Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)

  • Ideas and Technical Innovations
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minimal access surgical techniques have been described for diskectomy and laminectomy procedures performed through tubular exposures. Tubular exposures, however, restrain visibility to a fixed diameter and require co-axial instrument manipulation. An independent blade retractor system has been developed to overcome the obstacles of working through a tube. Decompression and circumferential fusion can be accomplished through this minimal access exposure via a combination of laminectomy and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) coupled with minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation. Herein, we describe a minimally-invasive technique for TLIF exposure. Illustrations, intraoperative photographs, and fluoroscopic images supplement this technique. We found that the described minimally-invasive system provides comparable exposure to the traditional-open techniques with the benefits of minimally-invasive techniques. Additionally, it does not have the added constraints of a tubular system. We were able to perform TLIFs without any additional complications. Minimal access decompression and TLIF can be performed safely and effectively using this minimally-invasive system. Besides the retractor system, no additional specialized instruments are required. An operative microscope is not required, in fact, all our cases were performed using operative loupes. The light attachment provides superb visbility without the discomfort of having to wear a headlight. Thus far we have found no added risks or complications using this system. We are currently working on long-term analysis and follow-up to further evaluate this system’s efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brodke DS, Dick JC, Kunz DN et al. (1997) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage. Spine 22:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein JA, McAfee PC (1996) Minimally invasive endoscopic surgery of the spine. J South Orthop Assoc 5:251–262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harms JG, Jeszenszky D (1998) The unilateral, transforaminal approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Traumatol 6:88–99

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hee HT, Castro FP Jr Majd ME et al. (2001) Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord 14:533–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG et al. (2001) Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 26:567–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lieberman IH, Willsher PC, Litwin DE et al. (2000) Transperitoneal laparoscopic exposure for lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 25:509–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lowe TG, Tahernia AD, O‘Brien MF et al. (2002) Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:31–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moskowitz A (2002)Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Clin North Am 33:359–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Obenchain TG (1991) Laparoscopic lumbar discectomy: case report. J Laparoendosc Surg 1:145–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Olsen D, McCord D, Law M (1996) Laparoscopic discectomy with anterior interbody fusion of L5-S1. Surg Endosc 10:1158–1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Regan JJ, Aronoff RJ, Ohnmeiss DD et al. (1999) Laparoscopic approach to L4–L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases. Spine 24:2171–2174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Regan JJ, Yuan H, McAfee PC (1999) Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: minimally invasive spine surgery. A prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion. Spine 24:402–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV (2001) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 48:569–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitecloud TS III, Roesch WW, Ricciardi JE (2001) Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior–posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J Spinal Disord 14:100–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zdeblick TA, David SM (2000) A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4–L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 25:2682–2687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burak M. Ozgur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozgur, B.M., Yoo, K., Rodriguez, G. et al. Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Eur Spine J 14, 887–894 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0941-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0941-3

Keywords

Navigation