeulen JL, de Waart DR, de Theije C, ten Have GA, van Eijk HM, Kunne C, Labruyere WT, Houten SM, Sokolovic M, Ruijter JM, Deutz NE, Lamers WH (2010a) Glutamine synthetase in muscle is required for glutamine production during fasting and extrahepatic ammonia detoxification. J Biol Chem 285:9516–9524PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. He Y, Hakvoort TB, Vermeulen JL, Labruyere WT, De Waart DR, Van Der Hel WS, Ruijter JM, Uylings HB, Lamers WH (2010b) Glutamine synthetase deficiency in murine astrocytes results in neonatal death. Glia 58:741–754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Hediger MA (1999) Glutamate transporters in kidney and brain. Am J Physiol 277:F487–F492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Hediger MA, Clemencon B, Burrier RE, Bruford EA (2013) The ABCs of membrane transporters in health and disease (SLC series): introduction. Mol Aspects Med 34:95–107. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.009 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Herman MA, Jahr CE (2007) Extracellular glutamate concentration in hippocampal slice. J Neurosci 27:9736–9741. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3009-07.2007 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Hertz L (2013) The glutamate-glutamine (GABA) cycle: importance of late postnatal development and potential reciprocal interactions between biosynthesis and degradation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 4:59. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00059 Google Scholar
  128. Hertz L, Yu A, Svenneby G, Kvamme E, Fosmark H, Schousboe A (1980) Absence of preferential glutamine uptake into neurons–an indication of a net transfer of TCA constituents from nerve endings to astrocytes? Neurosci Lett 16:103–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Hofmann K, Duker M, Fink T, Lichter P, Stoffel W (1994) Human neutral amino acid transporter ASCT1: structure of the gene (SLC1a4) and localization to chromosome 2p13–p15. Genomics 24:20–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Holmseth S, Dehnes Y, Bjørnsen LP, Boulland JL, Furness DN, Bergles D, Danbolt NC (2005) Specificity of antibodies: unexpected cross reactivity of antibodies directed against the EAAT3 (EAAC) glutamate transporter. Neuroscience 136:649–660. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.022 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Holmseth S, Lehre KP, Danbolt NC (2006) Specificity controls for immunocytochemistry. Anat Embryol (Berl) 211:257–266. doi: 10.1007/s00429-005-0077-6 Google Scholar
  132. Holmseth S, Scott HA, Real K, Lehre KP, Leergaard TB, Bjaalie JG, Danbolt NC (2009) The concentrations and distributions of three C-terminal variants of the GLT1 (EAAT2; slc1a2) glutamate transporter protein in rat brain tissue suggest differential regulation. Neuroscience 162:1055–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.048 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Holmseth S, Dehnes Y, Huang YH, Follin-Arbelet VV, Grutle NJ, Mylonakou MN, Plachez C, Zhou Y, Furness DN, Bergles DE, Lehre KP, Danbolt NC (2012a) The density of EAAC1 (EAAT3) glutamate transporters expressed by neurons in the mammalian CNS. J Neurosci 32:6000–6013. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5347-11.2012 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Holmseth S, Zhou Y, Follin-Arbelet VV, Lehre KP, Bergles DE, Danbolt NC (2012b) Specificity controls for immunocytochemistry: the antigen pre-adsorption test can lead to inaccurate assessment of antibody specificity. J Histochem Cytochem 60:174–187. doi: 10.1369/0022155411434828 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Huang YH, Dykeshoberg M, Tanaka K, Rothstein JD, Bergles DE (2004) Climbing fiber activation of EAAT4 transporters and kainate receptors in cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Neurosci 24:103–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, Plogg BA, Peng W, Gundersen GA, Benveniste H, Vates GE, Deane R, Goldman SA, Nagelhus EA, Nedergaard M (2012) A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid beta. Sci Transl Med 4:147ra111. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Jabaudon D, Shimamoto K, Yasuda-Kamatani Y, Scanziani M, Gähwiler BH, Gerber U (1999) Inhibition of uptake unmasks rapid extracellular turnover of glutamate of nonvesicular origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:8733–8738PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Jabaudon D, Scanziani M, Ghwiler BH, Gerber U (2000) Acute decrease in net glutamate uptake during energy deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5610–5615PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Jen JC, Wan J, Palos TP, Howard BD, Baloh RW (2005) Mutation in the glutamate transporter EAAT1 causes episodic ataxia, hemiplegia, and seizures. Neurology 65:529–534. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000172638.58172.5a PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Jensen AA, Bräuner-Osborne H (2004) Pharmacological characterization of human excitatory amino acid transporters EAAT1, EAAT2 and EAAT3 in a fluorescence- based membrane potential assay. Biochem Pharmacol 67:2115–2127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Jensen JB, Pickering DS, Schousboe A (2000) Depolarization-induced release of [3H]D-aspartate from GABAergic neurons caused by reversal of glutamate transporters. Int J Dev Neurosci 18:309–315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Jenstad M, Quazi AZ, Zilberter M, Haglerod C, Berghuis P, Saddique N, Goiny M, Buntup D, Davanger S, SHaug F-M, Barnes CA, McNaughton BL, Ottersen OP, Storm-Mathisen J, Harkany T, Chaudhry FA (2009) System A transporter SAT2 mediates replenishment of dendritic glutamate pools controlling retrograde signaling by glutamate. Cereb Cortex 19:1092–1106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Kanai Y, Hediger MA (1992) Primary structure and functional characterization of a high-affinity glutamate transporter. Nature 360:467–471. doi: 10.1038/360467a0 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Kanai Y, Smith CP, Hediger MA (1993) The elusive transporters with a high affinity for glutamate. Trends Neurosci 16:365–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Kanner BI (2007) Gate movements in glutamate transporters. ACS Chem Biol 2:163–166. doi: 10.1021/cb700040e PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Kanner BI (2013) Substrate-induced rearrangements in glutamate-transporter homologs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:1142–1144. