Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unilateral biportal endoscopic extreme transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with large cage combined with endoscopic unilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: a technical note and preliminary effects

  • Original Article - Spine degenerative
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of the study was to investigate the feasibility and preliminary effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic extreme transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(UBE-eXTLIF) with large cage combined with endoscopic unilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases.

Methods

Patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who received UBE-eXTLIF with large cage combined with endoscopic unilateral pedicle screw fixation from June 2022 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 4 females and 1 males. The clinical symptoms and signs were consistent with the imaging changes. We recorded operation time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and complications. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified Macnab scale was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy at preoperative, postoperative 1 month, and the last follow-up.

Results

The operation was successfully completed in all cases. The operation time was 150–180 min, with an average of 164.60 ± 12.03 min. No serious complications such as dural tears and vascular and nerve injuries occurred during operation. All the patients got out of bed 1–3 days after surgery and were hospitalized 4–5 days after surgery, with an average of 4.20 ± 0.45 days. Preoperative VAS scores of low back pain were 6.20 ± 0.84 and respectively decreased to 2.20 ± 0.45 and 1.40 ± 0.55 at postoperative 1 month and at the last follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Preoperative VAS scores of lower limb pain were 4.60 ± 2.61 and respectively decreased to 1.00 ± 0.71 and 0.60 ± 0.55 at postoperative 1 month and at the last follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Preoperative ODI scores were 62.00 ± 3.16 and respectively decreased to 38.00 ± 1.41 and 32.40 ± 3.29 at postoperative 1 month and at the last follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). According to the modified Macnab criteria, the final outcome was excellent in 4 cases and good in 1 case. Five patients could return to normal activities within 3 weeks.

Conclusions

UBE-eXTLIF with large cage combined with endoscopic unilateral pedicle screw fixation can achieve excellent clinical results and may become a new minimally invasive endoscopic fusion method for lumbar degenerative diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV (2001) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 48(3):569–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB (2012) Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 21(11):2265–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozgur BM, Yoo K, Rodriguez G, Taylor WR (2005) Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Eur Spine J 14(9):887–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee SH, Erken HY, Bae J (2017) Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological results of mean 46-month follow-up. Biomed Res Int 2017:3731983

    Google Scholar 

  5. Youn MS, Shin JK, Goh TS, Lee JS (2018) Full endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FELIF): technical note. Eur Spine J 27(8):1949–1955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heo DH, Lee DC, Kim HS, Park CK, Chung H (2021) Clinical results and complications of endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 145:396–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heo DH, Park CK (2019) Clinical results of percutaneous biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with application of enhanced recovery after surgery. Neurosurg Focus 46(4):E18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heo DH, Eum JH, Jo JY, Chung H (2021) Modified far lateral endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a biportal endoscopic approach: technical report and preliminary results. Acta Neurochir 163(4):1205–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Han YC, Liu ZQ, Wang SJ, Li LJ, Tan J (2014) Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in degenerative lumbar diseases a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 23(5):974–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, McAfee PC, Cunningham BW(1998) Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(14):1550–1558.

  11. Suk KS, Lee HM, Kim NH, Ha JW (2000) Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 25(14):1843–1847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beringer WF, Mobasser JP (2006) Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody. Neurosurg Focus 20(3):E4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu J, Zhu B, Chen L, Jing J, Tian D (2022) Clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation. Front Surg 9:948417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, Sandhu FA, Spears J, Kelly K, Rice L, Fessler RG (2005) Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 3(2):98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He EX, Guo J, Ling QJ, Yin ZX, Wang Y, Li M (2017) Application of a narrow-surface cage in full endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Int J Surg 42:83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang MS, You KH, Choi JY, Heo DH, Chung HJ, Park HJ (2021) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique. Spine J 21(12):2066–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heo DH, Hong YH, Lee DC, Chung HJ, Park CK (2020) Technique of biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurospine 17(Suppl 1):S129–S137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eum JH, Park JH, Song KS, Lee SM, Suh DW, Jo DJ (2022) Endoscopic extreme transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with large spacers: a technical note and preliminary report. Orthopedics 45(3):163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park MK, Kim KT, Bang WS, Cho DC, Sung JK, Lee YS, Lee CK, Kim CH, Kwon BK, Lee WK, Han I (2019) Risk factors for cage migration and cage retropulsion following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 19(3):437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fernández-Fairen M, Sala P, Ramírez H, Gil J (2007) A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) 32(4):395–401.

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by grants from the Foundation of Anhui Medical University (No. 2021xkj028) and Clinical Research and Cultivation Program of the Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University (2020LCZD05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juehua Jing.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and informed consent.

The study was approved by our institutional Ethics Committee, and the informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Spine degenerative.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, D., Liu, J., Zhu, B. et al. Unilateral biportal endoscopic extreme transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with large cage combined with endoscopic unilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: a technical note and preliminary effects. Acta Neurochir 165, 117–123 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05422-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05422-4

Keywords

Navigation