Abstract
LITT is a minimally-invasive laser ablation technique used to treat a wide variety of intracranial lesions. Difficulties performing intraoperative mapping have limited its adoption for lesions in/near eloquent regions. In this institutional case series, we demonstrate the utility of fMRI-adjunct planning for LITT near language or motor areas. Six out of 7 patients proceeded with LITT after fMRI-based tractography determined adequate safety margins for ablation. All underwent successful ablation without new or worsening postoperative symptoms requiring adjuvant corticosteroids, including those with preexisting deficits. fMRI is an easily accessible adjunct which may potentially reduce chances of complications in LITT near eloquent structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive surgical ablation technique with shown efficacy in the treatment of primary and metastatic brain tumors, radiation necrosis (RN), and epileptogenic foci [16]. The advent of MR guidance [9] and real-time thermography [12] have made LITT an increasingly utilized tool among neurosurgeons. Initially used primarily for deep-seated lesions, LITT’s increasing indications include patient frailty, patient preference, and decreased morbidity in some cases relative to open surgery [13, 10, 17, 1]. Despite these advantages, LITT can still pose a risk of unintended thermal damage to adjacent normal brain tissue [14]. Near eloquent structures, LITT may cause postoperative deficits in motor or language function, even with the aid of MR guidance [18]. This is further exacerbated by the inability to perform cortical or subcortical mapping during ablation secondary to targeting/trajectory disturbances from physiologic movement. Therefore, many are investigating utilization of awake neurologic assessment [6] or non-invasive patient immobilization [11]. However, these additions are not without extra cost to the patient and increased discomfort during the prolonged procedure.
Given these limitations, our institution has adopted fMRI for preoperative language and motor mapping to better guide treatment choice and intra-procedural thermal safety. In this institutional case series, we present 7 patients with intracranial lesions in or near eloquent structures who underwent preoperative fMRI for consideration of LITT. By reporting clinical outcomes in this cohort, we aim to demonstrate an easily accessible adjunct measure for improving LITT outcomes in patients with high-risk lesions.
Case series
Patients who underwent LITT at our institution for any indication and fMRI prior to treatment (Neuroblate, Monteris Medical) were identified retrospectively with institutional IRB approval (Table 1). fMRI was performed to lateralize language, localize functional areas with respect to lesions, indicate risk of functional deficits, and determine feasibility and safety margins for LITT (Figs. 1, 2, and 3). Only one patient [Patient 7] did not undergo LITT due to significant eloquent involvement on fMRI analysis and ultimately succumbed to widespread disease progression (Fig. 4). Surgical outcomes and postoperative deficits were subsequently reported (Table 2).
fMRI-guided tractography
Imaging was obtained on Siemens Prisma 3-Tesla MRI scanner. MRI protocol included high-resolution T1 and T2 images suitable for surgical navigation and a 64-direction DTI scan (b = 1000, 64 directions, 2 × 2 × 2 mm voxel dimension) for tractography. fMRI protocol included 96 T2* images (TE/TR/Voxel Size/FOV = 30/2.5/3.1 × 3.1 × 3/200 mm) with fat saturation. Matched-bandwidth high-resolution protocol was acquired at TE/TR/Voxel Size/FOV = 35/5.0/1.6 × 1.6 × 4/200 mm, 28 slices.
fMRI studies comprised three language tasks: an object naming and verb generation task, verbal responsive naming task, and auditory responsive naming task per previously described methods [2, 5]. Coplanar matched-bandwidth T2 images were collected before and after each scan for overlay in interpretation. fMRI preprocessing involved minimal data adjustments except for a 2-mm spatial smoothing kernel. Predicted BOLD correlation (canonical HRF and block design) was computed as Pearson’s r. Conjunctive AND combined threshold activation (r = 0.2, equivalent to p = 0.05) only on all 3 language scans in a set. The resultant activation map included only primary language areas with p < 0.000125. Functional maps were then overlaid as 3D objects onto coplanar matched-bandwidth MRI and DTI images using BrainLAB planning software. Deterministic tractography was done using the fMRI activation regions as fiber tract seeds. After the surgeon’s final review and trajectory addition, the completed plan was uploaded into BrainLAB Navigation hardware for surgery.
Operative technique
Patients were placed in Mayfield head holders and underwent stereotactic registration (Brainlab). Stereotactic accuracy was improved using preoperative CT with Leksell head frame (n = 1), bone fiducials (n = 2), or intraoperative AIRO CT (n = 3). Within the BrainLab Elements station, a predetermined trajectory was planned along the lesion’s long axis. Multiple trajectories were planned if ablation width diameter exceeded 2 cm. A stereotactic-guided 4.5-mm burr-hole was created. Dura was punctured with a coagulative blunt probe, and stereotactic biopsy was performed. We secured Monteris’ LITT bolt into the burr hole then capped to maintain sterility during MRI transport. At MRI, the laser probe was sterilely driven through the bolt to target using Monteris robotic system. Probe position was confirmed on initial T1 with half-dose gadavist. Once confirmed, safety points were placed by the neuroradiologist (NS) onto the intraprocedural scan to represent the functional areas of activation from the fMRI, and ablation was performed with sequential probe movement until adequate ablation was achieved. A post-ablation T1 MPRAGE was obtained after administering the remaining contrast agent. Upon completion, the patient was returned to the MRI antechamber, the laser probe and bolt were removed, and the incision was closed.