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2685 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Karakossian MH, Spencer SR, Gomez AQ, Padilla OR, Sacher A, Loo DD, Nelson N, Eskandari S (2005) Novel properties of a mouse gamma- aminobutyric acid transporter (GAT4). J Membr Biol 203:65–82PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Karlsson R-M, Tanaka K, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ, Heilig M, Holmes A (2009) Assessment of glutamate transporter GLAST (EAAT1)-deficient mice for phenotypes relevant to the negative and executive/cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:1578–1589. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.215 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Karlsson R-M, Adermark L, Molander A, Perreau-Lenz S, Singley E, Solomon M, Holmes A, Tanaka K, Lovinger DM, Spanagel R, Heilig M (2012) Reduced alcohol intake and reward associated with impaired endocannabinoid signaling in mice with a deletion of the glutamate transporter GLAST. Neuropharmacology 63:181–189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.01.027 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Kimelberg HK, Mongin AA (1998) Swelling-activated release of excitatory amino acids in the brain: relevance for pathophysiology. In: Lang F (ed) Contrib Nephrol. Karger, CH-4009 Basel, Switzerland, pp 240–257Google Scholar
  151. Kimelberg HK, Goderie SK, Higman S, Pang S, Waniewski RA (1990) Swelling-induced release of glutamate, aspartate, and taurine from astrocyte cultures. J Neurosci 10:1583–1591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Kiryk A, Aida T, Tanaka K, Banerjee P, Wilczynski GM, Meyza K, Knapska E, Filipkowski RK, Kaczmarek L, Danysz W (2008) Behavioral characterization of GLT1 (±) mice as a model of mild glutamatergic hyperfunction. Neurotox Res 13:19–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Klin Y, Zlotnik A, Boyko M, Ohayon S, Shapira Y, Teichberg VI (2010) Distribution of radiolabeled l-glutamate and d-aspartate from blood into peripheral tissues in naive rats: significance for brain neuroprotection. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 399:694–698. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.144 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Klöckner U, Storck T, Conradt M, Stoffel W (1993) Electrogenic l-glutamate uptake in Xenopus laevisoocytes expressing a cloned rat brain l-glutamate/l-aspartate transporter (GLAST-1). J Biol Chem 268:14594–14596PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Kobayashi K, Sinasac DS, Iijima M, Boright AP, Begum L, Lee JR, Yasuda T, Ikeda S, Hirano R, Terazono H, Crackower MA, Kondo I, Tsui LC, Scherer SW, Saheki T (1999) The gene mutated in adult-onset type II citrullinaemia encodes a putative mitochondrial carrier protein. Nat Genet 22:159–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Krebs HA (1935) Metabolism of amino acids. IV. Synthesis of glutamine from glutamic acid and ammonia, and the enzymatic hydrolysis of glutamine in animal tissue. Biochem J 29:1951–1969PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Kugler P, Schmitt A (2003) Complementary neuronal and glial expression of two high-affinity glutamate transporter GLT1/EAAT2 forms in rat cerebral cortex. Histochem Cell Biol 119:425–435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Kullmann DM (1999) Synaptic and extrasynaptic roles of glutamate in the mammalian hippocampus. Acta Physiol Scand 166:79–83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201x.1999.00546.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Lauriat TL, Mcinnes LA (2007) EAAT2 regulation and splicing: relevance to psychiatric and neurological disorders. Mol Psychiatry 12:1065–1078. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002065 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Leary GP, Holley DC, Stone EF, Lyda BR, Kalachev LV, Kavanaugh MP (2011) The central cavity in trimeric glutamate transporters restricts ligand diffusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:14980–14985PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Lehre KP, Danbolt NC (1998) The number of glutamate transporter subtype molecules at glutamatergic synapses: chemical and stereological quantification in young adult rat brain. J Neurosci 18:8751–8757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Lehre KP, Levy LM, Ottersen OP, Storm-Mathisen J, Danbolt NC (1995) Differential expression of two glial glutamate transporters in the rat brain: quantitative and immunocytochemical observations. J Neurosci 15:1835–1853PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Lehre KP, Davanger S, Danbolt NC (1997) Localization of the glutamate transporter protein GLAST in rat retina. Brain Res 744:129–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Lehre AC, Rowley NM, Zhou Y, Holmseth S, Guo C, Holen T, Hua R, Laake P, Olofsson AM, Poblete-Naredo I, Rusakov DA, Madsen KK, Clausen RP, Schousboe A, White HS, Danbolt NC (2011) Deletion of the betaine-GABA transporter (BGT1; slc6a12) gene does not affect seizure thresholds of adult mice. Epilepsy Res 95:70–81. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.02.014 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Lepore A, O’donnell J, Kim A, Yang E, Tuteja A, Haidet-Phillips A, O’Banion C, Maragakis N (2011) Reduction in expression of the astrocyte glutamate transporter, GLT1, worsens functional and histological outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury. Glia 59:1996–2005. doi: 10.1002/glia.21241 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Lerma J, Marques JM (2013) Kainate receptors in health and disease. Neuron 80:292–311. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.045 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Levi G, Raiteri M (1993) Carrier-mediated release of neurotransmitters. Trends Neurosci 16:415–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Levy LM, Lehre KP, Rolstad B, Danbolt NC (1993) A monoclonal antibody raised against an [Na+ − K+]coupled l-glutamate transporter purified from rat brain confirms glial cell localization. FEBS Lett 317:79–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Levy LM, Lehre KP, Walaas SI, Storm-Mathisen J, Danbolt NC (1995) Down-regulation of glial glutamate transporters after glutamatergic denervation in the rat brain. Eur J Neurosci 7:2036–2041PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Levy LM, Warr O, Attwell D (1998) Stoichiometry of the glial glutamate transporter GLT-1 expressed inducibly in a Chinese hamster ovary cell line selected for low endogenous Na+-dependent glutamate uptake. J Neurosci 18:9620–9628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Lewerenz J, Hewett SJ, Huang Y, Lambros M, Gout PW, Kalivas PW, Massie A, Smolders I, Methner A, Pergande M, Smith SB, Ganapathy V, Maher P (2013) The cystine/glutamate antiporter system x(c)(-) in health and disease: from molecular mechanisms to novel therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signal 18:522–555. doi: 10.1089/ars 2011.4391PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. Li Y, Zhou Y, Danbolt NC (2012) The rates of postmortem proteolysis of glutamate transporters differ dramatically between cells and between transporter subtypes. J Histochem Cytochem 60:811–821. doi: 10.1369/0022155412458589 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. Li D, Herault K, Silm K, Evrard A, Wojcik S, Oheim M, Herzog E, Ropert N (2013) Lack of evidence for vesicular glutamate transporter expression in mouse astrocytes. J Neurosci 33:4434–4455. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3667-12.2013 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Logan WJ, Snyder SH (1971) Unique high affinity uptake systems for glycine, glutamic and aspartic acids in cetral nervous tissue of the rat. Nature 234:297–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. Logan WJ, Snyder SH (1972) High affinity uptake systems for glycine, glutamic and aspartic acids in synaptosomes of rat central nervous tissues. Brain Res 42:413–431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. Longuemare MC, Swanson RA (1995) Excitatory amino acid release from astrocytes during energy failure by reversal of sodium-dependent uptake. J Neurosci Res 40:379–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. MacAulay N, Gether U, Klaerke DA, Zeuthen T (2001) Water transport by the human Na+-coupled glutamate cotransporter expressed in Xenopuso ocytes. J Physiol 530:367–378PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. MacAulay N, Hamann S, Zeuthen T (2004) Water Transport in the Brain: role of Cotransporters. Neuroscience 129:1031–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.06.045 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. Mackenzie B, Erickson JD (2004) Sodium-coupled neutral amino acid (System N/A) transporters of the SLC38 gene family. Pflugers Arch 447:784–795PubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. Mager S, Naeve J, Quick M, Labarca C, Davidson N, Lester HA (1993) Steady states, charge movements, and rates for a cloned GABA transporter expressed in Xenopuso ocytes. Neuron 10:177–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. Malarkey EB, Parpura V (2008) Mechanisms of glutamate release from astrocytes. Neurochem Int 52:142–154PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. Marcaggi P, Coles JA (2001) Ammonium in nervous tissue: transport across cell membranes, fluxes from neurons to glial cells, and role in signalling. Prog Neurobiol 64:157–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. Massie A, Cnops L, Smolders I, McCullumsmith R, Kooijman R, Kwak S, Arckens L, Michotte Y (2008) High-affinity Na(+)/K(+)-dependent glutamate transporter EAAT4 is expressed throughout the rat fore- and midbrain. J Comp Neurol 511:155–172. doi: 10.1002/cne.21823 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. Mathiisen TM, Lehre KP, Danbolt NC, Ottersen OP (2010) The perivascular astroglial sheath provides a complete covering of the brain microvessels: an electron microscopic 3D reconstruction. Glia 58:1094–1103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. Matsugami TR, Tanemura K, Mieda M, Nakatomi R, Yamada K, Kondo T, Ogawa M, Obata K, Watanabe M, Hashikawa T, Tanaka K (2006) Indispensability of the glutamate transporters GLAST and GLT1 to brain development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12161–12166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509144103 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. McKenna MC (2007) The glutamate-glutamine cycle is not stoichiometric: fates of glutamate in brain. J Neurosci Res 85:3347–3358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. McKenna MC, Stevenson JH, Huang X, Hopkins IB (2000) Differential distribution of the enzymes glutamate dehydrogenase and aspartate aminotransferase in cortical synaptic mitochondria contributes to metabolic compartmentation in cortical synaptic terminals. Neurochem Int 37:229–241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. McLennan H (1976) The autoradiographic localization of l-[3H]glutamate in rat brain tissue. Brain Res 115:139–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  189. McMahon HT, Nicholls DG (1990) Glutamine and aspartate loading of synaptosomes: a reevaluation of effects on calcium-dependent excitatory amino acid release. J Neurochem 54:373–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  190. Melone M, Bellesi M, Conti F (2009) Synaptic localization of GLT-1a in the rat somatic sensory cortex. Glia 57:108–117. doi: 10.1002/glia.20744 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  191. Melone M, Bellesi M, Ducati A, Iacoangeli M, Conti F (2011) Cellular and synaptic localization of EAAT2a in human cerebral cortex. Front Neuroanat 4:151. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2010.00151 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  192. Mennerick S, Dhond RP, Benz A, Xu WY, Rothstein JD, Danbolt NC, Isenberg KE, Zorumski CF (1998) Neuronal expression of the glutamate transporter GLT-1 in hippocampal microcultures. J Neurosci 18:4490–4499PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. Mim C, Balani P, Rauen T, Grewer C (2005) The glutamate transporter subtypes EAAT4 and EAATs 1-3 transport glutamate with dramatically different kinetics and voltage dependence but share a common uptake mechanism. J Gen Physiol 126:571–589PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. Minchin MC, Beart PM (1975) Compartmentation of amino acid metabolism in the rat dorsal root ganglion; a metabolic and autoradiographic study. Brain Res 83:437–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  195. Mitani A, Tanaka K (2003) Functional changes of glial glutamate transporter GLT-1 during ischemia: an in vivo study in the hippocampal CA1 of normal mice and mutant mice lacking GLT-1. J Neurosci 23:7176–7182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  196. Mitrovic AD, Plesko F, Vandenberg RJ (2001) Zn2+inhibits the anion conductance of the glutamate transporter EAAT4. J Biol Chem 276:26071–26076PubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. Nagy D, Knapp L, Marosi M, Farkas T, Kis Z, Vecsei L, Teichberg VI, Toldi J (2010) Effects of blood glutamate scavenging on cortical evoked potentials. Cell Mol Neurobiol 30:1101–1106. doi: 10.1007/s10571-010-9542-8 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  198. Nedergaard M (2013) Neuroscience. Garbage truck of the brain. Science 340:1529–1530. doi: 10.1126/science.1240514 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. Nedergaard M, Verkhratsky A (2012) Artifact versus reality–how astrocytes contribute to synaptic events. Glia 60:1013–1023. doi: 10.1002/glia.22288 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  200. Ni B, Rosteck PR Jr, Nadi NS, Paul SM (1994) Cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding a brain-specific Na+-dependent inorganic phosphate cotransporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:5607–5611PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. Nicholls DG (1993) The glutamatergic nerve terminal. Eur J Biochem 212:613–631PubMedGoogle Scholar
