Abstract
Background
To treat extradural solid-cystic lesions of the ventral skull base, a pedicled nasoseptal flap (NSF) maintains patency of the marsupialized cavity and prevents restenosis and cyst recurrence.
Methods
The authors provide a step-by-step description of the surgical technique valid in different lesions of the skull base, all treated via the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). The application is demonstrated by an operative video.
Conclusion
In selected lesions, endoscopic marsupialization using an NSF ensures drainage and ventilation of the surgical cavity. Re-epithelialization provided by a pedicled flap is a viable alternative to multilayer skull base reconstruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Endoscopic endonasal approaches are a well-established surgical technique in the treatment of ventral skull base pathologies. EEAs improved greatly in the last 20 years due to the development of dedicated corridors, reconstructive techniques, and increasingly modern instruments. In our experience, we have demonstrated how to use the pedicled nasoseptal flap in conjunction with marsupialization of expansive cystic (cholesterol granulomas) [4] or inflammatory (mucoceles) [9] lesions for therapeutic purposes. With this technique, patency of the operative cavity is therefore achieved, re-epithelialization is encouraged, and recurrences caused by scarring are prevented [5]. Once re-epithelialization of the surgical cavity is accomplished, complete closure of the skull base is obtained.
In the past years, we have used this technique as a valid alternative to skull base reconstruction to prevent mucocele formation in the surgical neo-cavity in various skull base extradural lesions. Specifically, our case series in the last five years consists of 8 cholesterol granulomas (CGs), 2 trigeminal schwannomas, and 1 benign notochord cell tumor’s biopsy. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate and illustrate the effectiveness of this technique and to offer practical surgical guidance in the process.
Relevant surgical anatomy
To reach the ventral skull base, a comprehensive knowledge of the anatomy from an endoscopic point of view is required. For a paraseptal transsphenoidal approach (TSA), [2] the sphenoidal sinus (SS) represents the epicenter of the surgical anatomy. The SS is divided by the intersphenoidal septum with different pneumatization patterns. The sellar floor is in the posterior wall of the sphenoidal sinus and continues above with the planum sphenoidalis and below with the clivus. Once an anterior sphenoidotomy is performed, the main anatomical landmarks that are fundamental to recognize are the optic nerve bulging above and the parasellar carotid artery prominence below. The lateral optico-carotideal recess lies between them and represents the pneumatization of the optic strut.
In a trans-ethmoidal-pterygo-sphenoidal approach (TEPS), [2, 4] the pterygopalatine fossa (PF) must be reached at the level of the sphenopalatine foramen by removing the orbital process of the palatine bone and the posterior wall of the maxillary sinus. Then, the vidian canal (VC) must be detected to locate the anterior genu of the horizontal segment of the petrous internal carotid artery (ICA) [6].
Using a transclival approach (TCA), [4, 3] the identification of the vidian nerve and the ICA marks the petroclival junction, which must be removed to gain access to the petrous apex.
Description of the technique
Operative setup
The patient is positioned supine in an anti-Trendelenburg position, with a mobile head slightly flexed. Depending on the site of the lesion and the individual anatomy, the following approaches can be employed: a TSA (to sellar/parasellar or clival region), a TEPS (lateral suprasellar region, pterygopalatine fossa, middle cranial fossa), or transclival (to petrous apex) approach. The required instrumentation is composed of an endoscopic endonasal set, a Neuronavigation system, an acoustic US Doppler, and adequate neurophysiological monitoring.
Surgical procedure
A “two nostrils – four hands technique” [1] is adopted during every procedure to enlarge the surgical field, increasing the surgical effectiveness.
Regardless of the chosen EEA (TSA, TEPS, TCA), the key surgical step is to harvest the pedicled NSF. It is important to bear in mind that the NSF must be large enough to cover at least 180 degrees of the circumference of the neo-cavity to ensure re-epithelialization [4].