Discussion
In this series, we described our technique for using fMRI as an adjunct in cases with eloquent area lesions to help guide patient selection, operative planning, and intraoperative guidance for LITT. In our workflow, fMRI activation serves as the basis of segmentation of eloquent cortical areas. In contrast to standard, anatomical-based tractography, we use the fMRI validated cortical functional regions as the seeds for the subsequent segmentation of functional tracts. We then used these cortical and subcortical tract segmentations to guide the LITT trajectory and set heat threshold safety points during the ablation. With this approach, we saw good functional outcomes in our six LITT-treated patients without compromising EOA.
Sharma et al. [19] describe another approach to asleep LITT in eloquent areas. Their technique for LITT-ablation of a left thalamic GBM employed intraoperative transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), and free-running electromyography (EMG) in a patient with preoperative right-sided weakness. They observed onset of right-sided EMG firing when the real-time temperature at the tumor border encroaching on the posterior limb of the internal capsule reached 40 °C, at which point they ended the ablation. Their patient had a stable exam apart from new right facial droop, which was not present immediately postoperatively, likely due to developing edema as opposed to direct thermal damage. Del Bene et al. describe their technique for IOM during LITT for lesions near the motor tract [4]. For preoperative planning, they integrate DTI and magneto-encephalography to serve as a functional tractographic roadmap, similar to how we use fMRI and DTI tractography in our practice. Intraoperatively, in addition to SSEP and MEP monitoring, they performed microelectrode subcortical monopolar stimulation along the planned LITT probe tract to map proximity to motor tracts. From this, they extrapolated the ablation safety radius using the 1 mA = 1-mm framework. They describe the use of this approach to treat a previously radiated, asymptomatic rolandic BM without any new postoperative deficits.
Two groups have described their experience with awake LITT. In a 10-patient series, Laurent et al. used thermoplastic masks to facilitate head stabilization during ablation [11]. They do not comment on proximity to eloquent regions. One patient had an intra-procedural seizure which abated with anti-epileptics, and four patients required rescans following patient movement. Hajtovic et al. report a series of 6 patients with eloquent tumors undergoing intraprocedural monitoring of speech, motor, or visual function every 5-min during ablation [6]. In this awake series, 5/6 patients were immobilized in stereotaxic frames. They report no intraoperative seizures or instances of rescanning due to patient movement. Based on these early experiences, awake LITT may be feasible in experienced centers, but not without challenges unique to LITT (e.g., importance of patient immobility) and common to awake neurosurgery more generally (e.g., risk of intraoperative seizures, patient discomfort).
Regardless of approach used for LITT in awake patients, even with accurate targeting and avoidance of direct thermal damage to eloquent structures, some patients do experience delayed neurological dysfunction. Transient cytotoxic edema following ablation is believed to cause temporary perioperative deficits or worsen preexisting deficits [14, 18, 20], which often necessitates postoperative steroids to resolve [3, 8, 7]. Within our cohort, 4/6 patients were on steroids at time of procedure. Steroid treatment was continued post-procedure and tapered gradually. The other two patients were placed on short dexamethasone tapers (< 1 week) post-procedure. None of the patients had to increase dosage or restart steroids after end of taper due to new symptoms. This is an unusual finding, as virtually all the aforementioned studies reported cases of new or worsened perioperative deficits which responded to corticosteroids. Even with the use of awake testing, Hajtovic et al. reported 3/6 patients experienced delayed neurological deterioration 2–3 weeks post-ablation, which resolved with subsequent steroid treatment. Patients should be advised on the possibility of delayed deficits, and that these often respond to corticosteroids and abate with time. These may be more common in those with preoperative deficits [14, 8, 15].
While our cohort is small, the utility of adjunct fMRI for pre- and intra-operative planning is promising. Tractography based on fMRI activation can guide safe ablation near eloquent regions without awake testing. Our cohort showed consistent perioperative improvement, with no evidence of permanent neurological deficits. Further studies with larger cohorts and more extensive follow-up periods are required to better understand the long-term outcomes of fMRI as adjunct planning for LITT near eloquent structures.