  202. Nicoletti F, Bockaert J, Collingridge GL, Conn PJ, Ferraguti F, Schoepp DD, Wroblewski JT, Pin JP (2011) Metabotropic glutamate receptors: from the workbench to the bedside. Neuropharmacology 60:1017–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.10.022 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  203. Nikkuni O, Takayasu Y, Iino M, Tanaka K, Ozawa S (2007) Facilitated activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors in cerebellar Purkinje cells in glutamate transporter EAAT4-deficient mice. Neurosci Res 59:296–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  204. Nissen-Meyer LS, Popescu MC, Hamdani EH, Chaudhry FA (2011) Protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation of a single serine residue on the rat glial glutamine transporter SN1 governs its membrane trafficking. J Neurosci 31:6565–6575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  205. Niswender CM, Conn PJ (2010) Metabotropic glutamate receptors: physiology, pharmacology, and disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 50:295–322PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. Omote H, Miyaji T, Juge N, Moriyama Y (2011) Vesicular neurotransmitter transporter: bioenergetics and regulation of glutamate transport. Biochemistry 50:5558–5565. doi: 10.1021/bi200567k PubMedGoogle Scholar
  207. Otis TS, Jahr CE (1998) Anion currents and predicted glutamate flux through a neuronal glutamate transporter. J Neurosci 18:7099–7110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  208. Otis TS, Kavanaugh MP (2000) Isolation of current components and partial reaction cycles in the glial glutamate transporter EAAT2. J Neurosci 20:2749–2757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  209. Owe SG, Marcaggi P, Attwell D (2006) The ionic stoichiometry of the GLAST glutamate transporter in salamander retinal glia. J Physiol 577:591–599. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.116830 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  210. Palmieri F (2013) The mitochondrial transporter family SLC25: identification, properties and physiopathology. Mol Aspects Med 34:465–484PubMedGoogle Scholar
  211. Peghini P, Janzen J, Stoffel W (1997) Glutamate transporter EAAC-1- deficient mice develop dicarboxylic aminoaciduria and behavioral abnormalities but no neurodegeneration. EMBO J 16:3822–3832. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.13.3822 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  212. Penmatsa A, Gouaux E (2013) How LeuT shapes our understanding of the mechanisms of sodium-coupled neurotransmitter transporters. J Physiol. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.259051 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  213. Petralia RS, Rubio ME, Wenthold RJ (1999) Cellular and subcellular distribution of glutamate receptors. In: Jonas P, Monyer H (eds) Ionotropic glutamate receptors in the CNS. Springer, Berlin, pp 143–171Google Scholar
  214. Pines G, Danbolt NC, Bjørås M, Zhang Y, Bendahan A, Eide L, Koepsell H, Storm-Mathisen J, Seeberg E, Kanner BI (1992) Cloning and expression of a rat brain l-glutamate transporter. Nature 360:464–467. doi: 10.1038/360464a0 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  215. Plachez C, Danbolt NC, Recasens M (2000) Transient expression of the glial glutamate transporters GLAST and GLT in hippocampal neurons in primary culture. J Neurosci Res 59:587–593PubMedGoogle Scholar
  216. Rauen T (2000) Diversity of glutamate transporter expression and function in the mammalian retina. Amino Acids 19:53–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  217. Rauen T, Kanner BI (1994) Localization of the glutamate transporter GLT-1 in rat and macaque monkey retinae. Neurosci Lett 169:137–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  218. Rauen T, Wiessner M (2000) Fine tuning of glutamate uptake and degradation in glial cells: common transcriptional regulation of GLAST1 and GS. Neurochem Int 37:179–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  219. Rauen T, Jeserich G, Danbolt NC, Kanner BI (1992) Comparative analysis of sodium-dependent l-glutamate transport of synaptosomal and astroglial membrane vesicles from mouse cortex. FEBS Lett 312:15–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  220. Rauen T, Rothstein JD, Wassle H (1996) Differential expression of three glutamate transporter subtypes in the rat retina. Cell Tissue Res 286:325–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  221. Rauen T, Taylor WR, Kuhlbrodt K, Wiessner M (1998) High-affinity glutamate transporters in the rat retina: a major role of the glial glutamate transporter GLAST-1 in transmitter clearance. Cell Tissue Res 291:19–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  222. Rauen T, Fischer F, Wiessner M (1999) Glia-neuron interaction by high-affinity glutamate transporters in neurotransmission. Adv Exp Med Biol 468:81–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  223. Ritzen A, Mathiesen JM, Thomsen C (2005) Molecular pharmacology and therapeutic prospects of metabotropic glutamate receptor allosteric modulators. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 97:202–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  224. Robinson MB (2006) Acute regulation of sodium-dependent glutamate transporters: a focus on constitutive and regulated trafficking. Handb Exp Pharmacol 175:251–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  225. Robinson MB, Hunter-Ensor M, Sinor J (1991) Pharmacologically distinct sodium-dependent l-[3H]glutamate transport processes in rat brain. Brain Res 544:196–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  226. Robinson MB, Sinor JD, Dowd LA, Kerwin JF (1993) Subtypes of sodium- dependent high-affinity l-[3H]glutamate transport activity - pharmacologic specificity and regulation by sodium and potassium. J Neurochem 60:167–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  227. Roettger V, Lipton P (1996) Mechanism of glutamate release from rat hippocampal slices during in vitro ischemia. Neuroscience 75:677–685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  228. Rogawski MA (2013) AMPA receptors as a molecular target in epilepsy therapy. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 197:9–18. doi: 10.1111/ane.12099 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  229. Rossi DJ, Oshima T, Attwell D (2000) Glutamate release in severe brain ischaemia is mainly by reversed uptake. Nature 403:316–321. doi: 10.1038/35002090 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  230. Rothstein JD, Martin L, Levey AI, Dykes-Hoberg M, Jin L, Wu D, Nash N, Kuncl RW (1994) Localization of neuronal and glial glutamate transporters. Neuron 13:713–725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  231. Rothstein JD, Van Kammen M, Levey AI, Martin LJ, Kuncl RW (1995) Selective loss of glial glutamate transporter GLT-1 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 38:73–84. doi: 10.1002/ana.410380114 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  232. Rothstein JD, Patel S, Regan MR, Haenggeli C, Huang YH, Bergles DE, Jin L, Dykes Hoberg M, Vidensky S, Chung DS, Toan SV, Bruijn LI, Su ZZ, Gupta P, Fisher PB (2005) Beta-lactam antibiotics offer neuroprotection by increasing glutamate transporter expression. Nature 433:73–77. doi: 10.1038/nature03180 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  233. Ryan RM, Mindell JA (2007) The uncoupled chloride conductance of a bacterial glutamate transporter homolog. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14:365–371. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1230 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  234. Sacher A, Nelson N, Ogi JT, Wright EM, Loo DD, Eskandari S (2002) Presteady-state and steady-state kinetics and turnover rate of the mouse gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter (MGAT3). J Membr Biol 190:57–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  235. Sagot E, Jensen AA, Pickering DS, Pu X, Umberti M, Stensbol TB, Nielsen B, Assaf Z, Aboab B, Bolte J, Gefflaut T, Bunch L (2008) Chemo-enzymatic synthesis of (2S,4R)-2-amino-4-(3-(2,2-diphenylethylamino)-3-oxopropyl)pentanedioic acid: a novel selective inhibitor of human excitatory amino acid transporter subtype 2. J Med Chem 51:4085–4092PubMedGoogle Scholar
  236. Santangelo RM, Acker TM, Zimmerman SS, Katzman BM, Strong KL, Traynelis SF, Liotta DC (2012) Novel NMDA receptor modulators: an update. Expert Opin Ther Pat 22:1337–1352. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2012.728587 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  237. Sato H, Tamba M, Ishii T, Bannai S (1999) Cloning and expression of a plasma membrane cystine/glutamate exchange transporter composed of two distinct proteins. J Biol Chem 274:11455–11458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  238. Sato H, Kuriyama-Matsumura K, Hashimoto T, Sasaki H, Wang HY, Ishii T, Mann GE, Bannai S (2001) Effect of oxygen on induction of the cystine transporter by bacterial lipopolysaccharide in mouse peritoneal macrophages. J Biol Chem 276:10407–10412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  239. Sato H, Tamba M, Okuno S, Sato K, Keinomasu K, Masu M, Bannai S (2002) Distribution of cystine/glutamate exchange transporter, system x(C)(-), in the mouse brain. J Neurosci 22:8028–8033PubMedGoogle Scholar
  240. Sato H, Nomura S, Maebara K, Sato K, Tamba M, Bannai S (2004) Transcriptional control of cystine/glutamate transporter gene by amino acid deprivation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 325:109–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  241. Sato H, Shiiya A, Kimata M, Maebara K, Tamba M, Sakakura Y, Makino N, Sugiyama F, Yagami K, Moriguchi T, Takahashi S, Bannai S (2005) Redox imbalance in cystine/glutamate transporter-deficient mice. J Biol Chem 280:37423–37429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  242. Sattler R, Rothstein JD (2006) Regulation and dysregulation of glutamate transporters. Handb Exp Pharmacol 175:277–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  243. Schmitt A, Asan E, Puschel B, Jons T, Kugler P (1996) Expression of the glutamate transporter GLT1 in neural cells of the rat central nervous system: non-radioactive in situ hybridization and comparative immunocytochemistry. Neuroscience 71:989–1004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  244. Schmitt A, Asan E, Puschel B, Kugler P (1997) Cellular and regional distribution of the glutamate transporter GLAST in the CNS of rats: nonradioactive in situ hybridization and comparative immunocytochemistry. J Neurosci 17:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  245. Schneider N, Cordeiro S, Machtens J-P, Braams S, Rauen T, Fahlke C (2014) Functional Properties of the Retinal Glutamate Transporters GLT-1c and EAAT5. J Biol Chem 289:1815–1824. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.517177 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  246. Schousboe A (1981) Transport and metabolism of glutamate and GABA in neurons and glial cells. Int Rev Neurobiol 22:1–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  247. Seal RP, Amara SG (1999) Excitatory amino acid transporters: a family in flux. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 39:431–456. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.39.1.431 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  248. Shafqat S, Tamarappoo BK, Kilberg MS, Puranam RS, McNamara JO, Guadanoferraz A, Fremeau RT (1993) Cloning and expression of a novel Na+-dependent neutral amino acid transporter structurally related to mammalian Na+/glutamate cotransporters. J Biol Chem 268:15351–15355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  249. Shashidharan P, Huntley GW, Murray JM, Buku A, Moran T, Walsh MJ, Morrison JH, Plaitakis A (1997) Immunohistochemical localization of the neuron-specific glutamate transporter EAAC1 (EAAT3) in rat brain and spinal cord revealed by a novel monoclonal antibody. Brain Res 773:139–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  250. Sheldon AL, Robinson MB (2007) The role of glutamate transporters in neurodegenerative diseases and potential opportunities for intervention. Neurochem Int 51:333–355. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.03.012 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  251. Shelton MK, McCarthy KD (1999) Mature hippocampal astrocytes exhibit functional metabotropic and ionotropic glutamate receptors in situ. Glia 26:1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  252. Shigeri Y, Seal RP, Shimamoto K (2004) Molecular pharmacology of glutamate transporters, EAATs and VGLUTs. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 45:250–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  253. Shimamoto K (2008) Glutamate transporter blockers for elucidation of the function of excitatory neurotransmission systems. Chem Rec 8:182–199. doi: 10.1002/tcr.20145 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  254. Shimamoto K, Shigeri Y (2006) Elucidation of glutamate transporter functions using selective inhibitors. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem 6:59–71Google Scholar