The NSF is vascularized by the septal branches of the sphenopalatine artery (SPA), and the harvesting technique may vary depending on the approach or the site of the lesion. These techniques are well described in the literature; therefore, they will not be discussed in this article in detail [7, 8].
In brief, a rescue NSF (RNSF) [7] is preferred for TSA, whereas a modified RNSF [8] is chosen in case of a TCA. If a TEPS is needed, the ipsilateral flap is created below the tail of the middle turbinate following the choana and extending through the vomer to the maxillary crest as already described [4]. Once the pterygopalatine fossa is reached, the flap is then stored in the maxillary sinus to be protected during surgery.
Placement of the NSF in the cavity
The NSF is inserted into the cavity once the asportation/biopsy is accomplished. To gain the rotational degree of the flap, it is always necessary to drill the basisphenoid to increase its length and avoid constricting the vascular supply. The coverage of the marsupialized cavity’s margins must extend for at least half of its perimeter. The flap is placed over the denuded bone after the sphenoidal mucosa had been moved, covering its surface to promote proper integration and re-epithelization. A soft silastic stent is used to stabilize the flap in the cavity, and it is left in place for two weeks (Fig. 1). For good hemostatic control, endonasal swabs are placed in each nostril.
Postoperative course
Each patient undergoes a postoperative encephalic CT scan (or MRI) on the first postoperative day (Fig. 2). After 24–48 h, the first endonasal endoscopic medication is performed and tampons are removed. After two weeks, the silastic stent is then removed, and the endoscopic examinations will follow at 40-, 60-, and 120-day post-surgery. Follow-up is tailored according to the outcome of the histologic examination.
Indications
EEA are minimally invasive and effective techniques for the management of off-midline pathologies. As we use the pedicled NSF in the endoscopic treatment of CGs, we extend this technique to the management of other pathologies. According to our experience, endoscopic marsupialization using an NSF is indicated only in extradural lesions with a solid-cystic component and in those cases in which the absence of intraoperative CSF leakage can be established. When re-epithelialization of the surgical cavity has been completed, this becomes part of the nasal cavities, and a full closing of the skull base is achieved (Figs. 3 and 4).
Limitations
This technique cannot be used in the case of intradural lesions or case of intraoperative evidence of CSF leakage.
How to avoid complications
A comprehensive experience in endoscopic basic skull base surgery (ESBS) is the first key to performing advanced approaches to ventral skull base pathologies. Proper planning of surgery by analysis of neuroimaging examinations is essential as well. During surgery, the assistance of neuronavigation, the proper endoscopic set, the US Doppler, and an experienced team are basic elements that grant to minimize complications.
Close clinical monitoring and endoscopic examinations are mandatory in the immediate postoperative period to rule out signs of endocranial hypotension or CSF leakage. In the postoperative period, the patient is discharged with the above-described follow-up, which is essential to monitor the normal evolution of the surgical field.
Specific information for the patient
Patients undergoing ESBS should always be informed about advantages and possible complications. Among the most common postoperative complications we need to mention are CSF leak and nasal morbidities (such as olfaction deficit). On the contrary, the most dangerous and devastating complication that can occur intraoperatively is ICA injury, which fortunately in literature is reported in a very small percentage of cases (incidence of 0.016 to 1%) [10].