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Barnett GH, Voigt JD, Alhuwalia MS (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the use of brain laser interstitial thermal therapy versus craniotomy for the treatment of high-grade tumors in or near areas of eloquence: an examination of the extent of resection and major complication rates associated with each type of surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 94(3):164–173. https://doi.org/10.1159/000446247
Bookheimer SY, Zeffiro TA, Blaxton T, Gaillard W, Theodore W (1995) Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading. Hum Brain Mapp 3(2):93–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.460030206
Chaunzwa TL, Deng D, Leuthardt EC et al (2018) Laser thermal ablation for metastases failing radiosurgery: a multicentered retrospective study. Neurosurgery 82(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx142
Del Bene M, Carone G, Porto E et al (2022) Neurophysiology-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy: a synergistic approach for motor function preservation. Technical Note World Neurosurg 168:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.121
Gaillard WD, Balsamo L, Xu B et al (2004) fMRI language task panel improves determination of language dominance. Neurology 63(8):1403–1408. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000141852.65175.a7
Hajtovic S, Mogilner A, Ard J et al (2020) Awake laser ablation for patients with tumors in eloquent brain areas: operative technique and case series. Cureus 12(12):12186. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12186
Hawasli AH, Bagade S, Shimony JS, Miller-Thomas M, Leuthardt EC (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused laser interstitial thermal therapy for intracranial lesions: single-institution series. Neurosurgery 73(6):1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000144
Hong CS, Deng D, Vera A, Chiang VL (2019) Laser-interstitial thermal therapy compared to craniotomy for treatment of radiation necrosis or recurrent tumor in brain metastases failing radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 142(2):309–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03097-z
Jolesz FA, Bleier AR, Jakab P, Ruenzel PW, Huttl K, Jako GJ (1988) MR imaging of laser-tissue interactions. Radiology 168(1):249–253. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.168.1.3380968
Kim AH, Tatter S, Rao G et al (2020) Laser ablation of abnormal neurological tissue using robotic neuroblate system (LAANTERN): 12-month outcomes and quality of life after brain tumor ablation. Neurosurgery 87(3):E338–E346. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa071
Laurent D, Oliveria SF, Shang M, Bova F, Freedman R, Rahman M (2018) Techniques to ensure accurate targeting for delivery of awake laser interstitial thermotherapy. Oper Neurosurg Hagerstown Md 15(4):454–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opx290
McNichols RJ, Gowda A, Kangasniemi M, Bankson JA, Price RE, Hazle JD (2004) MR thermometry-based feedback control of laser interstitial thermal therapy at 980 nm. Lasers Surg Med 34(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.10243
Medvid R, Ruiz A, Komotar RJ et al (2015) Current applications of MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy in the treatment of brain neoplasms and epilepsy: a radiologic and neurosurgical overview. Am J Neuroradiol 36(11):1998–2006. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4362
Patel P, Patel NV, Danish SF (2016) Intracranial MR-guided laser-induced thermal therapy: single-center experience with the Visualase thermal therapy system. J Neurosurg 125(4):853–860. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.JNS15244
Pruitt R, Gamble A, Black K, Schulder M, Mehta AD (2017) Complication avoidance in laser interstitial thermal therapy: lessons learned. J Neurosurg 126(4):1238–1245. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.3.JNS152147
Salem U, Kumar VA, Madewell JE et al (2019) Neurosurgical applications of MRI guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). Cancer Imaging 19:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-019-0250-4
Shao J, Radakovich NR, Grabowski M et al (2020) Lessons learned in using laser interstitial thermal therapy for treatment of brain tumors: a case series of 238 patients from a single institution. World Neurosurg 139:e345–e354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.213
Sharma M, Habboub G, Behbahani M, Silva D, Barnett GH, Mohammadi AM (2016) Thermal injury to corticospinal tracts and postoperative motor deficits after laser interstitial thermal therapy. Neurosurg Focus 41(4):E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.7.FOCUS16216
Sharma M, Scott VA, Ball T, Castle JR, Neimat J, Williams BJ (2023) Feasibility of transcranial motor evoked potentials and electromyography during mri-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 171:108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.12.135
Sloan AE, Ahluwalia MS, Valerio-Pascua J et al (2013) Results of the NeuroBlate System first-in-humans Phase I clinical trial for recurrent glioblastoma: clinical article. J Neurosurg 118(6):1202–1219. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.1.JNS1291
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Monteris for providing the ablation safety markers images.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ziad Rifi: conceptualization, investigation, data curation/analysis, writing—drafting, review and editing.
Maya Harary: conceptualization, investigation, data curation/analysis, writing—drafting, review and editing.
Patricia Walshaw: methodology, data curation/analysis, visualization, writing—review and editing.
Andrew Frew: methodology, data curation/analysis, visualization, writing—review and editing.
Richard Everson: resources, writing—review and editing.
Aria Fallah: resources, writing—review and editing.
Noriko Salamon: resources, methodology, data curation/analysis, visualization, writing—review and editing.
Won Kim: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, resources, writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
In accordance with COPE/CARE guidelines.
Consent to participate
IRB approved waiver of consent (IRB#20–000170).
Consent for publication
The authors provide consent for publication.
Conflict of interest
WK is a consultant for Monteris.
Additional information
The authors confirm that this work is not submitted to any other journal.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rifi, Z., Harary, M., Walshaw, P.D. et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as adjunct for planning laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) near eloquent structures. Acta Neurochir 166, 66 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-05970-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-05970-x