  255. Sibson NR, Mason GF, Shen J, Cline GW, Herskovits AZ, Wall JE, Behar KL, Rothman DL, Shulman RG (2001) In vivo (13)C NMR measurement of neurotransmitter glutamate cycling, anaplerosis and TCA cycle flux in rat brain during. J Neurochem 76:975–989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  256. Sims KD, Robinson MB (1999) Expression patterns and regulation of glutamate transporters in the developing and adult nervous system. Crit Rev Neurobiol 13:169–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  257. Solbu TT, Bjorkmo M, Berghuis P, Harkany T, Chaudhry FA (2010) SAT1, A Glutamine Transporter, is Preferentially Expressed in GABAergic Neurons. Front Neuroanat 4:1PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  258. Sontheimer H (2004) Ion channels and amino acid transporters support the growth and invasion of primary brain tumors. Mol Neurobiol 29:61–71PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  259. Sontheimer H (2008) A role for glutamate in growth and invasion of primary brain tumors. J Neurochem 105:287–295PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  260. Steinhauser C, Gallo V (1996) News on glutamate receptors in glial cells. Trends Neurosci 19:339–345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  261. Stern JR, Eggleston LV, Hems R, Krebs HA (1949) Accumulation of glutamic acid in isolated brain tissue. Biochem J 44:410–418PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  262. Stoffel W, Korner R, Wachtmann D, Keller BU (2004) Functional analysis of glutamate transmission of GLAST1 and transporters in excitatory synaptic GLAST1/EAAC1 deficient mice. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 128:170–181. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.06.026 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  263. Storck T, Schulte S, Hofmann K, Stoffel W (1992) Structure, expression, and functional analysis of a Na+-dependent glutamate/aspartate transporter from rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:10955–10959PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  264. Storm-Mathisen J (1981) Autoradiographic and microchemical localization of high affinity glutamate uptake. In: Roberts PJ, Storm-Mathisen J, Johnston GA (eds) Glutamate: transmitter in the central nervous system. Wiley, Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, pp 89–115Google Scholar
  265. Storm-Mathisen J, Wold JE (1981) In vivo high-affinity uptake and axonal transport of D-[2,3-3H]aspartate in excitatory neurons. Brain Res 230:427–433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  266. Sun Y, Petr GT, Frederick NM, Aoki CJ, Rotenberg A, Dhamne SC, Hameed MQ, Goodrich GS, Armsen W, Rosenberg PA (2012) Cell-type specific expression and function of the glutamate transporter GLT-1 at excitatory synapses probed with conditional deletion. Soc Neurosci Abstr 2012(332):16Google Scholar
  267. Takamori S, Rhee JS, Rosenmund C, Jahn R (2000) Identification of a vesicular glutamate transporter that defines a glutamatergic phenotype in neurons. Nature 407:189–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  268. Takamori S, Malherbe P, Broger C, Jahn R (2002) Molecular cloning and functional characterization of human vesicular glutamate transporter 3. EMBO Rep 3:798–803PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  269. Takasaki C, Okada R, Mitani A, Fukaya M, Yamasaki M, Fujihara Y, Shirakawa T, Tanaka K, Watanabe M (2008) Glutamate transporters regulate lesion-induced plasticity in the developing somatosensory cortex. J Neurosci 28:4995–5006. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0861-08.2008 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  270. Takatsuru Y, Iino M, Tanaka K, Ozawa S (2007) Contribution of glutamate transporter GLT-1 to removal of synaptically released glutamate at climbing fiber-Purkinje cell synapses. Neurosci Lett 420:85–89. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.04.062 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  271. Takayasu Y, Iino M, Takatsuru Y, Tanaka K, Ozawa S (2009) Functions of glutamate transporters in cerebellar Purkinje cell synapses. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 197:1–12Google Scholar
  272. Takeuchi S, Wada K, Toyooka T, Shinomiya N, Shimazaki H, Nakanishi K, Nagatani K, Otani N, Osada H, Uozumi Y, Matsuo H, Nawashiro H (2013) Increased xCT expression correlates with tumor invasion and outcome in patients with glioblastomas. Neurosurgery 72:33–41 discussion 41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  273. Takumi Y, Matsubara A, Danbolt NC, Laake JH, Storm-Mathisen J, Usami S, Shinkawa H, Ottersen OP (1997) Discrete cellular and subcellular localization of glutamine synthetase and the glutamate transporter GLAST in the rat vestibular end organ. Neuroscience 79:1137–1144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  274. Tanaka K (1993a) Expression cloning of a rat glutamate transporter. Neurosci Res 16:149–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  275. Tanaka K (1993b) Cloning and expression of a glutamate transporter from mouse brain. Neurosci Lett 159:183–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  276. Tanaka K, Watase K, Manabe T, Yamada K, Watanabe M, Takahashi K, Iwama H, Nishikawa T, Ichihara N, Hori S, Takimoto M, Wada K (1997) Epilepsy and exacerbation of brain injury in mice lacking the glutamate transporter GLT- 1. Science 276:1699–1702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  277. Teichberg VI (2007) From the liver to the brain across the blood-brain barrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:7315–7316. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702450104 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  278. Teichberg VI, Cohen-Kashi-Malina K, Cooper I, Zlotnik A (2009) Homeostasis of glutamate in brain fluids: an accelerated brain-to-blood efflux of excess glutamate is produced by blood glutamate scavenging and offers protection from neuropathologies. Neuroscience 158:301–308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  279. Tessler S, Danbolt NC, Faull RLM, Storm-Mathisen J, Emson PC (1999) Expression of the glutamate transporters in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroscience 88:1083–1091PubMedGoogle Scholar