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Castelnuovo P, Pistochini A, Locatelli D (2006) Different surgical approaches to the sellar region: focusing on the “two nostrils four hands technique.” Rhinology 44:2–7
Castelnuovo P, Dallan I, Pistochini A, Battaglia P, Locatelli D, Bignami M (2007) Endonasal endoscopic repair of Sternberg’s canal cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Laryngoscope 117(2):345–349. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000251452.90657.3a
De Notaris M, Cavallo LM, Prats-Galino A, Esposito I, Benet A, Poblete J, Valente V, Gonzalez JB, Ferrer E, Cappabianca P (2009) Endoscopic endonasal transclival approach and retrosigmoid approach to the clival and petroclival regions. Neurosurgery 65(6 Suppl):42–50 (discussion 50-2)
Karligkiotis A, Bignami M, Terranova P, Ciniglio-Appiani M, Shawkat A, Verrilaud B, Meloni F, Herman P, Castelnuovo P (2015) Use of the pedicled nasoseptal flap in the endoscopic management of cholesterol granulomas of the petrous apex. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 5(8):747–753
Kuan EC, Trent MS, Luu NN, Kohanski MA, Tong CC, O’Malley BW Jr, Adappa ND, Palmer JN (2019) Preventing restenosis of marsupialized rathke cleft cysts using a nasoseptal flap lining. Laryngoscope 129(10):2258–2261
Martinez-Perez R, Silveira-Bertazzo G, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM (2020) The importance of landmarks in endoscopic endonasal reinterventions: the transpterygoid transcavernous approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162(4):875–880
Otto BA, Bowe SN, Carrau RL et al (2013) Transsphenoidal approach with nasoseptal flap pedicle transposition: modified rescue flap technique. Laryngoscope 123:2976–2979
Rivera-Serrano CM, Snyderman CH, Gardner P et al (2011) Nasoseptal “rescue” flap: a novel modification of the nasoseptal flap technique for pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope 121:990–993
Terranova P, Karligkiotis A, Digilio E, Basilico F, Bernardini E, Pistochini A, Bignami M, Castelnuovo P (2015) Bone regeneration after sinonasal mucocele marsupialization: what really happens over time? Laryngoscope 125(7):1568–1572
Wang EW, Zanation AM, Gardner PA, Schwartz TH, Eloy JA, Adappa ND, Bettag M, Bleier BS, Cappabianca P, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Cavallo LM, Ebert CS Jr, El-Sayed IH, Evans JJ, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Folbe AJ, Froelich S, Gentili F, Harvey RJ, Hwang PH, Jane JA Jr, Kelly DF, Kennedy D, Knosp E, Lal D, Lee JYK, Liu JK, Lund VJ, Palmer JN, Prevedello DM, Schlosser RJ, Sindwani R, Solares CA, Tabaee A, Teo C, Thirumala PD, Thorp BD, de Arnaldo Silva Vellutini E, Witterick I, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Snyderman CH (2019) ICAR: endoscopic skull-base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 9(S3):S145–S365
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Brescia within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Luca Ferlendis: conceptualization, writing – reviewing and editing; Bianca Bossi: conceptualization, reviewing; Paolo Castelnuovo: supervision, surgeon; Davide Locatelli: supervision, surgeon, reviewing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Informed consent
The participants and any identifiable individuals consented to the publication of his/her image.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Key Points
1. Extended endonasal approaches are a good therapeutic option for ventral skull base lesions.
2. Normally, extended EEA requires a skull base reconstruction to repair the skull base defect, and there are different surgical techniques that can be employed.
3. In the treatment of extradural solid cystic lesions of the skull base, marsupialization of the surgical cavity with an NSF is a valid alternative to skull base reconstruction.
4. NSF allows drainage and ventilation of the surgical cavity, avoiding cyst recurrence or mucocele formation and favoring re-epithelization.
5. Brain CT and MRI are fundamental preoperative assessments in the choice of the appropriate surgical approach.
6. The intraoperative criteria for applying this technique are lesion consistency, intact dura mater, and consequent absence of CSF leakage.
7. NSF should be harvested before the endoscopic craniectomy in case of extended EEA.
8. The placement of a soft silastic stent is a fundamental step that allows to keep in place the NSF avoiding accidental displacement.
9. After two weeks, the silastic stent is removed and the surgical cavity is endoscopically evaluated.
10. The patient is periodically evaluated with neuroimaging and endoscopy after the assessment of complete re-epithelization.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 337155 KB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ferlendis, L., Bossi, B., Castelnuovo, P. et al. Marsupialization as an alternative to reconstruction in endoscopic skull base surgery. How I do it. Acta Neurochir 166, 99 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06003-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06003-3