  280. Thompson CM, Davis E, Carrigan CN, Cox HD, Bridges RJ, Gerdes JM (2005) Inhibitors of the glutamate vesicular transporter (VGLUT). Curr Med Chem 12:2041–2056PubMedGoogle Scholar
  281. Torp R, Danbolt NC, Babaie E, Bjørås M, Seeberg E, Storm-Mathisen J, Ottersen OP (1994) Differential expression of two glial glutamate transporters in the rat brain: an in situ hybridization study. Eur J Neurosci 6:936–942PubMedGoogle Scholar
  282. Torp R, Hoover F, Danbolt NC, Storm-Mathisen J, Ottersen OP (1997) Differential distribution of the glutamate transporters GLT1 and rEAAC1 in rat cerebral cortex and thalamus: an in situ hybridization analysis. Anat Embryol (Berl) 195:317–326Google Scholar
  283. Traynelis SF, Wollmuth LP, McBain CJ, Menniti FS, Vance KM, Ogden KK, Hansen KB, Yuan H, Myers SJ, Dingledine R (2010) Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev 62:405–496. doi: 10.1124/pr.109.002451 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  284. Trotti D, Volterra A, Lehre KP, Rossi D, Gjesdal O, Racagni G, Danbolt NC (1995) Arachidonic acid inhibits a purified and reconstituted glutamate transporter directly from the water phase and not via the phospholipid membrane. J Biol Chem 270:9890–9895PubMedGoogle Scholar
  285. Trotti D, Rossi D, Gjesdal O, Levy LM, Racagni G, Danbolt NC, Volterra A (1996) Peroxynitrite inhibits glutamate transporter subtypes. J Biol Chem 271:5976–5979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  286. Trotti D, Danbolt NC, Volterra A (1998) Glutamate transporters are oxidant-vulnerable: a molecular link between oxidative and excitotoxic neurodegeneration? Trends Pharmacol Sci 19:328–334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  287. Tzingounis AV, Wadiche JI (2007) Glutamate transporters: confining runaway excitation by shaping synaptic transmission. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:935–947. doi: 10.1038/nrn2274 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  288. Tzingounis AV, Lin CL, Rothstein JD, Kavanaugh MP (1998) Arachidonic acid activates a proton current in the rat glutamate transporter EAAT4. J Biol Chem 273:17315–17317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  289. Ullensvang K, Lehre KP, Storm-Mathisen J, Danbolt NC (1997) Differential developmental expression of the two rat brain glutamate transporter proteins GLAST and GLT. Eur J Neurosci 9:1646–1655PubMedGoogle Scholar
  290. Utsunomiya-Tate N, Endou H, Kanai Y (1996) Cloning and functional characterization of a system ASC-like Na+-dependent neutral amino acid transporter. J Biol Chem 271:14883–14890PubMedGoogle Scholar
  291. Van den Berg CJ, Garfinkel D (1971) A simulation study of brain compartments—metabolism of glutamate and related substances in mouse brain. Biochem J 123:211–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  292. Vandenberg RJ, Ryan RM (2013) Mechanisms of glutamate transport. Physiol Rev 93:1621–1657. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00007.2013 0007.2013PubMedGoogle Scholar
  293. Vandenberg RJ, Mitrovic AD, Johnston GA (1998) Molecular basis for differential inhibition of glutamate transporter subtypes by zinc ions. Mol Pharmacol 54:189–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  294. Vernadakis A (1996) Glia-neuron intercommunications and synaptic plasticity. Prog Neurobiol 49:185–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  295. Veruki ML, Morkve SH, Hartveit E (2006) Activation of a presynaptic glutamate transporter regulates synaptic transmission through electrical signaling. Nat Neurosci 9:1388–1396. doi: 10.1038/nn1793 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  296. Volterra A, Bezzi P, Rizzini BL, Trotti D, Ullensvang K, Danbolt NC, Racagni G (1996) The competitive transport inhibitor l-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4- dicarboxylate triggers excitotoxicity in rat cortical neuron- astrocyte co-cultures via glutamate release rather than uptake inhibition. Eur J Neurosci 8:2019–2028PubMedGoogle Scholar
  297. Voutsinos-Porche B, Bonvento G, Tanaka K, Steiner P, Welker E, Chatton JY, Magistretti PJ, Pellerin L (2003) Glial glutamate transporters mediate a functional metabolic crosstalk between neurons and astrocytes in the mouse developing cortex. Neuron 37:275–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  298. Wadiche JI, Amara SG, Kavanaugh MP (1995a) Ion fluxes associated with excitatory amino acid transport. Neuron 15:721–728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  299. Wadiche JI, Arriza JL, Amara SG, Kavanaugh MP (1995b) Kinetics of a human glutamate transporter. Neuron 14:1019–1027PubMedGoogle Scholar
  300. Walitza S, Wendland JR, Gruenblatt E, Warnke A, Sontag TA, Tucha O, Lange KW (2010) Genetics of early-onset obsessive-compulsive disorder. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19:227–235. doi: 10.1007/s00787-010-0087-7 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  301. Wang GJ, Chung HJ, Schnuer J, Pratt K, Zable AC, Kavanaugh MP, Rosenberg PA (1998) High affinity glutamate transport in rat cortical neurons in culture. Mol Pharmacol 53:88–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  302. Wang F, Smith NA, Xu Q, Goldman S, Peng W, Huang JH, Takano T, Nedergaard M (2013) Photolysis of caged Ca2 + but not receptor-mediated Ca2 + signaling triggers astrocytic glutamate release. J Neurosci 33:17404–17412. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2178-13.2013 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  303. Watanabe T, Morimoto K, Hirao T, Suwaki H, Watase K, Tanaka K (1999) Amygdala-kindled and pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in glutamate transporter GLAST- deficient mice. Brain Res 845:92–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  304. Watase K, Hashimoto K, Kano M, Yamada K, Watanabe M, Inoue Y, Okuyama S, Sakagawa T, Ogawa S, Kawashima N, Hori S, Takimoto M, Wada K, Tanaka K (1998) Motor discoordination and increased susceptibility to cerebellar injury in GLAST mutant mice. Eur J Neurosci 10:976–988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  305. Wenthold RJ, Roche KW (1998) The organization and regulation of non- NMDA receptors in neurons. Prog Brain Res 116:133–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  306. Wilkin GP, Garthwaite J, Balazs R (1982) Putative acidic amino acid transmitters in the cerebellum. II. Electron microscopic localization of transport sites. Brain Res 244:69–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  307. Wofsey AR, Kuhar MJ, Snyder SH (1971) A unique synaptosomal fraction, which accumulates glutamic and aspartic acids, in brain tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:1102–1106PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  308. Xing X, Chang L-C, Kong Q, Colton CK, Lai L, Glicksman MA, Lin C-LG, Cuny GD (2011) Structure-activity relationship study of pyridazine derivatives as glutamate transporter EAAT2 activators. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 21:5774–5777PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  309. Yamada K, Watanabe M, Shibata T, Nagashima M, Tanaka K, Inoue Y (1998) Glutamate transporter GLT-1 is transiently localized on growing axons of the mouse spinal cord before establishing astrocytic expression. J Neurosci 18:5706–5713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  310. Yasuda T, Yamaguchi N, Kobayashi K, Nishi I, Horinouchi H, Jalil MA, Li MX, Ushikai M, Iijima M, Kondo I, Saheki T (2000) Identification of two novel mutations in the SLC25A13 gene and detection of seven mutations in 102 patients with adult-onset type II citrullinemia. Hum Genet 107:537–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  311. Ye ZC, Rothstein JD, Sontheimer H (1999) Compromised glutamate transport in human glioma cells: reduction-mislocalization of sodium-dependent glutamate transporters and enhanced activity of cystine-glutamate exchange. J Neurosci 19:10767–10777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  312. Yernool D, Boudker O, Folta-Stogniew E, Gouaux E (2003) Trimeric subunit stoichiometry of the glutamate transporters from Bacillus Caldotenaxand Bacillus stearothermophilus. Biochemistry 42:12981–12988. doi: 10.1021/bi030161q PubMedGoogle Scholar
  313. Yernool D, Boudker O, Jin Y, Gouaux E (2004) Structure of a glutamate transporter homologue from Pyrococcus horikoshii. Nature 431:811–818. doi: 10.1038/nature03018 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  314. Young WS, Kuhar MJ (1979) A new method for receptor autoradiography: [3H]opioid receptors in rat brain. Brain Res 179:255–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  315. Yu AC, Hertz L (1982) Uptake of glutamate, GABA, and glutamine into a predominantly GABA-ergic and a predominantly glutamatergic nerve cell population in culture. J Neurosci Res 7:23–35. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490070104 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  316. Zerangue N, Kavanaugh MP (1996a) Interaction of l-cysteine with a human excitatory amino acid transporter. J Physiol 493:419–423PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  317. Zerangue N, Kavanaugh MP (1996b) Flux coupling in a neuronal glutamate transporter. Nature 383:634–637. doi: 10.1038/383634a0 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  318. Zerangue N, Arriza JL, Amara SG, Kavanaugh MP (1995) Differential modulation of human glutamate transporter subtypes by arachidonic acid. J Biol Chem 270:6433–6435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  319. Zhou Y, Danbolt NC (2013) GABA and glutamate transporters in brain. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 4:165. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00165 Google Scholar
  320. Zhou Y, Holmseth S, Guo C, Hassel B, Hofner G, Huitfeldt HS, Wanner KT, Danbolt NC (2012a) Deletion of the gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter 2 (GAT2 and SLC6A13) gene in mice leads to changes in liver and brain taurine contents. J Biol Chem 287:35733–35746. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.368175 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  321. Zhou Y, Holmseth S, Hua R, Lehre AC, Olofsson AM, Poblete-Naredo I, Kempson SA, Danbolt NC (2012b) The betaine-GABA transporter (BGT1, slc6a12) is predominantly expressed in the liver and at lower levels in the kidneys and at the brain surface. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 302:F316–F328. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00464.2011 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  322. Zhou Y, Wang XY, Tzingounis AV, Danbolt NC, Larsson HP (2013) Modeling of glutamate transporters reconstituted in liposomes argues against heteroexchange being substantially faster than net uptake. Soc Neurosci Abstr 2013(703):05Google Scholar
  323. Zhou Y, Waanders LF, Holmseth S, Guo C, Berger UV, Li Y, Lehre A-C, Lehre KP, Danbolt NC (2014) Proteome analysis and conditional deletion of the EAAT2 glutamate transporter provide evidence against a role of EAAT2 in pancreatic insulin secretion in mice. J Biol Chem 289:1329–1344. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.529065 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  324. Zlotnik A, Gurevich B, Cherniavsky E, Tkachov S, Matuzani-Ruban A, Leon A, Shapira Y, Teichberg VI (2008) The contribution of the blood glutamate scavenging activity of pyruvate to its neuroprotective properties in a rat model of closed head injury. Neurochem Res 33:1044–1050. doi: 10.1007/s11064-007-9548-x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  325. Zlotnik A, Klin Y, Kotz R, Dubilet M, Boyko M, Ohayon S, Shapira Y, Teichberg VI (2010) Regulation of blood l-glutamate levels by stress as a possible brain defense mechanism. Exp Neurol 224:465–471. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.05.009 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  326. Zlotnik A, Gruenbaum BF, Mohar B, Kuts R, Gruenbaum SE, Ohayon S, Boyko M, Klin Y, Sheiner E, Shaked G, Shapira Y, Teichberg VI (2011a) The effects of estrogen and progesterone on blood glutamate levels: evidence from changes of blood glutamate levels during the menstrual cycle in women. Biol Reprod 84:581–586. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.088120 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  327. Zlotnik A, Klin Y, Gruenbaum BF, Gruenbaum SE, Ohayon S, Boyko M, Sheiner E, Aricha-Tamir B, Shapira Y, Teichberg VI (2011b) The activation of beta2-adrenergic receptors in naive rats causes a reduction of blood glutamate levels: relevance to stress and neuroprotection. Neurochem Res 36:732–738. doi: 10.1007/s11064-010-0388-8 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  328. Zlotnik A, Ohayon S, Gruenbaum BF, Gruenbaum SE, Mohar B, Boyko M, Klin Y, Sheiner E, Shaked G, Shapira Y, Teichberg VI (2011c) Determination of factors affecting glutamate concentrations in the whole blood of healthy human volunteers. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 23:45–49. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181f82a8f PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Neurotransporter Group, Department of Anatomy, Institute of Basic Medical SciencesUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations